OkZ{f2*~Pd$J Ri RsdB[a"
RRC@Uu:C\4R)= )A+Js48M&s m6Q3H~!XVA ?pH3 8sW9. 8Grap7 IlCՖ6X\-*K'үFc`ïD~:^sJԌWavvAvC~.>UmŢ
#y$n;;;}mm̭͟[[fU3;g/)[R,lmܽlLYڔyLM& SSsfBclgme,4sqq˨3j[y2%?lG%Wk6~2t'ųZ`\ 0o &6^* ;+v}co VWnVr-U 8p r>7>"fJm~^# gNw_(:HǰLHX `=8A24 B%< ץ
6 x/a-l"(m0 B!
p
Nx pJ`8lll`l*Tq,7n PZ ,X4^( Ky!?f [](vNEi G)A:D) HG)Q B:AEt3'tׁR:G]KtUFgd$ݠ2*tn K>= 3=GTAzBOszA/_hFӹΠ4h6:)\orŝGUސO!+L1&0;fDd+#Ϝ3sa
/:N̗udXgօue~z ;]Įb@4GbXC|">UNW&*g(g*g) \er2}ξ`@6}X 6~b7X 0l1c ݊ VvvƜKv$UB5UMS 5SrsVnv;~跺jګ:::Nkof 7K6I/+qCo[^|"I|',RD(G.IR&CDI SH((EY()e rQnCy)_~}?(#RQ
R!*LE( *nꮺ~?DJPI*ETPY*GUJ?&QSMPBSiM4SY4[RVSGI%>Â]c͆ӱe_pz9g,qv'ss +CsenHw9nƸ\ s.ƹ\8\4
w*M5\su
\+sո:\ks >7܈sqsn-664 ܑ;qg]w iߺ܇r?x 坽>xv8ggsҙ
tN, _KGdԷ$E"2# "s9좂 $ !r"r#sy_kGD!FE18J$J!QeQQMgTBeTAUTCu@MBmA]C}4@C4F4E34G D+FE; ]
ߠ'E/|ަj/?` a. ;.J.9Gtq]Bu%^v b G6 &!a" #1
1c111 AFX阁٘,|,Bg%! Xe1"B4b8cVbjZzlFlf$` bcvbh6a7`/+ ppGT<xxhy9ᢖ&qbKxց&l1[60;.1{>\l;\1W5s 4a;γ.av1c@lv ")UFOMZvi .ү~JaZ:Cw_䅢Q3+=!:nk©WSVCۖO[h.uSZ^X 8 # < 0y:L2WksBZ洒c'@x/Be&q2 N:JK൵.p}u _d%I=w-(faDJ(` 4Bᩣe=?`8kxWo"0Gɇ*jb+77y]= q#x vl C}GKvb^kΉ\Q)~*$>RJ% (r H6ȊΈۋc9Xc| Q'x0>x_+8zGgxӹ+x fwo+ƈ~!'s2j:%Oa;{2pڷ}ږvbKgpr?^sf6̦PJn ėҟ!sy. Qaw>
u}pY1C/ge ̕?aj`l{ (SѕDYrE ; x kζvvnɵ߷7MdJ G> @؋hPn"I"MIE`DΒ 9yM6 趞"d0azZۈįIO Ƭh6SwzݜC*77!j8C\q]y(#9ph;ND
m,K4HլA46ɕzQ3!6UbyTĹ7UOxAni)6/@2 qT..LH1U=eT ?-' n0v/
qѷJmr#|E
)(.q)I۪DȆ"vșN%_~H
3C 7L% Ȯ34+m:syH)%ʤ}'˟^^p\dL},U N({ߧّ䨣Y cUMp |/v̗q|HqG23\r8}pWMTNH}3{?D.~ɵȺ\1Rdܥ˨<+*Ug;f#:dpԔ'%&Z|>b{8{z{d];w
TE
T$$鹹iV]/AC
~CCSc ==2#g #9RCcR5'ܺS _s>CӉ '˻8֬j B3~S}i| KE,o\X-J褏+~#6`PQ!66{B -P՝Ƹ8W]߃E{zekIKnn.];BRh%u-C+ӠWF2L
eb c1nmtrvk&FZ>O 붨VOmRw69'qSf;l۞piOSeAiz 7hNZ# ^&YTGɘ fv8%ZapXpEb&$v^{^~;,!'ᏢOUʶr< NER e7?_6QٸXLe|Y#l,+x, ^6`_|>+H.AzA c"U14[&/ y>0L.*! AsXI3?)H9I\&J G r5)(3rWQfn*7xO|ΛMMC+X17*4rD mbr9:֍P(C4@]]; ˴e^2m. PggXܾ?8nc`:g/E6Yݏ_0mzE}"57ٕ|&MDNSձmDlbܴ rfT ExռWWk_n?о+{R}-ۻQǨt]}Ef_<斖P
b*kJL;)Äg[B]pZ-meXށ #%ͺ 8P6_k[Lj.oHHh2~ C
Pe
B] sNRP 2O>:5OV25o ݮŧ1Y)T)iPso$|^z<{k( .$&`Cl 6SX[6La% Y}umh\xמ~`7wݪ9Ix7f=WsU}+ E|xk-k67=DackT#J[v;q]={Hg?2Gh{[{l1eކcEW^DkV= %2"d(1aY4Ѽ}ϞȦĦCnAEezfz
Y0S** B
:Aɴ̎ܗz/ _~|ăSo}S!ރ7|J%w{'h ?hroרLc aۍfs WߚJOpqRXo̬ϱH
"'!ks\C*)IJD kDǘ#Z :*UYw&9Ԋ>pO5 } ^7ȥ8(92fVmм | n'zف(rC)xS5)v Zpz9
E5R0 Z yǶ/ X?. ?E3 ;B _X /wPl℉Z7_Sݲ]$7(ٺ+$yE~t =6
άwsvfٝYzއlSQqS'NJ(O*硒!ؐ&M "ڢPZ
8D E"TDPZHp욘5;|ߜwTlswoXV@AZ
"f0DBDT tJ0- 9e܄\bDm܌M/@4R"#(i#:iv+ѵtߓC P=5BD[8BbQ]vb ^bI^| {o&
xBն iY> P:7=KFI0W{운G-!VFϞVD=Q mOZtن yf?T1/XZd.4mn&wRkѤڿ
9Y3XU"F2*t4u8}8sM1W:9Fi $-9"q I&2E c.N"GGo Idl2C@N
NżzOG䚚p&PGi|q`8| [z[L) 4a蹻 nϩǠ6o1ߗ?ix|X(dZIJ@] t{Nnh,t AeRYl #BG$-Pw k^Fȵ (3(1_|^2u+ǖ(W63w:+٠ P*lJ.بtuIG+W+1q 7W X-]JPH+)GRǖۖ
~^FnCA\.,q(MD<*1@+p8 d<&B>TITA)T8WF, FcV
0g( l(5{_} i<`-!ȯ.]f*i!->4 k^a; OjiȔJdzGFe92)Tߴr!nd AپZA݅8~= R O .r=$ _d9F:mΣ.>;xZC9|ܒ_ƈq'yGskجfUfDڈ|
NDˆ{yo8Rr%dʙv ri ٪D{[7kq_1
h4&sC8RMX,] L} ĶZ?%$;)` :{j-/zggiFkc3绷@
<& iiX<] 9Vh;}ȕⴃsi;cC$Dl0 I d6_o Hjmqw>?c/vsp^^ѐhJA@K]e
F))8Z HVMզVնJ*EL+m}ǦE}_~'rMGbWAvP{۵rBήڗI &+R%aͽJRN5UW^ߜ 'qF:鶻o3E2#I?`m}ԖcBƮmhzFJ_:~&+m*q(p)^[ ࠒm.%p0n\<'W>W6slwGCȷ}_Џ+r q"dp6<,M{^l7>J:6@>K߽gc- *#64AUE4b4( 'sPUьV E?Éf
IE;D1|fl
'3 vv E>Di Eb? ylc%&*mؐ$bQ 7< ^{ v\훴 M?*P8#
KRܦ +VK@NbCi&8>O`r㦧 1pk r02BX-S hڱ{
Q[WkZaV /ğ
2S6߶S_" )#C_Hc#cib4n-iz"\&,QbFUMa
իHHLP$¹)ƀT$TJĢQdED)R8DОOZxVʒsQDxwoE5L yN$*b85\XW1TM2X&uKL`x2
Y-fwK]N^:PCH^=cTm"(;7ܺJfߛ.7ݜS\z 9pn!H#u3
{L h'Wvo^w2!GBS HSi¾[pЏ&%}r7&#knw]$cpb/Dom ٵm{_'2 y".b)1P?Q\4~G.UTliP6][x3o/lAGɊV lc@QjIS;^[dê mXOFɰjC# 6(?c2[ٿ1eyW 5R<md-}#+tK ź
a /lvPWT(NX$v3lzV*/TIKT:su9[$ H&CpH)W4f= +h%19X3,g ;h98 oq2qʐ1 $7AV? ^үbZQP~:VY ;49sOp)⛟OzjbWci::O:QKj>.ډw }U0gvKg7Ջoh>GjƳqS̛ Jrd|4-6/;~/~%+G ڲI
(LffLLa4WuǶQ{.>g;g|v$>SmPH:֖~c4+ec*Q"mNb6XmҦ iLZVƘ? R;+~~鳗 ApQQ P|_6ּ B2F?pW0.uU4֚(p7|zQovPcpxqg.f[{V?ch}x r} 8 2ޡw^5
D #يj /H+ VPpII2d#7~Fѳ)9+Dmn>pK/z8(ONrIef/I?k]hW4*+3
ߖie~ xMH S/MG>ZsMo]}x&f~ ;++=̊k~n$Fσ)22.qs+G"r]* xJ&pbum\PXcFo 3{vOH1!c(Wg&Zꫮd17s~zvPTRm`yd#js o
t([ۿ+~t^L4Ȥ\]5y!Kzlɗ؟x??yako+vv ,UW}q W*='r|;cJGI
Y7ɾx&W
28KNs"F,2I 6.
_%Ӡ&
5;f
|r R#Hk ʸ2k0"H.5!M}cCwb q8=uRdi{$ T=TB0e]bcS1 ݭ>L5>%Tu.O< }q}j/ z@TCՂ&kfPi*Uh5; ^0iJݴ0'a!&'7ܶ {
\;`B1+vCմA4ES
^6#>+b0!bH˛PS^f~U;nzma}K¾h2]pԳhmy7i=t{ѝMwPof-xv
@
Diۜ Ԏ
~3$ JЊE-Qh=6pLj1 ̓7
#q@ffpyt3 1; p;'=/3_66<)Ăѱg (0! 8GHfatj8 7=,rM_B$ 2U< xTL WI =`֖\ E\4$Hd# xL+ b48:iTx_8tqI._
FjD3,|Y d$X0h^0`V{#kW2ּ
[+P&)weM+Pd6+nj@(6WV0fx\TEt?!]m |u,-'eh r^/EC.>0;( sAN?GUOo^$ Bvu;ag
͜a$ Vlu ߂:-'ABb} VT},s-&MXo 8 E.r
nzZʖVoɒ,Ydk%kc`[
!Z ) P IIBfd7qi4)-错vәۄN\mȽ+Sh5{tG?4RFUuzTF8l5r[|,ҩcA.t zt_GW")tjy{as_[P Ĵ$A) J@ z2 Sp1nO&IXƱ'7P:!4<'_7E³|" Qh!fvymS+e6nÏFƖ!IZ>=ATf^ʝ8yw-{6qK:Ꮇ;ܞodAVF.w%s/^Z6+Yo0D 4 QU ̶że.B>rP?j -ٮ}%t{O BBVn y˰~OGk;V$U)_M=¶QHdxߟ+=3X vߤz4BPwD%VaU1+cS9z]pOtq.^pµ!> v "nqHMm*EލJqDp+
t#h$ z@ϵ)4vrvTs¨EH7EÉFq
G5 ?J`;`%u_( =1'Ip1P}zG?_hm+5TT|7:rb(Ly0_) rOG
zҤ 4 NzWE}z`Ylv)zs(gLmUWLl֟#!U )Y#6q
S^S5h7*U\Nyej42o$we84C
t{_|-G
& |bbCR1U"r3zkő}kįgM~ \87'
Ǿz,7`
;73 /< | <93.\n(6;]뵷r x $<[ I`eBO}ϓAw
0 Ən< c{UjLC#3ˀ@ ]"I& ¦ޙZM@!'&H =i=D VF ^@;PLj> ʢR?s
ߕa;%CCEʅb<[.ƊHKPb
XWc:pH0еFAu>wahhoKt V*٭,T6}$<ܺP7_?3ryeu|>Y>|klw3s"'5h6 i ^8SSumgAd'e鄠`(!ff1']1-Nqm)Bɺ,bǕG+g0 p9tQGeX>ٜdHhB W$ ;~a iaJ8_ O8&; J t,ڥrm%MB6V(P x, zmxoE) # *>YU':҄6~#kE Nzڋ=Ψ+i ? )]Zlj ȃj$CKV>p5\&i(Uu@{C=喍Rx
jyBxbȓ7Y;QO0G[6A$S6>˝ݴag`|0|t U t- p "_ rԀ2Ŏ
W AjC;\;O5u-AwcN$g/1< qbȣ $IYG7ƀVҕ"--m@XNm)mBRغT
j1RU:J LD?y;ܳ*fq%^jxHkqS
q_ ^rSJ|@)Qg@*K J))zhQq%jDrF9js}7 B\jV*?J)pQͳ:xݰCЫ ⻫ʩbWj Z?PzA1~sctaGL_~c<3ZL$h Url#?Y? 8m^˞Ņ
עe6ī_%³ϛt[~ͱ@~
w6v,[ wtnQj{bi{ce7uԴ72vד+
UĹACm
MǍdkJ$dSN ot8ň=!5HT%%ONd9qsJȅ9.2uf6S~Y,ʨ$HG5v'}sb fO:]jn֣y==qN|4gû
*`{4YW cMG>Ϫ1}$J &Y6̒,b feI$ ʍ3AP xl] L~aoZ)X B6 s-mb`u!ŒckmáGn{7tk?Z|=MjY/W>4Ɠgv9U_H 䗝\ x cR5 &W#hHpKo(FS3K.ID:;|J6[y+rБݯXp;Pc'J8ť6\ DWQ ϳEm;!GϜ(
5uJZP"/ABeҧ#*W|08SslcpKc 2!q}
ӆ) O]wr9
M/X'%hZMK}bqmsGZaKl]܍ukw/[z
y=E*i# C{#&䞮8*kKwTu5FM"w{W!hѡд~D8>Udn<pX,E6\3*T1AarN!0b#ҔUAoA bE˵X|{:7:g-xgKcC;1 kueFF 5_nT9EU5WY,O`9 x/H?38_=~
7*: NyŒ5tJ1g:xPbTs
M)3V'ra:_xff6FQ2Zj כ6~mΞy-T
-rbZ/Q569esW23!D"$g\=Yat {7ts[ͷsl`o} &gr-Z3@\L˝?-C'.B
'+ajFߋ@T L\IH*1o6O㻁 @f< X 4aN70:^c#2p18-.&h]<*~
淤S'
cx E7} t|a=y煋` B
am89ϗ"|iH7@y@= œ0ns8 1^ȩ] cog[n@e#d !c|$Nl}cf{I_zMznm2뻃;kkr b/BHF^`]@8qK%W9!;ãBؓ:_' héX ~D.Kߩxsӹ~n W:g^.М9ag#m!S1 ^) 3 |?3ݏA豀{O5WO8/|wLg&#c,g I#M% ac Apq#inF7 ck ~3vs+`_dq3{qq&+38
}2^e{qkBuy>v8tNQ= $?20D8+dq뉬̞ńܒ: "| H A O2?MJ°etGdU7 ' w
g2,a^d20mJ SMOkkgJҼ^PeZ z^* ܋vo.j ƙArRt~C;+t Xk#bZF5KPۇ T~ݞAU8g:}3*}26,wzUEC} 8سйY4F} 2f%}ħ,Zl_:XB.J+5qa]ZQ}x>µ~ V+pv4}$7DCX%s s :-
4e!ݧʀ*UZ+r'&2wZ{47>`
Gya'9Ӡ~D8!3^-q3.kxzzDZGb^&AUǍ o6M}NU:nGM>FKi -TVrzƪ9o= UOyFEz]ŏs}HU_S *GS;YObGcg)<g+~>6qc8:M5g{")4w"j bNA7x~nγ
t{ى xf. m 0xg|ӆD+ @[A?zm) sk ,h%d>6s79_ _zG?yETBUMxUMT$j$\
Y+_XKI_[/#N|xj(g߂{chX;KP*(>UutSkno,;V[yN3]{܇1pc0}ZSێ3n'9x o> @#y7?@1Uo@2?grjQΛ8Kz- f/B *ij$_֠YyٲGFهSUg}1v+J 㗔6VIcNYLջ Ե@h<>T
[MY#"&V G RJ9tJ#.
HF͡YGp?52B~D ڄ,c" (Ȇ: m
@QNEDA`[@ؔ NA]lvhn5GsA=[yoTh
h{ ~g(5> z lll q<,@;ۯEŷ7`N߁ oC+x
Nt&zZ x^un Șbw==^־ wx ;C7:a 0ƫ{g3x=-X0`;|/,./p 0U>V"ob sIy9" \UR}FcT)ڷ~3 z:.;?@,~uc%XnJ0ۂ7i0Ll~mä9EGD*-?i=/3P>Ef oA *]^huU-Vk8*Ji^4ȜO}9-M?6Kg/ i-9,-fα'G:AI}j& #O E"bl WW Vh t/K5
s|+z#KY|@- .W}}ZI\fuӪ~jEݑEjjkMEw4OWm q~+9ZsV:=js3;DY'51kՄ;z H9?Ŀ{* *NR{P P9:;w؇2Kkr_
lEG@ki9Zۮ^9 ljvӚP)w$}=٤gwR z -Z;[ Zu!Us5FO Zh-٫M \ U'!CiX7ٿk0j=] vxFԷ?ֺ$ +4Z7yZ lOrozGteq|{νڥ2(5̘U(x52)bN[2fQTx %XfHJ=j2h& URFc4(+ =} u=s眽GKi #&e` "KQI4S d=,0x`<:{A? '|(ǃp1N:va]&ƹi!{/} - ^xغ #6/sQVf~bQ*Z~
%>}wx:AWA!o ]*K
cfBZ[Zb{!%w]nc_h.D,#qTbMnz/
<08}>bR;ܪpa3l Ā(q/~F5+C۶:Y^}`W8:) C{R o|:k%ŨhJӠ9h
|O 6Zv!Q-p><
J;P+8GuW|zUYp7̅;k%vueoLUL)L1[]Tum6z#*թXVzM5 h@v}f'in](;C HՓFر JB;i7-{9j'lnw$e}NSx M|E[ݛ 9ϡg\ӠȐhN=?l2g螊xѸa
L¹9j+Sou:Kx$y3*5
qN;=݃YzӶ64KQ_ uxhjx~sx&AMjbDɲWA =)
< :{Bu c7 ɎW#A DdxiB_쁦ϵ {kuz^v-)~/97&ڽ0sK:r>ܪF'|X^+Oܣ ~
ۆ;!1Y+Iы?B,^opG{`m)zpv- XS9ا8zb}ܜEv6&{"'yS
!VS}>8#n=o ; ~ 37g7OϺ BJVZ /SA2 3~ t];TE x6 &@L' 㹅nM U=92ze;%r%M5:]^ftRwvx:3yqhqx {RQ?sg%8(Qմ묣-Lߧ>眡9Xw)9y5=/1 O &cOƞ[vD"v 2={ʎ`翯ϞƦM,coۦ6ÏƟeɤAc&PvH}d-.f=}zYysl
*c^y'&LYȡi|/}{'h+>7JtK=\[3wz :nnN=Am·d#_:m/||^+}Nm?ؕVi|ĝGt:Mp6büUu 䑲}C|Ip9 ·k9! $"I-c~]Q*(߄ oP 9`^-k@0߲syC }DyFR }=1L÷SO GףdvnGprM';/PW> rL;IuByUTWDS9)&G' 74ug
9{8MT0 T 3ZȊFkG!ԆEEVE Y_؆p9~:%:S yxu觜V (ԟY?nh&n* Ho;3
KJjlZn/oC+ӄ:>ImK3ݑ:i;^[ͬNitYazu
w_ u
SCujZS
U[
ߞN7877u=||Uw1j+QYxH+\YPC簷z_.^ݦ JW!߲gPc.^rL휱Fj|=ѾA &[C AQPh⍞OU/ڥ>6TOAioN^8WOn͍:`_1<&bN mBa\8!5%*Cx|EBx$
D5a._f7!-*Sjg1ZG"R:HVZc mb:NM>sp(g>me51i,` Oz}d[$-X35%^v *f4Z h%2=T|,#(e~?&7ڷ3z 8p@Y=t,fM1ш 2]Mn#[`(?Yx d$>`jd IC%N)qxߔ_TQkl;:3ߠ>p+C6:ƱTl&wwpߐ1Vޗ'&][|gö\.dFُW#Nr)V9pyj#cox)FrO2&߇}E3Vb W`53AØ佂uE1َZbh^k|P
1 cZjL*Z"v|JdY ozٻR[IxԀ3Eo,^h/.2qAʗ~8elr5{){OūΫ{Qtʸmj>cTڈjhk ڭPF= pZ)XWYكU筰oo똗\\qyoD*'*Ep_(uNCvB]+
c.f *GH9T;9 t"փo+'l{1˦qoeNr11.×1߷w/.^nDu8E? /NXF+ r戓EIuiq]/ '= 7q?*ĔC2c8ƥs^z uހz
GXb3[,q_ЎkøbO ۭwe ~Q?[+(H8^wz'6z[w8C *3S0qx>?xSA<{{}>uv3iQ܃=sa+p8ʧB&w{Z8`/9Wj8~# ;Л璺sg0:MAld#L
K|(8WW8f!Y#[lx ҧ"K&}EX? y76fԑw1Y}q1dl%mGܗss1z
~C λ 8? g}HۼJO}~ʆ 2;
`P ݽyؾ~8;w;#ܺ{Pj4Fh4Fh4Fh4Fh4Fh4Fh4FӍ|S
0}\ y7E`J9CawAálS~.]ʿ eҰ{q́P60ɝ &zGB٦F(䕅2
QJA504R$hU%SPQ'T
"
,[9dU.`2U3Y2W⼅yfq 71QQne]{ [J4;WrC#yGҰLY*kۨc{M ӤlᣎEQe]c~tR_ژZ5qvͨ6+,/IZ'm'jsJKկ jTh,KZwg >G-왥"ZT sµ4mda]Q<q\Rަ}ǏFB? /\L ̣0cHyBa>FQZs6[3kIu}_)
qbG\\>*A6G첺LV5
n ~y6UoX-}.q܄8Mkΐ,9Ӂ6MlZnhdACeT?@eHQ]KJbQ&4Mnhٝwy ٹN0!za*#HLWpҊ2yzͰ\/muQ d',U ̮> =H$t9LO5
zIv-JL_-˸;`zˍ y nx>{ɂl`X@I~c]gY/>9 W9j
P菍>f.g22:lm`{
m!13 p[ q }f{5<ń`Ͱ$Hiw
sȘ ǐݣY=fHfP:6Y e.jif_fCf4C#Z/$<{61~"MFvu2>y-Ff V>OĀFL$~gPv7㪱/nTh B(l{vʵ5?U);X1ld'(d LÖBûNs0hE +o6nBO6 e(iH
LAz,> tOEJM,AiKg.C>;
%AgA !v :+Q'hBgs Mԥ.NNgh31bd plSDEi1Gץʳi呴RN+ƴr[ZɅN'Bz.|Sc1ɘ2 S1%x~ Yv|
&b{\=DQXECvRyT%]}y- jL=~{g?կ+ ⅔ $g`>=${}"!H߆ͬk394}~U1`%|ny"ɆvmU7Gdnq (;&h"9B*a" G
O˟Ѡ
O(AwWmOc
4#&h sk3&8YTZ`hs_8-!t]pD^AI$JpJ= B=ɛnw G7ݖ>O? /Fafj w2/o-٭ ӟv촩N:وN>p`@8;66 ڙրsyA(2
@ OA_ ,8C|E
3yB sssʡ9~@>Ut& (uϗBd&l *:CATplT gs旟?6AEF3;y+>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 4/Type/Page>>
endobj
52 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(04-09239.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/04-09239.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:36:12 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(In this case, the Administrative Judge's findings about Applicant's cond\
uct, credibility, and motives, that the Applicant)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 741.75 Tm
(takes issue with, went beyond what was reasonably supported by the recor\
d)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.52 0 Td
(evidence. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
4.053 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(, )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(e.g., )Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(ISCR Case No. 02-)Tj
-34.573 -1.125 Td
(24452 at 4-5 \(App. Bd. Aug. 4, 2004\). )Tj
(However, because the Applicant has identified these and other errors suf\
ficient to)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(warrant reversal, the Board need not)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.799 0 Td
(reach the issue of whether the circumstances presented in the case const\
itute a)Tj
-14.799 -1.125 Td
(sufficient basis for a reasonable person to question the fairness or imp\
artiality of the Judge.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(\(5\) Applicant has met his burden of demonstrating several errors which\
cumulatively were harmful to his case. )Tj
44.542 0 Td
(No)Tj
-44.542 -1.125 Td
(argument has been presented to sustain the decision on other grounds, an\
d the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.381 0 Td
(Board has considered the precedent in)Tj
-31.381 -1.125 Td
(other cases. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(See, e.g., )Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
8.746 0 Td
(ISCR Case No. 02-24452 \(App. Bd. Aug. 4, 2004\). )Tj
(Accordingly, the Chief Administrative Judge's)Tj
-8.746 -1.125 Td
(adverse security clearance decision)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.326 0 Td
(must be reversed.)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
-14.326 -2.125 Td
(Order)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(The Chief Administrative Judge's unfavorable security clearance decision\
is REVERSED.)Tj
T*
(Signed: Michael Y. Ra'anan)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 16 558 cm
0 0 m
134.795 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 533.25 Tm
(Michael Y. Ra'anan)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge)Tj
T*
(Chairman, Appeal Board)Tj
T*
(Signed: Jeffrey D. Billett)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 456 cm
0 0 m
120.645 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 431.25 Tm
(Jeffrey D. Billett)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge)Tj
T*
(Member, Appeal Board)Tj
T*
(Signed: William S. Fields)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 354 cm
0 0 m
124.002 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 329.25 Tm
(William S. Fields)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge)Tj
T*
(Member, Appeal Board)Tj
T*
(1. )Tj
(Applicant Exhibit D.)Tj
T*
(2. )Tj
(Applicant Exhibit B.)Tj
T*
(3. )Tj
(Applicant's memory as to the last time he remembers using marijuana is s\
uch that on two occasions, when he)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(completed his SF 86 in August 2002, and when he furnished his sworn stat\
ement in)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
33.663 0 Td
(January 2004, he stated his last use)Tj
-33.663 -1.125 Td
(occurred in November 2001. )Tj
11.746 0 Td
(In his Response to SOR in August 2005, and during the hearing in Februar\
y 2006, he)Tj
-11.746 -1.125 Td
(contended the date was September 2001.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(4. )Tj
(Directive \266 E2.A8.1.3.5 \("Failure to successfully complete a drug tr\
eatment program prescribed by a credentialed)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(medical professional. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.803 0 Td
(Recent)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
2.72 0 Td
( drug involvement, especially following the granting)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
21.273 0 Td
(of a security clearance, or an express)Tj
-32.796 -1.125 Td
(intent not discontinue use, will )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
12.554 0 Td
(almost invariably )Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
7.277 0 Td
(result in an unfavorable determination"\).)Tj
-19.832 -2.125 Td
(5. )Tj
(Directive \266 E2.A8.1.3.1 \("The drug involvement was not recent"\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(6. )Tj
(Directive \266 E2.A8.1.3.2. \("The drug involvement was an isolated or )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
28.327 0 Td
(aberrational)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( event\).)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
16 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 3/Type/Page>>
endobj
53 0 obj
[55 0 R 56 0 R 57 0 R 58 0 R 59 0 R 60 0 R 61 0 R 62 0 R]
endobj
54 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(04-09239.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/04-09239.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:36:12 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(changes involving church, family, and fitness activities, and had excell\
ent work and professional references. )Tj
43.541 0 Td
(Yet the)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 741.75 Tm
(Judge merely stated without explanation: "In this instance, I consider)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
27.874 0 Td
(Applicant's marijuana use in 2001 to be recent")Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 16 729.75 Tm
(\(11\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 16 729 cm
0 0 m
16.244 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 32.2437 725.25 Tm
(--and proceeded in a new paragraph to discuss Mitigating Condition 2. )Tj
28.493 0 Td
(The Judge did not articulate a sustainable)Tj
-29.847 -1.125 Td
(rationale for discounting the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.552 0 Td
(mitigative effect of Mitigating Condition 1. )Tj
17.636 0 Td
(Such a failure was harmful error. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
13.467 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( ISCR)Tj
-42.655 -1.125 Td
(Case No. 02-24452 at 5-6 \(App. Bd. Aug. 4, 2004\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(\(3\) Applicant argues the Chief Administrative Judge erred in concludin\
g that the security concerns raised by his prior)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(marijuana use had not been mitigated under Mitigating Condition 2 becaus\
e)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.631 0 Td
(Applicant's marijuana use was an isolated)Tj
-30.631 -1.125 Td
(incident. )Tj
3.721 0 Td
(Given the record in this case, the Judge's conclusion that Applicant's m\
arijuana use was not isolated is)Tj
-3.721 -1.125 Td
(sustainable.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(\(4\) Applicant argues that the Chief Administrative Judge's decision co\
ntains multiple statements that "are terse, cryptic,)Tj
0 -1.375 TD
(inflammatory, and conclusory, and show clear prejudice and bias by the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
29.019 0 Td
(Judge.")Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 400.1172 594.75 Tm
( \(12\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 400.1172 594 cm
0 0 m
18.681 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 418.7983 590.25 Tm
( )Tj
(In support of this argument,)Tj
-33.567 -1.375 Td
(Applicant specifically identifies these statements)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 250.5918 578.25 Tm
( \(13\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 250.5918 577.5 cm
0 0 m
18.681 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 269.2729 573.75 Tm
( in his brief:)Tj
-21.106 -2.125 Td
("He destroyed his fiduciary relationship with the government over)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(his zeal for marijuana and placed his own drug-induced pleasures)Tj
T*
(above those fiduciary responsibilities . . .")Tj
T*
("That substance abuse was illegal and against government policy . . .)Tj
T*
(was of no concern to him")Tj
T*
("It was more important to him that concerts, parties with friends,)Tj
T*
(and other social events be enjoyed while abusing marijuana.)Tj
0 -2.375 TD
(Marijuana was his crutch in confronting certain emotional issues")Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 331.4805 371.25 Tm
( \(14\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 331.4805 370.5 cm
0 0 m
18.681 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 341.25 Tm
(Applicant also argues that the Judge ignored record evidence inconsisten\
t with his "prejudicial views," misrepresenting)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(the type and quality of psychotherapy Applicant underwent to rehabilitat\
e)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
29.769 0 Td
(himself. )Tj
3.5 0 Td
(In that regard, Applicant notes that)Tj
-33.268 -1.375 Td
(the Judge found Applicant had engaged in "some psychotherapy, primarily \
related to marital issues,")Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 500.002 315.75 Tm
( \(15\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 500.002 315 cm
0 0 m
18.681 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 518.6831 311.25 Tm
( but failed to)Tj
-41.89 -1.125 Td
(consider that he had engaged in)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
12.884 0 Td
(more the five years of psychotherapy, one year of group therapy, and EAP\
counseling,)Tj
-12.884 -1.125 Td
(and that alternatives to marijuana to combat anxiety were discussed prom\
oted, and embraced by the Applicant)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
44.346 0 Td
(in all)Tj
-44.346 -1.375 Td
(three of those venues.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 120.6309 272.25 Tm
( \(16\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 120.6309 271.5 cm
0 0 m
18.681 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 139.312 267.75 Tm
( )Tj
(Finally, Applicant notes that the Judge did not allow into evidence the \
psychologist's opinion)Tj
-10.276 -1.375 Td
(regarding the likelihood Applicant would engage in drug use again,)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 339.9121 255.75 Tm
( \(17\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 339.9121 255 cm
0 0 m
18.681 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
/Span<>> BDC
12 0 0 12 358.5933 251.25 Tm
( )Tj
EMC
(framing it as an "agreement" between the)Tj
-28.549 -1.125 Td
(parties. )Tj
3.166 0 Td
(In that regard, Applicant argues that as a )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
16.466 0 Td
(pro se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( applicant he was at a distinct disadvantage, a circumstance that)Tj
-19.631 -1.375 Td
(allowed the Judge to prevail upon)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.774 0 Td
(him to withhold crucial evidence.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 342.2441 225.75 Tm
( \(18\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 342.2441 225 cm
0 0 m
18.681 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 195.75 Tm
(The Board has previously noted that the use of intemperate language by a\
n Administrative Judge can give rise to a)Tj
T*
(question of bias. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
6.833 0 Td
(See, e.g., )Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.832 0 Td
(ISCR Case No. 03-26176 at 3-4 \(App. Bd. Oct. 14,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(2005\); DISCR Case No. 94-0282 at 5)Tj
-10.664 -1.125 Td
(\(App. Bd. Feb. 21, 1995\). )Tj
(However, there is a rebuttable presumption that a Judge is impartial and\
unbiased, and a party)Tj
T*
(seeking to rebut that presumption has)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.219 0 Td
(a heavy burden of persuasion. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
12.218 0 Td
(See, e.g.,)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.582 0 Td
( ISCR Case No. 02-08032 at 4 \(App. Bd.)Tj
-31.019 -1.125 Td
(May 14, 2004\). )Tj
(The issue is not whether Applicant personally believes the Judge was bia\
sed or prejudiced against)Tj
T*
(Applicant. )Tj
4.443 0 Td
(Rather, the issue is whether the record contains any indication the Judg\
e acted in a manner that would lead a)Tj
-4.443 -1.125 Td
(reasonable person to question the fairness and impartiality of the Judge\
. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
28.937 0 Td
(See,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(e.g., )Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(ISCR Case No. 01-04713 at 3 \(App.)Tj
-28.937 -1.125 Td
(Bd. Mar. 27, 2003\). )Tj
(Bias is not demonstrated merely because the Judge made adverse findings \
or reached unfavorable)Tj
T*
(conclusions. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(See, e.g., )Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
9.053 0 Td
(ISCR Case)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(No. 94-0954 at 4 \(App. Bd. Oct. 16, 1995\). )Tj
(Moreover, even if an appealing party)Tj
-9.053 -1.125 Td
(demonstrates error by the Judge, proof of such error, standing alone, do\
es not demonstrate the Judge was biased. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
45.266 0 Td
(See,)Tj
-45.266 -1.125 Td
(e.g., )Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(ISCR Case No. 98-0515 at 5 \(App. Bd. Mar. 23, 1999\).)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
55 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[16.0 727.0 32.0 738.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
56 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[400.0 592.0 418.0 603.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
57 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[250.0 576.0 268.0 587.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
58 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[331.0 369.0 349.0 380.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
59 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[500.0 313.0 518.0 324.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
60 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[120.0 270.0 138.0 281.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
61 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[339.0 253.0 357.0 264.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
62 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[342.0 223.0 360.0 234.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 2/Type/Page>>
endobj
63 0 obj
[65 0 R 66 0 R 67 0 R 68 0 R 69 0 R 70 0 R 71 0 R]
endobj
64 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(04-09239.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/04-09239.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:36:12 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(deny, or revoke a security clearance if it is arbitrary, capricious, or \
contrary to law. )Tj
33.402 0 Td
(Directive \266 E3.1.32.3. )Tj
9.034 0 Td
(Our scope of)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 741.75 Tm
(review under this standard is narrow, and we may not substitute our judg\
ment for that of the Administrative Judge. )Tj
46.185 0 Td
(We)Tj
-46.185 -1.125 Td
(may not set aside an Administrative Judge's decision "that is rational, \
based)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.499 0 Td
(on consideration of the relevant factors, and)Tj
-30.499 -1.125 Td
(within the scope of the authority delegated to the agency. . ." )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
24.54 0 Td
(Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Ass'n,)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
10.74 0 Td
( 463 U.S. at 42. )Tj
(We review)Tj
-35.28 -1.125 Td
(matters of law )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
5.97 0 Td
(de novo.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-5.97 -2.125 Td
(Applicant contends that the Judge's unfavorable security clearance decis\
ion under Guideline H is arbitrary, capricious,)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(and contrary to law. )Tj
8.247 0 Td
(In support of that contention, Applicant argues that the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
22.161 0 Td
(Judge erred in his application of Guideline)Tj
-30.408 -1.375 Td
(B Disqualifying Condition 5)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 153.0039 650.25 Tm
( \(4\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 153.0039 649.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 166.8101 645.75 Tm
( and Mitigating Conditions 1)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 305.478 650.25 Tm
( \(5\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 305.478 649.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 319.2842 645.75 Tm
( and 2.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 351.6104 650.25 Tm
( \(6\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 351.6104 649.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 365.4165 645.75 Tm
( He also argues that the Judge was biased and)Tj
-29.118 -1.125 Td
(failed to consider relevant mitigating)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.023 0 Td
(evidence. )Tj
4.053 0 Td
(Applicant's arguments have mixed merit.)Tj
-19.076 -2.125 Td
(\(1\) Applicant argues the Chief Administrative Judge erred in applying \
Guideline H Disqualifying Condition 5 under the)Tj
T*
(facts of his case. )Tj
6.858 0 Td
(He also argues that the Judge's misapplication of that)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
21.48 0 Td
(Disqualifying Condition is harmful error because)Tj
-28.339 -1.125 Td
(it has the practical effect of subjecting Applicant to a higher standard\
of mitigation, given the Disqualifying Condition's)Tj
T*
(expression of a strong)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(presumption in favor of denial. )Tj
21.717 0 Td
(Applicant's argument has merit.)Tj
-21.717 -2.375 Td
(In his decision, the Administrative Judge stated: "[Applicant's] actions\
fall within DI DC E2.A8.1.2.5.")Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 510.877 542.25 Tm
( \(7\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 510.877 541.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 524.6831 537.75 Tm
( )Tj
(The Judge's)Tj
-42.39 -1.125 Td
(conclusion appears to be based solely upon the second sentence of the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
28.269 0 Td
(Disqualifying Condition \(")Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
10.741 0 Td
(Recent)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
2.72 0 Td
( drug)Tj
-41.73 -1.125 Td
(involvement, especially following the granting of a security clearance, \
or an expressed intent not discontinue use, will)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
T*
(almost invariably )Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
7.277 0 Td
(result in an)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
4.693 0 Td
(unfavorable determination"\). )Tj
11.82 0 Td
(However, that sentence appears in a context which is clearly)Tj
-23.791 -1.125 Td
(articulated in the first sentence of the Disqualifying Condition \("Fail\
ure to successfully complete a drug)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
41.758 0 Td
(treatment)Tj
-41.758 -1.125 Td
(program prescribed by a credentialed medical professional"\). )Tj
24.676 0 Td
(No such context is present in this case. )Tj
15.747 0 Td
(According to the)Tj
-40.422 -1.125 Td
(Judge's own findings, Applicant was never the subject of any)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
24.703 0 Td
(prescribed drug treatment program, and thus never failed)Tj
-24.703 -1.125 Td
(to successfully complete such a program: "Applicant has never participat\
ed in any therapeutic or rehabilitative substance)Tj
T*
(abuse program." )Tj
(Decision at 6. )Tj
12.599 0 Td
(Moreover, the Government did not argue for the application of Disqualify\
ing Condition)Tj
-12.599 -1.125 Td
(5. )Tj
(Given the record in this case, the Judge did not articulate a basis for \
applying one sentence)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
37.488 0 Td
(from the Disqualifying)Tj
-37.488 -1.125 Td
(Condition outside the context of a failed drug program. )Tj
22.328 0 Td
(Accordingly, the Judge erred in applying Disqualifying)Tj
-22.328 -1.125 Td
(Condition 5 in Applicant's case. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
13.012 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( ISCR Case No. 02-24452 at 3-4 \(App. Bd. Aug. 4, 2004\).)Tj
-13.012 -2.125 Td
(\(2\) Applicant argues the Chief Administrative Judge erred in concludin\
g that the security concerns raised by his prior)Tj
T*
(marijuana use had not been mitigated under Mitigating Condition 1 becaus\
e)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.631 0 Td
(Applicant's last use of marijuana, which)Tj
-30.631 -1.125 Td
(occurred five years ago in 2001, was not recent.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The Directive is silent on what constitutes a sufficient period of refor\
m and rehabilitation. However, such silence does)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(not means an Administrative Judge has unfettered discretion in deciding \
what)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.353 0 Td
(period of time is sufficient to demonstrate)Tj
-31.353 -1.375 Td
(reform and rehabilitation.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 138.9531 285.75 Tm
( \(8\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 138.9531 285 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 255.75 Tm
(The sufficiency or insufficiency of an applicant's period of conduct wit\
hout recurrence of past misconduct does not turn)Tj
T*
(on)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(any bright-line rules concerning the length of time needed to demonstrat\
e reform and rehabilitation, but rather on a)Tj
T*
(reasoned analysis of the facts and circumstances of an applicant's case \
based on a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
32.778 0 Td
(careful evaluation of the totality of the)Tj
-32.778 -1.375 Td
(evidence record within the parameters set by the Directive.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 298.8789 216.75 Tm
( \(9\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 298.8789 216 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 186.75 Tm
(The Board has previously noted that where an applicant had extensive )Tj
28.296 0 Td
(marijuana use and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
7.525 0 Td
(renewed marijuana use after)Tj
-35.821 -1.125 Td
(periods of abstinence, a Judge may articulate a rational basis for doubt\
s about whether the most recent period of)Tj
T*
(abstinence was sufficient to conclude the applicant had)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
22.27 0 Td
(put marijuana use behind them. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
12.83 0 Td
(See e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.082 0 Td
( ISCR Case No. 02-)Tj
-38.181 -1.125 Td
(08032 at 8 \(App. Bd. May 14, 2004\). However, the Board has repeatedly \
held that if the record evidence shows that a)Tj
T*
(significant period)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
7.276 0 Td
(of time has passed without evidence of misconduct by an applicant, then \
the Judge must articulate a)Tj
-7.276 -1.125 Td
(rational basis for concluding why that significant period of time does n\
ot demonstrate changed)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
38.101 0 Td
(circumstances or conduct)Tj
-38.101 -1.125 Td
(sufficient to warrant a finding of reform or rehabilitation. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
23.159 0 Td
(See, e.g., )Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.832 0 Td
(ISCR Case No. 98-0394 at 4 \(App. Bd. Jun. 10,)Tj
-26.99 -1.375 Td
(1999\).)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 46.9961 93.75 Tm
( \(10\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 46.9961 93 cm
0 0 m
18.681 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 63.75 Tm
(In this case, the record indicated Applicant)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.382 0 Td
(had not used marijuana for five years, had self reported his past miscon\
duct,)Tj
-17.382 -1.125 Td
(had engaged in extensive psychotherapy, group therapy, and/or counseling\
, had exhibited a number of positive lifestyle)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
65 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[153.0 648.0 167.0 659.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
66 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[305.0 648.0 319.0 659.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
67 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[351.0 648.0 365.0 659.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
68 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[510.0 540.0 524.0 551.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
69 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[138.0 283.0 152.0 294.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
70 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[299.0 214.0 313.0 225.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
71 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[47.0 91.0 65.0 102.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
14 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 1/Type/Page>>
endobj
72 0 obj
[74 0 R]
endobj
73 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(04-09239.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/04-09239.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:36:12 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 748.5 Tm
(At some point in 1995, while experiencing the initial stages of marital \
turmoil, Applicant )Tj
35.881 0 Td
(was reintroduced to marijuana)Tj
-35.881 -1.125 Td
(by his brother-in-law--his wife's brother--who had moved into)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
25.119 0 Td
(Applicant's residence on a temporary basis while)Tj
-25.119 -1.125 Td
(attending a local university. )Tj
11.358 0 Td
(His resumption of marijuana abuse occurred one night when he and his bro\
ther-in-law were)Tj
-11.358 -1.125 Td
("hanging out" in the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
8.315 0 Td
(family residence and they started using the substance. )Tj
21.743 0 Td
(Thereafter, until about September 2001 or)Tj
-30.059 -1.375 Td
(November 2001,)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 96.6484 696 Tm
( \(3\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 96.6484 695.25 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 110.4546 691.5 Tm
( on about 10 occasions, while attending concerts as well as during socia\
l events)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
32.02 0 Td
(and parties at)Tj
-39.891 -1.125 Td
(friends' homes and in his neighborhood, Applicant abused marijuana. )Tj
27.98 0 Td
(He smoked it in both cigarette form and in a pipe.)Tj
-27.98 -1.125 Td
(Applicant purchased marijuana, for his own use, on a few)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
23.326 0 Td
(occasions, but only one of those purchases took place after)Tj
-23.326 -1.125 Td
(1995.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant used marijuana for a variety of reasons. )Tj
20.243 0 Td
(In January 2004, he claimed he was initially influenced by curiosity)Tj
-20.243 -1.125 Td
(and the social setting in which he found himself, and because marijuana)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
29.019 0 Td
(induced a mellow contemplative feeling.)Tj
-29.019 -1.125 Td
(Applicant's therapist opined:)Tj
T*
(Contributing factors were his social anxiety and lack of confidence in s\
ocial)Tj
T*
(situations, difficulty managing painful affects and interpersonal confli\
ct,)Tj
T*
(and a wish to participate in social interaction in a more relaxed manner\
; these)Tj
T*
(factors were exacerbated by his distress over his marital situation and \
his)Tj
T*
(wife's decision to seek a separation and divorce.)Tj
T*
(During the hearing Applicant stated his initial use was motivated becaus\
e of social pressure and because he believed)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(marijuana would make him feel better in certain situations. )Tj
23.826 0 Td
(His subsequent use)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(was to ease some social anxiety or)Tj
-23.826 -1.125 Td
(maybe even depression over the state of his marriage, and to feel better\
.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant asserts he ceased abusing marijuana because of the lifestyle c\
hanges which occurred as a result of his divorce.)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(He is now active in church, family, and fitness activities, and vows to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
28.049 0 Td
(abstain from future marijuana abuse.)Tj
-28.049 -2.125 Td
(Applicant recognized that marijuana abuse was illegal, and he hid his us\
e from his wife and children. )Tj
40.682 0 Td
(He also knew)Tj
-40.682 -1.125 Td
(marijuana abuse while holding a security clearance was contrary to gover\
nment)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
32.126 0 Td
(policy, and kept his substance abuse)Tj
-32.126 -1.125 Td
(from his employer. )Tj
7.887 0 Td
(Applicant denied knowing that marijuana abuse was contrary to corporate \
policy.)Tj
-7.887 -2.125 Td
(Although he became a teaching fellow at a university, Applicant hid the \
fact of his substance abuse from the university)Tj
T*
(because such information would have adversely affected his reputation wi\
thin)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.434 0 Td
(the university. )Tj
5.971 0 Td
(Likewise, he did not)Tj
-37.405 -1.125 Td
(volunteer his drug use when completing his employment application for hi\
s employer. )Tj
34.743 0 Td
(Applicant did, however,)Tj
-34.743 -1.125 Td
(volunteer his history of substance abuse on his)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.886 0 Td
(SF 86 in August 2002.)Tj
-18.886 -2.125 Td
(In July 2000, Applicant underwent marital counseling and therapy to deal\
with his deteriorating marital relationship as)Tj
T*
(well as social anxiety. )Tj
9.081 0 Td
(That professional relationship eventually included)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
20.3 0 Td
(issues related to his substance abuse, but that)Tj
-29.38 -1.125 Td
(was not the primary reason for the therapy. )Tj
17.466 0 Td
(No evaluation or diagnosis related to substance abuse was made. )Tj
26.131 0 Td
(Applicant)Tj
-43.598 -1.125 Td
(has never participated in any)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.745 0 Td
(therapeutic or rehabilitative substance abuse program, and the collatera\
l exposure to the)Tj
-11.745 -1.125 Td
(topic of substance abuse while participating in marital therapy does not\
qualify as such.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(B. )Tj
(Discussion)Tj
T*
(The Judge's findings of fact will be discussed in the context of the iss\
ues raised on appeal.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
7.157 -2.125 Td
(Whether the Record Supports the Administrative Judge's Ultimate Conclusi\
ons)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.157 -2.125 Td
(An Administrative Judge is required to "examine the relevant data and ar\
ticulate a satisfactory explanation for" the)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(decision "including a 'rational connection between the facts found and t\
he choice)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
32.632 0 Td
(made.'" )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
(Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Ass'n of)Tj
-32.632 -1.125 Td
(the United States v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co., )Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
20.636 0 Td
(463 U.S. 29, 43 \(1983\) \(quoting )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
(Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v.)Tj
ET
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
12 0 0 12 16 39 Tm
(United States,)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
5.61 0 Td
( 371 U.S. 156, 168 \(1962\)\). )Tj
(The Appeal Board may reverse the Administrative Judge's decision to gran\
t,)Tj
ET
EMC
Q
endstream
endobj
74 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[96.0 693.0 110.0 704.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>
endobj
75 0 obj
<>
endobj
9 0 obj
<>
endobj
10 0 obj
<>
endobj
11 0 obj
<>
endobj
95 0 obj
(file:///usr.osd.mil/Home/OSD/OGC/JosephLM/_MyComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archived%20-%20HTML/04-09239.a1.html)
endobj
94 0 obj
<>
endobj
96 0 obj
<>
endobj
76 0 obj
[18 0 R/XYZ 0 594.0 null]
endobj
77 0 obj
[18 0 R/XYZ 0 501.0 null]
endobj
78 0 obj
[18 0 R/XYZ 0 476.0 null]
endobj
79 0 obj
[18 0 R/XYZ 0 450.0 null]
endobj
80 0 obj
[18 0 R/XYZ 0 425.0 null]
endobj
81 0 obj
[18 0 R/XYZ 0 399.0 null]
endobj
82 0 obj
[18 0 R/XYZ 0 374.0 null]
endobj
83 0 obj
[18 0 R/XYZ 0 348.0 null]
endobj
84 0 obj
[18 0 R/XYZ 0 201.0 null]
endobj
85 0 obj
[17 0 R/XYZ 0 263.0 null]
endobj
86 0 obj
[17 0 R/XYZ 0 237.0 null]
endobj
87 0 obj
[17 0 R/XYZ 0 212.0 null]
endobj
88 0 obj
[17 0 R/XYZ 0 146.0 null]
endobj
89 0 obj
[17 0 R/XYZ 0 93.0 null]
endobj
90 0 obj
[17 0 R/XYZ 0 68.0 null]
endobj
91 0 obj
[18 0 R/XYZ 0 765.0 null]
endobj
92 0 obj
[18 0 R/XYZ 0 740.0 null]
endobj
93 0 obj
[18 0 R/XYZ 0 647.0 null]
endobj
4 0 obj
<>
endobj
xref
0 97
0000000000 65535 f
0000000016 00000 n
0000000141 00000 n
0000003658 00000 n
0000190085 00000 n
0000003536 00000 n
0000003591 00000 n
0000003745 00000 n
0000003772 00000 n
0000188331 00000 n
0000188872 00000 n
0000188914 00000 n
0000188141 00000 n
0000004610 00000 n
0000180934 00000 n
0000169312 00000 n
0000158792 00000 n
0000154237 00000 n
0000118706 00000 n
0000003875 00000 n
0000003921 00000 n
0000003970 00000 n
0000004243 00000 n
0000004051 00000 n
0000004083 00000 n
0000004115 00000 n
0000004147 00000 n
0000004179 00000 n
0000004211 00000 n
0000004835 00000 n
0000004867 00000 n
0000010524 00000 n
0000010573 00000 n
0000010608 00000 n
0000011238 00000 n
0000011676 00000 n
0000118058 00000 n
0000118382 00000 n
0000064860 00000 n
0000065127 00000 n
0000030802 00000 n
0000031075 00000 n
0000012045 00000 n
0000012326 00000 n
0000012652 00000 n
0000031549 00000 n
0000065742 00000 n
0000118906 00000 n
0000124006 00000 n
0000124447 00000 n
0000124723 00000 n
0000125190 00000 n
0000154448 00000 n
0000159006 00000 n
0000159080 00000 n
0000166706 00000 n
0000167030 00000 n
0000167356 00000 n
0000167682 00000 n
0000168008 00000 n
0000168334 00000 n
0000168660 00000 n
0000168986 00000 n
0000169526 00000 n
0000169593 00000 n
0000178667 00000 n
0000178991 00000 n
0000179315 00000 n
0000179639 00000 n
0000179963 00000 n
0000180287 00000 n
0000180611 00000 n
0000181159 00000 n
0000181184 00000 n
0000187818 00000 n
0000188226 00000 n
0000189331 00000 n
0000189373 00000 n
0000189415 00000 n
0000189457 00000 n
0000189499 00000 n
0000189541 00000 n
0000189583 00000 n
0000189625 00000 n
0000189667 00000 n
0000189709 00000 n
0000189751 00000 n
0000189793 00000 n
0000189835 00000 n
0000189877 00000 n
0000189918 00000 n
0000189959 00000 n
0000190001 00000 n
0000190043 00000 n
0000189122 00000 n
0000188956 00000 n
0000189278 00000 n
trailer
<<4B927AE8BD393046BEF65969269D2246>]>>
startxref
190258
%%EOF