%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T15:45:53-04:00
2021-07-02T15:45:52-04:00
2021-07-02T15:45:53-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
05-03482.a1
uuid:394bbc29-78eb-4fb8-9f54-79741283d43a
uuid:f8e63d8b-a1eb-4495-9e04-1d4affebfb86
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
14 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
[17 0 R 17 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
[17 0 R 17 0 R]
endobj
17 0 obj
<><>]/P 15 0 R/Pg 12 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
20 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(05-03482.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/05-03482.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:45:53 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: September 13, 2006)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(---------)Tj
T*
(SSN: ----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 05-03482)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-6.414 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
7.192 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) declined to grant Ap\
plicant a security clearance. )Tj
41.649 0 Td
(On October 13,)Tj
-41.649 -1.125 Td
(2005, DOHA issued a statement of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(reasons \(SOR\) advising Applicant of the basis for that decision--secur\
ity concerns)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(raised under Guideline F \(Financial Considerations\) of Department of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
28.187 0 Td
(Defense Directive 5220.6 \(Jan. 2, 1992, as)Tj
-28.187 -1.125 Td
(amended\) \(Directive\). )Tj
9.079 0 Td
(Applicant requested his case be decided on the written record. )Tj
25.074 0 Td
(On March 28, 2006, after)Tj
-34.152 -1.125 Td
(considering the record, )Tj
9.441 0 Td
(Administrative Judge Mary E. Henry denied Applicant's request for a secu\
rity clearance.)Tj
-9.441 -1.125 Td
(Applicant timely appealed pursuant to the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.995 0 Td
(Directive \266\266 E3.1.28 and E3.1.30.)Tj
-16.995 -2.125 Td
(Applicant raised the following issue on appeal: whether the Administrati\
ve Judge's adverse clearance decision under)Tj
T*
(Guideline F is arbitrary, capricious, or)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.551 0 Td
(contrary to law.)Tj
-15.551 -2.125 Td
(Applicant argues that the Administrative Judge's adverse decision should\
be reversed because the Judge did not give)Tj
T*
(sufficient weight to Applicant mitigating)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.58 0 Td
(evidence which he contends demonstrates that he has controlled his spend\
ing)Tj
-16.58 -1.125 Td
(and made a good faith effort to pay his debts. )Tj
18.356 0 Td
(In support of his argument,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.109 0 Td
(Applicant offers new evidence in the form of)Tj
-29.465 -1.125 Td
(additional statements updating his financial situation. )Tj
21.579 0 Td
(The Board does not find Applicant's arguments persuasive.)Tj
-21.579 -2.125 Td
(The Board may not consider new evidence on appeal. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
21.714 0 Td
(See )Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(Directive \266 E3.1.29. )Tj
9.922 0 Td
(Accordingly, we may not consider)Tj
-31.636 -1.125 Td
(Applicant's explanations, and they do not)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.76 0 Td
(demonstrate error on the part of the Judge.)Tj
-16.76 -2.125 Td
(The Applicant has not met his burden of demonstrating that the Judge err\
ed in concluding that the financial)Tj
T*
(considerations allegations had not been mitigated. )Tj
20.245 0 Td
(Although Applicant strongly disagrees with the Judge's conclusions,)Tj
-20.245 -1.125 Td
(he has not established that those conclusions are arbitrary, capricious,\
or contrary to law. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
35.739 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( Directive \266 E3.1.32.3.)Tj
-35.739 -2.125 Td
(The application of disqualifying and mitigating conditions does not turn\
simply on a finding that one or more of them)Tj
T*
(applies to the particular facts of a case. )Tj
15.798 0 Td
(Rather, their application requires the exercise of sound discretion in l\
ight of the)Tj
-15.798 -1.125 Td
(record evidence as a whole. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
11.328 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 01-14740 at 7 \(App. Bd.)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Jan.15, 2003\). )Tj
(Thus, the presence of)Tj
-14.659 -1.125 Td
(some mitigating evidence does not alone compel the Judge to make a favor\
able security clearance decision. )Tj
43.234 0 Td
(As the trier)Tj
-43.234 -1.125 Td
(of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(fact, the Judge has to weigh the evidence as a whole and decide whether \
the favorable evidence outweighs the)Tj
T*
(unfavorable evidence, or )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
10.162 0 Td
(vice versa)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
4.025 0 Td
(. )Tj
(An)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(applicant's disagreement with the Judge's weighing of the evidence, or a\
n ability)Tj
-14.187 -1.125 Td
(to argue for a different interpretation of the evidence, is not sufficie\
nt to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
29.044 0 Td
(demonstrate the Judge weighed the evidence or)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
21 0 obj
<>
endobj
22 0 obj
(|aSE@_;66)
endobj
23 0 obj
<>
endobj
24 0 obj
<>
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
33 0 obj
<>
endobj
34 0 obj
<>stream
H\j >wIJB[ȡhHt
qylOg>?y?ZyΈ=JK:04J.b-$ٰAͻLxdItJ/p#j=dж q^F:O#q@7Yhy2_e,Gǚ"g.qB\>D*L8WL\ׁωuqA[W:9w_9$~C"4
0 ;
"
endstream
endobj
35 0 obj
<>stream
H|XTgv΅HS݅QQ`I4Dc" ETPTb#*"v4ذXPDTlˮU,X,}3sΜ9sf $Ahȷ-[W6K3&. kj `˦щm
W㲘A}4Hph3(n\$ @FGD=pέ\ùߗ>c3W]vpm@lGMp_<