=4n мT^CO2~Du*{7G k\:A M 2$ h{4FCr{ yb*`C5"*}}"`,{|JTM~ ۋTn1mJO9Q s5dGUyQ8MBJF*AlD~M~\-yKe>wD'F*ch[Ei_iύ T/@x1A {9~{"WϒRAj5UߧŐՅwQ|cQ
An > {uw8~mdhЮuЯc F=c\|:э%#PX
OUEɩm2ÈwR}SZqvOځqe?42O}WU]qx{=7Ah0ABDZQTR|T UʌÀZjKcE ӊPA֢h;Xʣi-Z;XHބ(wu>{~Pr ֦w vp3|zx FceOCQYVëp3ނ}8ઠ'ԭU{G)T '?ܮ\Jcq~CY%@Dd>0/Q'm!3q|gWz^ `"Ch×S/&呔+|uSX?'vUN?,s}+Q' ?I<ų:_uEh{pXr0])!Z}8s/?K\mk"_]%\ cq:[ .rv( {-?=sP٨/'8;R^`4Esrj_DZ`+ j jUإXBMK#zW [߀[`lmK%#G u g;!c' mwpߕuw̃? YOi tjJѪe3gՏyfc+{- Ykf 9S]ވDzzCk wĞ2b'|/װ?ImA
i.v]#]n9ueNb/ZTt?u./y]w6h%;)ܬ$ui E+rRwt%szR*$]wѻM; 8l98p9k8 >"fTA9ݒ9dL^
;3r۾M{;L ,}C R ~ ZݓL?.\'$4`v\)Q&V2JVg)576MĞfi5߈bMޕċh~L`4`sr3A9It:t
CS_SQ o!gk-rkz/Vx+}ByJz]j5UA}s=?38^oE\jQ]O>1=SWm]$IW;9 Q]1?MB#GV'%~Z7(6CP??MBI?O':qΨ.Ի-%/m
_K~ p
wpfp[Ǎ nΨohl unMh<3[
mMvm߹U؛oGhmk#K< Y8xb/cyɽLoɍفǙ+ \_EN!~F\-=E"P#_,brϦ I{iv/11Lyn9rɩү_F|~Ȁ2,@FFGEJ22[+[_i)%oJ r&9D;[ C *eqzji9B~l ZМ[FcdzQ?PO-|wxoL]3ynQ%&!x> ; o ~cLx,s8Gz8ź2 R{G76kI]tTLSN:ۍXm7ewϬ#JZSpPj2sY?gE0/e\~ʞ3rOstvtsғAkΆŬKp1zatʍ
py_߲Gmo 4"fD#ש̭Cl^we Gp'ADžѩNG3h;cw}֗^Xm-_#
lY%uua;ngrRwb<ݢjPgLrV?%0XO;C"ndZ==ꌀ _s/0YB.*J+YR vuDz` @yw}Yˑ|Ù|^Ro݃Af<җ=< Y3hn]O}
nM8F#ɳcsXh5g.MHQ^W\+ył[JĜz̷z6qG^yY\@VbTȝ=mdyJε C` >ex^6YUg ǹoy(E*HP|Pd(`+m * 8K6
CmA00E@ ([ I\&P s[^uK&ClM *2(f qlHBKڏss٫̔N˲m#nS =e- YJW GGX]r'Vcm|H*֩~ /Io-*ց/*u{[5W}r(
'23fVZ%[#rE:gYsɹ-2VNi@O9wTXqxG "J[q}jm ջrkm߭_n-*fÍo˅v
: ~r/w;܉ ;2E:<Y p->oCE9_~'Ur)KCfz q&SeWn<=3{-}vZt20x 'ؾ@MS2k '/I^ b m{V&1RQI2&j?Ƕe YoѾx%_pYOv>#1/m 'K߳z鿊r_}9mogmz힆gt?^{vNӱ_,2|s{VM??}uܵ
TLڗ Ӟw1.,A&={ BWimǻksܓOY%Y CY (0 zCz\et>( iL )w +Mo)ڴ_u :NMl6
rmx? L)e})#&\>~~{%~y ,T9ώnsb_t&L&,"gH3A$'R=sX1H`51BbYx< 5MLr8#%v,rL3B5 qkԪCȁFTRғ7oAm [m uƆmL^(4.k4SwuHrq_/'Uʠ&zF)ĥgb;0=+;,DVS笓U`nWIgB4OQ"O| zsT'*MF?7z1>r R&2ɶZ=O,jE4ke̓oפ wMr8<]Oc|;i-[hgSY|O/%"".ҡN
e7G6DWE0#%R ^S^4{I
4>
ym[ղ 6ˉiluZY^%sK 41^`"_8)OK#ϳ'_,;GA< cUFbϦIS/bc8wvB{t6x)-o-ЕJp_{o隑eb%#:pZE* /VLpHtѨ\_[ssޞss9ϙǴ,! lU:X#4 %IǾ^17a
;7Y,e{ c '6lg=ˊ'=
xs [y̧3wE E2.y\e$Gَ[o6F4g a:9
cs7录Ͼ019{gwxh{ WPHaޡA,7 {;os$}:8
7_5q.ng H3))"դ/O97Qy5Dy^?
*v!/{~z 8u,+ioW P,sTY Y>Ƌ7Fq9߂,`ԥMXkv9^Ҟ-$ NIvGu2=<[`:%SX#q>+FǿEvpV*}E$J<1- 3)Es}=vV}Q9%qzt|TKW%Ơ?ܝlK $N'x%k
Nx?Oƍ;S9o=#}9r< rüÏ"]dz$VgOE{}/? I>cQgL/o=w`NjRD F^-[yWE
1|a28yovیi *r.9V3i(w=v3I]qEF/RsS=c0}>9G+7LGd l>k70$62Mb{ꡝI}rG kww ;QXz c!7(窸Qb^s{v@qB^2{o'}Aڹ.}L ܯ`sARٟsЯ$)){.1ƸRK{^&yܓ6ڻ
nJZuJwAPDO1_3&߳GJ C!&=b<r|;H( lxny_ؿ y'#}w)rʳ $?ߟ {([lSL\wsq)Lo8Ob\[{i%8U8Y
o+?@n맿Hvf0o9 sǀ? S@
q~ </#-{=
F+O͇g/_2l D88u'YG &>?Y>` N+Sw/Qgq%&E="T9!ζ9:zX*k{9Ě Bj Χ[B.Rk+j^ze7Jz*,'X> -NH*.Q-BcJKկg4V$K;8Y,B왤:)ET Z:6,9.<A5 jy:"|uDg%bX?nDb-pUxu]هJe =_c6:ob6ʌw׆ܳˎWʲbq##.$RSN3}ܸ0zo1U5* X9q棌熦CMM#ar\cq q8L 8p [ĉƯ`eoeC9>* 5F! A c9Oby|߲^M]g{ksc
ؾ1$#0>ub P-%, ӺPu.` "u~EZ ec-{αVϤy{9= QUD4<' (^DU;Dsv,NI !U:^lb=B-;W@Ϡ-W16(
uUB gqv[wZ)`deYhHA].&DZDZsDZsljǞ
3@dUȖ"ZU?g6444(_a> hps|y3E_+3jZtRӈ ldeVGe5rvAj0${Fo|2eF88
Ā^̀9nQ Y=.g̋9 9q&7 kdoX cY`\D1@ g32nxk?! }Ļco9@ PBn=x9 ?{ 2~.)XV/dR|qU$+jthmOipJ%LO\ZZm\hϓ є%UKڗa@< ЎDx,4ed`zF6+M~ϵ=\kZ\)&U+/x^A Dm"F m6NK*ZGv} _BN:DaQ?[4 t46, K? m8*ڎt9;#T=K";v>I/aȨ ?F/t=xMloG4tAWm>ɻ+>MUU>9/2;#K=ns^^m)A`ŻD6co)ҦbA_<ݚ櫫b*c*W+k瀳˹۹ùѹY;++]e.Եеr.Kq=3L .V}BT`<)AEPzT{R$j ֺpr}?=K/2hYJ
9}P yBۙ MYs$ c% vJrXTƪF &6T˱*aÍQꕃy9
a
`e1lQPa:uB4#PSSf(z:N1u̩tx<'<{=S`mأ
Tܳ nW˄xt[< (! x8țSG@NDX K{ 7i9kկmXv (hނ&Ԉ7W@z1#?Ȱ H[@
1+RH ,f(fz)%@#(kk30(P6#j.f`,.e(.f . T-i+0
` Tz
endstream
endobj
32 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[389.0 100.0 403.0 111.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 3/Type/Page>>
endobj
42 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(03-21205.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(Computer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archiv\
ed%20-%20HTML/03-21205.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([6/24/2021 3:35:40 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 516.75 591.75 248.999 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(propositions and principles that are pertinent to the adjudication of an\
ADP trustworthiness case. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
38.908 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(, ADP Case)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 741.75 Tm
(No. 00-0131 \(May 3, 2001\) at p. 2 n.2.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(2. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(See also)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( ADP Case No. 00-0131 \(May 3, 2001\) at p. 2 n.2 \(noting the adjudicat\
ion of eligibility to occupy a sensitive)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(ADP position under DoD Regulation )Tj
15.083 0 Td
(5200.2-R is not identical to the adjudication of eligibility for a secur\
ity clearance)Tj
-15.083 -1.125 Td
(under DoD Directive 5220.6\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(3. )Tj
(In the decision below, the Administrative Judge's references to DoD Regu\
lation 5200.2-R, are consistent with the)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(regulation as posted on the Department of )Tj
17.023 0 Td
(Defense Web site. )Tj
7.552 0 Td
(A copy of DoD Regulation 5200.2-R can be accessed)Tj
-24.575 -1.125 Td
(through the Department of Defense web site at )Tj
18.938 0 Td
(http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/html/52002r.htm)Tj
-18.938 -2.125 Td
(4. )Tj
("[A] determination that the immediate family member\(s\), cohabitant, or\
associate\(s\) in question would not constitute)Tj
T*
(an unacceptable security risk.")Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(5. )Tj
("A determination that the immediate family member\(s\), \(spouse, father\
, mother, sons, daughters, brothers, sisters\),)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(cohabitant, or associate\(s\) in question are not agents of a foreign po\
wer or in a position to be exploited by a foreign)Tj
T*
(power in a way that could force the individual to choose between loyalty\
to the person\(s\) involved and the United)Tj
T*
(States.")Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
15 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 2/Type/Page>>
endobj
43 0 obj
[45 0 R]
endobj
44 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(03-21205.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(Computer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archiv\
ed%20-%20HTML/03-21205.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([6/24/2021 3:35:40 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(Applicant's ADP trustworthiness case, but )Tj
(then construes and interprets it in terms of Foreign Influence Mitigatin\
g)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 738.75 Tm
(Condition 1 as it appears in the current version of DoD Directive 5220.6\
.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 366.584 743.25 Tm
( \(5\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 366.584 742.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 380.3901 738.75 Tm
( )Tj
(It is not )Tj
(clear whether the Judge's decision)Tj
-30.366 -1.125 Td
(is relying on the language )Tj
10.581 0 Td
(of Foreign Influence Mitigating Condition 1 as it appears in the current\
version of DoD)Tj
-10.581 -1.125 Td
(Directive )Tj
3.97 0 Td
(5220.6 as legally binding in Applicant's ADP trustworthiness case or onl\
y as persuasive authority in)Tj
-3.97 -1.125 Td
(construing and interpreting the language of Foreign )Tj
20.855 0 Td
(Influence Mitigating Condition 1 as it appears in Appendix 8 of)Tj
-20.855 -1.125 Td
(DoD Regulation 5200.2-R.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(In order to decide the merits of this appeal, the Board would have to ma\
ke a threshold )Tj
34.601 0 Td
(determination as to which version)Tj
-34.601 -1.125 Td
(of Foreign Influence Mitigating )Tj
12.941 0 Td
(Condition 1 is applicable in ADP trustworthiness cases adjudicated under\
DoD)Tj
-12.941 -1.125 Td
(Regulation 5200.2-R. )Tj
8.888 0 Td
(Resolution of that threshold )Tj
11.388 0 Td
(question would involve )Tj
9.638 0 Td
(consideration of novel factual and legal)Tj
-29.914 -1.125 Td
(issues that were not addressed during the proceedings below. )Tj
24.66 0 Td
(The Board concludes that the most appropriate course of)Tj
-24.66 -1.125 Td
(action would be for the Board to remand the case with instructions to th\
e Judge to reopen the record to allow the parties)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(a reasonable opportunity to present )Tj
14.301 0 Td
(evidence and argument )Tj
9.523 0 Td
(as to which version of Foreign Influence Mitigating)Tj
-23.825 -1.125 Td
(Condition 1 is applicable to the adjudication of Applicant's ADP trustwo\
rthiness )Tj
32.426 0 Td
(case, and to rule on the issue.)Tj
-32.426 -2.125 Td
(2. )Tj
(Whether the Administrative Judge's decision is consistent with prior Boa\
rd decisions)Tj
ET
0 G
q 1 0 0 1 28 552 cm
0 0 m
407.42 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 435.4199 552.75 Tm
(. )Tj
(Department Counsel contends)Tj
-34.952 -1.125 Td
(the Administrative Judge's decision is )Tj
15.373 0 Td
(not consistent with prior Board decisions. )Tj
16.915 0 Td
(Applicant counters by arguing that the)Tj
-32.287 -1.125 Td
(Judge's decision is consistent with prior Board decisions. )Tj
23.039 0 Td
(Because of the )Tj
6.136 0 Td
(resolution of the first appeal issue, it would be)Tj
-29.175 -1.125 Td
(premature for the Board )Tj
9.885 0 Td
(to address this issue. )Tj
(Whether or not the Judge's decision is consistent with prior Board)Tj
-9.885 -1.125 Td
(decisions turns, in large part, on resolution of the unusual threshold q\
uestion noted earlier in this decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
21.767 -2.125 Td
(Conclusion)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.767 -2.125 Td
(Pursuant to Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.33.2, t\
he Board remands the case to the)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge for further processing )Tj
17.746 0 Td
(consistent with this decision. )Tj
11.805 0 Td
(After allowing the parties a reasonable)Tj
-29.55 -1.125 Td
(opportunity to present evidence and argument, the Judge should issue a n\
ew decision )Tj
34.27 0 Td
(consistent with the requirements)Tj
-34.27 -1.125 Td
(of Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.35 and E3.1.25.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Signed: Emilio Jaksetic)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 381 cm
0 0 m
113.32 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 356.25 Tm
(Emilio Jaksetic)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge)Tj
T*
(Chairman, Appeal Board)Tj
T*
(Signed: Michael Y. Ra'anan)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 279 cm
0 0 m
134.795 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 254.25 Tm
(Michael Y. Ra'anan)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge)Tj
T*
(Member, Appeal Board)Tj
T*
(Signed: Jeffrey D. Billett)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 177 cm
0 0 m
120.645 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 152.25 Tm
(Jeffrey D. Billett)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge)Tj
T*
(Member, Appeal Board)Tj
T*
(1. )Tj
(This case involves an adjudication \(under DoD Regulation 5200.2-R\) of \
Applicant's eligibility to occupy a sensitive)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(ADP position, not an adjudication )Tj
13.888 0 Td
(\(under DoD Directive 5220.6\) of Applicant's eligibility for a security\
clearance.)Tj
-13.888 -1.125 Td
(However, the Board can cite and rely on its decisions in security cleara\
nce )Tj
30.044 0 Td
(cases when those decisions support legal)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
45 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[366.0 741.0 380.0 752.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
14 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 1/Type/Page>>
endobj
46 0 obj
[48 0 R 49 0 R 50 0 R]
endobj
47 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(03-21205.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(Computer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archiv\
ed%20-%20HTML/03-21205.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([6/24/2021 3:35:40 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(decision to determine whether: it does not examine relevant evidence; it\
fails to articulate a satisfactory explanation for)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 741.75 Tm
(its )Tj
(conclusions, including a rational connection between the facts found and\
the choice made; it does not consider)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(relevant factors; it reflects a clear error of )Tj
16.879 0 Td
(judgment; it fails to consider an important aspect of the case; it offer\
s an)Tj
-16.879 -1.125 Td
(explanation for the decision that runs contrary to the record evidence; \
or it is so )Tj
32.018 0 Td
(implausible that it cannot be ascribed to)Tj
-32.018 -1.125 Td
(a mere difference of opinion. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
11.883 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 97-0435 \(July 14, 1998\) at p. 3 \(citing Supreme Court\
)Tj
28.72 0 Td
(decision\).)Tj
-43.935 -1.125 Td
(In deciding whether the Judge's rulings or conclusions are contrary to l\
aw, the Board will consider whether they are)Tj
T*
(contrary to provisions of )Tj
10.109 0 Td
(Executive Order 10865, the Directive, or other applicable federal law. )Tj
28.238 0 Td
(Compliance with state)Tj
-38.347 -1.125 Td
(or local law is not required because trustworthiness cases )Tj
23.132 0 Td
(involving personnel working on )Tj
13.054 0 Td
(sensitive ADP positions are)Tj
-36.186 -1.125 Td
(conducted by the Department of Defense pursuant to federal law. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
26.351 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( U.S. Constitution, Article )Tj
12.138 0 Td
(VI, clause 2)Tj
-38.489 -1.125 Td
(\(Supremacy Clause\). )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.636 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 00-0423 \(June 8, 2001\) at p. 3 \(citing Supreme Court \
decisions\).)Tj
-11.968 -2.125 Td
(When an Administrative Judge's factual findings are challenged, the Boar\
d must determine whether "[t]he)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge's findings of fact are supported )Tj
21.425 0 Td
(by such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as)Tj
-21.425 -1.125 Td
(adequate to support a conclusion in light of all the contrary evidence i\
n the same record. )Tj
35.516 0 Td
(In )Tj
(making this review, the)Tj
-35.516 -1.125 Td
(Appeal Board shall give deference to the credibility determinations of t\
he Administrative Judge." )Tj
39.174 0 Td
(Directive, Additional)Tj
-39.174 -1.125 Td
(Procedural )Tj
4.582 0 Td
(Guidance, Item E3.1.32.1. )Tj
10.775 0 Td
(The Board must consider not only whether there is record evidence suppor\
ting a)Tj
-15.356 -1.125 Td
(Judge's findings, but also whether there is evidence )Tj
20.758 0 Td
(that fairly detracts from the weight of the evidence supporting those)Tj
-20.758 -1.125 Td
(findings, and whether the Judge's findings reflect a reasonable interpre\
tation of the record )Tj
36.112 0 Td
(evidence as a whole.)Tj
-36.112 -1.125 Td
(Although a Judge's credibility determination is not immune from review, \
the party challenging a Judge's credibility)Tj
T*
(determination has a )Tj
8.081 0 Td
(heavy burden on appeal.)Tj
-8.081 -2.125 Td
(When an appeal issue raises a question of law, the Board's scope of revi\
ew is plenary. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
34.558 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( DISCR Case No. 87-2107)Tj
-34.558 -1.125 Td
(\(September 29, 1992\) at pp. 4-5 \(citing )Tj
15.857 0 Td
(federal cases\).)Tj
-15.857 -2.125 Td
(If an appealing party demonstrates factual or legal error, then the Boar\
d must consider the following questions:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Is the error harmful or harmless? )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
13.384 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 00-0250 \(July 11, 2001\) at p. 6 \(discussing harmless \
error)Tj
-16.715 -1.125 Td
(doctrine\);)Tj
T*
(Has the nonappealing party made a persuasive argument for how the Admini\
strative Judge's decision can be affirmed on)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(alternate grounds? )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
7.608 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR )Tj
(Case No. 99-0454 \(October 17, 2000\) at p. 6 \(citing federal cases\); \
and)Tj
-10.939 -2.125 Td
(If the Administrative Judge's decision cannot be affirmed, should the ca\
se be reversed or remanded? )Tj
40.333 0 Td
(\(Directive,)Tj
-40.333 -1.125 Td
(Additional Procedural Guidance, Items )Tj
15.912 0 Td
(E3.1.33.2 and E3.1.33.3\).)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
5.313 -2.125 Td
(Appeal Issues)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.225 -2.125 Td
(1. )Tj
(Whether the Administrative Judge misapplied Foreign Influence Mitigating\
Condition 1)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 28 267 cm
0 0 m
422.918 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 450.918 267.75 Tm
(. )Tj
(On appeal, Department)Tj
-36.243 -1.125 Td
(Counsel contends the Administrative Judge )Tj
17.636 0 Td
(erred by misapplying Foreign Influence Mitigating Condition 1. )Tj
25.857 0 Td
(Applicant)Tj
-43.493 -1.125 Td
(counters that the Judge did not misapply that mitigating condition.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(This case presents the Board with an unusual threshold legal question th\
at must be decided before the merits of the)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(appeal arguments made by the parties could )Tj
17.799 0 Td
(be addressed in any meaningful way.)Tj
-17.799 -2.125 Td
(Applicant's case involves an adjudication of her eligibility for assignm\
ent to a sensitive ADP position. )Tj
41.117 0 Td
(Such)Tj
-41.117 -1.125 Td
(adjudications are covered by DoD Regulation )Tj
18.55 0 Td
(5200.2-R. )Tj
(Under the MOA authorizing DOHA to adjudicate ADP)Tj
-18.55 -1.125 Td
(trustworthiness cases, the procedures used will be those applied by DOHA\
under DoD )Tj
34.826 0 Td
(Directive 5220.6, but the)Tj
-34.826 -1.375 Td
(investigative and adjudicative standards are provided by DoD Regulation \
5200.2-R.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 418.9023 137.25 Tm
( \(2\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 418.9023 136.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 107.25 Tm
(In the decision below, the Administrative Judge cites the language of Fo\
reign Influence Mitigating Condition 1 as it)Tj
0 -1.375 TD
(appears in Appendix 8 of DoD Regulation )Tj
17.191 0 Td
(5200.2-R.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 270.291 95.25 Tm
( \(3\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 270.291 94.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 284.0972 90.75 Tm
( )Tj
(However, the Judge also cites the language of Foreign Influence)Tj
-22.341 -1.125 Td
(Mitigating Condition 1 as it appears in the current version of DoD Direc\
tive )Tj
30.687 0 Td
(5220.6. )Tj
(The two versions of Foreign)Tj
-30.687 -1.125 Td
(Influence Mitigating Condition 1 differ significantly in their wording. \
)Tj
28.161 0 Td
(The Judge seems to hold that Foreign Influence)Tj
-28.161 -1.375 Td
(itigating Condition 1 as it appears in Appendix 8 of the DoD Regulation \
5200.2-R)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 410.6172 51.75 Tm
( \(4\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 410.6172 51 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 424.4233 47.25 Tm
( is the version applicable to)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
48 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[419.0 135.0 433.0 146.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
49 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[270.0 93.0 284.0 104.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
50 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[411.0 49.0 425.0 60.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>
endobj
51 0 obj
<>
endobj
9 0 obj
<>
endobj
10 0 obj
<>
endobj
11 0 obj
<>
endobj
58 0 obj
(file:///usr.osd.mil/Home/OSD/OGC/JosephLM/_MyComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archived%20-%20HTML/03-21205.a1.html)
endobj
57 0 obj
<>
endobj
59 0 obj
<>
endobj
52 0 obj
[15 0 R/XYZ 0 86.0 null]
endobj
53 0 obj
[16 0 R/XYZ 0 726.0 null]
endobj
54 0 obj
[16 0 R/XYZ 0 674.0 null]
endobj
55 0 obj
[16 0 R/XYZ 0 621.0 null]
endobj
56 0 obj
[16 0 R/XYZ 0 582.0 null]
endobj
4 0 obj
<>
endobj
xref
0 60
0000000000 65535 f
0000000016 00000 n
0000000141 00000 n
0000003658 00000 n
0000135559 00000 n
0000003536 00000 n
0000003591 00000 n
0000003731 00000 n
0000003758 00000 n
0000134737 00000 n
0000134905 00000 n
0000134947 00000 n
0000134547 00000 n
0000004394 00000 n
0000125954 00000 n
0000120190 00000 n
0000117656 00000 n
0000003861 00000 n
0000003907 00000 n
0000003956 00000 n
0000004147 00000 n
0000004019 00000 n
0000004051 00000 n
0000004083 00000 n
0000004115 00000 n
0000004619 00000 n
0000004644 00000 n
0000009908 00000 n
0000009957 00000 n
0000009992 00000 n
0000010502 00000 n
0000010925 00000 n
0000117332 00000 n
0000063948 00000 n
0000064215 00000 n
0000032480 00000 n
0000032753 00000 n
0000011312 00000 n
0000011588 00000 n
0000011948 00000 n
0000033192 00000 n
0000064829 00000 n
0000117856 00000 n
0000120404 00000 n
0000120429 00000 n
0000125630 00000 n
0000126179 00000 n
0000126218 00000 n
0000133578 00000 n
0000133902 00000 n
0000134225 00000 n
0000134632 00000 n
0000135350 00000 n
0000135391 00000 n
0000135433 00000 n
0000135475 00000 n
0000135517 00000 n
0000135155 00000 n
0000134989 00000 n
0000135297 00000 n
trailer
<<5D8D82F5188F974A96EA6588EF3D71BA>]>>
startxref
135732
%%EOF