%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-06-24T15:35:52-04:00
2021-06-24T15:35:51-04:00
2021-06-24T15:35:52-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
03-21329.a1
uuid:ce92e40e-e7a9-493d-aee8-f197604c45cc
uuid:aac63ade-fe33-4766-9678-6cf705b58629
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 17 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
23 0 obj
[31 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(03-21329.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(Computer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archiv\
ed%20-%20HTML/03-21329.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([6/24/2021 3:35:51 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: September 25, 2006)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(--------------)Tj
T*
(SSN:-----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 03-21329)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-3.304 -2.2 Td
(Nichole Noel, Esq., Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
4.082 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) declined to grant Ap\
plicant a security clearance. )Tj
41.649 0 Td
(On March 23,)Tj
-41.649 -1.125 Td
(2005, DOHA issued a statement of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(reasons advising Applicant of the basis for that decision--security conc\
erns raised)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(under Guideline F \(Financial Considerations\) of Department of Defense)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
29.075 0 Td
(Directive 5220.6 \(Jan. 2, 1992, as amended\))Tj
-29.075 -1.125 Td
(\(Directive\). )Tj
4.886 0 Td
(Applicant requested a hearing. )Tj
12.467 0 Td
(On March 29, 2006, after the hearing, Administrative Judge Wilford)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
27.631 0 Td
(H. Ross)Tj
-44.985 -1.125 Td
(denied Applicant's request for a security clearance. )Tj
20.615 0 Td
(Applicant timely appealed pursuant to the Directive \266\266 E3.1.28 and\
)Tj
-20.615 -1.125 Td
(E3.1.30.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant raised the following issues on appeal: whether Applicant was d\
enied due process of law; whether the)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Administrative Judge's adverse security)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.121 0 Td
(clearance decision is arbitrary capricious, or contrary to law.)Tj
-16.121 -2.125 Td
(Applicant argues he was denied due process of law because he was told by\
Department Counsel prior to the hearing that)Tj
T*
(it was not necessary for him to bring)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.886 0 Td
(certain items of documentary evidence, such as the full debtor's schedul\
e from his)Tj
-14.886 -1.125 Td
(bankruptcy filing or documentation relating to his dealings with a count\
y)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
29.466 0 Td
(child support agency for submission as)Tj
-29.466 -1.125 Td
(evidence at the hearing. )Tj
9.745 0 Td
(The Board does not find this argument persuasive.)Tj
-9.745 -2.125 Td
(There is a rebuttable presumption that federal officials and employees c\
arry out their duties in good faith. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
42.375 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(,)Tj
-45.706 -1.125 Td
(ISCR Case No. 00-0030 at 5 \(App. Bd. Sept.)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(20, 2001\). )Tj
(A party seeking to rebut that presumption has a heavy burden of)Tj
T*
(persuasion on appeal. )Tj
8.886 0 Td
(Applicant has not met that heavy burden, in that he fails to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
23.688 0 Td
(identify anything in the record below)Tj
-32.575 -1.125 Td
(that indicates or suggests a basis for a reasonable person to conclude t\
hat Department Counsel had acted improperly. )Tj
46.902 0 Td
(At)Tj
-46.902 -1.125 Td
(his hearing, the Administrative Judge asked Applicant whether he had the\
bankruptcy schedules, and Applicant)Tj
T*
(responded, "I asked for that, and the only thing)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
19.042 0 Td
(they sent me was a list of creditors." )Tj
14.766 0 Td
(Applicant's appeal did not include)Tj
-33.808 -1.125 Td
(the bankruptcy schedules, nor did Applicant explain how he was prejudice\
d by their)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
33.879 0 Td
(absence from the record. )Tj
10.134 0 Td
(Applicant)Tj
-44.013 -1.375 Td
(also testified at his hearing that he did not have any additional inform\
ation regarding his child support obligation.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 559.8789 128.25 Tm
( \(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 559.8789 127.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 573.6851 123.75 Tm
( )Tj
(A)Tj
-46.474 -1.125 Td
(review of the record suggests that Applicant did not bring the documents\
at issue to the hearing because they were)Tj
T*
(otherwise unavailable. As noted, Applicant's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.092 0 Td
(appeal does not explain how any bankruptcy documentation would support)Tj
-18.092 -1.125 Td
(a favorable clearance determination.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(In this case, Applicant was provided with the procedural rights set fort\
h in Executive Order 10865 and the Directive.)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Although )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
(pro se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( applicants cannot be)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.164 0 Td
(expected to act like lawyers, they are expected to take timely, reasonab\
le steps to)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
(w֎\nXw$)
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
38 0 obj
<>
endobj
39 0 obj
<>stream
H\Mn b"vHR&QqTc· Q*ɞ7vϝ5UFcezpƋ@nW'q.Ύ3%W<[Fo6_m_ m4TepÄliʛHsuU5k\ܠL4'
C,;{LVqsQP n3zEf"+\E5E)uȭx%r~dUzQtX*~W ?
endstream
endobj
40 0 obj
<>stream
H| Xz`