%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T15:20:40-04:00
2021-07-02T15:20:39-04:00
2021-07-02T15:20:40-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
03-26387.a1
uuid:e3298ce0-1a00-407b-b004-32140ed001ca
uuid:0ed10991-f58c-40a4-9bbb-d1782816fc6a
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>
endobj
21 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
<><><><><><>]/P 18 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
25 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(03-26387.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/03-26387.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:20:40 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: December 29, 2005)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(----------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 03-26387)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
3.93 -2.2 Td
(James Norman, Esq., Department Counsel)Tj
-0.041 -2.2 Td
(Robert Coacher, Esq, Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
4.428 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
0.139 -2.2 Td
(Philip D. Cave, Esq)Tj
12 0 0 12 16 369.75 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) issued to Applicant \
a Statement of Reasons \(SOR\), dated May)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(13, 2004, which stated the reasons why )Tj
15.969 0 Td
(DOHA proposed to deny or revoke access to classified information for)Tj
-15.969 -1.125 Td
(Applicant. )Tj
4.443 0 Td
(The SOR was based on Guideline B \(Foreign Influence\), Guideline E )Tj
28.049 0 Td
(\(Personal Conduct\) and Guideline J)Tj
-32.492 -1.125 Td
(\(Criminal Conduct\). )Tj
8.36 0 Td
(Administrative Judge James A. Young issued an unfavorable security clear\
ance decision, dated)Tj
-8.36 -1.125 Td
(March )Tj
(28, 2005.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant appealed the Administrative Judge's unfavorable decision. )Tj
27.728 0 Td
(The Board has jurisdiction under Executive Order)Tj
-27.728 -1.125 Td
(10865 and Department of Defense )Tj
14.023 0 Td
(Directive 5220.6 \(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as amended.)Tj
-14.023 -2.125 Td
(The following issues have been raised on appeal: \(1\) whether the Board\
has an obligation to substitute its judgment for)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(that of the Administrative Judge; \(2\) )Tj
14.83 0 Td
(whether the Administrative Judge properly applied Guideline B \(Foreign)Tj
-14.83 -1.125 Td
(Influence\) Mitigating Condition 1. )Tj
14.081 0 Td
(For the reasons that follow, the Board affirms the )Tj
19.995 0 Td
(Administrative Judge's decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
-13.391 -2.125 Td
(Scope of Review)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.685 -2.125 Td
(On appeal, the Board does not review a case )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
17.993 0 Td
(de novo)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(. )Tj
(Rather, the Board addresses the material issues raised by the)Tj
-17.993 -1.125 Td
(parties to determine whether there is factual )Tj
17.798 0 Td
(or legal error. )Tj
5.719 0 Td
(There is no presumption of error below, and the appealing)Tj
-23.517 -1.125 Td
(party must raise claims of error with specificity and identify how the A\
dministrative )Tj
33.963 0 Td
(Judge committed factual or legal)Tj
-33.963 -1.125 Td
(error. )Tj
(Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32. )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
25.797 0 Td
(See also)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( ISCR Case No. 00-0050 \(July 23, 2001\) at pp.)Tj
-25.797 -1.125 Td
(2-3 )Tj
(\(discussing reasons why party must raise claims of error with specifici\
ty\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(When the rulings or conclusions of an Administrative Judge are challenge\
d, the Board must consider whether they are:)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(1\) arbitrary or capricious; or \(2\) )Tj
13.328 0 Td
(contrary to law. )Tj
6.553 0 Td
(Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32.3. )Tj
24.104 0 Td
(In)Tj
-43.985 -1.125 Td
(deciding whether the Judge's rulings or conclusions are arbitrary or cap\
ricious, )Tj
31.726 0 Td
(the Board will review the Judge's)Tj
-31.726 -1.125 Td
(decision to determine whether: it does not examine relevant evidence; it\
fails to articulate a satisfactory explanation for)Tj
ET
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
12 0 0 12 16 39.75 Tm
(its )Tj
(conclusions, including a rational connection between the facts found and\
the choice made; it does not consider)Tj
ET
EMC
Q
endstream
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
27 0 obj
(CDȷ)
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
35 0 obj
<>
endobj
36 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
CIi9u{V'='Yl%ٲ94!y9]lipk6ۛ>3^%|^u*KH>9aճ/V[zwW}^CryR*QֿB6%?/S|.!lƌ'*S'BgT.n*3)Zf>
md2ĢY{LFZ45Zu\υs.{fɯ9>e?Ot"!-nu-cC'
£<^s5wwx ~@Q_ oG
endstream
endobj
37 0 obj
<>stream
H|XTgv΅HS݅`AbI4$( ETPThbDEĆh,ebذ]Ը}gѧ}K͝3̝w $ApھnWLBcV 5 eQqb|
ݰQ㶇HEGE