%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T15:46:27-04:00
2021-07-02T15:46:26-04:00
2021-07-02T15:46:27-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
05-03979.a1
uuid:c50d47d1-da9d-4c63-84c8-4f6123cf5cb3
uuid:becb6833-d236-43e1-ba60-5d4d524c75e4
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 17 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
23 0 obj
[30 0 R 31 0 R 32 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(05-03979.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/05-03979.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:46:26 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: January 10, 2007)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(------)Tj
T*
(SSN: ------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 05-03979)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.317 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) declined to grant Ap\
plicant a security clearance. )Tj
41.649 0 Td
(On October 20,)Tj
-41.649 -1.125 Td
(2005, DOHA issued a statement of reasons \(SOR\) advising Applicant of t\
he)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.745 0 Td
(basis for that decision--security concerns)Tj
-30.745 -1.125 Td
(raised under Guideline B \(Foreign Influence\) and Guideline E \(Persona\
l Conduct\) of Department of Defense Directive)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(5220.6 \(Jan. 2, 1992\), as amended)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.941 0 Td
(\(Directive\). )Tj
4.886 0 Td
(Applicant requested a hearing. )Tj
12.467 0 Td
(On May 24, 2006, after the hearing,)Tj
-31.295 -1.125 Td
(Administrative Judge James A. Young denied Applicant's request for a sec\
urity clearance. )Tj
36.335 0 Td
(Applicant timely)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
6.999 0 Td
(appealed)Tj
-43.334 -1.125 Td
(pursuant to the Directive \266\266 E3.1.28 and E3.1.30.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant raised the following issue on appeal: whether the Administrati\
ve Judge erred by )Tj
36.407 0 Td
(concluding that the security)Tj
-36.407 -1.375 Td
(concerns raised under Guideline B had not been mitigated.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 297.5781 314.25 Tm
( \(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 297.5781 313.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 284.25 Tm
(Applicant argues that the evidence he provided in the proceeding below w\
as sufficient to require the Administrative)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Judge to conclude, as a matter of law, that he had rebutted, mitigated o\
r)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
28.852 0 Td
(extenuated the security concerns raised by the)Tj
-28.852 -1.125 Td
(Guideline B \(Foreign Influence\) allegations. )Tj
17.995 0 Td
(Applicant is essentially contending that the Judge's adverse decision sh\
ould)Tj
-17.995 -1.375 Td
(be reversed because the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
9.717 0 Td
(Judge erred in not applying Guideline B Mitigating Conditions 1)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 443.5703 245.25 Tm
( \(2\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 443.5703 244.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 457.3765 240.75 Tm
( and 3,)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 489.7026 245.25 Tm
( \(3\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 489.7026 244.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 503.5088 240.75 Tm
( and made an)Tj
-40.626 -1.125 Td
(unfavorable decision that is unsupported by the record as a whole.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(In this case, the Administrative Judge made sustainable findings that: \(\
1\) Applicant's parents, parents-in-law, and)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(brother are citizens and residents of the People's Republic of Chine \(P\
RC\), \(2\))Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.561 0 Td
(Applicant provides financial support of)Tj
-31.561 -1.125 Td
(about $1,000 to $2,000 a year to his parents and speaks with them by tel\
ephone approximately once a month, \(3\))Tj
T*
(Applicant traveled to the PRC to visit his)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.721 0 Td
(family and his wife's family in 1994, 2001, and 2004, and \(4\) the PRC \
is an)Tj
-16.721 -1.125 Td
(authoritarian state, has a poor human rights record, is among the most a\
ctive collectors of intelligence from U.S.)Tj
T*
(sources,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(and is known to attempt to exploit U.S. citizens through their relatives\
in the PRC. )Tj
36.717 0 Td
(Given those findings, the)Tj
-36.717 -1.125 Td
(Administrative Judge concluded that Applicant's ties with his family mem\
bers in the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
34.063 0 Td
(PRC raised security concerns)Tj
-34.063 -1.125 Td
(under Guideline B and that Disqualifying Condition 1 applied. )Tj
25.274 0 Td
(That conclusion shifted the burden of persuasion to)Tj
-25.274 -1.125 Td
(Applicant. )Tj
4.443 0 Td
(If there are admitted or proven facts and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.326 0 Td
(circumstances that raise security concerns, "[t]he applicant is)Tj
-20.769 -1.125 Td
(responsible for presenting witnesses and other evidence to rebut, explai\
n, extenuate, or mitigate facts admitted by the)Tj
T*
(applicant or)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
4.998 0 Td
(proven by Department Counsel, and has the ultimate burden of persuasion \
as to obtaining a favorable)Tj
-4.998 -1.125 Td
(clearance decision." Directive \266 E3.1.15.)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
(|jzuΥ} xfE)
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
37 0 obj
<>
endobj
38 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
Cqb>Xpl%3,qC~]:OHvϝ5{p:֠eQ[3N~["Ν%6]p[`uFmAH^3ϲC)ov _gӸx0H;!YF2_\Tèe`NUEpTD|n2#L.s^c@ǂ@tد fz
endstream
endobj
39 0 obj
<>stream
H|Xϙsgwmwvf`
1K>c" JDTKl ^7kUbyasA/wg3{ *D i7-vOl"bfV@ u
i fE
P+
@r@̘hsƚ oy?s8z#x=A^