%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T15:21:34-04:00
2021-07-02T15:21:33-04:00
2021-07-02T15:21:34-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
03-26888.a1
uuid:1e69b4b3-038a-4fc8-b9f0-8bca187f2792
uuid:789aa6fc-54bf-4bec-b18f-817b6236eec0
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
14 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
[17 0 R 17 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
[17 0 R 17 0 R]
endobj
17 0 obj
<><>]/P 15 0 R/Pg 12 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
20 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(03-26888.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/03-26888.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:21:33 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: October 5, 2006)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -------------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 03-26888)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 247.375 518.25 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-4.498 -2.125 Td
(Richard A. Stevens, Esq., Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
5.276 -2.125 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.125 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-22.781 -2.125 Td
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) declined to grant Ap\
plicant a security clearance. )Tj
41.649 0 Td
(On April 21,)Tj
-41.649 -1.125 Td
(2005, )Tj
(DOHA issued a statement of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(reasons advising Applicant of the basis for that decision--security conc\
erns raised)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(under Guidelines K \(Security Violations\) and E \(Personal Conduct\), p\
ursuant)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.244 0 Td
(to Department of Defense Directive)Tj
-31.244 -1.125 Td
(5220.6 \(Jan. 2, 1992, as amended\) \(Directive\). )Tj
18.828 0 Td
(Applicant requested the case be decided on the written record. )Tj
25.128 0 Td
(On March)Tj
-43.956 -1.125 Td
(30, 2006, after considering the record, Administrative Judge James A. Yo\
ung denied Applicant's request for a security)Tj
T*
(clearance. )Tj
4.274 0 Td
(Applicant timely appealed)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
10.802 0 Td
(pursuant to the Directive \266\266 E3.1.28 and E3.1.30.)Tj
-15.076 -2.125 Td
(Applicant raised the following issue on appeal: )Tj
19.079 0 Td
(whether the Administrative Judge's adverse clearance decision under)Tj
-19.079 -1.125 Td
(Guidelines K and E is arbitrary,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
12.969 0 Td
(capricious, or contrary to law. )Tj
12.246 0 Td
(Applicant argues that the Judge's adverse clearance)Tj
-25.214 -1.125 Td
(decision should be reversed because the Judge failed to conclude as a ma\
tter)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.794 0 Td
(of law, that Applicant's conduct had been)Tj
-30.794 -1.125 Td
(mitigated. )Tj
4.277 0 Td
(The Board does not find Applicant's argument persuasive.)Tj
-4.277 -2.125 Td
(Applicant contends that the Administrative Judge should have found that \
Applicant's conduct was mitigated because: )Tj
47.141 0 Td
(\(1\))Tj
-47.141 -1.125 Td
(he lacked training or guidance on)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.606 0 Td
(security requirements; \(2\) greater weight should have been given to th\
e conclusion)Tj
-13.606 -1.125 Td
(that his security violation was isolated or infrequent; \(3\) he learned\
from and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.963 0 Td
(regretted his mistakes; and \(4\) he was)Tj
-30.963 -1.125 Td
(willing to attend training or take "other positive steps to reduce or el\
iminate his vulnerability to coercion, exploitation or)Tj
T*
(duress." Applicant's contentions lack merit.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
("Security violations are one of the strongest possible reasons for denyi\
ng or revoking access to classified information, as)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(they raise very serious questions about)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.719 0 Td
(an applicant's suitability for access to classified information." )Tj
24.832 0 Td
(ISCR Case No. 04-)Tj
-40.55 -1.125 Td
(04264 at 3 \(App. Bd. Sept. 8, 2006\) \(citing ISCR Case No. 97-0435 at \
3-4)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
29.942 0 Td
(\(App. Bd. July 14, 1998\)\). )Tj
(Once it is)Tj
-29.942 -1.125 Td
(established that Applicant has committed a security violation, he has "a\
very heavy burden of demonstrating that [he])Tj
T*
(should be entrusted with classified information. )Tj
19.302 0 Td
(Because security violations strike at the very heart of the industrial)Tj
-19.302 -1.125 Td
(security program, an Administrative Judge)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.329 0 Td
(must give any claims of reform and rehabilitation strict scrutiny." )Tj
26.429 0 Td
(ISCR Case)Tj
-43.758 -1.125 Td
(No. 00-0030 at 7 \(App. Bd. Sept. 20, 2001\). )Tj
("In many security clearance cases,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.872 0 Td
(applicants are denied a clearance for)Tj
-31.872 -1.125 Td
(having an indicator of a risk that they might commit a security violatio\
n \(e.g., alcohol abuse, delinquent debts or drug)Tj
T*
(use\)." )Tj
(ISCR Case No. 04-04264 at 3 \(App. Bd. Sept. 8, 2006\). )Tj
(In this case, the Judge found more than an indicator of)Tj
T*
(risk. )Tj
(Here the Judge found Applicant)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.024 0 Td
(negligently disregarded in-place security procedures, and then actively \
attempted)Tj
-15.024 -1.125 Td
(to conceal the security violations from an Industrial Security Represent\
ative of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.74 0 Td
(the Defense Investigative Service.)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
21 0 obj
<>
endobj
22 0 obj
(6ǀ|ԙXZGb)
endobj
23 0 obj
<>
endobj
24 0 obj
<>
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
Cqb>Xpl%3,qC~]:OHvϝ5{p:֠eQ[3N~["Ν%6]p[`uFmAH^3ϲC)ov _gӸx0H;!YF2_\Tèe`NUEpTD|n2#L.s^c@ǂ@tد fz
endstream
endobj
32 0 obj
<>stream
H| Tn3=L
1ygLd(QQ\p[\TEAAeFpw