%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T15:22:09-04:00
2021-07-02T15:22:08-04:00
2021-07-02T15:22:09-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
04-00109.a1
uuid:786c824d-3d50-487d-ab6f-85b061980bdf
uuid:3913852e-c09e-41fa-87d4-5ff7d4b5de98
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
<>
endobj
22 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
25 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
26 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
<><><><><><><><>]/P 19 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
27 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(04-00109.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/04-00109.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:22:08 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: July 13, 2006)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(--------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 04-00109)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-2.596 -2.2 Td
(Eric Borgstrom, Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
3.374 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) declined to grant Ap\
plicant a security clearance. )Tj
41.649 0 Td
(On March 1,)Tj
-41.649 -1.125 Td
(2005, DOHA issued a statement of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(reasons advising Applicant of the basis for that decision--security conc\
erns raised)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(under Guideline B \(Foreign Influence\), pursuant to Department of Defen\
se)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.24 0 Td
(Directive 5220.6 \(Jan. 2, 1992, as amended\))Tj
-30.24 -1.125 Td
(\(Directive\). )Tj
4.886 0 Td
(Applicant requested a hearing. )Tj
12.467 0 Td
(On November 30, 2005, after the hearing, Administrative Judge)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
25.827 0 Td
(Charles D.)Tj
-43.18 -1.125 Td
(Ablard granted Applicant's request for a security clearance. )Tj
23.975 0 Td
(The Department Counsel timely appealed pursuant to the)Tj
-23.975 -1.125 Td
(Directive \266\266 E3.1.28 and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
10.181 0 Td
(E3.1.30.)Tj
-10.181 -2.125 Td
(Department Counsel raised the following issue on appeal: whether the Adm\
inistrative Judge's ultimate conclusion that)Tj
T*
(Applicant sufficiently mitigated the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.496 0 Td
(foreign influence security concerns is arbitrary and capricious, in ligh\
t of record)Tj
-14.496 -1.125 Td
(evidence that the Russian Federal Security Service is aware of and has)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
28.435 0 Td
(investigated Applicant's relationship with his)Tj
-28.435 -1.125 Td
(Russian girlfriend. )Tj
7.693 0 Td
(We reverse the Administrative Judge's decision to grant the clearance.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0.31 -2.125 Td
(Whether the Record Supports the Administrative Judge's Factual Findings)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(.)Tj
-8.003 -2.125 Td
(A. Facts)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The relevant findings as found by the Administrative Judge are:)Tj
T*
(Applicant is a 55-year-old employee of a defense contractor working as s\
ecurity specialist installing equipment in U.S.)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(embassies and consulates. )Tj
10.664 0 Td
(He has held a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(security clearance for 18 years. He has never had a security violation o\
r been)Tj
-10.664 -1.125 Td
(criticized for any security lapse. )Tj
13.05 0 Td
(He is a widower with two grown sons. )Tj
(He)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(served two years in the army including)Tj
-13.05 -1.125 Td
(service in Viet Nam. )Tj
8.525 0 Td
(He was honorably discharged in 1970. )Tj
15.635 0 Td
(Later he served in the National Guard with the rank of staff)Tj
-24.16 -1.125 Td
(sergeant working on classified matters and holding a security clearance.\
)Tj
29.017 0 Td
(He has a high school GED equivalency but has)Tj
-29.017 -1.125 Td
(taken many courses in information)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.135 0 Td
(technology to qualify for his present work.)Tj
-14.135 -2.125 Td
(While working in Russia for his employer in 2002 he met a 32-year-old Ru\
ssian woman who works as an accountant.)Tj
T*
(He reported the contact to the consulate )Tj
16.132 0 Td
(and to his employer. He returned to conclude the project in May, 2003, s\
aw her)Tj
-16.132 -1.125 Td
(again, and they developed a romantic relationship. )Tj
20.41 0 Td
(He went on to other)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
8.192 0 Td
(assignments but corresponded with her and has)Tj
-28.602 -1.125 Td
(returned to visit twice on vacation, in November 2003, and in 2004, for \
periods of more than a month each time. )Tj
45.183 0 Td
(He)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
(|QUD4~5z)
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
<>
endobj
32 0 obj
<>
endobj
37 0 obj
<>
endobj
38 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
Cqb>Xpl%3,qC~]:OHvϝ5{p:֠eQ[3N~["Ν%6]p[`uFmAH^3ϲC)ov _gӸx0H;!YF2_\Tèe`NUEpTD|n2#L.s^c@ǂ@tد fz
endstream
endobj
39 0 obj
<>stream
H|Xϙsgw
evf`
1*%O1"*((,bAQPwEETeW캊]%K {}{9 A7[k7?r
^Z } 7NG '6-