%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-06-24T15:31:35-04:00
2021-06-24T15:31:34-04:00
2021-06-24T15:31:35-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
03-19101.a2
uuid:bd2e0925-c897-45d3-8a49-81713621c304
uuid:28c06a90-ed67-4195-a997-21026d6c96fc
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
18 0 obj
<><>]/P 16 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
21 0 obj
[29 0 R 30 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(03-19101.a2)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(Computer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archiv\
ed%20-%20HTML/03-19101.a2.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([6/24/2021 3:31:34 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: October 13, 2006)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(-------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 03-19101)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-3.721 -2.2 Td
(Eric Borgstrom, Esq., Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
4.499 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) declined to grant Ap\
plicant a security clearance. )Tj
41.649 0 Td
(On September)Tj
-41.649 -1.125 Td
(30, 2004, DOHA issued a statement of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(reasons \(SOR\) advising Applicant of the basis for that decision--secur\
ity)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(concerns raised under Guideline C \(Foreign Preference\) and Guideline B\
\(Foreign)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
33.128 0 Td
(Influence\), pursuant to Department of)Tj
-33.128 -1.125 Td
(Defense Directive 5220.6 \(Jan. 2, 1992, as amended\) \(Directive\). )Tj
26.324 0 Td
(Applicant requested a hearing. )Tj
12.467 0 Td
(On May 23, 2005, after)Tj
-38.791 -1.125 Td
(the hearing, Administrative Judge Katherine Moen Braeman granted Applica\
nt's request for a security clearance. )Tj
45.385 0 Td
(On)Tj
-45.385 -1.125 Td
(January 31, 2006, the Appeal Board)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.663 0 Td
(remanded the case to the Administrative Judge. )Tj
19.216 0 Td
(On April 14, 2006, the)Tj
-33.879 -1.125 Td
(Administrative Judge again granted Applicant's request for a security cl\
earance. )Tj
32.196 0 Td
(Department Counsel timely appealed)Tj
-32.196 -1.375 Td
(pursuant to the Directive \266\266 E3.1.28 and E3.1.30.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 252.8242 326.25 Tm
( \(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 252.8242 325.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 296.25 Tm
(Department Counsel raised the following issue on appeal: whether the Adm\
inistrative Judge's favorable clearance)Tj
T*
(decision is arbitrary, capricious or contrary to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.494 0 Td
(law.)Tj
-18.494 -2.375 Td
(Department Counsel argues that the Administrative Judge erred in her fav\
orable application of whole person concept.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 580.4805 258.75 Tm
( \(2\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 580.4805 258 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 240.75 Tm
(In that regard, it is Department)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
12.579 0 Td
(Counsel's position that the individual factors which the Judge relied up\
on either do not)Tj
-12.579 -1.125 Td
(readily suggest refutation, extenuation, or mitigation of the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
23.827 0 Td
(government's security concerns, or have low probative value.)Tj
-23.827 -1.125 Td
(In response, the Applicant argues that the factors cited by the Judge, a\
long with the other)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
35.823 0 Td
(evidence of record, is)Tj
-35.823 -1.125 Td
(sufficient to support the Judge favorable clearance decision. )Tj
24.241 0 Td
(On appeal, Applicant also offers new evidence that his)Tj
-24.241 -1.125 Td
(mother is now)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(deceased and his sister no longer works for the Israeli Ministry of Reli\
gion. )Tj
36.409 0 Td
(The Board does not find)Tj
-36.409 -1.125 Td
(Department Counsel's argument persuasive.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The Board may not consider new evidence on appeal. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
21.714 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( Directive \266 E3.1.29. )Tj
9.922 0 Td
(Accordingly, we may not consider the)Tj
-31.636 -1.125 Td
(change in status of Applicant's foreign)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.621 0 Td
(family ties, and the impact that it might have on the security concerns \
presented)Tj
-15.621 -1.125 Td
(in his case.)Tj
T*
(In her whole person analysis in this case, the Administrative Judge reli\
ed on numerous unchallenged findings of facts)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(which cumulatively support the Judge's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.039 0 Td
(ultimate conclusion that Applicant has sufficiently strong ties to the U\
nited)Tj
-16.039 -1.125 Td
(States to overcome the government's security concerns. )Tj
22.396 0 Td
(These facts include the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
9.44 0 Td
(following: Applicant has been a)Tj
-31.836 -1.125 Td
(naturalized U.S. citizen since 1984. )Tj
14.44 0 Td
(His immediate family members \(wife and two children\) are legally locat\
ed in the)Tj
-14.44 -1.125 Td
(U.S., as)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(are all of his financial ties. )Tj
14.218 0 Td
(Applicant had previously held security clearances in 1992 and 1995 witho\
ut)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
23 0 obj
<>
endobj
24 0 obj
(2iHˉ 1m)
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
37 0 obj
<>
endobj
38 0 obj
<>stream
H\Pj0+$%CԒX}WJHhٙa=ugmFWN>c|mgdq-.Qh
K
v..d3
lbҫd:sk[BhjᒌE2aBWܿFmHJ1poҨ1֮D,|RLrį /t4
endstream
endobj
39 0 obj
<>stream
H|XTgv΅HS݅KXP@E5&@^)EA;6;V
{uA,OL,}s朹s 4d ]|-,".<>k]}? p1>A#
`":~Xb u;1mBH i c#MY<s;8^1q Yk];:":7 ƅ'ƻ.bn xfTx\dbď`u=t`Em?~lT%'kD rڠ\P6D+\PP($vA8WZ#dC_{-,,#}
DT7Ώϰ)7wEl
[IL7pl֨G͚ԒF?jѲU6m}ڵѷSg?.]vqP^IO?|/CW_o~C#"126n1c%4~BI25)y/Sf̜:;-}܌y,\xҬeaU]~C>wʹey;vڽgo:\xhѱ%'N*=}epW^7
[r`
HڃLEBJL(h5`B;!T% jjꘪTeU'WK$W(}+
K?JSRtI2HϤWR&R3FY)Tihkӵ:NPkkt-uuu(OVY!חd7Cn.{mNr+')r