%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T15:24:09-04:00
2021-07-02T15:24:09-04:00
2021-07-02T15:24:09-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
04-02058.a1
uuid:4a266eb6-7703-4058-8f43-bc7dfa66d254
uuid:a287d2d6-969f-4f55-9f01-42e2459fbcfe
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 17 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
23 0 obj
[29 0 R 30 0 R 31 0 R 32 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(04-02058.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/04-02058.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:24:09 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: October 19, 2006)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -------------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 04-02058)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-8.22 -2.2 Td
(Kathryn D. MacKinnon, Esq., Deputy Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.998 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-4.777 -2.2 Td
(Leigh T. Hansson, Esq.; Kurt D. Ferstl, Esq.)Tj
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) declined to grant Ap\
plicant a security clearance. )Tj
41.649 0 Td
(On September)Tj
-41.649 -1.125 Td
(15, 2004, DOHA issued a statement of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(reasons advising Applicant of the basis for that decision--security conc\
erns)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(raised under Guideline B \(Foreign Influence\), Guideline E \(Personal C\
onduct\), and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
33.574 0 Td
(Guideline J \(Criminal Conduct\) of)Tj
-33.574 -1.125 Td
(Department of Defense Directive 5220.6 \(Jan. 2, 1992, as amended\) \(Di\
rective\). )Tj
32.377 0 Td
(Applicant requested a hearing. )Tj
12.467 0 Td
(On)Tj
-44.844 -1.125 Td
(March)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(31, 2006, after the hearing, Administrative Judge Joan Caton Anthony den\
ied Applicant's request for a security)Tj
T*
(clearance. )Tj
4.274 0 Td
(Applicant timely appealed pursuant)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.496 0 Td
(to the Directive \266\266 E3.1.28 and E3.1.30.)Tj
-18.77 -2.125 Td
(Applicant raised the following issue on appeal: whether the Administrati\
ve Judge's adverse security clearance decision)Tj
0 -1.375 TD
(under Guidelines B, E, and J is)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
12.637 0 Td
(arbitrary, capricious or contrary to law.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 355.9023 314.25 Tm
( \(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 355.9023 313.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 284.25 Tm
(\(1\) Applicant contends that the Administrative Judge's adverse decisio\
n should be reversed because the Judge failed to)Tj
T*
(consider all the evidence and erred in)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.188 0 Td
(not applying Guideline B Mitigating Condition 1)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 433.5742 272.25 Tm
( \(2\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 433.5742 271.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 447.3804 267.75 Tm
( )Tj
(In support of that contention,)Tj
-35.948 -1.125 Td
(Applicant argues that his family member in Hong Kong is not an agent of \
a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.41 0 Td
(foreign power and not in a position to be)Tj
-30.41 -1.125 Td
(exploited by a foreign power in any way. )Tj
16.689 0 Td
(He also argues that when the circumstances presented in each subparagrap\
h)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.516 0 Td
(of)Tj
-47.205 -1.125 Td
(the SOR, such as his foreign travel, are considered separately, they pre\
sent no security concern. )Tj
38.459 0 Td
(The Board does not find)Tj
-38.459 -1.125 Td
(these arguments persuasive.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The Administrative Judge made sustainable findings that: \(1\) Applicant\
was born in Taiwan, received his high school)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(education there, and served mandatory)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.716 0 Td
(military duty in the Taiwanese army; \(2\) Applicant was a member of a p\
olitical)Tj
-15.716 -1.125 Td
(party in Taiwan until 1981, when he became a U.S. citizen; \(3\) Applica\
nt's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.171 0 Td
(brother has resided in Hong Kong and)Tj
-30.171 -1.125 Td
(Shanghai since 1991 or 1992; \(4\) Applicant has monthly e-mail and tele\
phonic contact with this brother; \(5\) Applicant)Tj
T*
(traveled to Taiwan in 1991, 1998, and two times in 2000; \(6\) Applicant\
traveled to Hong Kong in 1998; \(6\) Taiwan is)Tj
T*
(an active collector of competitive)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.633 0 Td
(information and a perpetrator of industrial espionage against U.S. compa\
nies)Tj
-13.633 -1.125 Td
(producing military critical technologies; \(7\) Hong Kong is a special a\
dministrative)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
33.297 0 Td
(region of the People's Republic of)Tj
-33.297 -1.125 Td
(China \(PRC\), a totalitarian state rule by the Chinese Communist Party;\
and \(8\) the PRC is an active collector of)Tj
T*
(competitive)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
4.971 0 Td
(information and a perpetrator of industrial espionage against U.S. compa\
nies producing militarily critical)Tj
-4.971 -1.125 Td
(technologies. )Tj
5.554 0 Td
(Given those findings, the Judge)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
12.887 0 Td
(concluded that Applicant's ties with those immediate family members)Tj
-18.441 -1.375 Td
(raised security concerns under Guideline B and that Disqualifying Condit\
ions 1)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 397.9199 54.75 Tm
( \(3\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 397.9199 54 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 411.7261 50.25 Tm
( and 6)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 441.0522 54.75 Tm
( \(4\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 441.0522 54 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
/Span<>> BDC
12 0 0 12 454.8584 50.25 Tm
( )Tj
EMC
(applied. )Tj
3.693 0 Td
(That conclusion)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
(3dЗYb]*h1)
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
35 0 obj
<>
endobj
36 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
CI)i9e{V'='E},!')c 8'h;"-Z^;6N}TBMf->}h!ss/Pܻmׄ[ɗs;"` d
endstream
endobj
37 0 obj
<>stream
H|y\TG5o^p rGԸH4&Kn53F