%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T15:15:55-04:00
2021-07-02T15:15:55-04:00
2021-07-02T15:15:55-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
03-22475.a1
uuid:04f07005-ca14-4d41-adbb-ff53620a4f27
uuid:06ce6d6a-0ead-4491-8331-e59f1188abff
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
14 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
[17 0 R 17 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
[17 0 R 17 0 R]
endobj
17 0 obj
<><>]/P 15 0 R/Pg 12 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
20 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(03-22475.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/03-22475.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:15:55 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: September 25, 2006)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(-----------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -------------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 03-22475)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.317 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) declined to grant Ap\
plicant a security clearance. )Tj
41.649 0 Td
(On December)Tj
-41.649 -1.125 Td
(21, 2004, DOHA issued a statement of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(reasons \(SOR\) advising Applicant of the basis for that decision--secur\
ity)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(concerns raised under Guideline F \(Financial Considerations\) of Depart\
ment of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.991 0 Td
(Defense Directive 5220.6 \(Jan. 2, 1992,)Tj
-31.991 -1.125 Td
(as amended\) \(Directive\). )Tj
10.162 0 Td
(Applicant requested a hearing. )Tj
12.467 0 Td
(On March 31, 2006, after the hearing, Administrative Judge)Tj
-22.629 -1.125 Td
(ichael H. Leonard denied Applicant's request for a security clearance. )Tj
28.056 0 Td
(Applicant timely appealed pursuant to the)Tj
-28.056 -1.125 Td
(Directive \266\266 E3.1.28 and E3.1.30.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant raised the following issue on appeal: whether the Administrati\
ve Judge's unfavorable clearance decision)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(under Guideline F is arbitrary, capricious, or)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.078 0 Td
(contrary to law.)Tj
-18.078 -2.125 Td
(Applicant contends the Administrative Judge should have concluded that t\
he security concerns raised by her history of)Tj
T*
(financial difficulties had been mitigated)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.188 0 Td
(because her financial problems were largely the result of circumstances \
beyond)Tj
-16.188 -1.125 Td
(her control--periods of unemployment, divorces, and medical)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
24.798 0 Td
(emergencies--and she has received counseling and is)Tj
-24.798 -1.125 Td
(working to resolve her problems. )Tj
13.497 0 Td
(In support of her contention, Applicant essentially reargues her case)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
27.463 0 Td
(with respect to)Tj
-40.96 -1.125 Td
(the evidence she presented below and provides additional explanations as\
to what efforts she has taken to resolve her)Tj
T*
(remaining outstanding)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
9.221 0 Td
(debts. )Tj
(Applicant does not challenge the Judges findings of fact on the eleven f\
inancial concerns)Tj
-9.221 -1.125 Td
(listed in the SOR. )Tj
7.361 0 Td
(The Board does not find Applicant's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.733 0 Td
(contentions persuasive.)Tj
-22.094 -2.125 Td
(The Board may not consider new evidence on appeal. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
21.714 0 Td
(See )Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(Directive \266 E3.1.29. )Tj
9.922 0 Td
(Accordingly, we may not consider)Tj
-31.636 -1.125 Td
(Applicant's explanations, and they do not)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.76 0 Td
(demonstrate error on the part of the Administrative Judge.)Tj
-16.76 -2.125 Td
(The application of disqualifying and mitigating conditions does not turn\
simply on a finding that one or more of them)Tj
T*
(apply to the particular facts of a case. )Tj
15.188 0 Td
(Rather, their application requires the exercise of sound discretion in l\
ight of the)Tj
-15.188 -1.125 Td
(record evidence as a whole. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
11.328 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 01-14740 at 7 \(App. Bd.)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Jan.15, 2003\). )Tj
(Thus, the presence of)Tj
-14.659 -1.125 Td
(some mitigating evidence does not alone compel the Administrative Judge \
to make a favorable security clearance)Tj
T*
(decision. )Tj
3.833 0 Td
(As the trier of fact, the Judge has to weigh the evidence as a whole and\
decide whether the favorable evidence)Tj
-3.833 -1.125 Td
(outweighs the unfavorable evidence, or)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
/TT3 1 Tf
15.994 0 Td
(vice versa)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
4.025 0 Td
(. )Tj
(An applicant's disagreement with the Judge's weighing of the)Tj
-20.02 -1.125 Td
(evidence, or an ability to argue for a different interpretation of the e\
vidence, is not)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
33.125 0 Td
(sufficient to demonstrate the Judge)Tj
-33.125 -1.125 Td
(weighed the evidence or reached conclusions in a manner that is arbitrar\
y, capricious, or contrary to law.)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
21 0 obj
<>
endobj
22 0 obj
( uԆ<&K)
endobj
23 0 obj
<>
endobj
24 0 obj
<>
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
33 0 obj
<>
endobj
34 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
Cq5 (Y9 t1{OK3$!K;=w7=(|sWmX^w/2N~]