%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T15:17:27-04:00
2021-07-02T15:17:26-04:00
2021-07-02T15:17:27-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
03-23776.a1
uuid:43140cc3-1811-40ca-af7d-36a6fc3911d6
uuid:330ad3ab-ff28-4b2d-9cff-2ed2c910552b
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 17 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
23 0 obj
[30 0 R 31 0 R 32 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(03-23776.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/03-23776.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:17:26 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: June 13, 2006)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(----------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: ------------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(CR Case No. 03-23776)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-4.331 -2.2 Td
(Robert E. Coacher, Esq., Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
5.109 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
0.209 -2.2 Td
(Bret D. Davis, Esq.)Tj
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) declined to grant Ap\
plicant a security clearance. )Tj
41.649 0 Td
(On February 11,)Tj
-41.649 -1.125 Td
(2005, DOHA issued a statement of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(reasons advising Applicant of the basis for that decision--security conc\
erns raised)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(under Guideline F \(Financial Considerations\) of Department of Defense)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
29.075 0 Td
(Directive 5220.6 \(Jan. 2, 1992, as amended\))Tj
-29.075 -1.125 Td
(\(Directive\). )Tj
4.886 0 Td
(Applicant requested a hearing. )Tj
12.467 0 Td
(On December 22, 2005, after the hearing, Administrative Judge James)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
28.408 0 Td
(A.)Tj
-45.762 -1.125 Td
(Young denied Applicant's request for a security clearance. )Tj
23.587 0 Td
(Applicant timely appealed pursuant to the Directive \266\266)Tj
-23.587 -1.125 Td
(E3.1.28 and E3.1.30.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant raised the following issues on appeal: whether Applicant was d\
enied liberty or property without due process)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(of law in contravention of the Fifth)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.302 0 Td
(Amendment of the U.S. Constitution; whether the Administrative Judge err\
ed by)Tj
-14.302 -1.375 Td
(concluding the security concerns raised under Guidelines F had not been)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
29.297 0 Td
(mitigated.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 415.8848 300.75 Tm
( \(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 415.8848 300 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
9.75 0 0 9.75 16 272.25 Tm
(\(1\) Applicant argues he was denied liberty and property without due pr\
ocess of law in contravention of the Fifth Amendment of the U.S.)Tj
0 -1.231 TD
(Constitution because)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
8.61 0 Td
(the Defense Security Service \(DSS\) did not provide him with a copy of \
his Report of Investigation pursuant to his Freedom of)Tj
-8.61 -1.231 Td
(Information Act request, and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.802 0 Td
(Department Counsel did not call the DSS investigator as a witness for th\
e government or provide Applicant with his)Tj
-11.802 -1.231 Td
(name. )Tj
2.666 0 Td
(The Board does not find)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
9.97 0 Td
(Applicant's argument persuasive.)Tj
-12.636 -2.462 Td
(The Supreme Court has acknowledged the inherently discretionary nature o\
f security clearance decisions and concluded "[i]t should be obvious tha\
t)Tj
T*
(no has a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
('right' to a security clearance." )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
15.845 0 Td
(Department of Navy v. Egan)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
11.414 0 Td
( 484 U.S. 518, 527-28 \(1988\). )Tj
(Given the inherently discretionary nature of)Tj
-27.259 -1.231 Td
(security clearance)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
7.439 0 Td
(decisions, no applicant has any reasonable expectation of having a veste\
d interest in, or right to, a security clearance. )Tj
46.955 0 Td
(Moreover,)Tj
-54.395 -1.231 Td
(the federal courts have)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
9.329 0 Td
(repeatedly held there is no property right or interest in a security cle\
arance or a job requiring a security clearance. )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
45.619 0 Td
(See Jones)Tj
-54.947 -1.538 Td
(v. Navy, )Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.499 0 Td
(978 F.2d, 1223 \(Fed. Cir.)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(1992\); )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
(Dorfmont v. Brown, )Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(913 F.2d 1399, 1403-04 \(9)Tj
8.25 0 0 8.25 364.5482 165 Tm
(th)Tj
9.75 0 0 9.75 370.9653 161.25 Tm
( Cir. 1990\), )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
(cert. denied, )Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
10.081 0 Td
(499 U.S. 905 \(1991\); )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
(Doe v.)Tj
-46.488 -1.231 Td
(Cheney, )Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.499 0 Td
(885 F.2d 898, 909 \(D.C. Cir. 1989\);)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
/TT2 1 Tf
(Chesna v. U.S. Department of Defense,)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
30.358 0 Td
( 850 F. Supp. 110, 118-19 \(D. Conn. 1994\); )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
(Williams v. Reilly,)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-33.857 -1.231 Td
(743 F. Supp. 168, 172 \(S.D.N.Y. 1990\).)Tj
0 -2.462 TD
(A review of the record indicates Applicant was provided with the procedu\
ral rights set forth in Executive Order 10865 and the Directive. )Tj
55.01 0 Td
(Prior to)Tj
-55.01 -1.231 Td
(the hearing,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
4.97 0 Td
(Department Counsel provided Applicant with copies of all the evidence, s\
ubject to the control of DOHA, that the government intended)Tj
-4.97 -1.538 Td
(to offer at the hearing.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
8.25 0 0 8.25 102.8978 90 Tm
( \(2\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 102.8978 89.25 cm
0 0 m
11.682 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
9.75 0 0 9.75 114.58 86.25 Tm
( )Tj
(There is no indication from the record that Applicant requested the Defe\
nse Security Service \(DSS\) agent be present at the)Tj
-10.111 -1.231 Td
(hearing. )Tj
3.499 0 Td
(Applicant stated at the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
9.219 0 Td
(hearing that he had made a Freedom of Information Act \(FOIA\) request t\
o the DSS for a copy of his Report of)Tj
-12.718 -1.231 Td
(Investigation and had not received it. )Tj
15.079 0 Td
(But he also)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
4.75 0 Td
(stated at the hearing that he had not asked Department Counsel to assist\
him in obtaining it, and he)Tj
-19.828 -1.538 Td
(affirmatively stated to the Administrative Judge twice that)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
23.549 0 Td
(he was ready to proceed.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
8.25 0 0 8.25 342.2441 51 Tm
( \(3\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 342.2441 50.25 cm
0 0 m
11.682 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
9.75 0 0 9.75 353.9263 47.25 Tm
( )Tj
(Also, nothing in the record indicates Applicant had exercised)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
(TMQݕb\\R)
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
37 0 obj
<>
endobj
38 0 obj
<>stream
H\ϊ0>EتIZ<q
k|ɔ.l@2M2qY*"~a]o[xnvh{3?voE14Pn\x8~c;^aoۛX}Zݹb+BСK^D6Ul/sq ߱30ƀo
|Wm)];(O(yŀ\2g3rƀ2sF,%@|d>fF5%iJ֔)YGYc@|E=(VQR̊uT3٧"{WԻ:1ٳ"k7MMhɛfoiɏf?h*l8]9=C04町 /`
endstream
endobj
39 0 obj
<>stream
H|TT=\
ܙ;Ec1K^1A,(*%*FTE%ػbGc^fb6}z+9k>g}(x0BSr!gXDLxE xgV߬ 9QbڅvJ' <"mzwQ@2_hQO&蘸A3?/6@]W>z0Ą*#&oه|oCcu8#<_dr4ہBe\R@Uf+5QۖSe(N"#k(:,#]nnnn6/Τ`~0 ! 9$"既Q+pe2Ad+ 9
k)ޔjzZk-=P-^ۢkW3Q8s9Ur%Ԓ`IGr(m5fZB>pHS8dI%8DzHaUPT5-1m]˕$}zCwsw\s>$JJڈw%۽0^ȕT.a=~f=#mYӮ%Dijjj>uUvUrUpw\Rsݑov.:9ݹЙ8\wuJ3::dhϱ7߲gw}}=n[1N(er)|ޗwٞ