%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T15:16:12-04:00
2021-07-02T15:16:12-04:00
2021-07-02T15:16:12-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
03-22709.a1
uuid:3667381d-424d-4717-997c-e0e21556246e
uuid:4771769a-c592-419b-9bd0-63b824f4185e
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
18 0 obj
<><>]/P 16 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
21 0 obj
[27 0 R 28 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(03-22709.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/03-22709.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:16:12 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: March 15, 2006)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(-----------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 03-22709)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-4.166 -2.2 Td
(Julie R. Edmunds, Esq., Department Counsel)Tj
-3.443 -2.2 Td
(Kathryn MacKinnon, Esq., Deputy Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.386 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-1.208 -2.2 Td
(William S. Aramony, Esq.)Tj
12 0 0 12 16 394.5 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) declined to grant Ap\
plicant a security clearance. )Tj
41.649 0 Td
(On December)Tj
-41.649 -1.125 Td
(27, 2004, DOHA issued a statement of )Tj
(reasons advising Applicant of the basis for that decision--security conc\
erns)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(raised under Guideline E \(Personal Conduct\), of Department of Defense \
Directive )Tj
33.1 0 Td
(5220.6 \(Jan. 2, 1992\), as amended)Tj
-33.1 -1.125 Td
(\(Directive\). )Tj
4.886 0 Td
(Applicant requested the case be decided on the written record. )Tj
25.128 0 Td
(On August 15, 2005, after considering the)Tj
-30.015 -1.125 Td
(record, Administrative Judge David S. Bruce denied Applicant's request f\
or a security clearance. Applicant timely)Tj
T*
(appealed pursuant to the Directive \266\266 )Tj
15.123 0 Td
(E3.1.28 and E3.1.30.)Tj
-15.123 -2.125 Td
(Applicant raised the following issue on appeal: whether the Administrati\
ve Judge's findings and conclusions regarding)Tj
T*
(Applicant's 2001 termination by his )Tj
14.54 0 Td
(private employer and his description of that event on a 2002 security cl\
earance)Tj
-14.54 -1.125 Td
(application were arbitrary and capricious in light of all the record evi\
dence.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The Administrative Judge found that: in 2001, Applicant was terminated b\
y a private employer for poor performance on)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(the job, associated with unauthorized )Tj
15.107 0 Td
(use of the company computer system \(including to access pornographic we\
b sites\).)Tj
-15.107 -1.125 Td
(Applicant understood his unauthorized use of the computer system resulte\
d )Tj
30.382 0 Td
(in poor performance at the time, but did not)Tj
-30.382 -1.125 Td
(reveal it to his wife and family. )Tj
12.774 0 Td
(In June 2002, Applicant prepared a security clearance application, where\
in he)Tj
-12.774 -1.125 Td
(acknowledged having been fired and explained that it had been due to uns\
atisfactory performance, low product demand,)Tj
T*
(a reduction-in-force and personnel )Tj
14.049 0 Td
(reorganization mandates. The Judge's findings represent a plausible inte\
rpretation of)Tj
-14.049 -1.375 Td
(the record evidence. )Tj
8.329 0 Td
(The Judge concluded that Guideline E, Disqualifying )Tj
21.55 0 Td
(Condition 1)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 431.5527 169.5 Tm
( \(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 431.5527 168.75 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 445.3589 165 Tm
( and Disqualifying Condition 2)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 16 153 Tm
(\(2\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 152.25 cm
0 0 m
11.369 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 27.3687 148.5 Tm
( applied to Applicant's case. )Tj
11.455 0 Td
(The Judge discussed several mitigating conditions and the "whole person"\
concept, )Tj
33.531 0 Td
(and)Tj
-45.933 -1.125 Td
(concluded that Applicant had not shown that it is clearly consistent wit\
h the national interest to grant Applicant a)Tj
T*
(security clearance. )Tj
7.689 0 Td
(Applicant argues for )Tj
8.469 0 Td
(an alternative interpretation of the record evidence and then the succes\
sful)Tj
-16.159 -1.125 Td
(application of mitigating conditions and a favorable "whole person" anal\
ysis based )Tj
33.391 0 Td
(on the alternative interpretation.)Tj
-33.391 -1.125 Td
(Applicant's arguments do not demonstrate that the Judge erred. )Tj
25.451 0 Td
(The Board need not agree with the Judge to conclude)Tj
-25.451 -1.125 Td
(that his )Tj
3.167 0 Td
(interpretation and resultant analysis are sustainable. )Tj
20.91 0 Td
(Thus, the Administrative Judge did not err in denying)Tj
-24.076 -1.125 Td
(Applicant a clearance.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
22.823 -2.125 Td
(Order)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
23 0 obj
<>
endobj
24 0 obj
(j\rhss)
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
<>
endobj
32 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
CI)i9e{V'='E},!')c 8'h;"-Z^;6N}TBMf->}h!ss/Pܻmׄ[ɗs;"` d
endstream
endobj
33 0 obj
<>stream
H|y\TG5o^p ^fQѬ,W4fW#qcԍBDE%#
xx'((̈[Uch?~~ >Ȁ5o4OD$G?g":1#RYԭR&OQql@
c<b4喘u0hD
mBo|2iHL&;TmRqpyo{{¹YB?!?0eTW( [)bS4=$%hB^/P_R4$k4zI'I{
ᮃH+f;!WBt&rDE~Z7? P=
"X4Vq"Vfۧ_m:uo!X1!j[4}_xewںM[kߡc:w'G>{}ѻO|ٯT470~PBbR!)C
OzȴQ|3v\zo'd~IL͙;}Y̝7/.Xt+-VY+[_a[n۾c{!):Z|Nيs/\JJUh3BRu8riޚRC)KYiT&=h{D9K&Ot}z!h8b(1ӃQJgKUT*["B*88Ԙc\h<`|lg`662kl5똃̊msWs96DbRjToO
T뫍P&j:ITnuZeevXDXaQa1aqaaCh1Y&Z
-;,?99\1Ok