%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T15:16:53-04:00
2021-07-02T15:16:53-04:00
2021-07-02T15:16:53-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
03-23380.a1
uuid:435d2a8b-7c4b-4254-b0aa-bf3e44a02e45
uuid:05b6c2ba-2ac8-44a9-be9d-35884d6c1e25
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 17 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
23 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(03-23380.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/03-23380.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:16:53 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: September 13, 2005)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(-----------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 03-23380)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.317 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) issued to Applicant \
a Statement of Reasons \(SOR\), dated)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(December 10, 2004, which stated the reasons )Tj
18.355 0 Td
(why DOHA proposed to deny or revoke access to classified information)Tj
-18.355 -1.125 Td
(for Applicant. )Tj
5.859 0 Td
(The SOR was based on Guideline G \(Alcohol Consumption\). )Tj
24.775 0 Td
(Administrative Judge Joan Caton Anthony)Tj
-30.634 -1.125 Td
(issued an unfavorable security clearance decision, dated June 3, 2005.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant appealed the Administrative Judge's unfavorable decision. )Tj
27.728 0 Td
(The Board has jurisdiction under Executive Order)Tj
-27.728 -1.125 Td
(10865 and Department of Defense )Tj
14.023 0 Td
(Directive 5220.6 \(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as amended.)Tj
-14.023 -2.125 Td
(The following issue has been raised on appeal: whether it was arbitrary,\
capricious, or contrary to law for the)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Administrative Judge to conclude that Applicant )Tj
19.662 0 Td
(had failed to demonstrate sufficient evidence of reform and)Tj
-19.662 -1.125 Td
(rehabilitation to warrant a favorable security clearance decision. )Tj
25.904 0 Td
(For the reasons that follow, the )Tj
12.692 0 Td
(Board affirms the)Tj
-38.596 -1.125 Td
(Administrative Judge's decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.685 -2.125 Td
(Scope of Review)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.685 -2.125 Td
(On appeal, the Board does not review a case )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
17.993 0 Td
(de novo)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(. )Tj
(Rather, the Board addresses the material issues raised by the)Tj
-17.993 -1.125 Td
(parties to determine whether there is factual )Tj
17.798 0 Td
(or legal error. )Tj
5.719 0 Td
(There is no presumption of error below, and the appealing)Tj
-23.517 -1.125 Td
(party must raise claims of error with specificity and identify how the A\
dministrative )Tj
33.963 0 Td
(Judge committed factual or legal)Tj
-33.963 -1.125 Td
(error. )Tj
(Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
25.797 0 Td
(See also)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( ISCR Case No. 00-0050 \(July 23, 2001\) at pp.)Tj
-25.797 -1.125 Td
(2-3 )Tj
(\(discussing reasons why party must raise claims of error with specifici\
ty\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(When the rulings or conclusions of an Administrative Judge are challenge\
d, the Board must consider whether they are:)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(1\) arbitrary or capricious; or \(2\) )Tj
13.328 0 Td
(contrary to law. )Tj
6.553 0 Td
(Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32.3. )Tj
24.104 0 Td
(In)Tj
-43.985 -1.125 Td
(deciding whether the Judge's rulings or conclusions are arbitrary or cap\
ricious, )Tj
31.726 0 Td
(the Board will review the Judge's)Tj
-31.726 -1.125 Td
(decision to determine whether: it does not examine relevant evidence; it\
fails to articulate a satisfactory explanation for)Tj
T*
(its )Tj
(conclusions, including a rational connection between the facts found and\
the choice made; it does not consider)Tj
T*
(relevant factors; it reflects a clear error of )Tj
16.879 0 Td
(judgment; it fails to consider an important aspect of the case; it offer\
s an)Tj
-16.879 -1.125 Td
(explanation for the decision that runs contrary to the record evidence; \
or it is so )Tj
32.018 0 Td
(implausible that it cannot be ascribed to)Tj
-32.018 -1.125 Td
(a mere difference of opinion. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
11.883 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 97-0435 \(July 14, 1998\) at p. 3 \(citing Supreme Court\
)Tj
28.72 0 Td
(decision\).)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
24 0 obj
<>
endobj
25 0 obj
(MX{\\|= )
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
36 0 obj
<>
endobj
37 0 obj
<>stream
H\n <"ZJ(ҔRв=@
ND!o?U'
cmYY`4V{\Wg
QK8p83)s ~'=q荽WoW~pB#=2aB)lin)/gԬqqB?2Yh@h4/E;{LVrQ!n3deb2\]]}}:s9k%Z┙>/*1UGZd)[&1U먮S SRbՌ{g쀢d ƿ
endstream
endobj
38 0 obj
<>stream
H| TTWרȦҼ5hL2I,E#*"h\pQQqEqAQq}qsAGgΜSn[y߹/@ h@Uխ[HXLh\溆 6!^-[h]7"fpwQ ͒ l:U55;*"43zQ|c3*&>!s|?stlX(13,? Ms^\ i<_=&4&"
Sb[ ۏ> "? DamQ("N(( LP HʫQZ#G[
,, ȟ6fH]1.$&؊J
7vptrviխY-UZujݦwө_ݺI@}送}>hA_㫯ͷ
~? a#F3&6n?M0iϿL:-q3fΚ<'%5mn.ZdibYk֮[![qfݲu[;wޓw_>RtX'KO>s\p+W
Xu$ڂ
LEBBHiPsT@,RyqJ5J5ZuTUOs_\j"~`[i4TQ"풊Az&jt
uR3L3CY*6Z'mmsҶІj#<dPv]d7);r('rP^#;\,:].DԍŶ[o뭛#^j[zZzYZk=5VkRB^<)&SN먌=:CPa0W/ *UŪZwpOtr!IjiC(J+MTu:^@Id94Ӻ
A9dYJ9kC"t8ovӻd}zs{,`c_`˯D~:^sJԎU|֚+p`a6? Ԕ՜bQ^2]~fsGss{s;6f/s+,jM=9KLKLkM 캝rWXS0ڛL>&Occ?clo2j-.F4<5T̆;uoJC|>;f`fgme4h
ºfF
_VɕzZfvmyVp @h*cO
8a{?;8!f*CE Z ԙݡwQWany_L{ݛ5m$xK̂tHփpH3`!TsK!x_z`
B.!2 J!I84 VOa>\pT#a4@4,`<0&`2La
T-cxp .E25p9B-W?[+p%kPv Z\UPqfsp#n͘[p+n<;p'˘wǽq`ct@Gt[plM1
!,x`a3lG[`KT;QZ<'$)*t!ʡB~³Q*cTBR:E}H2]t
E9H7DtnK>=dG* NOUszA/(ӯ4+LE)v.WyTMP
Ide)1flȔ̎5`
ygsdN̙:@2?օueXwzf}X_֏gbW],>fXOg$L,ler2ELSU+)3@
b,/i/`Lrؿ (;wg0RܥʼnZJqwO@8P]u)RC 4/qηAnfEnvCnG~y@Kmyع"ȣ<.Oȓ<-YyN$v:ל-sS"O[EyI^WUyM^tu]CԵtm]Gt}@7ԍtcD7,nV>~A!jjF1ƫ *D*LMRUij]7-tKJmt[NԯkFuQRWSuPRuTS u=m/[RmW1MYIx)^x#ފHIDHEPZJ%$IGd SZQz@)(F)(.JPVF)\PTM~>QR4T
S*JhN~?D(Qq*A%2TQyzAiP(M0D)T^t^zީJTIUÂ]c͆Ӱei93qfY9sɹ875ͤYbw ܥnnƺq\qa.ƻ \88qq.%]HJw2\˹5Zw
\+qeUW\kqmu,܄r3n-%J-nm-܁;r']k"wFwwOuEɽ7 GăDhcbyaGOr$/żrGsrpvl(q:Cg9/8 g48`HAv 'ȄȂ(xȁȅ!A^|oQ QQE@!P%PPePLGTD%TFTE5TG
D-FE=4@C4Bc4AS4Cs@KBk]ߢCw|d:.+zzc.B;..9u.o5RCFD10C0TD`cFbFcbcB*`"h&a21S1
131,|D`"X<,EX! XXk[۰;Ӭ7{]ו؇88x*F}?_7ҹ(3}(bPAeT3 *wQBͮvQ4S5Զb艚GmNQG8W5#QSOfQs廯~8&O 8)&NiuxC1D%W78|&=Xi]ӺGoH[i/!
6?\ME@`ԫ4r|r9U0%B[>Fy%P&s&E,8:K+fp!8me:mqTŌ6R7:;Ȁ<#;$sQ:=k203>x../=l7?M6FvQ^]vC}`\KV4|'zPmVo)NT2O+:
^v{s^ׁK}z9).S| nq|R֫-"{ip}pE7ٰabg`]`hAvnxs
/żU⧢Z#u_.WO)DIA9h(?5#j!Z'xTLùC\#/M]ɳR3nrI1Ge1|!$?)1A+ݳG3#EtSݦ*R0z\f$
%IKz)Jhrch099F洏ɑhyt8ֵ}<5ӌ[! $ ]!;yb*ݚ~cίxn|1KwUtNK!Ó((+2bu襻-
)ny=8ӗj\/3HgtK
!Wh2eYn^kLm
Ie.S,YktOnñ1ϸ˞썓O,ͪ47E'{֯χo`HrJˈ1PRJ*tҌN82P?b:w7[(֣JJݽ{Pvw=iۭХBEG_H
s>Q`h4HSILc2
N. 2jjbܮߺtK[b}D+8:e#%HN#cv>"-u>q[B/asj*CŨ+5*E9)>C=='[=u{:u@FXR_(Oe?_4ūyG/yޟH2\^ƫ.
+dV?+Y%ϫkKlamx &cC$Pb(vH`
FPm6uRJBccISLC0IIÌ`
<`