%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T15:34:44-04:00
2021-07-02T15:34:43-04:00
2021-07-02T15:34:44-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
04-08934.a1
uuid:1946dd92-830f-41a4-bbb0-dfd125db4063
uuid:c76a7437-604d-41c9-b653-ac914d9f171f
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
18 0 obj
<><>]/P 16 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
21 0 obj
[29 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(04-08934.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/04-08934.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:34:44 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: August 17, 2006)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(--------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -------------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 04-08934)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.317 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) declined to grant Ap\
plicant a security clearance. )Tj
41.649 0 Td
(On January 14,)Tj
-41.649 -1.125 Td
(2005, DOHA issued a statement of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(reasons \(SOR\) advising Applicant of the basis for that decision--secur\
ity concerns)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(raised under Guideline J \(Criminal Conduct\) and Guideline E \(Personal\
)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
28.882 0 Td
(Conduct\) of Department of Defense Directive)Tj
-28.882 -1.125 Td
(5220.6 \(Jan. 2, 1992, as amended\)\(Directive\). )Tj
18.578 0 Td
(Applicant requested a hearing. )Tj
12.467 0 Td
(On February 24, 2006, after the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
12.885 0 Td
(hearing,)Tj
-43.93 -1.375 Td
(Administrative Judge Paul J. Mason denied Applicant's request for a secu\
rity clearance.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 437.0371 366.75 Tm
( \(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 437.0371 366 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 450.8433 362.25 Tm
( )Tj
(Applicant timely appealed)Tj
-36.237 -1.125 Td
(pursuant to the Directive \266\266)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.32 0 Td
(E3.1.28 and E3.1.30.)Tj
-11.32 -2.125 Td
(Applicant raised the following issue on appeal: whether the Administrati\
ve Judge's adverse clearance decision under)Tj
T*
(Guidelines J and E is arbitrary, capricious,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.245 0 Td
(or contrary to law.)Tj
-17.245 -2.125 Td
(Applicant argues that the Administrative Judge's adverse clearance decis\
ion should be reversed because the Applicant)Tj
T*
(did not deliberately falsify a material fact)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.798 0 Td
(on her September 23, 2002, Security Clearance Application. )Tj
24.354 0 Td
(Rather, it is)Tj
-41.152 -1.125 Td
(Applicant's contention that she had not listed the 1996 arrest charge in\
question)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.978 0 Td
(because she did not consider it to be an)Tj
-31.978 -1.125 Td
(arrest, and she had forgotten about it. )Tj
15.134 0 Td
(The Board does not find Applicant's arguments persuasive. )Tj
23.869 0 Td
(Applicant was in fact)Tj
-39.003 -1.125 Td
(arrested, taken to a police station, and fingerprinted. )Tj
21.076 0 Td
(She was found guilty of theft and received a fine.)Tj
-21.076 -2.125 Td
(The Administrative Judge's material findings with respect to Applicant's\
conduct reflect a plausible interpretation of the)Tj
T*
(record evidence. )Tj
6.857 0 Td
(The Board does not)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
8.109 0 Td
(review a case )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
5.635 0 Td
(de novo)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(. Considering the record evidence as a whole, the Judge's)Tj
-20.602 -1.125 Td
(material findings of security concern are sustainable.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's statements about her intent and state of mind when she execu\
ted her Security Clearance Application were)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(relevant evidence, but they were not)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.744 0 Td
(binding on the Administrative Judge. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
15.109 0 Td
(See, e.g.,)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.582 0 Td
( ISCR Case No. 01-19278 at 6-7)Tj
-33.435 -1.125 Td
(\(App. Bd. Apr. 22, 2003\). As the trier of fact, the Judge had to consi\
der Applicant's statements in light of the record)Tj
T*
(evidence as a whole, and Applicant's denial of any intent to provide fal\
se information did not preclude the Judge from)Tj
T*
(weighing the record evidence and making findings that contradicted Appli\
cant's denials. )Tj
35.558 0 Td
(The security concerns raised by)Tj
-35.558 -1.125 Td
(Applicant's falsification were)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.981 0 Td
(not necessarily overcome by Applicant's subsequent disclosures to the go\
vernment. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
33.589 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-45.57 -1.125 Td
(ISCR Case No. 01-19513 at 5 \(App. Bd. Jan. 22, 2004\). )Tj
(Similarly,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
26.804 0 Td
(such concerns were not necessarily overcome by)Tj
-26.804 -1.125 Td
(Applicant's favorable professional and work record. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
20.979 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(, )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
(e.g)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(., ISCR Case No. 01-01642 at 6 \(App. Bd. June)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(14, 2002\).)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
23 0 obj
<>
endobj
24 0 obj
(f;k2b)
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
36 0 obj
<>
endobj
37 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
Cq5 (Y9 t1{OK3$!K;=w7=(|sWmX^w/2N~]