%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T15:26:40-04:00
2021-07-02T15:26:39-04:00
2021-07-02T15:26:40-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
04-02928.a1
uuid:a22b9953-3d0a-4ce1-a989-4511394a60b6
uuid:4e382b61-b5fb-4541-a2b5-261d9e72f12e
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
18 0 obj
<><>]/P 16 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
21 0 obj
[28 0 R 29 0 R 30 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(04-02928.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/04-02928.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:26:39 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: February 15, 2006)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(---------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(\))Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(ISCR Case No. 04-02928)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 517.5 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 493.5 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-3.527 -2.2 Td
(Jason R. Perry, Esq., Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
4.304 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 393.75 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) declined to grant Ap\
plicant a security clearance. )Tj
41.649 0 Td
(On December 7,)Tj
-41.649 -1.125 Td
(2004, DOHA issued a Statement of )Tj
(Reasons \(SOR\) advising Applicant of the basis for that decision-securi\
ty concerns)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(raised under Guideline F \(Financial Considerations\) of Department of )Tj
28.187 0 Td
(Defense Directive 5220.6 \(January 2, 1992, as)Tj
-28.187 -1.125 Td
(amended \(Directive\)\). )Tj
9.079 0 Td
(Applicant requested a hearing. )Tj
12.467 0 Td
(On May 31, 2005, after the hearing, Administrative Judge)Tj
-21.546 -1.125 Td
(Jacqueline T. Williams granted Applicant's request for a security cleara\
nce. )Tj
30.445 0 Td
(Department Counsel timely appealed)Tj
-30.445 -1.125 Td
(pursuant to Directive \266\266 E3.1.28 and E3.1.30.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Department Counsel raised the following issues on appeal: \(1\) whether \
the Administrative Judge's application of three)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Guideline F mitigating conditions was )Tj
15.582 0 Td
(supported by the record evidence; and \(2\) whether the Administrative J\
udge's)Tj
-15.582 -1.125 Td
(overall decision was arbitrary, capricious or contrary to law. )Tj
24.352 0 Td
(In his reply brief, )Tj
7.192 0 Td
(Applicant argued that the Judge's)Tj
-31.544 -1.125 Td
(application of the mitigating conditions was sustainable based on the re\
cord evidence. )Tj
34.629 0 Td
(Applicant also argued that the)Tj
-34.629 -1.125 Td
(Judge's )Tj
(ultimate conclusion in favor of granting him a security clearance was su\
stainable under the "whole person")Tj
T*
(concept referencing the totality of the record )Tj
18.075 0 Td
(evidence.)Tj
-18.075 -2.125 Td
(The Administrative Judge made the following findings of fact: \(a\) Appl\
icant had eight outstanding debts totaling)Tj
T*
($71,200 which started accumulating in 1993; )Tj
18.302 0 Td
(\(b\) the fact that Applicant lived beyond his means was a contributing)Tj
-18.302 -1.125 Td
(factor in the debt delinquencies; \(c\) problems with automobile and hea\
lth insurance )Tj
33.656 0 Td
(coverage as well as medical)Tj
-33.656 -1.125 Td
(problems encountered by his wife during her second pregnancy also contri\
buted to Applicant's debt delinquencies; \(d\))Tj
T*
(Applicant's )Tj
(mother-in-law, who owns a portion of Applicant's house, took out a home \
equity loan and loaned Applicant)Tj
T*
(\(and his wife\) $50,000 to repay his overdue debts; )Tj
20.329 0 Td
(\(e\) Applicant used the loan to pay off all but two of his creditors; \(\
f\))Tj
-20.329 -1.125 Td
(Applicant's wife now manages the family finances; \(g\) Applicant no lon\
ger has credit )Tj
34.475 0 Td
(cards, but maintains one debit)Tj
-34.475 -1.125 Td
(card that deducts funds for purchases directly from his bank account; \(\
h\) Applicant has received guidance in financial)Tj
T*
(matters )Tj
3.193 0 Td
(from his boss and friend; and \(i\) Applicant did not accumulate any new\
debts outside those listed in the SOR.)Tj
-3.193 -2.125 Td
(The Administrative Judge concluded that: \(i\) the government establishe\
d a case for disqualification under Guideline F;)Tj
0 -1.375 TD
(\(ii\) Guideline F Mitigating Conditions )Tj
15.583 0 Td
(3,)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 211.9961 62.25 Tm
( \(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 211.9961 61.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 225.8022 57.75 Tm
( 4,)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 237.8022 62.25 Tm
( \(2\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 237.8022 61.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 251.6084 57.75 Tm
( and 6)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 280.9346 62.25 Tm
( \(3\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 280.9346 61.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 294.7407 57.75 Tm
( apply to the case; \(iii\) Applicant has learned the value of)Tj
-23.228 -1.125 Td
(managing his money and is now more successful in managing his finances; \
\(iv\) )Tj
32.021 0 Td
(Applicant now has someone to guide)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
23 0 obj
<>
endobj
24 0 obj
(]-EcE7Q)
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
35 0 obj
<>
endobj
36 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
Cqb>Xpl%3,qC~]:OHvϝ5{p:֠eQ[3N~["Ν%6]p[`uFmAH^3ϲC)ov _gӸx0H;!YF2_\Tèe`NUEpTD|n2#L.s^c@ǂ@tد fz
endstream
endobj
37 0 obj
<>stream
H|XϙsAE¬5رb0>c" ETPTh,Q,XbA]@.E
žuX%k\Ч}K{{7jA6k[hxlXܒ̪ !|L\ B" 83.ʐȰK' 4FN}]"xcAQx|
5fDx.DZa qT 8kF)ކ ؏Wf3[QDeb+hjtj(rEMpC ^M:߉{b+x
@Sg}>q~|u9|(RQL*rwMbFTT٥[ZԭWS^ުAF4̧Y-[n۶]:uܿKn{"^_:(|}wa`Hh
=d谘#F㘱 4aɉS~4m)fϙ6o,Zd2Xbk֮3fe笧
s7mu;v߳w>r'O>sΝ/pezdn
W5 .hF K)fj:KX5$6!1E+/=z8q9s3Pz+ e])RJTyk##s˵2@T]]^;kk}#}}>L%x9{TPꬺTm1j&juUWE)zUo3B
(0È}}u\cѾ>l6_-n<3:;!)S02^3',aLq8O,b\I9:8t]ܗ.,5XM澽3kSkk#kC~j́ 7n,,dXR,*vn[FZBxoie640ۛ}͍ͭzs=MOL&v[#~S_65m20u5u1y&VAE3J憑.y__54K5KgZpc> b-1B}/9O9K*,vHKPy#s=˹縷?"gRe}#ϳ*_*A&$41,0@*lXΐ!MP`6,d(})x%d8G`#pH8p8 4<(8gra0