%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T15:43:57-04:00
2021-07-02T15:43:57-04:00
2021-07-02T15:43:57-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
05-01820.a1
uuid:8e2904f1-99cf-4895-a2be-bbe6750763e8
uuid:f706ec55-a4ed-49d5-a8ed-7de4ed47fb79
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
<>
endobj
22 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
25 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
26 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
<><><><><><><><>]/P 19 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
27 0 obj
[34 0 R 35 0 R 36 0 R]
endobj
28 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(05-01820.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/05-01820.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:43:57 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: December 14, 2006)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(--------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 05-01820)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-4.97 -2.2 Td
(Edward W. Loughran, Esq., Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
5.748 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) declined to grant Ap\
plicant a security clearance. )Tj
41.649 0 Td
(On September)Tj
-41.649 -1.125 Td
(28, 2005, DOHA issued a statement of reasons \(SOR\) advising Applicant \
of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.773 0 Td
(the basis for that decision--security)Tj
-30.773 -1.125 Td
(concerns raised under Guideline B \(Foreign Influence\), pursuant to Dep\
artment of Defense Directive 5220.6 \(Jan. 2,)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(1992, as amended\) \(Directive\). )Tj
12.662 0 Td
(Applicant)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
4.193 0 Td
(requested a hearing. )Tj
8.274 0 Td
(On May 9, 2006, after the hearing, Administrative Judge)Tj
-25.129 -1.125 Td
(Barry M. Sax granted Applicant's request for a security clearance. )Tj
26.614 0 Td
(Department Counsel timely appealed pursuant to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
19.828 0 Td
(the)Tj
-46.442 -1.125 Td
(Directive \266\266 E3.1.28 and E3.1.30.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Department Counsel raised the following issues on appeal: whether the Ad\
ministrative Judge erred in applying)Tj
0 -1.375 TD
(Guideline B Mitigating Conditions 1)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 192.666 314.25 Tm
( \(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 192.666 313.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 206.4722 309.75 Tm
( and 3)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 235.7983 314.25 Tm
( \(2\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 235.7983 313.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 249.6045 309.75 Tm
(; whether there is sufficient evidence to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.021 0 Td
(sustain the Administrative)Tj
-35.489 -1.125 Td
(Judge's favorable security clearance decision. )Tj
18.45 0 Td
(We reverse the )Tj
6.246 0 Td
(Administrative Judge's decision to grant the clearance.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
-16.568 -2.125 Td
(Whether the Record Supports the Administrative Judge's Factual Findings)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-8.128 -2.125 Td
(A. )Tj
(The Administrative Judge made the following findings of fact:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant is a 39-year-old employee of a defense contractor. )Tj
24.49 0 Td
(The February 24, 2005 SOR contains two \(2\) allegations)Tj
-24.49 -1.125 Td
(under Guideline B \(Foreign Influence\). )Tj
15.939 0 Td
(Applicant admits both allegations. )Tj
13.97 0 Td
(Both admissions are accepted and)Tj
-29.909 -1.125 Td
(incorporated herein as Findings of Fact.)Tj
T*
(After considering the totality of the evidence, I make the following add\
itional FINDINGS OF FACT as to the status of)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(each SOR allegation.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 -2.125 TD
(Guideline B \(Foreign Influence\))Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(1.a. - Applicant's wife is a citizen of the People's Republic of China \(\
PRC\), who resides with him in the U.S. )Tj
43.687 0 Td
(They met)Tj
-43.687 -1.125 Td
(via an internet chat room in about 2003.)Tj
T*
(1.b. - Applicant's \(sic\) traveled to the PRC twice in 2003, twice in 2\
004, and in 2005 to visit his wife \(then his fiancee\).)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 16 51.75 Tm
(\(3\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 51 cm
0 0 m
11.369 0 l
h
S
Q
EMC
endstream
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
30 0 obj
(mrx)
endobj
31 0 obj
<>
endobj
32 0 obj
<>
endobj
33 0 obj
<>
endobj
41 0 obj
<>
endobj
42 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
Cqb>Xpl%3,qC~]:OHvϝ5{p:֠eQ[3N~["Ν%6]p[`uFmAH^3ϲC)ov _gӸx0H;!YF2_\Tèe`NUEpTD|n2#L.s^c@ǂ@tد fz
endstream
endobj
43 0 obj
<>stream
H|XTgEE݅`AA,!ygL
JQbAPP7DQDPl(]*F