%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T15:41:36-04:00
2021-07-02T15:41:34-04:00
2021-07-02T15:41:36-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
05-00374.a1
uuid:009fdc27-bf64-4351-b669-a393317b0b60
uuid:474e27ac-5bff-4c05-b5c7-1718657200ad
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>
endobj
21 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
<><><><><><>]/P 18 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
25 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(05-00374.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/05-00374.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:41:34 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: September 20, 2006)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(--------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -------------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 05-00374)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-4.166 -2.2 Td
(Julie R. Edmunds, Esq., Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
4.944 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-1.457 -2.2 Td
(Joseph J. Defrancesco, Esq.)Tj
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) declined to grant Ap\
plicant a security clearance. )Tj
41.649 0 Td
(On August 25,)Tj
-41.649 -1.125 Td
(2005, DOHA issued a statement of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(reasons advising Applicant of the basis for that decision-security conce\
rns raised)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(under Guideline E \(Personal Conduct\) of Department of Defense Directiv\
e)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.212 0 Td
(5220.6 \(Jan. 2, 1992, as amended\))Tj
-30.212 -1.125 Td
(\(Directive\). )Tj
4.886 0 Td
(On January 30, 2006, after a hearing, Administrative Judge Mary E. Henry\
granted Applicant's request for a)Tj
-4.886 -1.125 Td
(security clearance. )Tj
7.689 0 Td
(Department Counsel timely appealed pursuant to the Directive \266\266 E3\
.1.28 and E3.1.30.)Tj
-7.689 -2.125 Td
(Department Counsel raises the following issues on appeal: \(a\) whether \
the Administrative Judge's application of)Tj
T*
(Personal Conduct Mitigating Condition)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.055 0 Td
(\(PCMC\) 5 was erroneous and contrary to the record evidence; \(b\) whet\
her the)Tj
-16.055 -1.125 Td
(Judge's "whole person" analysis of the case was arbitrary, capricious an\
d)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
29.376 0 Td
(contrary to law; \(c\) whether the Judge failed to)Tj
-29.376 -1.125 Td
(adequately address Applicant's involvement in a 1999 domestic assault in\
cident; and \(d\) whether the Judge)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
43.03 0 Td
(engaged in a)Tj
-43.03 -1.125 Td
(piecemeal analysis of the case.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The Administrative Judge's findings were not challenged on appeal. )Tj
27.395 0 Td
(Those include the following: While serving as a)Tj
-27.395 -1.125 Td
(noncommissioned officer in the Army in)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.552 0 Td
(November 1998, Applicant was charged with fraternization when he, as a)Tj
-16.552 -1.125 Td
(student in a training program, became friends with a female classmate wh\
om he later)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
34.238 0 Td
(learned was an initial trainee)Tj
-34.238 -1.125 Td
(soldier and of a lower rank than he. )Tj
14.412 0 Td
(On a cold evening, Applicant offered to let the female student sit in hi\
s vehicle,)Tj
-14.412 -1.125 Td
(which was)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(not permitted under the local Army rules. )Tj
21.328 0 Td
(He and the female student received nonjudicial punishment under)Tj
-21.328 -1.125 Td
(Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
20.468 0 Td
(\(UCMJ\) and he was required to perform extra duties. )Tj
21.494 0 Td
(In April 1999)Tj
-41.961 -1.125 Td
(Applicant's then girlfriend filed a criminal assault charge against him \
for hitting her. )Tj
33.948 0 Td
(After)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(a protracted argument, he hit)Tj
-33.948 -1.125 Td
(her after her repeated attempts to provoke him to do so. )Tj
22.437 0 Td
(Later, when Applicant told the woman he intended to end the)Tj
-22.437 -1.125 Td
(relationship, she filed the assault complaint. )Tj
17.829 0 Td
(The military police took no action on the complaint. )Tj
21.106 0 Td
(Applicant did receive a)Tj
-38.935 -1.125 Td
(letter of counseling as a result of the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.773 0 Td
(incident. )Tj
3.721 0 Td
(In December 2000 Applicant was an Army training instructor. )Tj
25.16 0 Td
(He met a)Tj
-43.654 -1.125 Td
(female enlisted person who was in his battalion, but not his company or)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
28.939 0 Td
(platoon. )Tj
3.5 0 Td
(She was not his student. )Tj
(Applicant had)Tj
-32.438 -1.125 Td
(one sexual encounter with this woman in a relationship that lasted three\
weeks. )Tj
31.88 0 Td
(Just before their sexual)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
9.497 0 Td
(encounter,)Tj
-41.377 -1.125 Td
(Applicant learned that the woman was a student on the post, but not at h\
is duty station. )Tj
34.966 0 Td
(In February 2001, the Army)Tj
-34.966 -1.125 Td
(convened a Special court-martial, charging Applicant with three violatio\
ns of Article 92 \(failure to obey a lawful order\))Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(of the UCMJ because of his relationship with the woman and also)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
26.606 0 Td
(for giving two other female students a ride to the)Tj
-26.606 -1.125 Td
(movies in his privately owned vehicle in a non-emergency situation. )Tj
27.576 0 Td
(The Army alleged that Applicant)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.468 0 Td
(unlawfully)Tj
-41.044 -1.125 Td
(engaged in a nonprofessional relationship with the female students. )Tj
27.16 0 Td
(Applicant pled not guilty to the charges. )Tj
16.33 0 Td
(The Court)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
27 0 obj
(ʢu._)
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
32 0 obj
<>
endobj
33 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
CI)i9e{V'='E},!')c 8'h;"-Z^;6N}TBMf->}h!ss/Pܻmׄ[ɗs;"` d
endstream
endobj
34 0 obj
<>stream
H|y\TG5o^p GԸJ4%ј]ƍQ7
APxFH"^x!^x!^(x+3q?d`&=jߧ~!!g͚;_XlBbcSZN3@Q@,jW & )[퀤1 ,]@c?b,/r0h=l`r6z[ICb51e@0JR?baHlrzЏH:"?ex|_LCG!I-*WdFƟdF/dY#i FxAn
JL-tFrDE~jZ7? P='DxeFE8%:O
_jթ[~`44l&i,-kdV?[ԇmڶkߡG:哿kOG_=ջ/&_O0pP!CS
Qnj iL̚6={FY͝7B-_b.XlU֭/ܰq-[m߱s={?p=vSq.^
j5h3BRuri^R]%I4@*k}fr?y)ϐg܀]4V>+81xp%!?*`MR(_*㕭JrN*g0̐m37<15N2fW4&6MLL]SS)>TjTjToO
T
0&j:EVufuW-VK2z'<*]xC5
jbLZvX\k";(GG{GWU\ճOUW;C4gʽĞ2k1jzk
0)Z+eN2\zߓ{ɱTy