%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T15:44:07-04:00
2021-07-02T15:44:06-04:00
2021-07-02T15:44:07-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
05-01964.a1
uuid:480423c3-bb15-44cc-9501-831fcd20c1fe
uuid:2d00d376-6d5c-4015-b052-cc8344a179db
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
18 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 16 0 R/Pg 12 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
22 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(05-01964.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/05-01964.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:44:07 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: February 28, 2007)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(--------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 05-01964)Tj
17.934 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.666 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 263.1982 543 cm
0 0 m
85.354 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
/TT1 1 Tf
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-4.498 -2.2 Td
(Richard A. Stevens, Esq., Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
5.276 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-0.375 -2.2 Td
(Stanley E. Sacks, Esq.)Tj
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) declined to grant Ap\
plicant a security clearance. )Tj
41.649 0 Td
(On September)Tj
-41.649 -1.125 Td
(21, 2005, DOHA issued a statement of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(reasons advising Applicant of the basis for that decision--security conc\
erns)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(raised under Guideline E \(Personal Conduct \), pursuant to Department o\
f Defense)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
33.018 0 Td
(Directive 5220.6 \(Jan. 2, 1992, as)Tj
-33.018 -1.125 Td
(amended\) \(Directive\). )Tj
9.079 0 Td
(Applicant requested a hearing. )Tj
12.467 0 Td
(On June 30, 2006, after the hearing, Administrative Judge )Tj
11.25 0 0 11.25 555.8184 378.75 Tm
(Juan J.)Tj
-47.984 -1.2 Td
(Rivera )Tj
12 0 0 12 48.7997 365.25 Tm
(denied Applicant's request for a security clearance. )Tj
20.615 0 Td
(Applicant timely appealed pursuant to the Directive \266\266)Tj
-23.349 -1.125 Td
(E3.1.28 and E3.1.30.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant raised the following issues on appeal: whether the Judge's fin\
dings of fact are )Tj
35.393 0 Td
(supported by substantial)Tj
-35.393 -1.125 Td
(evidence and whether the Judge's decision is)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.091 0 Td
(arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law. )Tj
16.188 0 Td
(We affirm the Judge's decision to)Tj
-34.279 -1.125 Td
(deny the clearance.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.128 -2.125 Td
(Whether the Record Supports the Administrative Judge's Factual Findings)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-8.128 -2.125 Td
(A. Facts)Tj
T*
(The Judge found that in January 2002, Applicant proposed to another work\
er from a different federal contractor who)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(shared his worksite that the worker enter)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.522 0 Td
(into a lease to rent Applicant's house. )Tj
15.176 0 Td
(The other worker was in "temporary)Tj
-31.699 -1.125 Td
(duty" status while performing a project for the Navy. )Tj
21.458 0 Td
(The other worker had a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
9.579 0 Td
(company credit card which he used for)Tj
-31.037 -1.125 Td
(living expenses, which was reimbursed by the government.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The agreement would be between the other worker and Applicant's mother, \
with a rent payment higher than the actual)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(rental amount. )Tj
6.026 0 Td
(The worker would live)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
9.386 0 Td
(in the house and would submit his inflated rent payment to the governmen\
t for)Tj
-15.412 -1.125 Td
(reimbursement. )Tj
6.498 0 Td
(A portion of the excess rent would go to Applicant and a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
22.939 0 Td
(portion to the worker, as a "kickback." )Tj
15.673 0 Td
(The)Tj
-45.11 -1.125 Td
(other worker advised his employer and government representatives of Appl\
icant's proposal. )Tj
36.892 0 Td
(Applicant's employer)Tj
-36.892 -1.125 Td
(confronted Applicant with the allegation and after Applicant confirmed t\
he basic facts, fired him. )Tj
39.153 0 Td
(In the portion of the)Tj
-39.153 -1.125 Td
(opinion marked "Conclusions," the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.287 0 Td
(Judge stated that the other worker's testimony during the hearing was cr\
edible, that)Tj
-14.287 -1.125 Td
(he had no motive to lie, and that the testimony was to some extent)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
26.689 0 Td
(corroborated by other government evidence. )Tj
17.993 0 Td
(The)Tj
-44.682 -1.125 Td
(Judge stated, "Applicant knew or should have known his proposal to submi\
t a false rental fee claim was)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
41.759 0 Td
(illegal, and his)Tj
-41.759 -1.125 Td
(actions were committed with the intent to defraud the government and for\
his own personal benefit.")Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
23 0 obj
<>
endobj
24 0 obj
(.w,l*fi\r9)
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
30 0 obj
<>stream
H\j@{^htg+A/Cm &
MXo99a'_o7.M]$=wT뱍ٴpM[?>U}[z.+KyHWwjfKj4n>ֻ[.}'5zFOU\cݶvY߉kF}UkQrbҕ,3ͿY`PV)+Ll1`