%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T15:24:07-04:00
2021-07-02T15:24:07-04:00
2021-07-02T15:24:07-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
04-02030.a1
uuid:e71327db-eb49-4413-bd27-f4aa62f628bd
uuid:08163a7f-4bbb-46ae-89dc-647fa59c4c97
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 17 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
23 0 obj
[30 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(04-02030.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/04-02030.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:24:07 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: August 23, 2006)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(-------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: ---------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 04-02030)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-5.387 -2.2 Td
(Kathryn D. MacKinnon, Esq., Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
6.165 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-0.069 -2.2 Td
(Joyce E. Peters, Esq.)Tj
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) declined to grant Ap\
plicant a security clearance. )Tj
41.649 0 Td
(On March 18,)Tj
-41.649 -1.125 Td
(2005, DOHA issued a statement of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(reasons advising Applicant of the basis for that decision--security conc\
erns raised)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(under Guideline E \(Personal Conduct\) and Guideline F \(Financial)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
26.577 0 Td
(Considerations\) of Department of Defense Directive)Tj
-26.577 -1.125 Td
(5220.6 \(Jan. 2, 1992, as amended\) \(Directive\). )Tj
18.828 0 Td
(Applicant requested a hearing. )Tj
12.467 0 Td
(On January 23, 2006, after)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(the hearing,)Tj
-31.295 -1.125 Td
(Administrative Judge Thomas M. Crean denied Applicant's request for a se\
curity clearance. )Tj
36.946 0 Td
(Applicant timely appealed)Tj
-36.946 -1.375 Td
(pursuant to the Directive)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
10.164 0 Td
(\266\266 E3.1.28 and E3.1.30.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 252.8242 353.25 Tm
( \(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 252.8242 352.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 323.25 Tm
(Applicant raised the following issues on appeal: whether the Administrat\
ive Judge's findings are supported by)Tj
T*
(substantial evidence; whether the Administrative)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
19.8 0 Td
(Judge erred in concluding Applicant's falsification of her security)Tj
-19.8 -1.125 Td
(clearance application was deliberate; whether the Administrative Judge's\
unfavorable)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
34.361 0 Td
(clearance decision under)Tj
-34.361 -1.125 Td
(Guidelines E is arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(\(1\) Applicant argues that the Administrative Judge's adverse findings \
are not supported by substantial evidence. )Tj
44.946 0 Td
(The)Tj
-44.946 -1.125 Td
(Board does not find this argument)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.887 0 Td
(persuasive.)Tj
-13.887 -2.125 Td
(Substantial evidence is such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind migh\
t accept as adequate to support a conclusion in)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(light of all the contrary evidence in the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.772 0 Td
(record. Directive \266 E3.1.32.1. "This is something less than the weigh\
t of the)Tj
-15.772 -1.125 Td
(evidence, and the possibility of drawing two inconsistent conclusions fr\
om the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.661 0 Td
(evidence does not prevent an)Tj
-31.661 -1.125 Td
(administrative agency's finding from being supported by substantial evid\
ence." )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
31.858 0 Td
(Consolo v. Federal Maritime Comm'n)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
15.24 0 Td
(,)Tj
-47.099 -1.125 Td
(383 U.S.)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(607, 620, \(1966\). In evaluating the Administrative Judge's finding, we\
are required to give deference to the)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge's credibility determinations.)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
20.204 0 Td
(Directive \266 E3.1.32.1.)Tj
-20.204 -2.125 Td
(The findings which Applicant complains about are permissible characteriz\
ations of the record evidence on the part of)Tj
T*
(the Administrative Judge. )Tj
10.554 0 Td
(The)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Administrative Judge's material findings with respect Applicant's conduc\
t of security)Tj
-10.554 -1.125 Td
(concern reflect a reasonable or plausible interpretation of the record)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
27.375 0 Td
(evidence. )Tj
4.053 0 Td
(The Board does not review a case )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
13.745 0 Td
(de)Tj
-45.173 -1.125 Td
(novo)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(. )Tj
(Considering the record evidence as a whole, the Board sustains the Judge\
's material findings of security)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
44.141 0 Td
(concern)Tj
-44.141 -1.125 Td
(because they are supported by substantial evidence.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(\(2\) Applicant argues that she did not deliberately falsify her securit\
y clearance application by failing to disclose adverse)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
(g5!c)
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
35 0 obj
<>
endobj
36 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
CI6i9e{V7='YlK?94n!yiq~p6up&;_3v^%.*KH>:tƕJނ0<}
fHbOtn,?#dq1fxй2QAyQ)tysoʌӔq!\05QHF&C5^x|>⟳D&C,:w̹p,z4rhӬMK.ԬSeE&C,y[Hނ/dhp荹@mO!;18|?y(W ǣJ
endstream
endobj
37 0 obj
<>stream
H|XT3"M݅
DyKbL
J#*"v4EEDņ]('%E/{̜{7? P $6%#aq` sNĸ&w~Etи 4N04vBtHa iϐȇ ӄN\¸}̵W ;*"_TLqn; 5P}89~ mc4/ Q' DaQ)(( LPN@Hijx7zHmkWhm7W69?>B~N{ĖLo;{QXSgW7<<7iL%5ZoYQ-[طMv:tԹKn{|سW>}}_epW~OCaHDdTИaGƍ?zǍO0ILM3gNM37}^-^4srXr5k߰Qiٺm{vٛo
):Z|N9{_xpxT ~T{)hU[ɛi