9UOd9
mE[Y(/4vOz:˰D <)]/M:]2,ػ x\d"l/&8J%h#ދ?Gn;*#vzgtLB.`4(Qe#h$3eV P@=mK$, >#up 'L
%
QC *KgR,s'E¬
4AY T]62gea !URa+owpAz (M[{ nB* WǺ
J Jwm2)}?1tq ! ظ
ޗ ?72ղtǖ_D6)b%H%lS6}z S/9?J- oc $;~ 0>mWoS{HXg@bYEݵbo"b܃8ݽyH$A ,ڔGK
H
1ènvI쫻B$(JQKVV:Z*ckq: iQbvF Y/ QǙ;9wQmiفg϶h/ "7m xN)q K;F-TU
+FwJ[O*5= }]}^\Yѣ >>- ;E檂k e{Xcp3sl˖_*r1/8v'RF x(JO+@ljL ʜ ߍ7oj,j Wk||yr j=i~Ï!Sǽ+'sqtBe\R4˩=ʋ}0syOjRR3 ]o۪Q+@jЪ`|5Il{9e7* {8F e: u$`#~յWkO==TD<
KXS\!^*Yo/ysMZTjYש`&c&Tu5\ Ig%T:R!R {qac>Om9[7'n9o#d1?
`0 `0 `0 `0 `0 `0 `0 `0 `0 ,/'JЀ݀p3
|
gzj=r4 }.0Y|]Oغ"K:\yl%m݁ZϽD'bA[wQ=:ǓSu֎ X-"B@L[1>ڃD
s_nO"Sқ 蒅73I~Z#wl}m vl3?u?cȱbczcJc?
?zUq9)? +9&坠Ѿ][0T觴G4ZVj{
C'9 k&vja]Gb=6
kO˧GD@A͢WϷ짣[[W/{,D1K.cѸ/Fjdc($ۂ=ɄlV|VgkcV]Y%e( K46WujvD\ zd/{i]@BLЍtE)
}!i2Qv*ѾߢJLyl~+˄eI+iV@Vx0&XI_0i^qN{0l%XmѰ/ҺڵA"I'q_
2u{χ|9#_Έf7<#{^,| }HOx8Lc{טv@ʸJ\My*WbvR:>%.0cąZJ-%1Μ+VxSez*#U~'I|U4OM9RMMrY%={|c87SQ^k,!@Fp8 ~1{ysLU3;lx8esN1!e*F\a;K~H\(泊'kE]/iHUV4V2_Z"ۯv
StOOQz)YIw
Mk4~]:DsC\ -3-3O ̠E%T,g D ]ُyGFTJӏ8ωM*nD] S*{Syj#RٲXt+PV+]^,X$J a?5c~I\4Umwn]ݮ /Zs-9AÒ\<]qƇD,!18ۍKl_6rPh'UDrgv:fc6ػYHΎpkdžK^NR *AAhNPG(wTw6}flSk?;ϼzfm0A/B{^ tAx%` d=<<wy؊h#X
.oiiiPݒ> C0·?uE@B fgv|ru6zV"e렦S37nx
rOuuyɍuv ܾ~K]=.i3+g?2a L it P qY0ǸVxǥ2p=*c`V|: kEw+?Xן~~0Fcc H `!joGQ+Q>n#& L_/x `ovi=LKj EuYp3g`:H$LԵXU"UJǵ۵|Zgu r%>߫ۏh Y { vXԄkw0
AtNĸY'oǽƏnۨ?qw=Oȍ3|pYr-=FZ$ #g2P,2684/P
f+uj!QX&b!&LLaiPL^#kDy˺NI9u }~\v3^e{MK tr"p#^@+l1~]4Dt@ 4FL]v2~O|+>p>
X lY
l- ;oimkt"e4*n10Kl\ -qߔoo66֩MjHmTר
*GT1sN qx8{D;$qDU yJJu${ IJU~gG,C_U(a =G~9lQ:4J;NwNӬ}\} jA 2i3iZ\QK|5E"m䢊iB7cBP1{DxQ0kS1i^ԡfk$Ob4zXf8Pt~ ađHr6D yK ;sHG*cO𨑮́\e OhM{:VMd| ,ZY^+kVvfrkvI
4XԆnqFvEï6_|bygr4ړI !FP]z(Z#?i̋R4UT.SpNFΞ}#9rcy?s F,<Ƅ9:149OHĜ0;Z;<`&kes9;túiIִ5cZnԥ>O3+8 pˁ[,+( )EeR9Q+3T LNP (J Gr )ihH3YJ3fcXo.1>-N ? .,=rܞ OҰܵԹkGv5;~ -ID` V ]Ih
endstream
endobj
15 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 2/Type/Page>>
endobj
42 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(03-20638.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(Computer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archiv\
ed%20-%20HTML/03-20638.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([6/24/2021 3:34:00 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 317.25 591.75 448.5 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
/TT1 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 277.1992 755.25 Tm
(Conclusion)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 729.75 Tm
(The Board affirms the Administrative Judge's security clearance decision\
because Applicant's first claim does not)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(demonstrated error below that warrants )Tj
15.966 0 Td
(remand or reversal, and Applicant's second claim does not demonstrate an\
y error)Tj
-15.966 -1.125 Td
(below.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Signed: Emilio Jaksetic)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 16 676.5 cm
0 0 m
113.32 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 651.75 Tm
(Emilio Jaksetic)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge)Tj
T*
(Chairman, Appeal Board)Tj
T*
(Signed: Jean E. Smallin)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 574.5 cm
0 0 m
114.656 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 549.75 Tm
(Jean E. Smallin)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge)Tj
T*
(Member, Appeal Board)Tj
T*
(Signed: William S. Fields)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 472.5 cm
0 0 m
124.002 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 447.75 Tm
(William S. Fields)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge)Tj
T*
(Member, Appeal Board)Tj
T*
(1. )Tj
(The Administrative Judge entered formal findings in favor of Applicant w\
ith respect to the debts covered by SOR)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(paragraphs 1.n and 1.p. )Tj
(Those favorable )Tj
16.3 0 Td
(formal findings are not at issue on appeal.)Tj
-16.3 -2.125 Td
(2. )Tj
(Directive, Adjudicative Guidelines, Item E2.A6.1.2.3.)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
14 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 1/Type/Page>>
endobj
43 0 obj
[45 0 R 46 0 R]
endobj
44 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(03-20638.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(Computer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archiv\
ed%20-%20HTML/03-20638.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([6/24/2021 3:34:00 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(In deciding whether the Judge's rulings or conclusions are contrary to l\
aw, the Board will consider whether they are)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 741.75 Tm
(contrary to provisions of )Tj
10.109 0 Td
(Executive Order 10865, the Directive, or other applicable federal law. )Tj
28.238 0 Td
(Compliance with state)Tj
-38.347 -1.125 Td
(or local law is not required because security clearance )Tj
21.851 0 Td
(adjudications are conducted by the Department of Defense)Tj
-21.851 -1.125 Td
(pursuant to federal law. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
9.691 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( U.S. Constitution, Article VI, clause 2 \(Supremacy Clause\). )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
25.828 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(, )Tj
(ISCR Case No. 00-)Tj
-35.519 -1.125 Td
(0423 \(June 8, 2001\) at p. 3 \(citing Supreme Court decisions\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(When an Administrative Judge's factual findings are challenged, the Boar\
d must determine whether "[t]he)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Administrative Judge's findings of fact are supported )Tj
21.425 0 Td
(by such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as)Tj
-21.425 -1.125 Td
(adequate to support a conclusion in light of all the contrary evidence i\
n the same record. )Tj
35.516 0 Td
(In )Tj
(making this review, the)Tj
-35.516 -1.125 Td
(Appeal Board shall give deference to the credibility determinations of t\
he Administrative Judge." )Tj
39.174 0 Td
(Directive, Additional)Tj
-39.174 -1.125 Td
(Procedural )Tj
4.582 0 Td
(Guidance, Item E3.1.32.1. )Tj
10.775 0 Td
(The Board must consider not only whether there is record evidence suppor\
ting a)Tj
-15.356 -1.125 Td
(Judge's findings, but also whether there is evidence )Tj
20.758 0 Td
(that fairly detracts from the weight of the evidence supporting those)Tj
-20.758 -1.125 Td
(findings, and whether the Judge's findings reflect a reasonable interpre\
tation of the record )Tj
36.112 0 Td
(evidence as a whole.)Tj
-36.112 -1.125 Td
(Although a Judge's credibility determination is not immune from review, \
the party challenging a Judge's credibility)Tj
T*
(determination has a )Tj
8.081 0 Td
(heavy burden on appeal.)Tj
-8.081 -2.125 Td
(When an appeal issue raises a question of law, the Board's scope of revi\
ew is plenary. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
34.558 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( DISCR Case No. 87-2107)Tj
-34.558 -1.125 Td
(\(September 29, 1992\) at pp. 4-5 \(citing )Tj
15.857 0 Td
(federal cases\).)Tj
-15.857 -2.125 Td
(If an appealing party demonstrates factual or legal error, then the Boar\
d must consider the following questions:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Is the error harmful or harmless? )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
13.384 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 00-0250 \(July 11, 2001\) at p. 6 \(discussing harmless \
error)Tj
-16.715 -1.125 Td
(doctrine\);)Tj
T*
(Has the nonappealing party made a persuasive argument for how the Admini\
strative Judge's decision can be affirmed on)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(alternate grounds? )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
7.608 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR )Tj
(Case No. 99-0454 \(October 17, 2000\) at p. 6 \(citing federal cases\); \
and)Tj
-10.939 -2.125 Td
(If the Administrative Judge's decision cannot be affirmed, should the ca\
se be reversed or remanded? )Tj
40.333 0 Td
(\(Directive,)Tj
-40.333 -1.125 Td
(Additional Procedural Guidance, Items )Tj
15.912 0 Td
(E3.1.33.2 and E3.1.33.3\).)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
5.313 -2.125 Td
(Appeal Issues)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.225 -2.125 Td
(The Administrative Judge made findings of fact about Applicant's extensi\
ve history of financial difficulties, which)Tj
0 -1.375 TD
(spanned the period 1998-2004.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 164.6348 323.25 Tm
( \(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 164.6348 322.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 178.4409 318.75 Tm
( )Tj
(With two )Tj
4.25 0 Td
(exceptions, the Judge's findings of fact are not challenged on appeal.)Tj
-17.786 -1.125 Td
(Specifically, Applicant challenges: \(1\) the Judge's finding that he ha\
s an average )Tj
32.475 0 Td
(remainder of $220 a month after)Tj
-32.475 -1.125 Td
(monthly expenses are deducted from monthly income; and \(2\) the Judge's\
finding that he has )Tj
37.421 0 Td
(failed to follow up on past)Tj
-37.421 -1.125 Td
(promises to pay off his debts.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(In support of the first challenge, Applicant asserts that there is a mis\
take in one of the figures contained in Applicant's)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Exhibit A. )Tj
4.416 0 Td
(Because Applicant offered )Tj
10.912 0 Td
(Applicant Exhibit A for the Administrative Judge to consider in his case\
,)Tj
-15.328 -1.125 Td
(Applicant is not in a strong position to complain that the Judge erred b\
y relying on )Tj
33.272 0 Td
(that exhibit in making his findings of)Tj
-33.272 -1.125 Td
(fact. )Tj
1.999 0 Td
(Furthermore, even if the Board were to conclude that Applicant's claim o\
f factual error had merit, it would not be)Tj
-1.999 -1.125 Td
(material to the outcome of this case. )Tj
14.717 0 Td
(Given the totality of the Administrative Judge's unchallenged findings o\
f fact)Tj
-14.717 -1.125 Td
(concerning Applicant's long history of )Tj
15.594 0 Td
(financial difficulties, there is not a significant chance that the Judge\
's decision)Tj
-15.594 -1.125 Td
(would be different if he had made a finding of fact consistent with Appl\
icant's )Tj
31.504 0 Td
(claim concerning Applicant Exhibit A.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
-31.504 -1.125 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 00-0250 \(July 11, 2001\) at p. 6\) \(discussing harmles\
s error doctrine\).)Tj
-3.332 -2.125 Td
(In support of the second challenge, Applicant asserts that he lacks disc\
retionary income that would allow him to pay off)Tj
T*
(his debts. )Tj
(Given the Administrative )Tj
14.442 0 Td
(Judge's unchallenged findings of fact, it was not unreasonable for the J\
udge to)Tj
-14.442 -1.125 Td
(conclude that Applicant has failed to follow through with his past promi\
ses to )Tj
31.355 0 Td
(deal with his debts. )Tj
7.971 0 Td
(As the Judge noted)Tj
-39.327 -1.375 Td
(\(Decision at p. 8\), Financial Considerations Disqualifying Condition 3\
)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 353.957 93.75 Tm
( \(2\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 353.957 93 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 367.7632 89.25 Tm
( covers the inability or the unwillingness to)Tj
-29.314 -1.125 Td
(satisfy debts. )Tj
(Given the Judge's unchallenged findings of fact about Applicant's long h\
istory of financial difficulties, it is)Tj
T*
(not material to the outcome of this )Tj
14.024 0 Td
(case whether Applicant is unwilling or unable to pay off his outstanding\
debts.)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
45 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[165.0 321.0 179.0 332.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
46 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[354.0 91.0 368.0 102.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>
endobj
47 0 obj
<>
endobj
9 0 obj
<>
endobj
10 0 obj
<>
endobj
11 0 obj
<>
endobj
51 0 obj
(file:///usr.osd.mil/Home/OSD/OGC/JosephLM/_MyComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archived%20-%20HTML/03-20638.a1.html)
endobj
50 0 obj
<>
endobj
52 0 obj
<>
endobj
48 0 obj
[15 0 R/XYZ 0 381.0 null]
endobj
49 0 obj
[15 0 R/XYZ 0 342.0 null]
endobj
4 0 obj
<>
endobj
xref
0 53
0000000000 65535 f
0000000016 00000 n
0000000141 00000 n
0000003649 00000 n
0000147029 00000 n
0000003527 00000 n
0000003582 00000 n
0000003715 00000 n
0000003742 00000 n
0000146423 00000 n
0000146507 00000 n
0000146549 00000 n
0000146233 00000 n
0000004277 00000 n
0000138187 00000 n
0000136073 00000 n
0000003845 00000 n
0000003891 00000 n
0000003940 00000 n
0000004090 00000 n
0000003994 00000 n
0000004026 00000 n
0000004058 00000 n
0000004499 00000 n
0000009893 00000 n
0000009942 00000 n
0000009977 00000 n
0000010483 00000 n
0000010906 00000 n
0000011275 00000 n
0000083057 00000 n
0000083324 00000 n
0000051589 00000 n
0000051862 00000 n
0000032831 00000 n
0000033112 00000 n
0000011662 00000 n
0000011938 00000 n
0000012298 00000 n
0000033438 00000 n
0000052301 00000 n
0000083935 00000 n
0000136273 00000 n
0000138412 00000 n
0000138444 00000 n
0000145586 00000 n
0000145910 00000 n
0000146318 00000 n
0000146945 00000 n
0000146987 00000 n
0000146757 00000 n
0000146591 00000 n
0000146892 00000 n
trailer
<]>>
startxref
147202
%%EOF