%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T15:20:34-04:00
2021-07-02T15:20:33-04:00
2021-07-02T15:20:34-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
03-26197.a1
uuid:546500d2-2999-44da-8bb7-4d60e94bd6fa
uuid:0484dadf-2f3a-4bfe-afcf-1a0b64238107
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>
endobj
21 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
<><><><><><>]/P 18 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
25 0 obj
[31 0 R]
endobj
26 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(03-26197.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/03-26197.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:20:34 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: October 13, 2006)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(----------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -------------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 03-26197)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 247.375 518.25 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-4.332 -2.125 Td
(Daniel F. Crowley, Esq., Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
5.11 -2.125 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-0.902 -2.125 Td
(Francis J. Flanagan, Esq.)Tj
-19.157 -2.125 Td
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) declined to grant Ap\
plicant a security clearance. )Tj
41.649 0 Td
(On April 11,)Tj
-41.649 -1.125 Td
(2005, )Tj
(DOHA issued a statement of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(reasons advising Applicant of the basis for that decision-security conce\
rns raised)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(under Guidelines K \(Security Violations\), M \(Misuse of Information)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
27.717 0 Td
(Technology Systems\), and E \(Personal Conduct\),)Tj
-27.717 -1.125 Td
(pursuant to Department of Defense Directive 5220.6 \(Jan. 2, 1992, as am\
ended\) \(Directive\). )Tj
37.099 0 Td
(Applicant)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
4.193 0 Td
(requested a)Tj
-41.292 -1.125 Td
(hearing. )Tj
3.499 0 Td
(On March 22, 2005, )Tj
(after the hearing, Administrative Elizabeth M. Matchinski denied Applica\
nt's request for a)Tj
-3.499 -1.375 Td
(security clearance. )Tj
7.689 0 Td
(Applicant timely appealed pursuant to the Directive \266\266 E3.1.28 and\
E3.1.30.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 474.7187 350.25 Tm
( \(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 474.7187 349.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 320.25 Tm
(Applicant raised three issues on appeal: \(1\) whether the Administrativ\
e Judge's findings are supported by substantial)Tj
T*
(evidence; \(2\) whether the Administrative)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.688 0 Td
(Judge failed to give sufficient weight to mitigating conditions; and \(3\
\) whether)Tj
-16.688 -1.125 Td
(the Administrative Judge's unfavorable clearance decision under the "who\
le)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.605 0 Td
(person" concept is arbitrary, capricious, or)Tj
-30.605 -1.125 Td
(contrary to law. )Tj
6.553 0 Td
(The Board resolves all three issues against Applicant.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
-6.553 -2.125 Td
(1. )Tj
(Whether the Administrative Judge's findings are supported by substantial\
evidence)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant argues that the Administrative Judge made inconsistent finding\
s, and that favorable findings were supported)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(by greater evidence. )Tj
8.329 0 Td
(The Judge)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(concluded that Applicant's security violations were isolated, and stated\
that Applicant)Tj
-8.329 -1.125 Td
("can be counted on to properly handle classified information in the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
26.983 0 Td
(future." )Tj
(Witness testimony cited by the Judge)Tj
-26.983 -1.125 Td
(described Applicant as a "security fanatic" and noted his "subsequent po\
sitive discharge of his security)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
41.352 0 Td
(responsibilities.")Tj
-41.352 -1.125 Td
(Applicant's appeal highlights lengthy quotations from the Judge's decisi\
on that support her conclusion that Applicant is)Tj
T*
(rehabilitated in the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
7.747 0 Td
(areas of security violations, and the misuse of Information Technology S\
ystems, as well as the)Tj
-7.747 -1.125 Td
(personal conduct that pertained to the security violations, under)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
25.659 0 Td
(Guidelines K, M and E, respectively.)Tj
-25.659 -2.125 Td
(The Administrative Judge, however, found against Applicant with respect \
to deliberately lying during a 2003 security)Tj
T*
(investigation about classified information)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.885 0 Td
(stored on his computer. )Tj
9.637 0 Td
(The Judge concluded:)Tj
-26.522 -2.125 Td
(Alleged under Guideline E, the government proved Applicant impeded the c\
ompany's preliminary inquiry into a)Tj
T*
(suspected compromise of classified)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.44 0 Td
(information, an investigation required under \266 C1.3.4.1. of the NISPO\
M. )Tj
29.393 0 Td
(When)Tj
-43.834 -1.125 Td
(questioned by security personnel who had been tasked with sanitizing the\
)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
29.632 0 Td
(affected computers, Applicant repeatedly)Tj
-29.632 -1.125 Td
(denied that he had downloaded the confidential document to his hard driv\
e. )Tj
30.408 0 Td
(His fear that he could lose years of data)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.077 0 Td
(or)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
(Fs}X~D7d&E)
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
34 0 obj
<>
endobj
35 0 obj
<>stream
H\j@}l/Φ д`t
*sOiO|lc75.6sIM0pb6/L5ۜ!˵yw=ᴍ>*fp/
Gsݚ|wp
q43\6tS=<ק`nni_ui6 ǐU3zk{ol:eUL\=ك5\'C%z˒\*[XXXXةƒ-ؑX'߃WvCހllT;9999998883
2
3
2
g
f
g4sA^WWQQQQQQQ3GFO77O77O77O77O77O77O=`?U/qsIIWxlv1~YC?}0 ݏ
endstream
endobj
36 0 obj
<>stream
H|y\TG5o^p xDF5Y5ٍn!"(*Q0xx!(xx ^xψ+ʸjԏ&I#~THy
'Ȥv~(5:ِ|@kylҠvc} 8(a\lUs+Ы2.&2aQ-|mOPďzp\b }:iaQjI@^O(s@gbahdbYa xa#8'Ih"%_$)^SzyFB}J9%,k$Mpb7!ݳqVCݨH{;N6=\oCQk~G
h\cYwsSϿNz4l8 P1MAj;M6{_Zl^6ж]?k:v哮ӿGz_}ۯ00"_GE?$!q谤#F&=f8)%uSҾ~3fΚ='cf.Z˖gYj7n6ou;wh_qHcO