%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-06-24T15:33:51-04:00
2021-06-24T15:33:50-04:00
2021-06-24T15:33:51-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
03-20538.a1
uuid:b2213f6d-0158-4027-91fc-14ba2b58f0a5
uuid:9ac4f14a-ea09-4459-ba78-43c767f72ed8
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 17 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
23 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(03-20538.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(Computer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archiv\
ed%20-%20HTML/03-20538.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([6/24/2021 3:33:51 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: July 5, 2006)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(--------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: ---------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 03-20538)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-4.499 -2.2 Td
(Braden M. Murphy, Esq., Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
5.276 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) declined to grant Ap\
plicant a security clearance. )Tj
41.649 0 Td
(On June 9,)Tj
-41.649 -1.125 Td
(2004, DOHA issued a statement of reasons)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(\(SOR\) advising Applicant of the basis for that decision--security conc\
erns)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(raised under Guideline E \(Personal Conduct\) of Department of Defense D\
irective)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
32.85 0 Td
(5220.6 \(Jan. 2, 1992, as amended\))Tj
-32.85 -1.125 Td
(\(Directive\). )Tj
4.886 0 Td
(Applicant requested a hearing. )Tj
12.467 0 Td
(On December 14, 2005, after the hearing, )Tj
16.882 0 Td
(Administrative Judge Henry)Tj
-34.236 -1.125 Td
(Lazzaro)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
3.469 0 Td
(denied Applicant's request for a security clearance. )Tj
20.615 0 Td
(Applicant timely appealed pursuant to the Directive \266\266)Tj
-24.084 -1.125 Td
(E3.1.28 and E3.1.30.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant raised the following issue on appeal: whether the Administrati\
ve Judge's adverse clearance decision under)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Guidelines E is arbitrary, capricious or)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.745 0 Td
(contrary to law.)Tj
-15.745 -2.125 Td
(The Administrative Judge found that Applicant had willfully and maliciou\
sly destroyed mission-critical company and)Tj
T*
(government documents as alleged in the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.329 0 Td
(SOR. )Tj
(The Judge rejected Applicant's claims that she did not willfully destroy\
)Tj
-16.329 -1.125 Td
(those documents. )Tj
7.193 0 Td
(The Judge concluded that Applicant's conduct was not)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
22.008 0 Td
(mitigated. )Tj
4.277 0 Td
(Applicant argues that the Judge's)Tj
-33.478 -1.125 Td
(adverse clearance decision should be reversed because the Judge made mul\
tiple errors in his findings of fact; made)Tj
T*
(findings of fact as to matters not alleged in the SOR; made findings of \
fact based upon Government Exhibits 1 and 5,)Tj
T*
(rather than Applicant's testimony; failed)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.314 0 Td
(to consider the record evidence as a whole; and misapplied the disqualif\
ying)Tj
-16.314 -1.125 Td
(and mitigating conditions, and the "whole person" factors. )Tj
23.534 0 Td
(The Board does not)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
8.109 0 Td
(find Applicant's arguments persuasive.)Tj
-31.643 -2.125 Td
(\(1\) The findings which Applicant complains about are either permissibl\
e characterizations on the part of the)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge or immaterial, in that they)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
19.496 0 Td
(would not be reasonably likely to change the outcome of the case.)Tj
-19.496 -1.125 Td
(Applicant has not met her burden of demonstrating that the Judge's mater\
ial findings with)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
36.117 0 Td
(respect to Applicant's conduct)Tj
-36.117 -1.125 Td
(of security concern do not reflect a reasonable or plausible interpretat\
ion of the record evidence. )Tj
38.705 0 Td
(The Board does not)Tj
-38.705 -1.125 Td
(review a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(case )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
(de novo)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(. )Tj
(Considering the record evidence as a whole, the Judge's material finding\
s of security concern are)Tj
T*
(sustainable.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(\(2\) Applicant is entitled to receive an SOR that places her on reasona\
ble notice of the allegations being made against)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(her. )Tj
(However, an SOR is an)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(administrative pleading that is not required to satisfy the strict requi\
rements of a criminal)Tj
T*
(indictment, and it does not have to allege every possible fact that may)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
28.158 0 Td
(be relevant at the hearing. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
10.606 0 Td
(See, e.g., )Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.832 0 Td
(ISCR Case)Tj
-42.596 -1.125 Td
(No. 00-0633 at 4 \(App. Bd. Oct. 24, 2003\). )Tj
(Nor does an SOR have to indicate what arguments Department)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
42.963 0 Td
(Counsel)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
24 0 obj
<>
endobj
25 0 obj
(UH}\(Ra@)
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
36 0 obj
<>
endobj
37 0 obj
<>stream
H\j@>C0q$
u]Vs;Ro3U}]?CF]lipk]7fh}RrL3Ƥ( 4Vv:I߂л+f
ist3l,bG^ZiLԖl(/sYD-N5ZwŤ)8)t?$ҙ6$E-b-+$|"?E&CQHKL1j^xϜWq_u>0W\_zY>Yd2ĢA-}5բYf-fsVw>?z,~_
endstream
endobj
38 0 obj
<>stream
H|TT=\;3p-.1|K&R(#*;Vcłb{q:?xgЧﭷ־swoob#4_Uʌ+6iᑱq)K(Z9hI} v bŶ;P.pۭИJ\eq舨{gZtwe,,.qAƛ}##J9`<?Wr6$|S-ݑq:;``Aɝk?tܪ4T sJUA5};NE)P,ó C:*.}K
mv5ixOΨ4E\WBqsWE,]Oeʖ+_f2[O*URڧkԬUNz4lԸIPf7oѲU6˯ڵ:$?}CNKXxFFEtޣgޱ}?`σ:_? cƎK?!iSN>c)sbS-^t+W5ke߰q-[mߑsW={?p#G?qTN9{|jjQ|UwaL5!Q/Wz_?/w[F
[md2[ƥML+Xn2 g3gsg+gHA^AAI5`6t2 a 9L%ïUj)e2I(O|!9xTgZYͤBs-AvU{4chJ6J08xK,~9[
9Cz%ɡс=%^6L%-1-#ժ%ΆCMšx-}+ߣb*RIuq;+}\+XܖZhhQQQQ?^5]fZYY$ܵs=LF5: [[k[b`5ޱte=hͶf2:kkkkskb5[ndr1Fi봲Or^vs縧xxj:~"Uy!}3ڰYob724֏{Y.>{xLa9#
?kEIk%HC]d$a>V`)0ABxH^ٗcV9c5 ֠+"(E4N!q
9Xnx838\GO@/Ģ7 }q1PX!(