%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T15:28:05-04:00
2021-07-02T15:28:04-04:00
2021-07-02T15:28:05-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
04-03849.a1
uuid:35c6055f-a94e-442b-9d92-24160e960e10
uuid:0fa4a6d1-d3d1-4c22-850b-7ccae179fac1
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 17 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
23 0 obj
[31 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(04-03849.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/04-03849.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:28:05 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: January 26, 2006)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(------)Tj
T*
(SSN: --------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 04-03849)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-5.429 -2.2 Td
(James B. Norman, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
6.207 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) declined to grant Ap\
plicant a security clearance. )Tj
41.649 0 Td
(On July 6, 2005,)Tj
-41.649 -1.125 Td
(DOHA issued a statement of reasons advising Applicant of the basis for)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
29.049 0 Td
(that decision--security concerns raised under)Tj
-29.049 -1.125 Td
(Guideline H \(Drug Involvement\), Guideline E \(Personal Conduct\), Guid\
eline F \(Financial Considerations\), and)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Guideline J \(Criminal Conduct\) of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.025 0 Td
(Department of Defense Directive 5220.6 \(Jan. 2, 1992, as amended\) \(Di\
rective\).)Tj
-14.025 -1.125 Td
(Applicant requested the case be decided on the written record. )Tj
25.128 0 Td
(On June 20, 2006, after considering the record,)Tj
-25.128 -1.125 Td
(Administrative Judge Roger C. Wesley denied Applicant's request for a se\
curity clearance. )Tj
36.557 0 Td
(Applicant timely appealed)Tj
-36.557 -1.375 Td
(pursuant to the Directive \266\266 E3.1.28 and E3.1.30.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 252.8242 339.75 Tm
( \(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 252.8242 339 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 309.75 Tm
(Applicant raised the following issue on appeal: whether the Administrati\
ve Judge erred by concluding that the security)Tj
T*
(concerns raised under Guidelines H, E and F had not been mitigated.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(\(1\) The application of disqualifying and mitigating conditions does no\
t turn simply on a finding that one or more of)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(them applies to the particular facts of a case. )Tj
18.048 0 Td
(Rather, their application requires)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.412 0 Td
(the exercise of sound discretion in light)Tj
-31.459 -1.125 Td
(of the record evidence as a whole. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
13.882 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(, ISCR Case No. 01-14740 at 7 \(App. Bd. Jan.15, 2003\). )Tj
(Thus, the presence)Tj
-13.882 -1.125 Td
(of some mitigating evidence does)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.691 0 Td
(not alone compel the Judge to make a favorable security clearance decisi\
on. )Tj
30.626 0 Td
(As the)Tj
-44.317 -1.125 Td
(trier of fact, the Judge has to weigh the evidence as a whole and decide\
whether the favorable evidence)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
41.426 0 Td
(outweighs the)Tj
-41.426 -1.125 Td
(unfavorable evidence or )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
9.912 0 Td
(vice versa)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
4.025 0 Td
(. )Tj
(An applicant's disagreement with the Judge's weighing of the evidence, o\
r an ability)Tj
-13.937 -1.125 Td
(to argue for a different interpretation of the evidence, is not)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
23.99 0 Td
(sufficient to demonstrate the Judge weighed the evidence or)Tj
-23.99 -1.125 Td
(reached conclusions in a manner that is arbitrary, capricious, or contra\
ry to law. )Tj
32.155 0 Td
(The Board does not review a case )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
13.745 0 Td
(de)Tj
-45.899 -1.125 Td
(novo)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(\(2\) Applicant argues that the Judge should have concluded that the sec\
urity concerns raised under Guideline H had been)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(mitigated, as a matter of law, because Applicant's drug use was not rece\
nt,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.003 0 Td
(he has demonstrated rehabilitation, and he)Tj
-30.003 -1.125 Td
(never used drugs while holding a security clearance. )Tj
21.187 0 Td
(The Board does not find Applicant's arguments persuasive.)Tj
-21.187 -2.125 Td
(The Judge made sustainable findings as to a )Tj
17.829 0 Td
(lengthy and very serious history of improper or illegal drug use by a 55\
-)Tj
-17.829 -1.125 Td
(year-old Applicant. )Tj
8.025 0 Td
(That history included illegal marijuana, hashish, and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
21.245 0 Td
(cocaine use, sometimes on a weekly basis,)Tj
-29.27 -1.125 Td
(from 1972 to 1999. )Tj
(As a result of that illegal drug use, Applicant had been terminated from\
his employment, lost his)Tj
T*
(house to non-judicial foreclosure,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.69 0 Td
(and had been forced to file for bankruptcy. )Tj
17.354 0 Td
(Applicant had requested his case be)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
(g;d]_j}n?)
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
38 0 obj
<>
endobj
39 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
CqY9e{V='[llY[l֎仟u|ъ 3pۥUOu 8vEU
Of>F7oЏ_M] mK^ Amk?uK17>WP}Οѳ}o/(F
ՉF-К{/"^22
s|$?&*'&C*w%s|Z*j)RQKUY$&CZe*oiSw^S}ʙZ+8Zw(*N+ ,1
endstream
endobj
40 0 obj
<>stream
H|TT=\
̝{C$ɋ/1%&(FTE%cb2#v؟cw@JZwoobH #75UHa13m P02b@z\ xΎ>@D^!QLEƢzDw?u$chC ~G7cAҏ:FSV?ALx\l)XNDB,Pc.^~ljz#P"R,.^hq:%I1Vbdq
YV)[~淡u5~J῁**HA1 dxxF"E/So2e˕PI3[zGTV5kծS^
5nIO5oѲU6/۵C?N?t.a-2{zGۯ?7d/0ⷑFI2n|ꄴ&O:m0{y,\xm+xk֮[a[fn۾cg֮{G;~d6N>stsĤS=a6
؟;`