%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T15:46:09-04:00
2021-07-02T15:46:08-04:00
2021-07-02T15:46:09-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
05-03678.a1
uuid:31396d50-ce7d-443e-bde1-61459edc2998
uuid:f47b554c-e20f-47ee-b948-8df8360b8187
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 17 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
23 0 obj
[31 0 R 32 0 R 33 0 R 34 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(05-03678.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/05-03678.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:46:09 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: January 12, 2007)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(----------)Tj
T*
(SSN:------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 05-03678)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.317 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) declined to grant Ap\
plicant a security clearance. )Tj
41.649 0 Td
(On October 5,)Tj
-41.649 -1.125 Td
(2005, DOHA issued a statement of reasons \(SOR\) advising Applicant of t\
he)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.745 0 Td
(basis for that decision--security concerns)Tj
-30.745 -1.125 Td
(raised under Guideline E \(Personal Conduct\), Guideline J \(Criminal Co\
nduct\) and Guideline F \(Financial)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Considerations\) of Department of Defense)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.245 0 Td
(Directive 5220.6 \(Jan. 2, 1992, as amended\) \(Directive\). )Tj
22.798 0 Td
(Applicant requested)Tj
-40.042 -1.125 Td
(the case be decided on the written record. )Tj
16.854 0 Td
(On June 16, 2006, after considering the record, )Tj
19.078 0 Td
(Administrative Judge)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
8.832 0 Td
(Darlene)Tj
-44.763 -1.375 Td
(Lokey Anderson denied Applicant's request for a security clearance.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 343.6973 353.25 Tm
( \(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 343.6973 352.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 357.5034 348.75 Tm
( )Tj
(Applicant timely appealed pursuant to the)Tj
-28.459 -1.125 Td
(Directive \266\266 E3.1.28 and E3.1.30.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant raised the following issue on appeal: whether the Administrati\
ve Judge erred by concluding that the security)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(concerns raised under Guidelines E and J had not been mitigated.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(In this case, the Administrative Judge made sustainable findings that Ap\
plicant had deliberately provided false)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(information about mental health treatment, marijuana use, delinquent deb\
ts, wage)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
32.906 0 Td
(garnishments, a repossession, and an)Tj
-32.906 -1.125 Td
(unpaid judgement, in response to questions 19, 27, 34, 35, 37 and 38 of \
his February 2001 Security Clearance)Tj
T*
(Application. )Tj
5.221 0 Td
(She also made a sustainable finding)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.552 0 Td
(that Applicant had deliberately provided false information about)Tj
-19.773 -1.375 Td
(marijuana use in a June 2004 signed, sworn statement to a government inv\
estigator.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 417.9062 218.25 Tm
( \(2\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 417.9062 217.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 431.7124 213.75 Tm
( )Tj
(Applicant contends the Judge)Tj
-34.643 -1.125 Td
(should have)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(concluded, as a matter of law, that the security concerns raised by his \
multiple falsifications were mitigated)Tj
0 -1.375 TD
(because: \(a\) Applicant had once been advised by a military recruiter t\
o not disclose his)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
34.96 0 Td
(prior drug use,)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 505.8379 188.25 Tm
( \(3\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 505.8379 187.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 519.644 183.75 Tm
( \(b\) the)Tj
-41.97 -1.375 Td
(falsifications were an isolated incident, that is not recent, and Applic\
ant has demonstrated rehabilitation,)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 516.5078 171.75 Tm
( \(4\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 516.5078 171 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 530.314 167.25 Tm
( and \(c\))Tj
-42.859 -1.125 Td
(Applicant has an outstanding military record. )Tj
18.356 0 Td
(The Board)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
4.499 0 Td
(does not find Applicant's contentions persuasive.)Tj
-22.855 -2.125 Td
(The Applicant has not met his burden of demonstrating that the Judge err\
ed in concluding that the security concerns)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(presented by his personal and criminal conduct were not mitigated. )Tj
27.075 0 Td
(Although)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Applicant strongly disagrees with the)Tj
-27.075 -1.125 Td
(Judge's conclusions, he has not established that those conclusions are a\
rbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
44.113 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-44.113 -1.125 Td
(Directive \266 E3.1.32.3.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The Administrative Judge was not required, as a matter of law, to conclu\
de that Applicant's reliance on a military)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(recruiter's advice, to never disclose his past marijuana use, was suffic\
ient to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.503 0 Td
(mitigate his multiple falsifications relating)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
(Gf&/\(o)
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
41 0 obj
<>
endobj
42 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
Cq5 (Y9 t1{OK3$!K;=w7=(|sWmX^w/2N~]