%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T15:36:18-04:00
2021-07-02T15:36:17-04:00
2021-07-02T15:36:18-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
04-09248.a1
uuid:8bebaa32-6d4f-45cc-a5a7-5d81c50c8dc1
uuid:67c64473-7502-4cc2-8f5f-1b9640759682
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[19 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
<><><>]/P 17 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
23 0 obj
[31 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(04-09248.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/04-09248.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:36:18 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: January 17, 2007)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(---------)Tj
T*
(SSN: ------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 04-09248)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-5.429 -2.2 Td
(James B. Norman, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
6.207 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) declined to grant Ap\
plicant a security clearance. )Tj
41.649 0 Td
(On June 7,)Tj
-41.649 -1.125 Td
(2005, DOHA issued a statement of reasons \(SOR\) advising Applicant of t\
he)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.745 0 Td
(basis for that decision--security concerns)Tj
-30.745 -1.125 Td
(raised under Guideline F \(Financial Considerations\), Guideline J \(Cri\
minal Conduct\) and Guideline E \(Personal)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Conduct\) of Department of Defense)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.634 0 Td
(Directive 5220.6 \(Jan. 2, 1992, as amended\) \(Directive\). )Tj
22.798 0 Td
(Applicant requested the)Tj
-37.432 -1.125 Td
(case be decided on the written record. )Tj
15.382 0 Td
(On June 23, 2006, after considering the record, )Tj
19.078 0 Td
(Administrative Judge Marc)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.192 0 Td
(E.)Tj
-45.651 -1.125 Td
(Curry denied Applicant's request for a security clearance. )Tj
23.198 0 Td
(Applicant timely appealed pursuant to the Directive \266\266)Tj
-23.198 -1.375 Td
(E3.1.28 and E3.1.30.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 116.9863 339.75 Tm
( \(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 116.9863 339 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 309.75 Tm
(Applicant raised the following issue on appeal: whether the Administrati\
ve Judge erred by concluding that the security)Tj
T*
(concerns raised under Guidelines F and E had not been mitigated.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant argues that the Administrative Judge erred in concluding that \
the security concerns raised under Guideline E)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(had not been mitigated, because in the two years since he began his curr\
ent)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.295 0 Td
(employment he has not mishandled)Tj
-30.295 -1.125 Td
(classified information. )Tj
9.248 0 Td
(Applicant also argues that the Judge erred in concluding that the securi\
ty concerns raised)Tj
-9.248 -1.125 Td
(Guideline F had not been mitigated, because)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.05 0 Td
(Applicant has established a repayment plan and is making regular)Tj
-18.05 -1.125 Td
(payments to his creditors on his debts. )Tj
15.554 0 Td
(Applicant's arguments do not demonstrate that the Judge erred.)Tj
-15.554 -2.125 Td
(The Administrative Judge made sustainable findings that Applicant had pr\
ovided false information in the response to)Tj
T*
(four questions on his 2003 Security Clearance Application, that Applican\
t had)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.548 0 Td
(a security clearance revoked for failure to)Tj
-31.548 -1.125 Td
(respond in 2001, and that Applicant was discharged from the U.S. Army wi\
th a General Discharge for a Pattern of)Tj
T*
(Misconduct in 2003. )Tj
8.5 0 Td
(Those findings)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(provide a sufficient rational basis for the Judge's unfavorable security\
clearance)Tj
-8.5 -1.125 Td
(decision under Guideline E. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
11.414 0 Td
(See, e.g., )Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(ISCR Case No. 04-12548 at 2-3 \(App. Bd. Sep. 18, 2006\). )Tj
(The Directive)Tj
-11.414 -1.125 Td
(presumes there is a nexus or rational connection between proven conduct \
under any of its Guidelines and an applicant's)Tj
T*
(security eligibility. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
7.804 0 Td
(See, e.g., )Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.832 0 Td
(ISCR Case No. 02-28935 at 3-4 \(June 28,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(2005\). )Tj
(The federal government must be able to)Tj
-11.636 -1.125 Td
(repose a high degree of trust and confidence in persons granted access t\
o classified information. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
38.598 0 Td
(See Snepp v. United)Tj
-38.598 -1.125 Td
(States, )Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(444 U.S. 507, 511 n.6)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(\(1980\). )Tj
(The absence of security violations does not bar or preclude an adverse s\
ecurity)Tj
T*
(clearance decision. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
7.856 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( ISCR Case No. 01-03357 at 4 \(App. Bd. Dec. 13, 2005\).)Tj
-7.856 -2.125 Td
(The Administrative Judge also made sustainable findings that Applicant h\
ad a lengthy history of not meeting financial)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
(.:ns)
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
38 0 obj
<>
endobj
39 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0l/JkB`d-b[c"o?*̐3_~@'`yze"z_ %7X~E_ad"y`/-$չ.BY.zik;"$1mW:uG9!qq1z28VoE*8*Z<{䴮߭EiJbOćbE@4rϼzY>2^LkS63K/^*x),o/-I=634tsxPVį V
endstream
endobj
40 0 obj
<>stream
H|XTg\
ww[w4%&H^|I((Q,K,XWްc{bSx}|33̹(0B:|] r){XDlxEEx8^;(