%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-06-24T15:31:40-04:00
2021-06-24T15:31:39-04:00
2021-06-24T15:31:40-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
03-19107.a1
uuid:69e2614f-b28a-4c06-95cc-2b6efe2868ec
uuid:c8b96284-41c6-494a-84b9-86010f00bbbe
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 17 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
23 0 obj
[30 0 R 31 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(03-19107.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(Computer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archiv\
ed%20-%20HTML/03-19107.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([6/24/2021 3:31:39 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: April 24, 2006)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(--------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 03-19107)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.317 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) declined to grant Ap\
plicant a security clearance. )Tj
41.649 0 Td
(On August 25,)Tj
-41.649 -1.125 Td
(2004, DOHA issued a statement of )Tj
(reasons advising Applicant of the basis for that decision--security conc\
erns raised)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(under Guideline B \(Foreign Influence\) and Guideline E \(Personal Condu\
ct\) )Tj
30.436 0 Td
(of Department of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
-30.436 -1.125 Td
(\(Jan. 2, 1992, as amended\) \(Directive\). )Tj
15.828 0 Td
(Applicant requested a hearing. )Tj
12.467 0 Td
(On September 28, 2005, after the hearing,)Tj
-28.295 -1.375 Td
(Administrative Judge Philip S. Howe denied Applicant's request for a sec\
urity clearance.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 442.375 366.75 Tm
( \(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 442.375 366 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 456.1812 362.25 Tm
( )Tj
(Applicant timely appealed)Tj
-36.682 -1.125 Td
(pursuant to the Directive \266\266 E3.1.28 and )Tj
16.375 0 Td
(E3.1.30.)Tj
-16.375 -2.125 Td
(Applicant raised the following issues on appeal: whether the Administrat\
ive Judge erred in making certain factual)Tj
T*
(findings and whether the Administrative )Tj
16.413 0 Td
(Judge erred in concluding that the security concerns raised under Guidel\
ine B)Tj
-16.413 -1.125 Td
(had not been mitigated.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant argues that the Administrative Judge erred in finding that: \(\
1\) Applicant works for a defense contractor as a)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
("chemical engineer," \(2\) Applicant's )Tj
14.796 0 Td
(parents were "victims of the Cultural Revolution," \(3\) "there is a U.S\
. Consulate [in)Tj
-14.796 -1.125 Td
(Applicant's home province]," and \(4\) Applicant "admits she would trave\
l )Tj
29.461 0 Td
(to the PRC to visit [her parents] if not for)Tj
-29.461 -1.125 Td
(security concerns." )Tj
7.877 0 Td
(Applicant's arguments have mixed merit. There is insufficient record evi\
dence to support the first)Tj
-7.877 -1.375 Td
(three findings. )Tj
6.026 0 Td
(However, the fourth finding is reasonably supported by record evidence.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 436.5391 218.25 Tm
( \(2\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 436.5391 217.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 188.25 Tm
(Applicant argues that the evidence she provided in the proceeding below \
was sufficient to require the Administrative)Tj
T*
(Judge to conclude, as a matter of law, that )Tj
17.078 0 Td
(she had rebutted, mitigated or extenuated the security concerns raised b\
y the)Tj
-17.078 -1.125 Td
(Guideline B \(Foreign Influence\) allegations. )Tj
17.995 0 Td
(The Board does not find this )Tj
11.665 0 Td
(argument persuasive.)Tj
-29.66 -2.125 Td
(The Administrative Judge made sustainable findings that: \(1\) Applicant\
has parents and a brother who are citizens of the)Tj
T*
(People's Republic of China \(China\), )Tj
14.678 0 Td
(residing in China, \(2\) Applicant had traveled to China in 2002 and 200\
4, and \(3\))Tj
-14.678 -1.125 Td
(Applicant maintains monthly telephone contact with her parents. )Tj
26.132 0 Td
(Given those )Tj
(findings, the Administrative Judge)Tj
-26.132 -1.125 Td
(concluded that Applicant's ties with those immediate family members rais\
ed security concerns under Guideline B and)Tj
T*
(that )Tj
1.75 0 Td
(Foreign Influence Disqualifying Conditions 1 and 6 applied. )Tj
24.413 0 Td
(The Judge's conclusion shifted the burden of)Tj
-26.162 -1.125 Td
(persuasion to Applicant. )Tj
9.998 0 Td
(Where there are admitted )Tj
10.383 0 Td
(or proven facts and circumstances that raise security concerns, "[t]he)Tj
-20.381 -1.125 Td
(applicant is responsible for presenting witnesses and other evidence to \
rebut, explain, )Tj
34.379 0 Td
(extenuate, or mitigate facts)Tj
-34.379 -1.125 Td
(admitted by the applicant or proven by Department Counsel, and has the u\
ltimate burden of persuasion as to obtaining a)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
($אX8Ss8)
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
36 0 obj
<>
endobj
37 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
Cqb>Xpl%3,qC~]:OHvϝ5{p:֠eQ[3N~["Ν%6]p[`uFmAH^3ϲC)ov _gӸx0H;!YF2_\Tèe`NUEpTD|n2#L.s^c@ǂ@tد fz
endstream
endobj
38 0 obj
<>stream
H|Xϙsgw
evfa3&RlD`[,(b.Elbu?KְOޗ;3̙o~߽ U nM=G+E[?1qJKow ph3bi9(z\iU Jq/czxփ}"xc1qς=zDxcc{Qt i]qNz CcGEƖt @K$qQ((
4(U!?RM;ߊOk}bg]>xp~|i)/&9;&1QdJTVݣFMOZy+zW5իߠaƟ4iڬyZiۮ}>ܥk=>z?}߷~@Hh4xa1GĎ5:1cǍqO'<9iiSRg̜5;myYp%t+We^֜nڸ)k۶ع+{r8ǎ(:yt19[rpzv
X$jA)~& K B3h%
}q"aCB;{SSz(J?C)PJXy##Ky'ɆT/L`kkcc#c1#TPz^j]WmTh5QMR+Еyww3K+J{!JK9\P*ϔzGit!$CnC-{ƈ
Cs9!4smM̞f9ټjC3-P/ůD
~:^sJ
/!WPMf;oOr_:`_p;v6Vv?{{s{3{S'Fv]xw e^[`[`[eK-߹iiQ3[g`aYYX:V+ZYJ-v,G,y\K6_lttZF^y3J憑z=y__K\\ZpcM Ěb8xq9_pB{V-[,ɡyT.zKN侏}.s]XEĊGg:qTH)CX wa*̂TX`5B
4x
3a!$C>Ka9^*li G8P'D8
Ő́spJ`0܇RCa#`$(
?@`xG &@6Ȼ$x a.( !Cb\PO8q).q%肕2x p5hL\qnMqnm^yLT܁;qfnUqjnX
tG܇9Xk 'zf6uQxn-TP4Q<DZO`S胾 Oc1X`/ mimmvNEٴ^G9r) _K)Q#tq*TD'Gc:@1TB<]t.,ddktnMEݥ{dJ!F1=7DD?dSh*MdλN*ۙ\qg+zMoAo*#'L`id*ʼCUe+scՙ;x/e-kڰk:0֑ub.+ƺ,}vR{J+ݓ}T*=~Ir"8U-\#M҈)-}E(=eI̔EbQvA9)<7U?3SO%((I T(lo^ww]}Oo;R0PQ
bTJPI*E3CAEcih@izNiz^Wzުw*Y>;,eɊ=l8
[qz9g,?9;ss_T.p7ύu8?p7M\sw88C(r1.%%RwY+$\]rWk8r9."W\r55&\r=pCnč 7f<4Vܚp[nwN߹
%]wܓ{qo}N?0M3&$@ăya]n焸pv:'9'9LAg, i!=2)dl}Y9F6Q99<ȋ
!?
0 B0BP((((c"eQQQ QUQ
Q5QQP
M-RA+FE;GtD'|]=v`:N聞胾.9o?."t.9u!3ߚΩb~y`c@pm2$`0`(a8F`$Fa4 s40јɘLLrb6`.!@