%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T15:29:09-04:00
2021-07-02T15:29:08-04:00
2021-07-02T15:29:09-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
04-04509.a1
uuid:409358cc-a798-47a4-923a-66797ea768ac
uuid:72997b62-b4d5-4718-99e8-cd34f29ccefc
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>
endobj
21 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
<><><><><><>]/P 18 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
25 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(04-04509.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/04-04509.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:29:08 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: MAY 18, 2006)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(-------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: --------------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 04-04509)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-4.457 -2.2 Td
(Eric H. Borgstrom, Esq. , Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
5.235 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
0.125 -2.2 Td
(Elissa B. Katz, Esq.)Tj
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) declined to grant Ap\
plicant a security clearance. )Tj
41.649 0 Td
(On March 28,)Tj
-41.649 -1.125 Td
(2005, DOHA issued a statement of )Tj
(reasons advising Applicant of the basis for that decision--security conc\
erns raised)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(under Guideline J \(Criminal Conduct\) and Guideline E \(Personal Conduc\
t\) )Tj
30.216 0 Td
(of Department of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
-30.216 -1.125 Td
(\(Jan. 2, 1992\), as amended \(Directive\). )Tj
15.828 0 Td
(Applicant elected to have the matter decided on the written record in li\
eu of )Tj
30.543 0 Td
(a)Tj
-46.371 -1.125 Td
(hearing. )Tj
3.499 0 Td
(On October 13, 2005, Administrative Judge Thomas M. Crean denied Applica\
nt's request for a security)Tj
-3.499 -1.125 Td
(clearance. )Tj
4.274 0 Td
(Applicant timely appealed )Tj
10.802 0 Td
(pursuant to the Directive \266\266 E3.1.28 and E3.1.30.)Tj
-15.076 -2.125 Td
(Applicant raised the following issues on appeal: )Tj
19.468 0 Td
(whether the Administrative Judge was arbitrary and capricious in)Tj
-19.468 -1.125 Td
(failing to examine all the record evidence )Tj
16.854 0 Td
(submitted by the Applicant; )Tj
11.387 0 Td
(whether the Administrative Judge erred by failing)Tj
-28.241 -1.125 Td
(to find that Applicant's falsification was not pertinent to a determinat\
ion of )Tj
30.172 0 Td
(judgment, trustworthiness or reliability;)Tj
-30.172 -1.125 Td
(whether the Administrative Judge erred in his application of the Directi\
ve and limited application of the Guidelines;)Tj
T*
(whether the Administrative Judge's adverse decision under Guideline J is\
supported by the record evidence; and whether)Tj
T*
(the Administrative Judge erred by )Tj
13.857 0 Td
(failing to apply the "whole person" concept.)Tj
-13.857 -2.125 Td
(The dispositive findings of fact by the Administrative Judge that are re\
levant to this appeal are as follows:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant admits to being arrested and charged with possession of mariju\
ana in 1976. )Tj
34.547 0 Td
(There is no information)Tj
-34.547 -1.125 Td
(concerning the disposition of this charge, and )Tj
18.44 0 Td
(Applicant does not remember the disposition. )Tj
18.469 0 Td
(Applicant admits he was)Tj
-36.909 -1.125 Td
(arrested and charged with possession of marijuana and drug paraphenalia \
in 1989. )Tj
33.073 0 Td
(He )Tj
(was found guilty of the possession)Tj
-33.073 -1.125 Td
(of marijuana charge and sentenced to probation for one year and to pay a\
fine. )Tj
31.487 0 Td
(Applicant admits he was charged with)Tj
-31.487 -1.125 Td
(and )Tj
(convicted of consuming alcohol in a vehicle in 1994, and sentenced to pa\
y a fine. )Tj
34.489 0 Td
(Applicant admits he was charged)Tj
-34.489 -1.125 Td
(with and convicted of driving under the )Tj
16.079 0 Td
(influence of alcohol in 1994, and sentenced to pay a fine. )Tj
23.131 0 Td
(Applicant admits he)Tj
-39.21 -1.125 Td
(was charged with and convicted of driving under the influence of alcohol\
in )Tj
30.573 0 Td
(November 2000. )Tj
(He was sentenced to pay a)Tj
-30.573 -1.125 Td
(fine, perform community service, attend alcohol and driving classes, and\
his driver's license was suspended. )Tj
43.474 0 Td
(In)Tj
-43.474 -1.125 Td
(December 2001, Applicant was charged with and found guilty of driving wi\
th a suspended license, and sentenced to pay)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(a fine and an additional year )Tj
11.606 0 Td
(suspension of his driver's license. )Tj
(Applicant was involved in a motor vehicle accident in)Tj
-11.606 -1.125 Td
(November 2000, which led to the driving under the influence charge. )Tj
27.908 0 Td
(After the accident, he informed police he only)Tj
-27.908 -1.125 Td
(consumed a few beers. )Tj
9.357 0 Td
(He later informed security investigators that he also consumed mixed dri\
nks at this home )Tj
35.88 0 Td
(prior to)Tj
-45.238 -1.125 Td
(the accident.)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
27 0 obj
(\)"mD>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
32 0 obj
<>
endobj
33 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
CI)i9e{V'='E},!')c 8'h;"-Z^;6N}TBMf->}h!ss/Pܻmׄ[ɗs;"` d
endstream
endobj
34 0 obj
<>stream
H|y\TG5o^p rxÛxDFj$^ј]ƍQ7
A9xFH^xxqx_
(3q?d`&=jߧ~R!!g4?GXB"#O^3@a@@NdC_z}!s
qH¸svё|1~K.VDǍ<焢|w>i0<*RQ!cgr.pio5P$
!zk?idtfPDS~8M1dr[
e+"FKFtҹcY܄OY#;S[t9Nm{ކ Qk~G/h\cYwsS?^
5n5͚/-[~Mwڮ}[vԹKu'G^>~ѯ|9pPD$3$vh\|BI#FJzOf⤔NIӦH9k/XhYbkk m/(,ڴymwܵ{Oޒ}P#G?qTyE%N:{\l^
XhXDNAO/K1R4C)I3J\$Ogs#})7a.EUW<x<c@cqqIcb`jdRLLoz"M``
Uz>@m-w05AMUiLunT7bT=VۡaBFFƄƇoҲ~.fy^fYUcڧ`G#Qq,r555R.JRz
ߑɑtyT|q
?* G3i/>O է(D5FtJ15@
T_+)d #ctNI:EL!;*4*:5f7qNG|Oq9WpF[uh2d!KVeu^ve>gy_f[
WU?u7;|}/?t.%L_WFsy?yUq{=}=raw.,Mt $ƘAiJ M (0NdCAB(m[Y6ߙL/y8tN:E43t܈.|/s__x
ҫ{yz?;:[79:W|]BS4~WO3L=K=WP/ҋ4r2RE
2FbZuzPoșȅȩyYozXo;'SSһWƉč9S88388prGEcdKWM}/g?88s8#hXKr!q3n-%?u768|\q.%r\+q~Mh.˸ך2s?Irs9s;
ҩrЩu9uc(fM)$\0x4B#9Ai I!R!
c5'YN+5d;m @.A>@S(4W-3|-|"h͡V@[hO@{7{m
x0fCxQ<;<'~sx/`)^Kx
^[x{~7!V`%Va5,- keCDz2)BLI$(JiB"rɓeL2MO,2Cf,M
(Ԉ((1%S
RSeRer((
)Rl"s5ԒZQkjCm=A=IẹNԙ.4unԝzP1}w}>ԗ3ԟ@D`BC9Fio|k榹enr/{;殹g桩0T)AjAfdHEi=OciHz^OksN_ѯ
I`.̃ "XK`),VJXjXkarW7&s-fh&̋\7yox+oy;mWfnQ_P.wt1Ss|X,+ŚXAlv)v_Wk_4ߚC9iqTyqI\?[\܅pxP U|RvOS5\ˏs P1ԋp!NH/d'Yv]cX ǚfHc|U.ߐo<9YNoi1!gŊg'Er\Ur(kzIn;.WEM~!bmt@GE3y\ge,5yCRz%VjqC%T2TRMTWMUjZvj:ꪺb*QToGU3AY5X
QCsjFjTѼ
Qcx5I^=ǓyT/k{^/7
F{㼉K+kfff,2K
ڬ7&l5;.nn;~io~{ LAb0.&avVasT%|:v=gX
{}¾K=d#=f {Ҟ=k-%{ٖ+^y?Ot;RsɹLnub]"ܨ+]j]r]]]Z7pmdjL_b9eΕhE2ZDkMylm:87Mp$즸nfn6qs\7wܦ|>8'Y.誫$n\P% !\d:K,xh -"H#*+@hH$*9ow̝7u.8qW)""vy"l9
쁽PC69EvR5XUv=Xvw.@B\P<%P3jG(%bbmM-%7/K-jC$Jz;ԎSHF3uԍҩ;E~7Oh
eW=e/FiQ1OSCci4&RM42)4N3h&egSӾRElC_\GuґG{anNC}g&Q zZ-Z@i-%2ZN+h%մ:ZOh#.MY̧-їAoa]Ovڋw(~:@a:BG)*"*:A'R*3TNgZ6яgg]3]t=t+צ4X8|0 c
Nĥc,nuՍtnuhSu#uM* 4ml[Z.6Kj};n߰5lM[ֶul][WctSt{螺 论m ڽ6{=bQ12\FH\TYj*3e.ee>fM/Kel*ce lμxߙC^Ĩ%{0!RmM1R&Zř&*Ę*Ě8Ln̙HM8&Zy>aLMk[6*REfYnVfYm֘fYo6flfL-Av2Mv}L
SSfɩAG|S40
M 1 3MZ
T痫\u *yHp ܁UഐB?𰚭O7`i
^4Vn<0àl
o@
,-3<{&C8tƎ5~>5u
@uq0r?Q[K:~u!F4X[yVQHa,`uh.Vqݳ@wdAwHF6-As>kd.1v!]2ٴ`:\I/E؝8<)=ܮP4f\lh0S1
9Zf8$ts1g>R/1&