%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T15:41:09-04:00
2021-07-02T15:41:08-04:00
2021-07-02T15:41:09-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
04-12911.a1
uuid:2d3df003-fe94-457b-9c1a-7227bf51e010
uuid:afc47e3e-37ea-4a4e-9e78-56590a47985d
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
18 0 obj
<><>]/P 16 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
21 0 obj
[29 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(04-12911.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/04-12911.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:41:09 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: July 25, 2006)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(-------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: ------------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 04-12911)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.317 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) declined to grant Ap\
plicant a security clearance. )Tj
41.649 0 Td
(On April 26,)Tj
-41.649 -1.125 Td
(2005, DOHA issued a statement of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(reasons advising Applicant of the basis for that decision--security conc\
erns raised)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(under Guideline J \(Criminal Conduct\), Guideline E \(Personal Conduct\)\
and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.466 0 Td
(Guideline F \(Financial Considerations\) of)Tj
-30.466 -1.125 Td
(Department of Defense Directive 5220.6 \(Jan. 2, 1992, as amended\) \(Di\
rective\). )Tj
32.377 0 Td
(Applicant requested a hearing. )Tj
12.467 0 Td
(On)Tj
-44.844 -1.125 Td
(February 21, 2006, after the hearing, Administrative Judge LeRoy F. Fore\
man denied Applicant's request for a security)Tj
0 -1.375 TD
(clearance.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 64.2871 353.25 Tm
( \(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 64.2871 352.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 78.0933 348.75 Tm
( )Tj
(Applicant timely appealed)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.052 0 Td
(pursuant to the Directive \266\266 E3.1.28 and E3.1.30.)Tj
-16.226 -2.125 Td
(Applicant raised the following issue on appeal: whether the Administrati\
ve Judge erred by concluding that the security)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(concerns raised under Guideline J had)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.495 0 Td
(not been mitigated.)Tj
-15.495 -2.125 Td
(Applicant argues that the Administrative Judge should have concluded tha\
t the security concerns raised under Guideline)Tj
T*
(J had been mitigated, as a matter of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.412 0 Td
(law, because Applicant's last criminal incident occurred in 2001, he was\
acquitted of)Tj
-14.412 -1.125 Td
(some of the charges, and he has demonstrated he is now rehabilitated. )Tj
28.158 0 Td
(Applicant also argues that certain statements in)Tj
-28.158 -1.125 Td
(the Judge's decision indicated bias against the Applicant. )Tj
22.98 0 Td
(The Board does not find Applicant's arguments)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
19.148 0 Td
(persuasive.)Tj
-42.128 -2.125 Td
(There is a rebuttable presumption that an Administrative Judge is impart\
ial and unbiased, and a party seeking to rebut)Tj
T*
(that presumption has a heavy burden of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.023 0 Td
(persuasion. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
(See, e.g.,)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( ISCR Case No. 02-08032 at 4 \(App. Bd. May 14, 2004\).)Tj
-16.023 -1.125 Td
(The issue is not whether Applicant personally believes the Judge was bia\
sed or)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.853 0 Td
(prejudiced against Applicant. )Tj
11.996 0 Td
(Rather, the)Tj
-43.849 -1.125 Td
(issue is whether the record contains any indication the Judge acted in a\
manner that would lead a reasonable person to)Tj
T*
(question the fairness and impartiality of the Judge. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
20.467 0 Td
(See, e.g., )Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.832 0 Td
(ISCR Case No. 01-04713 at 3 \(App. Bd. Mar. 27, 2003\).)Tj
-24.299 -1.125 Td
(Bias is not demonstrated merely because)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.551 0 Td
(the Judge made adverse findings or reached unfavorable conclusions. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
27.99 0 Td
(See, e.g.,)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-44.541 -1.125 Td
(ISCR Case No. 94-0954 at 4 \(App. Bd. Oct. 16, 1995\). )Tj
(Moreover, even if an)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.828 0 Td
(appealing party demonstrates error by the)Tj
-30.828 -1.125 Td
(Judge, proof of such error, standing alone, does not demonstrate the Jud\
ge was biased. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
34.825 0 Td
(See, e.g., )Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.832 0 Td
(ISCR Case No. 98-)Tj
-38.656 -1.125 Td
(0515 at 5 \(App. Bd. Mar. 23, 1999\). )Tj
(After reviewing the record and the Judge's decision, the Board concludes\
that)Tj
T*
(Applicant has not met his heavy burden of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.218 0 Td
(persuasion on the issue of bias. )Tj
12.692 0 Td
(Applicant fails to identify anything in the)Tj
-29.911 -1.125 Td
(record that indicates or suggests a basis for a reasonable person to que\
stion the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.713 0 Td
(fairness or impartiality of the Judge.)Tj
-31.713 -2.125 Td
(The application of disqualifying and mitigating conditions does not turn\
simply on a finding that one or more of them)Tj
T*
(applies to the particular facts of a case. )Tj
15.798 0 Td
(Rather, their application requires the exercise of sound discretion in l\
ight of the)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
23 0 obj
<>
endobj
24 0 obj
(uc#m:y{ҡo)
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
36 0 obj
<>
endobj
37 0 obj
<>stream
H\j >wIJB[ȡhHt
qylOg>?y?ZyΈ=JK:04J.b-$ٰAͻLxdItJ/p#j=dж q^F:O#q@7Yhy2_e,Gǚ"g.qB\>D*L8WL\ׁωuqA[W:9w_9$~C"4
0 ;
"
endstream
endobj
38 0 obj
<>stream
H|XTgv΅t][Eh /yD@ DX0"(bGc
+EDņ]łq %9s|ΙzA߶jS4/Ϙdžg Λ$hķ+ \, ˢ
0퐘qQk$ i`i :?O8v ~{G&$fv -1qapm@tdž%ƻ-` Y<^3",62ΩmF'Ը8Ķ?*2~c
4RZ\RD)\QP($vk!q bᖦJH~ZXPV @#@_ŻxpؽObKPbwEbtS{
5nRK[ҴY-?iۺ_v;t9KuѳW|W}}?yPHh=tq#GNeq0q)MM6}FԴYd̝7E3,eWZzu
r6Ҧ[n۾cy{`ÅG;~gΖ¹.^|]7nˀ9ͳjv0 k f K)f*:KY=$BB0G8&<^JT5R}I%I?HDiT$]3TЌԤki
4Aک4BmN9\uut.Lr +亲.{MdoVc$9YNgU&y/SY|_wׇQ}<|-