5-;\ac6 73n72v7v3zuFQ};זcߌRqȼ<ʸr^Kg88 kq 8| b83P ԡ)CڤPU8pfG9_鿇< 3>oV+J`i
a#'Hᐦ|(0C2 V&x /-p
`+ pH(H8 3p B\P`PD"]t*]tC(LtTB6ݡtzHzD Q=^ѿi
FSN4i&:\ogsŝCސ*Oj 1&2;f$b;#˜3sa
*^xRڳ#:3օuen;z^,}zK NRg@z(YGcTz"!=TTU3TɪUjj*M5Gξ`_X ֗cA,}M% [ օbGF3wg[ܥCݝRk@<@qww-u)RC%r(7r*r)wr+<\pnC%yX G1y\')yZ OgsŹp.:/W]!ɿYyNEyI^WU]]5u-][uu=]_7
u#X7Mu3fS(UW@5H
d5D
Up5BTh5FMx5APD5IMVjnBԭtkFt{\/+Zw u'SR WSuP RuT S m uR}m?u,2&kߋgx!x-ފw"Y D(>*š4K1yP:Q,|2R&,JR*D)F)\P^ʗi/J2T@T
S*JTmYww]}Oo;Rq*A%)JQi*Ce
ShP(Q8MI4"h
Mi9Mz^zީd^}P 'RgvX0˒3{p: N8#g̜r6n sqny9 E3i]_s~7ڍ\Ѝux7 qa.ED7rq.%9Kqi..u]e
*w]\+qeUW\kqmu ܐ܄r3n-%iYm-܁;r']+wKSDwn iɽ7 ȃ{DkL<a-")֟(b)))2N):UV\7MqKwB^aW y^qW Jy2^YWޫ{J^efy;Q↺an;Nmbi^Wͫjz^ Wϫ5z^kZ /+oCzD >lwvl(v8'}g99qg4 9a_"=2 F&1OYٜd 9yȋ|
_#?
0(P (( BiAYCyT0 ʨꨁڨhFh&hfhhVh6h+* ڣ:: Aw| =M't1]M7BoA_C @]P҅7 ]D:@c.9t.K
:|cy h恍h'ccbX"L,D8& LdD`
bcfbf;s1s1YXXHDax%F bx$ IXeX+
k [
۱ì3{\ו؋}؏8Cx,]}<bN4MHQY j1bQbO l2l32 \ ;\27A;ζs\;η Bxx^^
b3as 57-s1w1s3W5s ?_/?֏?O
_os9fRL*$n Iѿ:? uƿޙ]E ":C||!qw%4kELS1bx x7R ,}GQqL 3qRM) oo9bKxZopPCzN
'^F
l~
, >KHWi eFs pjka CK5q<}>0IP60JL ,RYp
dW3H<'5^ _Ll9StX oQʧ P1y*5U*: UVR-&si*9~V/%pMIgyCJ#G[OӠj `ǁE RxbX]yhJsy3&A%5m8pyжS3ڼKݠW?V7 ? 8p^F(F V9 vya d\/|mǰ5DExm-| j 5q]',Y fRf!v3CYcm>pX;Ri00XpM.fx(xpFFy .夸L`JZ
%f voGdş!&ނ >nQ+&h.ⅼZ0s"WT*ɲeR>
&} 3a4,rXnB :h
hQك2^t.
^ٝ1 n7{ɯ\k *ES}N *ܤma% i E\`jn5:)AȜv Mȅ&,1W\W HD%yqs?7ڎ4hKR4?/R5kbMMr%<^ {vbk D7qMU&0)-8)o1qZ} С C| 6K|491RL|O"%Oɇ8vFk|C\y-R\+* h`
K\
m0(-5%yI z?߷O^1= -kΝ6U)գ5#o(IznnUKPDДCiOș32}dvHИTͣk 5B/ܺO3n.$wtb扩pk5".U9-;C d8zvdqHϨzAa]=F/mi`DO q9T]ezAx[JhB6a-ͶvCZ}jS`uc$SgLg=
Ǣ?x7N<15ЌzuZ> "1 ҫ-#ƤCK}k+*=VR3:@
TTloPG {u1.N{@Q^Z{R#[>#K'nIyE dK#}"4hձL<eǘèf\@(ݚoOp~-%Zl/?#9ي Y^ G^LJ͝N˫TQSmkT@)>C==X=5{:u^@FXR_(O(Owy{d=pWlWT?dDacw }~>Ǿ\b;G0FVuDV
$6uB -B%IݦiRiQi5c%[e l{g`e w~>*x36Ě1*?ɛF!8dݰ1C&zvm [(=N>F?&^S(1zmd|lm Ri\RPڨԏ<+Y4 XiUS}cKN Kl [ wIģ_$'d ]fDKaX[3DHPBEUP%*188&ehh&#
?0ڤ
m0jd("?Mo`GvaUW@.6>j_p;CejǠe1
Uv K"#CŨY
#w
v>?Tͣ0tB-S~/ 7T4 Fg "b@
ɺ^*:}#+|&* a[#ѝNwB1 ['J
x =Z z,E F`+hيcic/|bm}窳lu-Eج u/?=_L95U[~tqp|F;CeDƿ m~+BUw%FUe 5ػ2Uؗ^pZmĠ;bԮj?t1 b ꘅ>݉rr:VlM݈"*h{=;ő9g )8uebQUu 7 NGV}`sI:t귀gNpI:!9TvCEAeԛom-#"Dm P rQ 2.48)ĕz-qNDhBi! ^ -o߄ Q!Lq < $O慙XqDD3,\HF7BeB(
~EC3D91F3": o6l! 19Ô=0gʦN!&C0A!UDKl20cIhI+*㢀SZr yI#I7") BޞK%KB d߅G`A fg ۏ(#Wt͞ѩb=pJZG> -vj1}/M[Wʋ
uu{{Sx4 %5DRQ:HUrܣWځm9I ,dI5?r T`搧P iE 88rplԌLsD3$ X ŸAN)%pN!_Vӥ
m*4/: DEJw6f 4i_KkV
%;d^̿k_}տ> Lб{'άۢl"揎][#R=2mWӽusK$ETHC/0ogm365 c; ǵM
)}:$9pL6{ Hb20NBVzٙCp??Y?oo9iLTf!4mv##5R%HP " M(QCӝn
m Stxw6 Qzզ O~ /Ğ=8; r?7>M:IA0 K+`-WypDߌ^*(--V+bzqn۞Ln1RH:9"0 AVk8y>LDb"xgu#3/?2; ]t:Ebi[w8qy3^{ϙwmx<̎=kb0&M#$V hQHJw[
Y(
JE(*C6jU "*YTQ{Y(iwVX~{TnTE*L70 }H1{^TDmTBQHM}L,{V߆wI":8dۂ6%? # 5CW RHGSY-G2Uq
%66e"G/YI3ؗT/g; nSU..}L8;ɖN=Z/;P<U1ԙVSZ
)+ua:_N2!
'9P9Ra-G:8bUw3'0bJ(Sr݆iZ\
c)T_b8eX58Y{ 35Xqz`I&Z%|"T%JB OA\ eʰnlAhWњ/К/$M{ w}(QܦN$ 53tvoKe߰80, GoI'd|܆Pk#''?e~=?8+(p 0?_w[^ DBndqHjK P2wAt p9خe{ k2j!_9)fs} JL3*nޝ_r \zKhym$[Ɣwwñm|&-M;p,f
Q9Ue'L.nH$YF A4ڤTrI6r,e0GkEɖJ y
b2jbgUhhҒJ"28nEoDAڏLfi)"XHdIz2D ?g?3nFlhpi? VZq"2ϦUN}oᗌ}e t?W{l >g>?g%q HBx
4@!@Kx,eP(%ebt 0A˫ mZ5UZU{H
,֖d9rf7|{7~XjSy!UkjRLs? i]?2#Zo<4dF '&1b%M36ś " bK8( _v /ֵ0u\:+-zZI-2חcz3R!Sf0τـ+y^(v"QBXH4"ak62$,qwM Y"
yA"Qs^x<Fwkp==TԷV COՆ~o@u7+> HæH? GGb#v[SSTz^D5Z *7V-,-7#Bca+l\Tw1rMc@)#%b(bU0!Yqʲ*N~2UHj'rVUdQog# &L&Z+i$rLHpj8#_FP
F it:υ0 gFT!+,p H@yrH^=Skj: EI&ݷ$u4^&$.= 8_Dxc\7؈ׯ@H[p:U/<p#(
/u&JLޜ ?SfюD8 MK Lnb5Go75͙,x(af\t xum {ZǺ95̢_R0VzoJV/<3~(mޖމKo,=AF1lĕ~l0k^ު` +iR5KKH1 ~ G|؊'$X`ĂHaq_煸j`ޣX;
]yȍcH/K DԌ^t,/]"nB+RS
3෦-e|Me|]GԞ[J~J$d'& e34 crcV ʼnφ_ u{zҁ}p~wûNN\) 2Olڃ?~d/8x+<{ ڷ UZ*yY'UQ;n6'}3ԩXL ! c_"*eT ^QJy=8(Ƙ_CDsͣބ #(W %p)o12>ad/7ުR=o'H-'>o7
+?+gDՠ#Ԧ3mZe *2N\SFs|jB)5EKuW:su9[ {4J!t8X'?.s9ܼc !cYO:>N Yigk =AA9x< =`Ca~-Kt%E@op;ZWJHKw!ғ/aIutt|\ 48oxrЍ|ԄH1K&~Q!{tA &~ήwx,;_Yó qgr'nϪ]*[WjAф|#z 2&ʾشLLsKkkV#Ϙ;
Ÿ MɘRd6
~d2a߯v W!f )ٗ@s)Bk V
Ш[Jgځ5N %{.,M$B2$WAX`+f"07MUT PˎLc=kL Tٲaw\ E:2nֲ_nBߎ u"w
ڿٮ63|%}\rgc'ٵ$n8BG
c
k3`P2
*M AJ:w4$hHH&1iQ:$vZM}ݗϟy}[>^i5+ϛۉ!3{JoNJT-MoYྐ,8U!V ^:WEcm&!- G,:úR}^9}Xec
A /`J>>F1R1$z]ChW4/2Aߓie~ ΰ/M?nɻQ赎@\ϬzWtѫޑ&N
GSdtDWFS\u|C&pBo2C3:\X'SvҀ,Mc[iಊώ\b8י?פ.0}D/~V{)ntt "G#AxAds~'K:sxQ2%;b2-Đԩ|TV-IP1 jnQ-GC Wgޛ"]DZN#9, `: 2;elԢ@Ňډ>zF
*MQ|G!pI;(mya8`)4~ɞX|v\v y!| ?I'{ܼwBkF 3ՎIE)%gV|rmX 1C{b]̷J߹P-cu{NLj
T<:vuP!\ V V{f#
>k"`p 'dc|up^33 9(J $OJA.HG*
S4w2切 LTf8(/(.E;*tvLh1%H
⅂k;4|
BSzPUxa
M)ghﱅ йs{# SA8tr\%u 6߉ً*3V9 2(ط7?B w{-Rtio4OB@| |2!Xσ!1ޮs1Xat$oc '5 H oʡQ>JIbňZD> j = eDK0EZh9!%[w,egD\ %D^LN %nUj mرg6֮mmo1XWt\,[U<6|E .W|EJmfoc65Kw8-}z.ð$]RB/Dyrc|,s( o !F 3?̂+CEiy|95M6]nt; _ bnxR.PC$ ԨLvènuC*T*^3|5/(J$ X B~ HUS&J 7Hw6z5{K.b
)_~)F & cpnxn]sԨiO)Z)'0W4 pmy#V!$Eog]\%Stv0w"q+(aj`I*# h U6 N^0~CA6xպWvPr!趉 @IWA@wj=pm CI
V\cspe9?+ $xmᩃ/C\yKQHU
LO>M+FSɇ`%̺ ̬[SN 0$܍R']awmwI@w^ !1 ܌2~-cEo1 28 e%:]j 0 *qxʽp5W-E B<\^ +q` v㋅w$ Xō~Dž& u
. lvy)zʦ
_D4l뜏sNN#8tYxz<+Ɩ;w7q]q]Y+ ^-KB-'l36P !NL h1Mj
IydҒ6)-͇f3Lie$t+3jtutsw
k,#u̺/۶FvwDި ǏF֏5[s}8exrLj&=V|ͺ[[ Wj^ڊ־>|p;mԞ齭:ΧAKV\K`4M2
AW rwaq8ؐ
X i6ܒ, f,l_dd LWr %wX|B^J/$B
a<-
g0-A5#zYؖ ә9!e,')V7ЏCVFHmY,:KÇ "Ʌ| 9H~H% #)ĘXz.5Q[C=ZOuX#TL)rS]D
ۼ4ץG ;S !ڥSgHм{OZR 暆kx3[2Z5I:Rqޱo
ӗVƎT}?M8}oNYCF&{^ljX9Tػh$ s<bKq\I 8 %#g#;RsEXј*Eij-J?]Ba[yS]N< sb Ƿ
+i[c9E ;;&~B.I^ R1.j!UkE4q&]JeӴBJtf@7?S57cUx9T4kxj) c ON P#h8_+ܼ*J<>![Q!!KyJ[uH AmxxQP(ڟKR -֝V'cC a
1)@Qϑ7z@XT^j^ ~$Nu^vŵà",.]+((6?IaF[8Yɍv /n{g׆#4bUjO-BCγNѼFi
=\5 }U[`!o C ȣ uud_
~"=L0
s,m߂!tCa,pRt[|j5$}e9q<ǒA9Lq(Ut
N$9ы-C AMrwOcN0GiaG2?$E t,R;^ yRQG"_Ě.# 3swwۣ4IRTsgR o{
5kXZ14vobU4Iݾ ~!:n'ըѩJ:ki:PyJO8nh04`#\
CCHVQ
<)&w_>K Ͼw緳c;/c;q{ӤIզ˖#C}Q0mb+FS5P7tcV,TU63!MCID -)v=:u|C&1t !4{WPDQNB&(&eO=-69 "4A N8R$u2Z V=p8" Fma} Oƅ뚊ؐ\)$-zpd}@ܼwc}0 ~]ao7 [ g
==t: ǞZzO(Ȣz2R{ocf*<4=K嗄`|EmmD}ă.ʭ(*2HdZ (Y0O`2QS$0v+! l() rM(
qn.#DXaqxYZ¾˒ņl}[l#[+4\ulWBwxYo[5U͵̷w7
(v 7"9c-6W~o٥O F}{ce=HJxUz^?'ޒNg?Ş߶5;ֿF
Lj~pJnCU MN$ooV_:Dr悿ƨ i [(,sqZ#,Eaj.1@5ٴ'`/Qf9ɼĘuG!.Y+RqoLшM.MI$ $O;} HyIңކ= /UCx+\4~ += ^bYyFu;$o,fo,N}(STcKCG}&.n\"4!d`䢘G'"\ZU$ o')b)-!{ްSvPF,U 䏈&q]%ORS&bdlMFqNpޢKyY7ɔ|TP m~k=pZ PVŶ˂- rv@2 Uʤc] IPx \bm44JޝV FȆ̥8˰ vys@fc]Uwp+&3֘;*(TZL u̾ Kۢq(=P(v?헗>[Q8Kl+Kg!b; E ÂT,Q2ZՁ
zhL7~<lE Q$"Jz'RCIݗL Ov1·}4WMdݔKw"ddI.:MG%B] *@^_8uIy)" rG tXւq\ĪWϼS \5u #x.~$Ȱ_ "qg2(gH&5۵= âȇlfD_.'j%_®j2g%& LBmXbG<ٰl xzH@]K pFó^h-MIW9l) ~Q
(n2v5ʣ2Ut]ԣapr`)Fmk5]4lջ:nqGpc`h;DS%jj1IJ sd?A >k6Ue@C^-@U]Wt{yO(OGbL5'jcV6ђ1!~I4BM;3Q1cjEUc,ӵϻ3tof}ιϹ{oπEC JCR0|Afĥݦ4`loȘ0 T+ 9p[SRaf 3vpj dIb!ot͈X F^''df釴!qJ 1Tx&GNH#O*V}@aDL"? 6y|]c"úeDtC[ a5VW!x(223>#?BXQ&^|fyQ+v >J.jȐTjdNd *?U/i^?xyS/^N wfk/Q
[LQ. w/D 1Z`AHpX8q^vJl' GO,ޚ1*x5V?fZC\DYSHn߫q5Y(Yi1[ SI'p%GӤ]- kܶr^ %1Mg rhL0HcΡ=:ɋºz|KR g'wXS / Xb5~`qVr ڍGؿV˷"yX,Xz`]%CDL3) yEh.Otj=Uݸi ga˰Xmۀ5lO{ߩ3|' 4y>܈Oc;Ⱦ qpʁ :&lJ4d
a=b 槳/|Sֳoߏa|ۮ f ōVϡWbhcY̾>H7euN+[;CI}M"fYA쳬M+>xh= J^" E,oYՍt~
b kqXc^WuR.CrդjquFm`4}&4Y5eܾWv3%o:@?aV ?54h-E-w$Ʒˁ|UHQ@\|#Fw" -?h2-j5(Yմ@"F~ 6?
Z#%[:A `gu=-'ݗu9?0G3B
qr-r;y
sKi ιUеϯ <ЙQh;7T'Ol#aڡ[E4E QW9Ω6;e''<$WXy-gr⛽rǧʛȟ+Zyz*^YLRq1xrWx "`,M b\\IKΐ9'G)QǓXSZB[ۯ!W H>ZI{Le !];=k6ՙpYwAASkɁ|r)sX̗}߅\S@UL>xM},3yu`/srH )(n~s5"ik"N qCTn5{-x>$\op
asQkN '?H_Χ9b KdnA-R#QB}[2 JQ߄
Um+>>pidY{CD\ Fn;c$ԧ0M3EG%S,I<-k21v#ދݰ}y[|@S+T'^QqyO#h'4_ƋǠo5/ʫyJTGo{\adӻFt:ImQ/JW(`]{([ k\=mܻe[ ; >euc!|d* 78h:yk`MC JS ݹ~_%2 i߃sv|is$gO{021212Ip5' c.e>c.e>3켿
QN= [;WM"K~8j mG#kXkϡ^.YTW ?ww/A$ClҀRimNoH4;` ~Ӹsyg'
tj#?i
ܡv!WZ萻6ߣMKY>J0~g;[qE(+ ]&R;JIDsk !y"zKV<$W7cYkk^Wԭ .BO ̅}؝ȣjn=|Vh/'3o9%k $G|T#z-T
&i.ZfP3 ?Ru _9L~ :5Gג?>NHVMSQkǔc 0GE z ez _tFkʦ~w|_9 uJ#knu[께 44'c izJ
+uYHLub8Z`<1*`+h`8Kx
CT] iM: KwYlmﱰz3t{6~c
zOgL`>`0<
{4 ǁ/,0/.pu
ډsMku1#+ MRnu1J ב.[[?9=~{jjz"#: vRsjOO8g&aRw꜊\"
.藩?yV
A C g%Pbv-g!_EufE_AlidhɡUHe>gNodn_kً\ v[L%c}Y>h4O=mS)T1qϖVdZmsy*u wwY_#O hH'KogrZ[=]}dbkT@GE4U9 3_AV-7 lU|ۙؿ=4B4$_K_ՙ.ԟT*^5A$'AN`.w|= m6IjEdoM͝Չ`O`/cF^+w>={-Z&x@ coyV
nZ3E ]+@O6hycsZj^D::B[<ֳ.볆s k]]g~U7jm뺖"fFm筇z&&b=51oU== b(&lPF#ھ]5]O w s5;`@ Ea4Z7]B`-eZ)</bPe .;C+״EcΨ< jK w1? mwQK/xGShL+$p A,7EZzB U-S賋v Q ўHkVcT虀δLB-Z~ig,s$
u0 LO,z
FB3.Ϙ1^1'`Ք DI5lZdo\O ws4w&1>O`S]r%[?bW!Fsa- oxgUr/cu+/|wɻdJw qϚϞUnh ,jc1opot~E=b{= 0S7}S V0q ])ǭv$KNƇH=sB;~B4w wȹ1p -bL2^=^w <9KZ}Me mUs[։l5Eefmh-
5H AVN͚ae{Ȫ_99s|X$š6 #D_kyj<{Iv\x 57ܝs 6@*ԥTs [yPρ\N̽~6'qI 97 ƹў| V_ pO< c@6:1S۴MUt\I /6-^CFtqs;N0Q`;>{AmR YԝqLH~ksBˡr˾=%Ρݽk9ɾ1c?!m9dau6~Q)sTY9BB?&IPo:)[5BIf̰ FO%;o3 M?Rqhi 5aX/ p`ADtI"Z5ãoriw8-_j1}=hzo{[wz_ hG }֦=_ 68駚dcE# n@KՎo{moU
UN?9ޔǜlSySxܩKVNX!{tLr\ z )b"ȵoas{`Va1W]ƇÌ\]R6ڄ=8ޢ?ru *r)Tj )b ֣RL`YUKO9ʸ?'ޞ72ۭj6bλHTE^>1PKjot)1 []T6NFe`>n- 1z8ܳ;}kD3V% C3qn{}elT(0k^?>g w qÈ7r ,
nRnf[-
j8_o6j 5|z_gn` j;7cy x>Oa flV)q|7Uk~
bگb+gnbU*]]36>ߊF d|9PolØ묑;9Hm?6z>jͱԍic Ob=='T+/{$Ӛ\*U |cm[(`nu2 Y=|HB9$[di{#_2ݐ<%YZ!>҂G w rh*ѧp뽤Q(;yi11LuNc9c'iY*8![D\4ڐ?uh _QWig&#:cC{(ǥqHg0owyƨjTkXmwt.ñy
}xL&h 2WMdnk 68utw`8H2"Zڂ.v (
eyr`Ü1ֲ;cd
8%OfP=\T9Y䧴UrgntgK9teжэ;aKhÜ2߇|XUJS.:/bX *? -Sm6ʹ:xWpe(!.v:qN>K9uˍo\)kn}`0v{U7nI+w!R[Ђ1rnLڋ3-#1MrOڥ,!k *gm¶C}>5xI-Jy!OH?i_W]8eָOy>fQQ'S 8C4og§AOo-YJ/d2T"$UЯ ъD QoD%jDEjN-h|hBP(
BP(
BP(
BP(
BP(
BP(
BP(4"ݤNETKWdL4^A " ڍ&ˤ<# e6o *"l>ְ;Ԍ<,3Vfnuq6P?9ڜ< !N
GzɁl8
!Y">&5j~<:P S%ҁnQiiEi'j ڃ ƽ7fX ða71F!%fᳳ#l "0]q#G覾&zQ+Z1O"1GΧGƂS ;"j#2cN<) [+J=}fZQ9{sщ~2kdGj841E2>hOa1L"
>d}="rbOD }ߞd? V݊z`7!pa!xGF} Ѥ7 OXwgGN d|8@D : ~lc`YÓÝN4DyGdw"6$ cDT$֟i^36$8{:mSl|ͲH3Ixϧ/ȗhŘ XSǎ!rimT
ݔ^mv~EBOqpu'xe"cLxЌG ` x3ljbz+4 YY#ebuR6}1pLlJ //&--̪Lfbyu)&:$;I^5֍p!*pbX.i6J˭U?+ *bi M%p bg}٨֧?j߈1GwM!d{F+I/&3NiOK7Z{F KC5RL NR
2$>|
q,/@7'M)x1NB v$µ bab~L犺ZH=U Ǭr! m
|P^QؿnTJ[^n &x
voOZE@ҝ -W o
ZkAƆF6_+
~/ RW}ǧ>>J|]9c9zw̫ ~Z ^(*_R!\I/(AIqXkeU`6歖56BmJѥ9Ѽ**jlY.!7D Xlχ,uU 0P~ .PX6{٨>Otcivqh bjY3ʺ0ܨ_v! Z .KcCmE
*E,sbS!R ХN7Eci֯{z괐ki:RI /sK(H$z. CA4A5hV͊.Wv}H2LeZ*
nϸf]|aS[5R$:.¶Bʛ>ic<8;/ &Ӂftٔ/@RYV?Y/88l6$%֕47MfoYYLkmOnӇmz67H
bꋠE!ḓnJ |-PH }RѨ8w~37 LE;% лA/F鷉]!FѯI@"_ /[EOA(m3qX /9Y#>9Y51%BZa<.td7=EN>inF7+0O#n:n
̮Yl= H%|#Zf %ϙz3,w-4/l*Iu ٔ*乼4>ka vyMX!wbO3_f{
6Z#\eN !U9x∶hhVhOiڠ6=o]S+:{Ew7FIثrVo
SjY^5=' |֠Czwbc1yT2xBy?p-MX\gt_:dǙQȌuC7fmFثj/Aāc5eAy˭)(~mN( !Ӊ z>I1EM%hr(&1FW2C2`L2, % 柘4ٔf{Z.DLD1h0{rB^ĽWmOLLNDwgd t_vgiE'/B'D
l<0]Q 9]`~.
匮`~2EVZ4a*IW MO wzձAUɣeoLe_xb
i(BP2ζ rm.I;żf)iNy_eךixȖdހ/ ~:
endstream
endobj
16 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 3/Type/Page>>
endobj
49 0 obj
[51 0 R]
endobj
50 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(05-04648.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/05-04648.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:47:09 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(E3.1.33. )Tj
(Our scope of review under this standard is narrow and we may not substit\
ute our judgment for that of the)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 741.75 Tm
(Administrative Judge. )Tj
9.082 0 Td
(We may not set aside an Administrative Judge's decision)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
22.98 0 Td
("that is rational, based on consideration)Tj
-32.063 -1.125 Td
(of the relevant factors, and within the scope of the authority delegated\
to the [Judge]..." )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
35.146 0 Td
(Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Ass'n)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
10.49 0 Td
(, 463)Tj
-45.637 -1.125 Td
(U.S. at 42. )Tj
(We review matters of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.385 0 Td
(law )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(de novo)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(.)Tj
-13.385 -2.125 Td
(The application of disqualifying and mitigating conditions and whole per\
son factors does not turn simply on a finding)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(that one or more of them apply to the particular facts of a case. Rather\
, their)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.599 0 Td
(application requires the exercise of sound)Tj
-30.599 -1.125 Td
(discretion in light of the record evidence as a whole. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
21.187 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( ISCR Case No. 01-14740 at 7 \(App. Bd. Jan.15, 2003\). Thus,)Tj
-21.187 -1.125 Td
(the presence of some potentially)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.19 0 Td
(disqualifying evidence does not alone compel the Judge to make an unfavo\
rable)Tj
-13.19 -1.125 Td
(security clearance decision. As the trier of fact, the Judge has to weig\
h the evidence as a whole and decide whether)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
46.231 0 Td
(the)Tj
-46.231 -1.125 Td
(favorable evidence outweighs the unfavorable evidence, or )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
23.823 0 Td
(vice versa)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
4.025 0 Td
(. A Department Counsel's disagreement with the)Tj
-27.848 -1.125 Td
(Judge's weighing of the evidence, or an ability to argue for a different\
)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
28.115 0 Td
(interpretation of the evidence, is not sufficient to)Tj
-28.115 -1.125 Td
(demonstrate the Judge weighed the evidence or reached conclusions in a m\
anner that is arbitrary, capricious, or contrary)Tj
T*
(to law.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Department Counsel relies heavily on Board precedent interpreting FIMC 3\
\()Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
30.88 0 Td
(Contact and correspondence with foreign)Tj
-30.88 -1.375 Td
(citizens are casual and infrequent)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
13.554 0 Td
(\) when, in fact, the Judge neither applied)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.55 0 Td
(nor cited FIMC 3.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 463.9023 543.75 Tm
( \(6\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 463.9023 543 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 477.7085 539.25 Tm
( The Judge analyzed the)Tj
-38.476 -1.125 Td
(nature of Applicant's relationships with both his sister in Iran and his\
wife's family in Bolivia to conclude that FIMC 1)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(applied because none of them were either agents of a foreign power or in\
a position to be exploited in a way that could)Tj
T*
(force Applicant to choose between loyalty to them and loyalty to the Uni\
ted States. Contrary to Department Counsel's)Tj
T*
(assertion on appeal, the Judge correctly cited and applied the "very hea\
vy burden" standard of proof to Applicant's)Tj
T*
(mitigation case because of the hostile nature of one of the countries)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
27.213 0 Td
(involved. )Tj
4 0 Td
(Applicant came to the United States from)Tj
-31.212 -1.125 Td
(Iran when it was a strong U.S. ally, as it had been for the entire 18 ye\
ars of his life to that point. The fact that he fully)Tj
T*
(agrees with the adverse)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
9.607 0 Td
(characterization of the current regime there does not contradict the Jud\
ge's finding that "the)Tj
-9.607 -1.125 Td
(mitigating evidence substantially outweighs the evidence supporting the \
SOR," as Department Counsel)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
41.539 0 Td
(asserts. )Tj
(The)Tj
-41.539 -1.125 Td
(Judge's conclusion that FIMC 1 applies in this case is based on his exam\
ination of the relevant evidence, is rational and)Tj
T*
(is within the scope of authority delegated to him to adjudicate)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
24.966 0 Td
(this clearance determination. )Tj
11.772 0 Td
(He found that Applicant's)Tj
-36.738 -1.125 Td
(strong U.S. attachments and absence of any loyalty to his or his wife's \
foreign family members showed that none of)Tj
T*
(them were in a position)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
9.637 0 Td
(to be exploited in a way that could force Applicant to choose between co\
nflicting loyalties.)Tj
-9.637 -1.125 Td
(Department Counsel's argument for a virtual )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
18.064 0 Td
(per se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( rule, denying clearance to any U.S. citizen who has a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
24.13 0 Td
(family)Tj
-42.194 -1.125 Td
(member living in another country because presence there subjects them to\
possible foreign exploitation, is contrary to)Tj
T*
(the Directive's express language, its adjudicative guidelines, and its)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
27.2 0 Td
(intent that all evidence, pro and con, be individually)Tj
-27.2 -1.125 Td
(evaluated in reaching these determinations in the best interest of natio\
nal security. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
33.072 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( Directive \266 E2.2.2. The Judge's)Tj
-33.072 -1.125 Td
(conclusion that FIMC 1)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
9.777 0 Td
(applies is neither arbitrary and capricious nor contrary to law.)Tj
-9.777 -2.125 Td
(Department Counsel also asserts that the Judge's whole person analysis, \
resulting in a favorable finding for Applicant, is)Tj
T*
(arbitrary and capricious and contrary to law. )Tj
17.993 0 Td
(After correctly discussing the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
12.052 0 Td
("fully relevant" nature of Directive \266)Tj
-30.044 -1.125 Td
(E2.2.1.8. \()Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(The potential for pressure, coercion, exploitation or duress)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
27.886 0 Td
(\) in whole person analysis under Guideline B,)Tj
-27.886 -1.125 Td
(Department Counsel incorrectly, and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.023 0 Td
(without citing legal authority, asserts that whole person analysis is lo\
gically)Tj
-15.023 -1.125 Td
(predicated on the assumption that the Judge found no specific mitigating\
conditions apply. )Tj
36.437 0 Td
(Department Counsel also)Tj
-36.437 -1.125 Td
(incorrectly asserts that whole person analysis may only be based on cons\
ideration of Applicant's actual conduct, to the)Tj
T*
(exclusion of other evidence bearing on reliability, trustworthiness and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
28.214 0 Td
(potential for coercion or exploitation. )Tj
15.217 0 Td
(Directive \266)Tj
-43.432 -1.125 Td
(E2.2.1., describing the whole person concept, requires consideration of \
a sufficient period of a person's life, not merely)Tj
T*
(his or her conduct,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
7.692 0 Td
(including available, reliable information about the person, past and pre\
sent, favorable and)Tj
-7.692 -1.125 Td
(unfavorable. )Tj
5.275 0 Td
(Directive \266 E2.2.3 requires that the ultimate determination be an ove\
rall common sense)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
35.136 0 Td
(determination)Tj
-40.412 -1.125 Td
(based upon careful consideration of the individual Guidelines, "each of \
which is to be evaluated in the context of the)Tj
T*
(whole person.")Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The Judge not only specifically found that FIMC 1 applied to mitigate se\
curity concerns raised in the SOR, but further)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(noted several factors, including Applicant's minimal contact with his si\
ster,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.34 0 Td
(his absence of any communication with his)Tj
-30.34 -1.125 Td
(wife's family, his powerful attachments in and commitment to the United \
States, to find that very little potential exists)Tj
T*
(for pressure, coercion, exploitation)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.217 0 Td
(or duress. )Tj
(I find this to be a permissible and sustainable conclusion as part of th\
e)Tj
-14.217 -1.125 Td
(Judge's articulated "whole person" analysis. )Tj
17.77 0 Td
(The various factors cited by the Judge were not considered in)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
24.797 0 Td
(isolation, but)Tj
-42.567 -1.125 Td
(in his analysis of the totality of circumstances indicating negligible p\
otential for exploitation based on foreign influence.)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
51 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[464.0 541.0 478.0 552.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 2/Type/Page>>
endobj
52 0 obj
[54 0 R]
endobj
53 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(05-04648.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/05-04648.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:47:09 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 745.5 Tm
(The Administrative Judge's favorable security clearance decision is REVE\
RSED.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Signed: Michael Y. Ra'anan)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 16 719.25 cm
0 0 m
134.795 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 694.5 Tm
(Michael Y. Ra'anan)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge)Tj
T*
(Chairman, Appeal Board)Tj
T*
(Signed: Jean E. Smallin)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 617.25 cm
0 0 m
114.656 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 592.5 Tm
(Jean E. Smallin)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge)Tj
T*
(Member, Appeal Board)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
14.338 -2.125 Td
(Separate Opinion of Member David M. White)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-14.338 -2.125 Td
(I respectfully dissent. )Tj
8.831 0 Td
(I do not agree that the Administrative Judge erred. )Tj
20.382 0 Td
(Furthermore, this is not a case in which)Tj
-29.213 -1.125 Td
(correction of any error identified by the majority either mandates or is\
cured by)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.988 0 Td
(reversal. Department Counsel raises two)Tj
-31.988 -1.125 Td
(issues on appeal: \(1\) whether the Judge erred by applying Foreign Infl\
uence Mitigating Condition \(FIMC\) 1 and)Tj
0 -1.375 TD
(concluding that relatives in Iran and Bolivia)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.856 0 Td
(are not in a position to be exploited by a foreign power;)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 497.2012 451.5 Tm
( \(5\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 497.2012 450.75 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 511.0073 447 Tm
( and \(2\) whether)Tj
-41.251 -1.125 Td
(the Judge's whole person analysis is arbitrary, capricious and contrary \
to law.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant is a 46 year old software engineer with bachelor's and master'\
s degrees in electrical engineering from a U.S.)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(university. )Tj
4.5 0 Td
(He was born in Iran. )Tj
(His parents were a teacher and a school)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
24.49 0 Td
(principal. )Tj
4.054 0 Td
(In 1978, at age 18, he moved to the)Tj
-33.044 -1.125 Td
(U.S. and has lived here ever since, becoming a naturalized citizen in 19\
90. )Tj
30.073 0 Td
(He has visited Iran only twice since 1978, to)Tj
-30.073 -1.125 Td
(visit his mother during an)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
10.527 0 Td
(illness and later to attend her funeral. )Tj
15.105 0 Td
(Both of his parents are now deceased and he has)Tj
-25.632 -1.125 Td
(formally renounced his Iranian citizenship. )Tj
17.438 0 Td
(His brother left Iran at age 17, has never returned, and lives)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
24.046 0 Td
(permanently in)Tj
-41.485 -1.125 Td
(the United States. )Tj
7.332 0 Td
(Applicant has a close relationship with his brother. )Tj
20.579 0 Td
(His sister, a home-maker married to an)Tj
-27.911 -1.125 Td
(anesthesiologist, still lives in Iran. )Tj
13.915 0 Td
(In 2003 he married a Bolivian)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
12.274 0 Td
(citizen who is now a permanent resident alien of the)Tj
-26.189 -1.125 Td
(U.S. and intends to apply for citizenship as soon as she becomes eligibl\
e. Her family, comprising two parents and a)Tj
T*
(sister, are citizens and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
9.08 0 Td
(residents of Bolivia. Applicant's son was born in the U.S. in 2005. )Tj
26.678 0 Td
(He owns two houses worth)Tj
-35.757 -1.125 Td
(approximately $900,000.00 and has substantial other financial assets, al\
l in the U.S.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Department Counsel took issue with one of the Judge's Findings of Fact i\
n connection with the first allegation of error.)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Department Counsel cites an ambiguous portion of Applicant's brother's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
29.104 0 Td
(written statement to contend that Applicant has)Tj
-29.104 -1.125 Td
(a close relationship with his sister. )Tj
14.025 0 Td
(The Judge found that they only speak by telephone two or three times a y\
ear and that)Tj
-14.025 -1.125 Td
(they do not have a close)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
9.886 0 Td
(relationship. )Tj
5.221 0 Td
(The Board's scope of review for contested Findings of Fact is to determi\
ne)Tj
-15.107 -1.125 Td
(whether they are supported by such relevant evidence as a reasonable min\
d might accept as adequate to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
41.622 0 Td
(support a)Tj
-41.622 -1.125 Td
(conclusion in light of all the contrary evidence in the same record. )Tj
26.741 0 Td
(The Judge based his finding on extensive testimony)Tj
-26.741 -1.125 Td
(from Applicant and corroborating evidence to the effect that he has)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
27.128 0 Td
(only seen his sister three or four times since 1978,)Tj
-27.128 -1.125 Td
(and there is no ongoing relationship or affection. )Tj
19.745 0 Td
(The Judge's decision reflects a rational interpretation of all the relev\
ant)Tj
-19.745 -1.125 Td
(evidence, and his)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
7.164 0 Td
(finding is a sustainable characterization on this issue. )Tj
21.522 0 Td
(This finding was not an implicit application of)Tj
-28.686 -1.125 Td
(FIMC 3, but rather supported the conclusions under FIMC 1 and the whole \
person analysis that )Tj
38.411 0 Td
(Applicant did not feel or)Tj
-38.411 -1.125 Td
(owe any loyalty to his sister that could be exploited to conflict with h\
is loyalty to the United States.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(An Administrative Judge is required to "examine the relevant data and ar\
ticulate a satisfactory explanation for" the)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(decision, "including a 'rational connection between the facts found and \
the choice)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
32.882 0 Td
(made.'" )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
(Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Ass'n of)Tj
-32.882 -1.125 Td
(the United States v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
20.386 0 Td
(, 463 U.S. 29, 43 \(1983\) \(quoting )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
(Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v.)Tj
-20.386 -1.125 Td
(United States)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
5.36 0 Td
(, 371 U.S. 156, 168 \(1962\)\). )Tj
(The Appeal Board may reverse or remand the Administrative Judge's decisi\
on)Tj
-5.36 -1.125 Td
(to grant, deny or revoke a security clearance if it is arbitrary, capric\
ious or contrary to law. )Tj
36.485 0 Td
(Directive \266\266 E3.1.32.3,)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
54 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[497.0 449.0 511.0 460.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
14 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 1/Type/Page>>
endobj
55 0 obj
[57 0 R 58 0 R 59 0 R]
endobj
56 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(05-04648.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/05-04648.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:47:09 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(The Administrative Judge's findings of fact are not challenged on appeal\
.)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
/TT1 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 101.8779 729.75 Tm
(Whether the Record Supports the Administrative Judge's Ultimate Conclusi\
ons)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.156 -2.125 Td
(An Administrative Judge is required to "examine the relevant data and ar\
ticulate a satisfactory explanation for" the)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(decision "including a 'rational connection between the facts found and t\
he choice)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
32.632 0 Td
(made.'" )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
(Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Ass'n of)Tj
-32.632 -1.125 Td
(the United States v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co., )Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
20.636 0 Td
(463 U.S. 29, 43 \(1983\) \(quoting )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
(Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v.)Tj
-20.636 -1.125 Td
(United States,)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
5.61 0 Td
( 371 U.S. 156, 168 \(1962\)\). )Tj
(The Appeal Board may reverse the Administrative Judge's decision to gran\
t,)Tj
-5.61 -1.125 Td
(deny, or revoke a security clearance if it is arbitrary, capricious, or \
contrary to law. )Tj
33.402 0 Td
(Directive \266 E3.1.32.3. )Tj
9.034 0 Td
(Our scope of)Tj
-42.437 -1.125 Td
(review under this standard is narrow, and we may not substitute our judg\
ment for that of the Administrative Judge. )Tj
46.185 0 Td
(We)Tj
-46.185 -1.125 Td
(may not set aside an Administrative Judge's decision "that is rational, \
based)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.499 0 Td
(on consideration of the relevant factors, and)Tj
-30.499 -1.125 Td
(within the scope of the authority delegated to the agency. . ." )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
24.54 0 Td
(Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Ass'n,)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
10.74 0 Td
( 463 U.S. at 42. )Tj
(We review)Tj
-35.28 -1.125 Td
(matters of law )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
5.97 0 Td
(de novo)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(.)Tj
-5.97 -2.375 Td
(Department Counsel argues that the Administrative Judge erred by applyin\
g FIMC 1)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 422.916 572.25 Tm
( \(2\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 422.916 571.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 436.7222 567.75 Tm
( and concluding that Applicant's)Tj
-35.06 -1.125 Td
(sister in Iran is not in a position to be exploited by the Iranian gover\
nment. )Tj
30.16 0 Td
(Department Counsel contends that the)Tj
-30.16 -1.125 Td
(Judge's conclusion regarding the possibility of exploitation is arbitrar\
y, capricious, and unsupported by the record)Tj
T*
(evidence. )Tj
4.053 0 Td
(Department Counsel's argument)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.094 0 Td
(has merit. )Tj
4.193 0 Td
(Application of FIMC 1 requires that an applicant's relatives in a)Tj
-21.34 -1.125 Td
(foreign country are not agents of a foreign government and that they are\
not in a position to be exploited by a foreign)Tj
T*
(government in a way that could influence the applicant to act in a way t\
hat would be detrimental to the United States.)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
T*
(See, e.g., )Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.832 0 Td
(ISCR Case No. 02-24566 at 3 \(App. Bd. July 17, 2006\). )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
(See also,)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(ISCR Case No. 03-15205 at 3-4 \(App. Bd.)Tj
-3.832 -1.125 Td
(Jan. 21, 2005\). )Tj
(Here, the Judge stated that Applicant's sister is a housewife and has no\
ties to the Iranian government.)Tj
T*
(The Judge noted that Iran is)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.386 0 Td
("undisputedly hostile" to the United States and that Applicant has a ver\
y heavy burden of)Tj
-11.386 -1.125 Td
(showing that his sister does not pose a security risk. Without any suppo\
rt in the record, the Judge then)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
41.021 0 Td
(concluded that)Tj
-41.021 -1.125 Td
(the sister is not in position to be exploited by the Iranian government.\
)Tj
28.05 0 Td
(The record does not support the Judge's)Tj
-28.05 -1.125 Td
(application of FIMC 1.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The Administrative Judge performed a whole-person analysis. )Tj
25.16 0 Td
(Department Counsel argues that the Judge based his)Tj
-25.16 -1.125 Td
(whole-person analysis in part on conclusions which are unsupported by re\
cord)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.631 0 Td
(evidence. )Tj
4.053 0 Td
(One example of lack of)Tj
-35.684 -1.125 Td
(support in the record is the Judge's application of FIMC 1, as discussed\
above. )Tj
31.619 0 Td
(Another is the Judge's statement that)Tj
-31.619 -1.125 Td
(Applicant does not have a close relationship)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.912 0 Td
(with his sister in Iran, which we construe as an implicit application of\
)Tj
-17.912 -1.375 Td
(FIMC 3.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 57.3438 341.25 Tm
( \(3\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 57.3438 340.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 71.1499 336.75 Tm
( )Tj
(While Applicant testified that he does not have a close relationship wit\
h his sister, portions of Applicant's)Tj
-4.596 -1.125 Td
(testimony indicate regular contact \(phone conversations two to three ti\
mes a year\) with his sister and familial regard for)Tj
0 -1.375 TD
(her.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 34.3223 311.25 Tm
( \(4\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 34.3223 310.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 48.1284 306.75 Tm
( )Tj
(There is a rebuttable presumption that an applicant's contacts with)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
26.922 0 Td
(family members are not casual. )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
12.773 0 Td
(See, e.g.,)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-42.372 -1.125 Td
(ISCR Case No. 02-24267 at 7 \(App. Bd. May 24, 2005\). )Tj
(Applicant had the burden of proving that his ties to his sister)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(casual in nature. )Tj
6.775 0 Td
(Applicant has not)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
7.304 0 Td
(met that burden. )Tj
6.776 0 Td
(The Judge's conclusion on the matter is unsupported by the record.)Tj
-20.855 -2.125 Td
(The Board does not agree with Department Counsel that the factors listed\
in E2.2.2.1 of the Directive are the only ones)Tj
T*
(that may be considered in performing a whole person analysis in a Guidel\
ine)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.963 0 Td
(B case. )Tj
(Other matters such as evidence of)Tj
-30.963 -1.125 Td
(an applicant's personal loyalties; the nature and extent of an applicant\
's family ties to the U.S. relative to his ties to a)Tj
T*
(foreign country; his or her social ties)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.968 0 Td
(within the U.S.; and many others raised by the facts of a given case can\
properly)Tj
-14.968 -1.125 Td
(be factored into judge's evaluation of an applicant's worthiness of a se\
curity clearance. )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
34.792 0 Td
(See, e.g.,)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.582 0 Td
(ISCR Case No. 04-)Tj
-38.373 -1.125 Td
(00631 at 4-5 \(App. Bd. Sept. 6, 2006\); ISCR Case No. 03-02878 at 3 \(A\
pp. Bd. June 7, 2006\). )Tj
(The consideration for the)Tj
T*
(Board is whether in a given case a judge's whole-person analysis support\
s)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
29.784 0 Td
(his or her final decision. )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
9.942 0 Td
(See, e.g.,)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.582 0 Td
( ISCR Case)Tj
-43.308 -1.125 Td
(No. 04-00540 at 7 \(App. Bd. Jan. 5, 2007\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(In this case, however, the Judge's whole-person analysis is not sustaina\
ble because it relies in significant part on his)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(misplaced application of FIMC 1 and FIMC 3. )Tj
18.915 0 Td
(What is left is a conclusory)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.164 0 Td
(statement without reference to record)Tj
-30.078 -1.125 Td
(evidence as to what Applicant would do in a hypothetical situation. )Tj
27.16 0 Td
(On appeal, Applicant cites to record evidence to)Tj
-27.16 -1.125 Td
(support the Judge's conclusion, but the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.706 0 Td
(Board cannot determine with confidence what the Judge was thinking about\
the)Tj
-15.706 -1.125 Td
(matters imputed to him by Applicant. )Tj
15.248 0 Td
(That uncertainty is merely another reason the Board cannot affirm the Ju\
dge's)Tj
-15.248 -1.125 Td
(decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
22.823 -2.125 Td
(Order)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
57 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[423.0 570.0 437.0 581.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
58 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[57.0 339.0 71.0 350.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
59 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[34.0 309.0 48.0 320.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>
endobj
60 0 obj
<>
endobj
9 0 obj
<>
endobj
10 0 obj
<>
endobj
11 0 obj
<>
endobj
68 0 obj
(file:///usr.osd.mil/Home/OSD/OGC/JosephLM/_MyComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archived%20-%20HTML/05-04648.a1.html)
endobj
67 0 obj
<>
endobj
69 0 obj
<>
endobj
61 0 obj
[17 0 R/XYZ 0 464.0 null]
endobj
62 0 obj
[17 0 R/XYZ 0 411.0 null]
endobj
63 0 obj
[17 0 R/XYZ 0 345.0 null]
endobj
64 0 obj
[17 0 R/XYZ 0 320.0 null]
endobj
65 0 obj
[17 0 R/XYZ 0 281.0 null]
endobj
66 0 obj
[17 0 R/XYZ 0 201.0 null]
endobj
4 0 obj
<>
endobj
xref
0 70
0000000000 65535 f
0000000016 00000 n
0000000141 00000 n
0000003658 00000 n
0000184815 00000 n
0000003536 00000 n
0000003591 00000 n
0000003738 00000 n
0000003765 00000 n
0000183915 00000 n
0000184111 00000 n
0000184153 00000 n
0000183725 00000 n
0000004502 00000 n
0000173814 00000 n
0000166423 00000 n
0000156516 00000 n
0000119298 00000 n
0000003868 00000 n
0000003914 00000 n
0000003963 00000 n
0000004195 00000 n
0000004035 00000 n
0000004067 00000 n
0000004099 00000 n
0000004131 00000 n
0000004163 00000 n
0000004727 00000 n
0000004752 00000 n
0000010074 00000 n
0000010123 00000 n
0000010158 00000 n
0000010790 00000 n
0000011234 00000 n
0000118974 00000 n
0000065163 00000 n
0000065430 00000 n
0000030357 00000 n
0000030630 00000 n
0000011603 00000 n
0000011884 00000 n
0000012210 00000 n
0000031115 00000 n
0000066048 00000 n
0000119498 00000 n
0000124910 00000 n
0000125363 00000 n
0000125639 00000 n
0000126127 00000 n
0000156730 00000 n
0000156755 00000 n
0000166099 00000 n
0000166648 00000 n
0000166673 00000 n
0000173490 00000 n
0000174039 00000 n
0000174078 00000 n
0000182757 00000 n
0000183081 00000 n
0000183403 00000 n
0000183810 00000 n
0000184563 00000 n
0000184605 00000 n
0000184647 00000 n
0000184689 00000 n
0000184731 00000 n
0000184773 00000 n
0000184361 00000 n
0000184195 00000 n
0000184510 00000 n
trailer
<<7F05DD98110F714985C61B682B357EB6>]>>
startxref
184988
%%EOF