%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T15:18:41-04:00
2021-07-02T15:18:41-04:00
2021-07-02T15:18:41-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
03-24893.a1
uuid:6fbc2fab-2933-43f6-8a6f-82af436093bc
uuid:3a5df6dc-b9bf-4fbe-ba0f-111b3f12f228
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 17 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
23 0 obj
[29 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(03-24893.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/03-24893.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:18:41 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: April 28, 2006)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(-----------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 03-24893)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.317 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-0.625 -2.2 Td
(Alan V. Edmunds, Esq.)Tj
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) declined to grant Ap\
plicant a security clearance. )Tj
41.649 0 Td
(On December)Tj
-41.649 -1.125 Td
(22, 2004, DOHA issued a statement of )Tj
(reasons advising Applicant of the basis for that decision-security conce\
rns raised)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(under Guideline C \(Foreign Preference\) and Guideline B \(Foreign Influ\
ence\) )Tj
31.045 0 Td
(of Department of Defense Directive)Tj
-31.045 -1.125 Td
(5220.6 \(Jan.2, 1992, as amended\)\(Directive\). )Tj
18.328 0 Td
(Applicant requested a hearing. )Tj
12.467 0 Td
(On September 20, 2005, after the hearing,)Tj
-30.795 -1.125 Td
(Administrative Judge Henry Lazzaro denied Applicant's request for a secu\
rity clearance. )Tj
35.666 0 Td
(Applicant timely appealed)Tj
-35.666 -1.125 Td
(pursuant to the Directive \266\266 E3.1.28 and )Tj
16.375 0 Td
(E3.1.30.)Tj
-16.375 -2.125 Td
(Applicant raised the following issues on appeal: \(1\) whether it was ar\
bitrary and capricious for the Administrative Judge)Tj
0 -1.375 TD
(to conclude that Applicant had not )Tj
14.052 0 Td
(established a case in mitigation under Guideline B.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 429.2266 314.25 Tm
( \(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 429.2266 313.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 443.0327 309.75 Tm
( )Tj
(For the reasons that follow, the)Tj
-35.586 -1.125 Td
(Board concludes that Applicant has failed to demonstrate error on the pa\
rt )Tj
29.879 0 Td
(of the Administrative Judge.)Tj
-29.879 -2.125 Td
(Applicant makes the following specific arguments in support of his posit\
ion on appeal: \(a\) the Administrative Judge)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(should have applied Foreign Influence )Tj
15.634 0 Td
(itigating Conditions 1, 3, 4, and 5; \(b\) two prior hearing office deci\
sions,)Tj
-15.634 -1.125 Td
(although not legally binding precedent, have similar fact patterns and a\
re instructive )Tj
33.905 0 Td
(as to the proper resolution of this)Tj
-33.905 -1.125 Td
(case; \(c\) there is significant favorable evidence in the case record r\
egarding Applicant's work ethic, professional)Tj
T*
(reputation )Tj
4.304 0 Td
(and trustworthiness, as well as evidence of the democratic nature of the\
Columbian government and the fact)Tj
-4.304 -1.125 Td
(that it is becoming a force for progress and stability )Tj
20.883 0 Td
(in its region.)Tj
-20.883 -2.125 Td
(The Administrative Judge found that Applicant is an American citizen by \
birth who has a mother, a brother, and an)Tj
T*
(uncle who are citizens of and reside in )Tj
15.605 0 Td
(Colombia. )Tj
4.444 0 Td
(Applicant's wife is a Colombian citizen who has lived in the U.S. for)Tj
-20.049 -1.125 Td
(eight years and has applied for U.S. citizenship. )Tj
19.356 0 Td
(Her parents, who were )Tj
(Colombian, are deceased. )Tj
19.825 0 Td
(There is the)Tj
-39.181 -1.125 Td
(possibility that Applicant will inherit part of a piece of property in C\
olombia, but the value of that asset would be an)Tj
T*
(insubstantial portion of his total assets. )Tj
15.804 0 Td
(The Administrative Judge concluded that the government had established a\
case)Tj
-15.804 -1.125 Td
(under Guideline B since Applicant had )Tj
15.829 0 Td
(close ties of affection to his Colombian relatives which was demonstrate\
d by his)Tj
-15.829 -1.125 Td
(frequent telephonic contact, regular visits to Colombia, gifts and finan\
cial )Tj
29.769 0 Td
(support given by him and anticipated future)Tj
-29.769 -1.125 Td
(visits by his mother to the United States. )Tj
16.471 0 Td
(The Judge discussed at length the serious security problems in Colombia)Tj
-16.471 -1.125 Td
(currently presented by terrorist groups and drug traffickers. )Tj
23.964 0 Td
(The Judge concluded that the potential for coercion,)Tj
-23.964 -1.125 Td
(exploitation, or pressure being exerted on )Tj
16.856 0 Td
(Applicant directly and through his foreign relatives by any of the terro\
rist)Tj
-16.856 -1.125 Td
(organizations operating in Colombia is obvious. )Tj
19.47 0 Td
(The Judge concluded that no )Tj
11.747 0 Td
(mitigating conditions applied and decided)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
(=%fHW)
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
32 0 obj
<>
endobj
33 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
CI)i9e{V'='E},!')c 8'h;"-Z^;6N}TBMf->}h!ss/Pܻmׄ[ɗs;"` d
endstream
endobj
34 0 obj
<>stream
H|y\TG5o^p xDFj$^ј]ƍQ7A9(j$*(x!}߈x2#oWIfң.fH}炙 x!|ֺmq*$"*12ļ
GJ1e1PзI!?PNCĘtw;`,0@bm,?n"Ĕ^ mHMDY 'Y#Srpeo]|=S$
aF?iDt&<