%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T15:15:49-04:00
2021-07-02T15:15:49-04:00
2021-07-02T15:15:49-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
03-22281.a1
uuid:b5eeaf25-35bf-4a03-a714-3232a945f037
uuid:78301bac-6b09-4542-bf2c-6ac5c4713b4f
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
18 0 obj
<><>]/P 16 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
21 0 obj
[29 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(03-22281.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/03-22281.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:15:49 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: July 13, 2006)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(-------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: ------------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 03-22281)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.317 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) declined to grant Ap\
plicant a security clearance. )Tj
41.649 0 Td
(On October 27,)Tj
-41.649 -1.125 Td
(2004, DOHA issued a statement of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(reasons advising Applicant of the basis for that decision--security conc\
erns raised)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(under Guideline F \(Financial Considerations\), Guideline E \(Personal)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
27.744 0 Td
(Conduct\), and Guideline J \(Criminal Conduct\) of)Tj
-27.744 -1.125 Td
(Department of Defense Directive 5220.6 \(Jan. 2, 1992, as amended\) \(Di\
rective\). )Tj
32.377 0 Td
(Applicant requested the case)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.717 0 Td
(be)Tj
-44.094 -1.125 Td
(decided on the written record. )Tj
12.217 0 Td
(On January 30, 2006, after considering the record, Administrative Judge \
Philip S. Howe)Tj
-12.217 -1.375 Td
(denied Applicant's request for a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
12.926 0 Td
(security clearance.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 260.3828 353.25 Tm
( \(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 260.3828 352.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 274.189 348.75 Tm
( )Tj
(Applicant timely appealed pursuant to the Directive \266\266 E3.1.28)Tj
-21.516 -1.125 Td
(and E3.1.30.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant raised the following issue on appeal: whether the Administrati\
ve Judge's unfavorable clearance decision)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(under Guidelines E and F is arbitrary,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.33 0 Td
(capricious or contrary to law.)Tj
-15.33 -2.125 Td
(Applicant argues that the Administrative Judge's unfavorable clearance d\
ecision should be reversed because Applicant)Tj
T*
(did not intend to falsify his security)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.47 0 Td
(clearance application and the Judge erred with respect to a finding abou\
t one of)Tj
-14.47 -1.125 Td
(Applicant's debts. )Tj
7.374 0 Td
(In support of the latter argument, Applicant offers new)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
22.16 0 Td
(evidence in the form of an additional)Tj
-29.533 -1.125 Td
(explanation as to the circumstances relating to the debt. )Tj
22.437 0 Td
(The Board does not find Applicant's arguments persuasive.)Tj
-22.437 -2.125 Td
(Applicant's statements about his intent and state of mind when he execut\
ed his security clearance applications were)Tj
T*
(relevant evidence, but they were not)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.744 0 Td
(binding on the Administrative Judge. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
15.109 0 Td
(See, e.g.,)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.582 0 Td
( ISCR Case No. 01-19278 at 6-7)Tj
-33.435 -1.125 Td
(\(App. Bd. Apr. 22, 2003\). As the trier of fact, the Judge had to consi\
der)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
28.855 0 Td
(Applicant's statements in light of the record)Tj
-28.855 -1.125 Td
(evidence as a whole, and Applicant's denial of any intent to falsify a s\
tatement did not preclude the Judge from)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
44.583 0 Td
(weighing)Tj
-44.583 -1.125 Td
(the record evidence and making findings that contradicted Applicant's de\
nials. )Tj
31.586 0 Td
(Considering the record as a whole, the)Tj
-31.586 -1.125 Td
(Judge had a sufficient basis to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
12.275 0 Td
(find that Applicant's omissions were deliberate and intentional. )Tj
25.479 0 Td
(Therefore, the Judge's)Tj
-37.754 -1.125 Td
(unfavorable clearance decision under Guideline E is not arbitrary,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
26.6 0 Td
(capricious or contrary to law.)Tj
-26.6 -2.125 Td
(The Board may not consider new evidence on appeal. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
21.714 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( Directive \266 E3.1.29. )Tj
9.922 0 Td
(Its submission does not demonstrate)Tj
-31.636 -1.125 Td
(error on the part of the Administrative)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.523 0 Td
(Judge. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
(See, e.g., )Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(ISCR Case No. 02-12789 at 3 \(App. Bd. May 13, 2005\).)Tj
-15.523 -1.125 Td
(Therefore, the Board may not consider Applicant's additional explanation\
about his)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
33.56 0 Td
(debt. )Tj
(The Judge's finding under)Tj
-33.56 -1.125 Td
(Guideline F is reasonably supported by the record.)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
23 0 obj
<>
endobj
24 0 obj
(JԘha5)
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
36 0 obj
<>
endobj
37 0 obj
<>stream
H\n <""MY'-p2!T4KeSgM1h5('cٱmTEVߖsgGDŽ A%
v
g-hNj=~g*h8G/ҿg١Ӕ7q;K3i\TL0_\Tèe`Noq[M|-|%>=d&%*b>ZCIyc`<*+ {
endstream
endobj
38 0 obj
<>stream
H|TT=\
wfNlމ$K^c" [,(X]({GΈ]G1![Yk߳)s
P`tFWbCZXDtxL