%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T15:31:20-04:00
2021-07-02T15:31:20-04:00
2021-07-02T15:31:20-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
04-06242.a1
uuid:cf0449d9-7b22-4d01-a1aa-02f0ba29b2ec
uuid:5186d607-4730-4182-ba20-1f5721ac6ec5
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
14 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
[17 0 R 17 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
[17 0 R 17 0 R]
endobj
17 0 obj
<><>]/P 15 0 R/Pg 12 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
20 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(04-06242.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/04-06242.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:31:20 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: June 28, 2006)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(--------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: ----------------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(CR Case No. 04-06242)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.317 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-0.763 -2.2 Td
(Joseph P. Drennan, Esq.)Tj
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) declined to grant Ap\
plicant a security clearance. )Tj
41.649 0 Td
(On April 5,)Tj
-41.649 -1.125 Td
(2005, DOHA issued a statement of reasons)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(\(SOR\) advising Applicant of the basis for that decision--security conc\
erns)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(raised under Guideline B \(Foreign Influence\), pursuant to Department o\
f Defense)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
32.878 0 Td
(Directive 5220.6 \(Jan. 2, 1992, as)Tj
-32.878 -1.125 Td
(amended\) \(Directive\). )Tj
9.079 0 Td
(Applicant requested a hearing. )Tj
12.467 0 Td
(On November 29, 2005, after the hearing, Administrative Judge)Tj
-21.546 -1.125 Td
(Leroy)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(F. Foreman denied Applicant's request for a security clearance. )Tj
28.114 0 Td
(Applicant timely appealed pursuant to the)Tj
-28.114 -1.125 Td
(Directive \266\266 E3.1.28 and E3.1.30.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant raised the following issue on appeal: whether the Administrati\
ve Judge's whole-person analysis is sustainable.)Tj
T*
(Applicant argues that the Administrative Judge's whole person analysis i\
n this case is not sustainable. )Tj
40.839 0 Td
(The Board does)Tj
-40.839 -1.125 Td
(not find this argument persuasive.)Tj
T*
(An Administrative Judge is required to make an overall common sense dete\
rmination of an Applicant's clearance)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(eligibility based upon a careful consideration)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.272 0 Td
(of the whole person factors, as well as factors set forth in the guideli\
nes.)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
-18.272 -1.125 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( Directive \266\266 E2.2.1 and E2.2.3. )Tj
14.43 0 Td
(Although the Judge analyzed this case principally)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
20.133 0 Td
(in the context of the disqualifying)Tj
-34.563 -1.125 Td
(and mitigating conditions, he referenced the whole person factors and ma\
de extensive findings of fact which indicate)Tj
T*
(that he)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
2.943 0 Td
(evaluated the totality of Applicant's circumstances in reaching his deci\
sion. )Tj
30.365 0 Td
(The Judge weighed the mitigating)Tj
-33.309 -1.125 Td
(evidence offered by Applicant against the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.937 0 Td
(serious of security concerns presented by Applicant's circumstances and)Tj
-16.937 -1.125 Td
(reasonably explained why that evidence was insufficient to overcome thos\
e concerns. )Tj
34.488 0 Td
(Given the limited record evidence)Tj
-34.488 -1.125 Td
(in this case, the Judge's whole person analysis was sufficient and the B\
oard does not have to agree with that analysis to)Tj
T*
(conclude that it is sustainable.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
22.823 -2.125 Td
(Order)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-22.823 -2.125 Td
(The Administrative Judge's favorable security clearance decision is AFFI\
RMED.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Signed: Michael Y. Ra'anan)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 76.5 cm
0 0 m
134.795 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 51.75 Tm
(Michael Y. Ra'anan)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
21 0 obj
<>
endobj
22 0 obj
(ֿiCqOa?!@\))
endobj
23 0 obj
<>
endobj
24 0 obj
<>
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
<>stream
H\Pj0+$%CԒX}WJHhٙa=ugmFWN>c|mgdq-.Qh
K
v..d3
lbҫd:sk[BhjᒌE2aBWܿFmHJ1poҨ1֮D,|RLrį /t4
endstream
endobj
32 0 obj
<>stream
H|XTgv΅HS,wwnXP@E5&@^)E#*"v4l,v(bwX,}s朹s 4d ]|-,".<>km}? p1>A-[ l_?,n`w1 MR :
6!g$1Q'/x\cĬ5.Wx\ o kO]27E<_=*<.Jn qrq V׃' FojOq@f@䏙 (,|
u~ eCB Jbyz`o55BFm? j~1 @O|pr{WVL;{QP~džN.n{4iڬSRk^-[n֧]};uҵ[`ջO~"8|?A!a04"2*zX#cF3v\O'$N/$%OuZ3SgϞ17s-^t,_rU5knظ6oٺ-ov`
):Z|N9{_xpxT| ~T{)hU[ȋi%Qͦt^,Xh'|#
34ap\x,TPTUI