%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T15:20:30-04:00
2021-07-02T15:20:30-04:00
2021-07-02T15:20:30-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
03-26162.a1
uuid:b4fd7328-d6cf-47a2-a7a3-9e7bc3a77d3c
uuid:6f2b871e-f942-4971-adc1-afa4bf501ecc
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
14 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
[17 0 R 17 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
[17 0 R 17 0 R]
endobj
17 0 obj
<><>]/P 15 0 R/Pg 12 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
20 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(03-26162.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/03-26162.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:20:30 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: May 18, 2006)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(----------)Tj
T*
(SSN: ------------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 03-26162)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.317 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-0.208 -2.2 Td
(Scott D. Desind, Esq.)Tj
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) declined to grant Ap\
plicant a security clearance. )Tj
41.649 0 Td
(On January 26,)Tj
-41.649 -1.125 Td
(2005, DOHA issued a statement of )Tj
(reasons advising Applicant of the basis for that decision--security conc\
erns raised)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(under Guideline J \(Criminal Conduct\) of Department of Defense Directiv\
e )Tj
30.102 0 Td
(5220.6 \(Jan. 2, 1992, as amended\))Tj
-30.102 -1.125 Td
(\(Directive\). )Tj
4.886 0 Td
(Applicant requested a hearing. )Tj
12.467 0 Td
(On October 31, 2005, after the hearing, Administrative Judge Martin H.)Tj
-17.354 -1.125 Td
(Mogul )Tj
(denied Applicant's request for a security clearance. )Tj
23.532 0 Td
(Applicant timely appealed pursuant to the Directive \266\266)Tj
-23.532 -1.125 Td
(E3.1.28 and E3.1.30.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant raised the following issue on appeal: whether the Administrati\
ve Judge erred by concluding that the security)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(concerns raised under Guideline J had )Tj
15.495 0 Td
(not been mitigated.)Tj
-15.495 -2.125 Td
(Applicant argues that the Administrative Judge should have concluded tha\
t the security concerns raised under Guideline)Tj
T*
(J had been mitigated, as a matter of )Tj
14.412 0 Td
(law, because Applicant's last criminal incident occurred in 2001 and App\
licant has)Tj
-14.412 -1.125 Td
(demonstrated he is now rehabilitated. )Tj
15.218 0 Td
(The Board does not find Applicant's )Tj
14.733 0 Td
(arguments persuasive.)Tj
-29.951 -2.125 Td
(The application of disqualifying and mitigating conditions does not turn\
simply on a finding that one or more of them)Tj
T*
(applies to the particular facts of a case. )Tj
15.798 0 Td
(Rather, their application requires the exercise of sound discretion in l\
ight of the)Tj
-15.798 -1.125 Td
(record evidence as a whole. )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
11.328 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 01-14740 at 7 \(App. Bd. )Tj
(Jan.15, 2003\). )Tj
(Thus, the presence of)Tj
-14.659 -1.125 Td
(some mitigating evidence does not alone compel the Judge to make a favor\
able security clearance decision. )Tj
43.234 0 Td
(As the trier)Tj
-43.234 -1.125 Td
(of )Tj
(fact, the Judge has to weigh the evidence as a whole and decide whether \
the favorable evidence outweighs the)Tj
T*
(unfavorable evidence or )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
9.912 0 Td
(vice versa)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
4.025 0 Td
(. )Tj
(An )Tj
(applicant's disagreement with the Judge's weighing of the evidence, or a\
n ability)Tj
-13.937 -1.125 Td
(to argue for a different interpretation of the evidence, is not sufficie\
nt to )Tj
29.044 0 Td
(demonstrate the Judge weighed the evidence or)Tj
-29.044 -1.125 Td
(reached conclusions in a manner that is arbitrary, capricious, or contra\
ry to law.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(In this case, the Administrative Judge made sustainable findings as to a\
)Tj
28.744 0 Td
(lengthy and serious history of criminal conduct.)Tj
-28.744 -1.125 Td
(That history involved eight separate )Tj
14.635 0 Td
(incidents between 1986 and 2001, including felonious assault, spousal ab\
use,)Tj
-14.635 -1.125 Td
(domestic battery, domestic violence, failure to appear for a bench warra\
nt, and )Tj
31.681 0 Td
(vandalism. )Tj
4.61 0 Td
(Three of these incidents)Tj
-36.292 -1.125 Td
(occurred in 2001. )Tj
7.275 0 Td
(The Judge weighed the mitigating evidence offered by Applicant against t\
he length and seriousness of)Tj
-7.275 -1.125 Td
(the disqualifying conduct and considered the possible application of rel\
evant mitigating conditions. )Tj
39.963 0 Td
(The Judge)Tj
-39.963 -1.125 Td
(articulated a rational basis for not favorably )Tj
17.743 0 Td
(applying any mitigating conditions in this case, and reasonably explaine\
d)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
21 0 obj
<>
endobj
22 0 obj
(u>neys )
endobj
23 0 obj
<>
endobj
24 0 obj
<>
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
<>stream
H\j >wIJB[ȡhHt
qylOg>?y?ZyΈ=JK:04J.b-$ٰAͻLxdItJ/p#j=dж q^F:O#q@7Yhy2_e,Gǚ"g.qB\>D*L8WL\ׁωuqA[W:9w_9$~C"4
0 ;
"
endstream
endobj
32 0 obj
<>stream
H|XTgv΅HS݅Q1hL
J#*"v4ذXPDTlˮU,X,}3sΜ9sf $AH-[W6K3&.aqkj ` ˦1 m
Wq}C 4Hph38v\$ @DG>pέ\øߏ>1q .s@;K숈p6 &05x qb 6GEol@F@3@ QX*Cktʂh
@n-,v]nilUBzu/w J )"*Ń-l}{2/ESu뺸{ԫՠa*}d'M6kSߖ~ZiЮ};w,k=z_~է!8য়àȨ1C>"~ 8n&N4巩ӦH6kv/Xhq撥lYVYn!{CFڴymwܵ;o},8tHcO+_An0}>Z?L?d_Onaa!`VOk5\mjLZŏ-C!49tZCTɜYJ/3\TP*RUAR$[
y!TJvKeBzM&A@Mf|94ЩsEp2,9*(P!|!Ők9ݪݭ5v;I
D[x%0'Ҫ\/(7XMẃgiiĢ>9,lyy9
Rii垟9o124:L&?SSaBScbgme,6uԸθcF{QyUJx^-w\1EV0^0_ ):QUx?wZl_m^oSQ( N{>9^g4i;/b&=juB @2LS