%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T15:33:41-04:00
2021-07-02T15:33:40-04:00
2021-07-02T15:33:41-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
04-07831.a1
uuid:4df53486-f9a2-4683-a87a-2e5caa7aee3b
uuid:9c886bea-ac31-4872-ac6a-6b4c1351c8ac
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
14 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
[17 0 R 17 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
[17 0 R 17 0 R]
endobj
17 0 obj
<><>]/P 15 0 R/Pg 12 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
20 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(04-07831.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/04-07831.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:33:41 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: August 9, 2006)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(-------------)Tj
T*
(SSN:-----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 04-07831)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.317 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) declined to grant Ap\
plicant a security clearance. )Tj
41.649 0 Td
(On June 17,)Tj
-41.649 -1.125 Td
(2005, DOHA issued a statement of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(reasons advising Applicant of the basis for that decision--security conc\
erns raised)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(under and Guideline G \(Alcohol Consumption\) and Guideline J \(Criminal\
)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
29.828 0 Td
(Conduct\) of Department of Defense Directive)Tj
-29.828 -1.125 Td
(5220.6 \(Jan. 2, 1992, as amended\) \(Directive\). )Tj
18.828 0 Td
(Applicant requested a hearing. )Tj
12.467 0 Td
(On March 8, 2006, after the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.385 0 Td
(hearing,)Tj
-42.68 -1.125 Td
(Administrative Judge Darlene Lokey Anderson denied Applicant's request f\
or a security clearance. )Tj
39.805 0 Td
(Applicant timely)Tj
-39.805 -1.125 Td
(appealed pursuant to the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
9.997 0 Td
(Directive \266\266 E3.1.28 and E3.1.30.)Tj
-9.997 -2.125 Td
(Applicant raised the following issue on appeal: whether the Administrati\
ve Judge's unfavorable clearance decision)Tj
T*
(under Guidelines G and J is arbitrary,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.274 0 Td
(capricious, or contrary to law.)Tj
-15.274 -2.125 Td
(Applicant argues that the Administrative Judge's adverse clearance shoul\
d be reversed because Applicant's last criminal)Tj
T*
(offense occurred in 2000 and he quit)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.912 0 Td
(drinking in that year. )Tj
8.637 0 Td
(He further argues that he has since completed an outpatient)Tj
-23.548 -1.125 Td
(alcohol program, refrained from abusing alcohol, returned to and complet\
ed)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.656 0 Td
(his schooling, and has otherwise)Tj
-30.656 -1.125 Td
(demonstrated changed circumstances and rehabilitation. )Tj
22.658 0 Td
(Applicant also asserts that although he admitted in his answer)Tj
-22.658 -1.125 Td
(to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(consuming alcohol in excess and to the point of intoxication from 1999 t\
o March 15, 2004, it was error for the Judge)Tj
T*
(to make such a finding considering his)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.691 0 Td
(testimony at the hearing. )Tj
10.136 0 Td
(Given the record of this case, the Board does not find)Tj
-25.828 -1.125 Td
(these arguments persuasive.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The application of disqualifying and mitigating conditions does not turn\
simply on a finding that one or more of them)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(applies to the particular facts of a case. )Tj
15.798 0 Td
(Rather, their application requires the exercise of sound discretion in l\
ight of the)Tj
-15.798 -1.125 Td
(record evidence as a whole. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
11.328 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 01-14740 at 7 \(App. Bd.)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Jan.15, 2003\). )Tj
(Thus, the presence of)Tj
-14.659 -1.125 Td
(some mitigating evidence does not alone compel the Judge to make a favor\
able security clearance decision. )Tj
43.234 0 Td
(As the trier)Tj
-43.234 -1.125 Td
(of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(fact, the Judge has to weigh the evidence as a whole and decide whether \
the favorable evidence outweighs the)Tj
T*
(unfavorable evidence, or )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
10.162 0 Td
(vice versa)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
4.025 0 Td
(. )Tj
(An)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(applicant's disagreement with the Judge's weighing of the evidence, or a\
n ability)Tj
-14.187 -1.125 Td
(to argue for a different interpretation of the evidence, is not sufficie\
nt to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
29.044 0 Td
(demonstrate the Judge weighed the evidence or)Tj
-29.044 -1.125 Td
(reached conclusions in a manner that is arbitrary, capricious, or contra\
ry to law.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(In this case, the Administrative Judge found Applicant had a lengthy and\
serious history excessive alcohol consumption)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(that included six alcohol related)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.023 0 Td
(criminal offenses between 1989 and 2000. )Tj
17.189 0 Td
(She also found Applicant had been charged)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
21 0 obj
<>
endobj
22 0 obj
(/cZ\(5b)
endobj
23 0 obj
<>
endobj
24 0 obj
<>
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
33 0 obj
<>
endobj
34 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
Cq5 (Y9 t1{OK3$!K;=w7=(|sWmX^w/2N~]