%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T15:19:12-04:00
2021-07-02T15:19:11-04:00
2021-07-02T15:19:12-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
03-25154.a1
uuid:f4b87100-21b9-44f8-900c-93280b685602
uuid:e765e05d-d2f8-4bd0-a854-5d7cc24c11cb
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
18 0 obj
<><>]/P 16 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
21 0 obj
[29 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(03-25154.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/03-25154.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:19:12 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: July 14, 2006)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(-------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: ------------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 03-25154)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.317 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) declined to grant Ap\
plicant a security clearance. )Tj
41.649 0 Td
(On January 6,)Tj
-41.649 -1.125 Td
(2005, DOHA issued a statement of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(reasons advising Applicant of the basis for that decision--security conc\
erns raised)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(under Guideline D \(Sexual Behavior\) and Guideline E \(Personal Conduct\
\) of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.075 0 Td
(Department of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
-31.075 -1.125 Td
(\(Jan. 2, 1992, as amended\) \(Directive\). )Tj
15.828 0 Td
(Applicant requested a hearing. )Tj
12.467 0 Td
(On January 31, 2006, after the hearing,)Tj
-28.295 -1.125 Td
(Administrative Judge Michael J. Breslin denied Applicant's request for a\
security clearance. )Tj
37.001 0 Td
(Applicant timely appealed)Tj
-37.001 -1.125 Td
(pursuant to the Directive \266\266 E3.1.28)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.681 0 Td
(and E3.1.30.)Tj
-14.681 -2.125 Td
(Applicant raised the following issues on appeal: whether Applicant was d\
enied due process of law; whether the)Tj
0 -1.375 TD
(Administrative Judge erred by concluding the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.551 0 Td
(security concerns raised under Guidelines E had not been mitigated.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 565.1699 314.25 Tm
( \(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 565.1699 313.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 284.25 Tm
(\(1\) Applicant argues he was denied due process of law because Departme\
nt Counsel did not call the Defense Security)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Service investigator as a witness at the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.69 0 Td
(hearing. )Tj
3.499 0 Td
(The Board does not find Applicant's argument persuasive.)Tj
-19.188 -2.125 Td
(A review of the record indicates Applicant was provided with the procedu\
ral rights set forth in Executive Order 10865)Tj
T*
(and the Directive. )Tj
7.386 0 Td
(There is no indication)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
8.998 0 Td
(from the record that Applicant requested the Defense Security Service \(\
DSS\))Tj
-16.383 -1.125 Td
(agent be present at the hearing or objected to proceeding without him. )Tj
28.241 0 Td
(Although)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
/TT3 1 Tf
(pro se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( applicants cannot be expected to)Tj
-28.241 -1.125 Td
(act like lawyers, they are expected to take timely, reasonable steps to \
protect their rights under the Directive. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
43.678 0 Td
(See, e.g.,)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-43.678 -1.125 Td
(ISCR Case No. 00-0593 at 4 \(App. Bd. May 14, 2001\). )Tj
(If they fail to take timely, reasonable steps to protect their rights,)Tj
T*
(that failure to act does not constitute a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.495 0 Td
(denial of their rights. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
8.637 0 Td
(See, e.g., )Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.832 0 Td
(ISCR Case No. 02-19896 at 6 \(App. Bd. Dec. 29,)Tj
-27.963 -1.125 Td
(2003\). )Tj
(Because Applicant did not object to proceeding or otherwise request a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.129 0 Td
(continuance of his case, he cannot fairly)Tj
-31.129 -1.125 Td
(claim he was denied due process under the Directive or Executive Order.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(\(2\) Applicant also argues that the Administrative Judge erred by concl\
uding the security concerns raised under)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Guidelines E had not been mitigated because)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.244 0 Td
(Applicant was entitled, as a matter of law, to a favorable application o\
f the)Tj
-18.244 -1.125 Td
(mitigating conditions and the "whole person" concept. )Tj
21.979 0 Td
(Again, the Board does not)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
10.72 0 Td
(find Applicant's arguments persuasive.)Tj
-32.699 -2.125 Td
(The application of disqualifying and mitigating conditions does not turn\
simply on a finding that one or more of them)Tj
T*
(apply to the particular facts of a case. )Tj
15.188 0 Td
(Rather, their application requires the exercise of sound discretion in l\
ight of the)Tj
-15.188 -1.125 Td
(record evidence as a whole. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
11.328 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 01-14740 at 7 \(App. Bd.)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Jan.15, 2003\). )Tj
(Thus, the presence of)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
23 0 obj
<>
endobj
24 0 obj
(0REvo )
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
36 0 obj
<>
endobj
37 0 obj
<>stream
H\Mn b"vHR&QqTc· Q*ɞ7vϝ5UFcezpƋ@nW'q.Ύ3%W<[Fo6_m_ m4TepÄliʛHsuU5k\ܠL4'
C,;{LVqsQP n3zEf"+\E5E)uȭx%r~dUzQtX*~W ?
endstream
endobj
38 0 obj
<>stream
H| Xz`<`vxEh /yD@QAQFň7uUPD@Q cUd zѧ}Kjf $Apm;TK3.aqY 0 !'|BZ#w
vUT!$t3)i) ~ ёa.ۘC?^ѱ 띮r?)fLxJG
~elXBՇǫGFWK N3>|@zܸȸdz̀3 R6 Q*'T*&Hn%,Vjn-5BZm?@j +X^
"ƃ-l]k2/llEɮ^
]5vukҴYswYzz)h٪u}ڶkc']vz}ŀ_
~#"G9*&v4ab¤S~:mz_f&͚='ynJi.Zd+Vªkf[a&-[)g;ww_>RpX'O.9s2p+Wz-c9$VmEV
Vm#O
4RhRz "RI}(%k=ˍdw