%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T15:38:36-04:00
2021-07-02T15:38:35-04:00
2021-07-02T15:38:36-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
04-11112.a1
uuid:757256b4-d861-46d8-9e99-5a900be696e6
uuid:e15acec3-1f5f-4214-90c0-83e6c6ce24b1
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
14 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
[17 0 R 17 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
[17 0 R 17 0 R]
endobj
17 0 obj
<><>]/P 15 0 R/Pg 12 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
20 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(04-11112.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/04-11112.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:38:35 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: February 21, 2007)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(-----)Tj
T*
(SSN:-------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Trustworthiness Determination)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ADP Case No. 04-11112)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-5.429 -2.2 Td
(James B. Norman, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
6.207 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) proposed to deny or \
revoke access to automated information)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(systems in ADP-I/II/III sensitivity)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.943 0 Td
(positions for Applicant. )Tj
9.721 0 Td
(On August 11, 2005, DOHA issued a statement of reasons)Tj
-23.665 -1.125 Td
(\(SOR\) advising Applicant of the basis for that decision--security conc\
erns)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
29.881 0 Td
(raised under Guideline F \(Financial)Tj
-29.881 -1.125 Td
(Considerations\) of Department of Defense Directive 5220.6 \(Jan. 2, 199\
2, as amended\) \(Directive\). )Tj
40.042 0 Td
(Applicant requested)Tj
-40.042 -1.125 Td
(a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(hearing. )Tj
4.192 0 Td
(On June 30, 2006, after the hearing, Administrative Judge Erin C. Hogan \
denied Applicant's request for a)Tj
-4.192 -1.125 Td
(trustworthiness designation. )Tj
11.471 0 Td
(Applicant)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
4.193 0 Td
(timely appealed pursuant to the Directive \266\266 E3.1.28 and E3.1.30.)Tj
-15.665 -2.125 Td
(Applicant raised the following issue on appeal: whether the Judge's adve\
rse trustworthiness determination under)Tj
T*
(Guideline F is arbitrary, capricious, or)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.551 0 Td
(contrary to law.)Tj
-15.551 -2.125 Td
(Applicant argues that the Judge's adverse trustworthiness determination \
should be reversed because her unpaid debts are)Tj
T*
(not recent. )Tj
4.47 0 Td
(In support of this)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(argument Applicant offers new evidence which explains the circumstances \
relating to her)Tj
-4.47 -1.125 Td
(indebtedness, and establishes that she created a budget, continued to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
27.547 0 Td
(make monthly payments on seven of the debts, and)Tj
-27.547 -1.125 Td
(received a satisfactory performance appraisal from her employer. )Tj
26.348 0 Td
(Applicant also states that her position no)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.525 0 Td
(longer)Tj
-42.873 -1.125 Td
(requires her to be in contact with sensitive or secured information. )Tj
26.77 0 Td
(The Board does not find Applicant's argument)Tj
-26.77 -1.125 Td
(persuasive.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The Board cannot consider Applicant's new evidence on appeal. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
25.893 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( Directive \266 E3.1.29. )Tj
9.922 0 Td
(And such evidence does not)Tj
-35.815 -1.125 Td
(demonstrate error on the part of the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.411 0 Td
(Judge. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
(See, e.g, )Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(ISCR Case No. 05-00609 at 2 \(App. Bd. Nov. 24, 2006\). )Tj
(The Board)Tj
-14.411 -1.125 Td
(has previously noted that the level of clearance being sought is not a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
27.575 0 Td
(relevant or material issue in DOHA proceedings.)Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
-27.575 -1.125 Td
(See, e.g., )Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.832 0 Td
(ADP Case No. 04-12331 at 2 \(App. Bd. Nov. 17, 2006\).)Tj
-3.832 -2.125 Td
(The application of disqualifying and mitigating conditions and whole per\
son factors does not turn simply on a finding)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(that one or more of them apply to the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.135 0 Td
(particular facts of a case. )Tj
10.216 0 Td
(Rather, their application requires the exercise of sound)Tj
-25.351 -1.125 Td
(discretion in light of the record evidence as a whole. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
21.187 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ADP Case)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(No. 05-03939 at 2 \(App. Bd. Sept.1, 2006\).)Tj
-24.519 -1.125 Td
(Thus, the presence of some mitigating evidence does not alone compel the\
Judge to make a favorable security)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
44.18 0 Td
(clearance)Tj
-44.18 -1.125 Td
(decision. )Tj
3.833 0 Td
(As the trier of fact, the Judge has to weigh the evidence as a whole and\
decide whether the favorable evidence)Tj
-3.833 -1.125 Td
(outweighs the unfavorable)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
10.858 0 Td
(evidence, or )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
5.136 0 Td
(vice versa)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
4.025 0 Td
(. )Tj
(An applicant's disagreement with the Judge's weighing of the)Tj
-20.02 -1.125 Td
(evidence, or an ability to argue for a different interpretation of the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
26.627 0 Td
(evidence, is not sufficient to demonstrate the Judge)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
21 0 obj
<>
endobj
22 0 obj
(ў5*k7\n%1Q)
endobj
23 0 obj
<>
endobj
24 0 obj
<>
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
33 0 obj
<>
endobj
34 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
Cq5 (Y9 t1{OK3$!K;=w7=(|sWmX^w/2N~]