%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T15:20:26-04:00
2021-07-02T15:20:25-04:00
2021-07-02T15:20:26-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
03-26083.a1
uuid:994e8e66-ee61-4a99-9f41-1b2512e52a75
uuid:e2b9368c-1e26-4ee8-8381-392788e886be
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 17 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
23 0 obj
[29 0 R 30 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(03-26083.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/03-26083.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:20:26 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: November 1, 2006)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(-------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: --------------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 03-26083)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-4.332 -2.2 Td
(Daniel F. Crowley, Esq., Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
5.11 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-1.097 -2.2 Td
(William F. Savarino, Esq.)Tj
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) declined to grant Ap\
plicant a security clearance. )Tj
41.649 0 Td
(On October 4,)Tj
-41.649 -1.125 Td
(2005, DOHA issued a statement of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(reasons advising Applicant of the basis for that decision--security conc\
erns raised)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(under Guideline B \(Foreign Influence\) of Department of Defense Directi\
ve)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.322 0 Td
(5220.6 \(Jan. 2, 1992, as amended\))Tj
-30.322 -1.125 Td
(\(Directive\). )Tj
4.886 0 Td
(Applicant requested a hearing. )Tj
12.467 0 Td
(On March 8, 2006, after the hearing, )Tj
14.884 0 Td
(Administrative Judge Joan Caton)Tj
-32.237 -1.125 Td
(Anthony denied Applicant's request for a security clearance. )Tj
24.365 0 Td
(Applicant timely appealed pursuant to the Directive \266\266)Tj
-24.365 -1.125 Td
(E3.1.28 and E3.1.30.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant raised the following issue on appeal: whether the Administrati\
ve Judge's adverse security clearance decision)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(under Guideline B is arbitrary,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
12.497 0 Td
(capricious and contrary to law.)Tj
-12.497 -2.125 Td
(Applicant argues that the evidence he provided in the proceeding below w\
as sufficient to require the Administrative)Tj
T*
(Judge to conclude, as a matter of law, that)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.078 0 Td
(he had rebutted, mitigated or extenuated the security concerns raised by\
the)Tj
-17.078 -1.125 Td
(Guideline B \(Foreign Influence\) allegations. )Tj
17.995 0 Td
(Specifically, Applicant contends that)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.023 0 Td
(the Judge's adverse decision should)Tj
-33.018 -1.375 Td
(be reversed because the Judge erred in not applying Guideline B Mitigati\
ng Conditions 1)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 443.5703 248.25 Tm
( \(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 443.5703 247.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 457.3765 243.75 Tm
( and 3,)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 489.7026 248.25 Tm
( \(2\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 489.7026 247.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 503.5088 243.75 Tm
( and made an)Tj
-40.626 -1.125 Td
(unfavorable decision that is unsupported by the record as a whole.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The Administrative Judge made sustainable findings that: \(1\) Applicant\
's mother and sister are citizens of India, residing)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(in India, \(2\) Applicant's mother lives)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.982 0 Td
(on her teacher's pension and an inheritance from her late husband, \(3\)\
Applicant's)Tj
-14.982 -1.125 Td
(wife is a citizen of Russia currently residing in the U.S. with Applican\
t, \(4\))Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.299 0 Td
(Applicant met his wife over the internet, \(5\))Tj
-30.299 -1.125 Td
(Applicant's parents-in-law are citizens and residents of Russia, \(6\) A\
pplicant's step-son is a citizen and resident of)Tj
T*
(Russia, \(7\) Applicant and his wife have provided this step-son with ap\
proximately $3,000 a year for his education since)Tj
T*
(2002, \(8\) Applicant's wife is close to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.955 0 Td
(her son and owns an apartment in Russia with him, \(9\) Applicant's wife\
visits her)Tj
-14.955 -1.125 Td
(parents in Russia once a year, has e-mail contact with her son in Russia\
once)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.936 0 Td
(a week, and speaks by telephone with her)Tj
-30.936 -1.125 Td
(parents and son once a month, \(10\) Applicant traveled to Russia in 199\
8, 2001, and 2004, \(11\) India is active in)Tj
T*
(pursuing aggressive information collection and industrial espionage agai\
nst the U.S., \(12\) political and economic)Tj
T*
(instability in Russia raise security concerns)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.552 0 Td
(for U.S. citizens residing there, and by extension, for those U.S. citiz\
ens)Tj
-17.552 -1.125 Td
(who have family members residing there, \(13\) the Russian government kn\
ows about)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
34.02 0 Td
(Applicant's work because he has)Tj
-34.02 -1.125 Td
(worked with Russian scientists on joint projects. )Tj
19.609 0 Td
(Given those findings, the Administrative Judge concluded that)Tj
-19.609 -1.125 Td
(Applicant's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(ties with his and his wife's immediate family members raised security co\
ncerns under Guideline B, and that)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
(@4nwNs)
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
33 0 obj
<>
endobj
34 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
CI)i9e{V'='E},!')c 8'h;"-Z^;6N}TBMf->}h!ss/Pܻmׄ[ɗs;"` d
endstream
endobj
35 0 obj
<>stream
H|y\TG5o^p xDDj3ݸ1F!*EA"^9^ xʌhu\5Ə&I#~-+,V!щQIm&P8P'7zT!/KylҠ6)> 0&֜] ct#k=X
E'<819|>m0,:JYd
zĨFٜ\]'F%,9fЏJ620?iDLf@dG ~!Iq"ˋVbVCƗdF/dY#io y ),nBЫGg㬒]H{;N6]oCQk~G
h\cYwsSϿNz4l8 P1MAj;M6{_B[ײmݦ-v;t.]?ѽg=#{_?_<$.>!q谤#F&3jtʘ?!uSҾ~3ffʚ=gr.Xju7H6nu;wh_qHcOyR*ćp)c|OI>ŧqJ[uh2d!KVeu^ve><_K|U`[Wu?Mŷ{|C#/?KtU GW[~8sslcHY&E@@ {bcI4w&M'q2! H]`Aԭ,L&3@`C9qp4q,ѥ\M7ܒ:܊[sp>.\p9
?զ\4e\kM|Nsǹs9NST9NS::SDA
<