%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T15:46:04-04:00
2021-07-02T15:46:03-04:00
2021-07-02T15:46:04-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
05-03635.a1
uuid:ce69b3f3-d446-4dd2-ae78-fef9600b8a28
uuid:546f0f4d-9b42-4204-908a-e048fd2cdda6
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 17 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
23 0 obj
[30 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(05-03635.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/05-03635.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:46:04 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: December 20, 2006)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(-------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: ------------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 05-03635)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
12.114 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION AND REMAND ORDER)Tj
8.32 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-4.332 -2.2 Td
(Eric H. Borgstrom, Esq., Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
5.11 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) declined to grant Ap\
plicant a security clearance. )Tj
41.649 0 Td
(On July 29,)Tj
-41.649 -1.125 Td
(2005, DOHA issued a statement of reasons \(SOR\) advising Applicant of t\
he)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.745 0 Td
(basis for that decision-security concerns)Tj
-30.745 -1.125 Td
(raised under Guideline B \(Foreign Influence\), Guideline F \(Financial \
Considerations\) and Guideline E \(Personal)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Conduct\), pursuant to Department of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.997 0 Td
(Defense Directive 5220.6 \(Jan. 2, 1992, as amended\) \(Directive\). )Tj
26.324 0 Td
(Applicant)Tj
-41.32 -1.125 Td
(requested a hearing. )Tj
8.274 0 Td
(On March 30, 2006, after the hearing, Administrative Judge Charles D. Ab\
lard granted Applicant's)Tj
-8.274 -1.125 Td
(request for a security clearance. )Tj
12.937 0 Td
(Department Counsel timely appealed pursuant to the Directive \266\266 E3\
.1.28 and E3.1.30.)Tj
-12.937 -2.125 Td
(Department Counsel raises two issues on appeal: whether the Judge erred \
in concluding that Applicant sufficiently)Tj
T*
(mitigated the Foreign Influence security concerns; and whether the Judge\
erred in)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
32.933 0 Td
(his application of one Financial)Tj
-32.933 -1.125 Td
(Considerations Mitigating Condition and in his ultimate conclusion that \
Applicant sufficiently mitigated the Financial)Tj
0 -1.375 TD
(Considerations security concerns.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 177.625 287.25 Tm
( \(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 177.625 286.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
/TT1 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 257.25 Tm
(Whether the Record Supports the Administrative Judge's Factual Findings)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
0 -2.125 TD
(Department Counsel adopted the Judge's Findings of Fact for purposes of \
the appeal, so no issue concerning the)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(sufficiency of the record support for those findings is before the Board\
. )Tj
28.742 0 Td
(The Judge)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(found the following facts concerning)Tj
-28.742 -1.125 Td
(Guidelines B and F.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant was born in Nigeria, where he lived with his mother until he w\
as 17 years old. )Tj
35.742 0 Td
(He then lived with an uncle for)Tj
-35.742 -1.125 Td
(three years before coming to the United States in 1989, at age 20. )Tj
26.409 0 Td
(He)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(received a GED then joined the U.S. Navy for a)Tj
-26.409 -1.125 Td
(four year enlistment. In 1995, after leaving the Navy, he became a natur\
alized U.S. citizen. )Tj
36.625 0 Td
(He also served a six year)Tj
-36.625 -1.125 Td
(enlistment in the National)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
10.609 0 Td
(Guard from 1997 to 2003. )Tj
(His mother is a citizen of and resides in Nigeria. )Tj
30.298 0 Td
(His father and)Tj
-40.907 -1.125 Td
(two brothers, who all came to the U.S. together in 1976, are U.S. citize\
ns. )Tj
29.743 0 Td
(He has never returned to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
10.079 0 Td
(Nigeria,)Tj
-39.822 -1.125 Td
(communicates with his mother infrequently by email no more than four tim\
es a year, and has not spoken to her by)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(phone since 2003 when they communicated concerning a problem of his)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
29.242 0 Td
(brother. )Tj
(He has affection for his mother, but)Tj
-29.242 -1.125 Td
(has limited current contact and had little contact with her for 20 years\
. )Tj
28.323 0 Td
(The Judge specifically found, "While Nigeria is a)Tj
-28.323 -1.125 Td
(country with many problems)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.776 0 Td
(despite its great wealth \(Exh. IV\), Applicant's limited contact with i\
t and lack of contact)Tj
-11.776 -1.125 Td
(even with his one remaining relative living there, indicates little like\
lihood of security concern." )Tj
38.674 0 Td
(Decision at)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
4.776 0 Td
(2. )Tj
(Nowhere)Tj
-43.451 -1.125 Td
(else in the decision does the Judge address the security situation in Ni\
geria.)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
(!$:9~ z\()
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
35 0 obj
<>
endobj
36 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
Cqb>Xpl%3,qC~]:OHvϝ5{p:֠eQ[3N~["Ν%6]p[`uFmAH^3ϲC)ov _gӸx0H;!YF2_\Tèe`NUEpTD|n2#L.s^c@ǂ@tد fz
endstream
endobj
37 0 obj
<>stream
H|XTgEE,pwZ!ygLE%Ƃb[,*vQDPDPD^vX