%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T15:40:10-04:00
2021-07-02T15:40:10-04:00
2021-07-02T15:40:10-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
04-12363.a1
uuid:96445c44-ffe6-4aef-8c6b-2585f8ae04db
uuid:bb309b0e-7798-46d4-a8ef-1b3e989b3b51
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 17 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
23 0 obj
[31 0 R 32 0 R 33 0 R 34 0 R 35 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(04-12363.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/04-12363.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:40:10 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: July 14, 2006)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(----------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: ------------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 04-12363)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-3.304 -2.2 Td
(Nichole Noel, Esq., Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
4.082 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) declined to grant Ap\
plicant a security clearance. )Tj
41.649 0 Td
(On July 26,)Tj
-41.649 -1.125 Td
(2005, DOHA issued a statement of reasons)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(\(SOR\) advising Applicant of the basis for that decision--security conc\
erns)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(raised under Guideline B \(Foreign Influence\), pursuant to Department o\
f Defense)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
32.878 0 Td
(Directive 5220.6 \(Jan. 2, 1992, as)Tj
-32.878 -1.125 Td
(amended\) \(Directive\). )Tj
9.079 0 Td
(Applicant requested a hearing. )Tj
12.467 0 Td
(On November 30, 2005, after the hearing, Administrative Judge)Tj
-21.546 -1.125 Td
(Katherine Moen Braeman granted Applicant's request for a security cleara\
nce. )Tj
31.583 0 Td
(Department Counsel timely appealed)Tj
-31.583 -1.125 Td
(pursuant to the Directive \266\266 E3.1.28 and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.375 0 Td
(E3.1.30.)Tj
-16.375 -2.125 Td
(Department Counsel raised the following issue on appeal: whether the Adm\
inistrative Judge's favorable clearance)Tj
T*
(decision is arbitrary, capricious or contrary to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.494 0 Td
(law.)Tj
-18.494 -2.125 Td
(Department Counsel argues that the Administrative Judge erred in her app\
lication of Guideline B Disqualifying)Tj
0 -1.375 TD
(Condition 3,)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 76.0059 275.25 Tm
( \(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 76.0059 274.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 89.812 270.75 Tm
( Guideline B Mitigating)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
9.833 0 Td
(Condition 1,)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 267.8081 275.25 Tm
( \(2\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 267.8081 274.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 281.6143 270.75 Tm
( and the whole person factors.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 425.5674 275.25 Tm
( \(3\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 425.5674 274.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 439.3735 270.75 Tm
( )Tj
(Department Counsel's)Tj
-35.281 -1.125 Td
(argument has mixed merit.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Given the record in this case, the Administrative Judge erred in not app\
lying Disqualifying Condition 3 and in favorably)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(applying Mitigating Condition 1. )Tj
13.472 0 Td
(However, those errors are harmless under the unusual facts and circumsta\
nces of this)Tj
-13.472 -1.125 Td
(case because the Judge found that Applicant's circumstances raised)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
27.087 0 Td
(security concerns under Disqualifying Conditions 1)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 16 192.75 Tm
(\(4\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 192 cm
0 0 m
11.369 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 27.3687 188.25 Tm
( and 6,)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 59.6948 192.75 Tm
( \(5\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 59.6948 192 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 73.501 188.25 Tm
( and the Judge did not rely heavily on Mitigating Condition 1 in reachin\
g her ultimate security)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
37.964 0 Td
(clearance)Tj
-42.756 -1.125 Td
(decision. )Tj
3.833 0 Td
(Absent the applicability of that Mitigating Condition 1, it is clear tha\
t the Judge would have reached the same)Tj
-3.833 -1.125 Td
(result based upon the record)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.524 0 Td
(as a whole. )Tj
(Therefore, the continued viability of the Judge's favorable conclusions \
about)Tj
-11.524 -1.125 Td
(Applicant's security eligibility under Guideline B turns on whether)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
26.925 0 Td
(the Judge articulated a rational basis for those)Tj
-26.925 -1.125 Td
(favorable conclusions that is consistent with the record evidence and wi\
th a whole person analysis. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
39.767 0 Td
(See, e.g.,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
/TT0 1 Tf
(ISCR Case)Tj
-39.767 -1.125 Td
(No. 03-04300 at p. 7 \(App. Bd. Feb. 16, 2006\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(In her whole person analysis in this case, the Administrative Judge reli\
ed on numerous unchallenged findings of facts)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(which cumulatively support the Judge's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.039 0 Td
(ultimate conclusion that Applicant has sufficiently strong ties to the U\
nited)Tj
-16.039 -1.125 Td
(States to overcome the government's security concerns. )Tj
22.396 0 Td
(Applicant has been a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
8.608 0 Td
(naturalized U.S. citizen since 1998. )Tj
14.44 0 Td
(His)Tj
-45.443 -1.125 Td
(immediate family members \(wife, child, mother, sister and two brothers\)\
are legally located in the U.S., as are all of his)Tj
T*
(financial ties. )Tj
5.637 0 Td
(Applicant is a member an ethnic group that suffered under the Taliban, a\
nd he and his family are)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
(Ϧ==j9nO)
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
42 0 obj
<>
endobj
43 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
CqфB=@j+a~BImZyΈ=LJK;pś,/@*(b-$ɰAŻvgigItJ`{Q{Ƞi@DuxzIyi*>WP8O#q@7:#k~&kj/o$G"g96qK$"cuG&G|L|\%*ɭ.mwh
qq0k,*+ {
endstream
endobj
44 0 obj
<>stream
H|TT=\
wf+N֘D#yK4&"XQTbKTK,XQ,X+2#؟;O[o%g}: FHk{Y5#NإEDYZ@A!&uBΏ1s/b<ҠgQ͐жɢ"{9sPר\(]#L2;lΒdh7 "d :|X,/Mã#=_g8
PG[0W3(2fu회[%*1@S&ž"PAaE(FP0ú*El>Zzkש[~7iڬy-> n٪u>m_te7]ÏB=GdT^@Ac2t?2r17~BĤIL6}Y̝.J]di+W5kO߰q-[3mܱs={?p0#G?qTN9{|fQfZ p(*4]kُ;P͉<)~!JNJm[%T$*SC}O>}]D+hmwZ6R۬j6\+00
4%曲LcIRRRRɢYYjX[-~?w?ݠu/^Ek
$}X_o3~J
h7`@сށf:kpu3r8AΖ6N~o
L{:C2/~)JE W&*JC?>M}ULZ{-P-N۪ekS (S)Ŕ*9j7!9TfQBsHSU9.Is#9"j&Xӭ/Wבt8Hv"7('O+#^ㅜUJ%%ԥ7ϟoˁ[ 7u4v4twsuqvrtpTsTu8WqG
[7+wV$ 7h';w`nٛث-v/;mmۍlٶ,n[-,6zVQNfQE>c7ys]縹k:R^~"Uy.~3oڤo:fb\e mvwQW6my_*/{h!2"0w0H2#QBx'H>ٗa!V9`
#kHAE$N"
q
9Xx838^|LDF_D#01 p`F`8~H,hr,Mb74<
@+("Jd$7*A%i -eJ+h%մ:ZO鴁6&yJ$L[h+e6*Ei;eRr'*kNE;h'4vnʢ=7UzSED U*Ct^nF&2a:BGtȟt
SCsȤ*U긅tyoMVm3y]Wp9a>GG|R>g,|/%W
Ovʹ:|o9c~O?1+
;N$I,w
W;
\( H!"\*M%e*-w!
OE"]tljH4MDSL4AcB|"ZVh#ڊvS^m6S
;]աSw8ogo`L0N4&)\|!:KIx~,҄UP(swox