%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T15:47:22-04:00
2021-07-02T15:47:21-04:00
2021-07-02T15:47:22-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
05-04831.a1
uuid:d22f0f85-32c7-4c4e-9002-5c0cbbfe15d3
uuid:d392fde4-023b-4c63-b564-07e4b1415464
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>
endobj
21 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
<><><><><><>]/P 18 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
25 0 obj
[31 0 R 32 0 R 33 0 R]
endobj
26 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(05-04831.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/05-04831.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:47:22 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: November 29, 2006)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(---------)Tj
T*
(SSN: --------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 05-04831)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.317 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-0.984 -2.2 Td
(Jeffrey J. Harradine, Esq.)Tj
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) declined to grant Ap\
plicant a security clearance. )Tj
41.649 0 Td
(On October 12,)Tj
-41.649 -1.125 Td
(2005, DOHA issued a statement of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(reasons \(SOR\) advising Applicant of the basis for that decision-securi\
ty concerns)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(raised under Guideline H \(Drug Involvement\) pursuant to Department of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
29.38 0 Td
(Defense Directive 5220.6 \(Jan. 2, 1992, as)Tj
-29.38 -1.125 Td
(amended\) \(Directive\). )Tj
9.079 0 Td
(Applicant requested a hearing. )Tj
12.467 0 Td
(On May 11, 2006, after the hearing, Administrative Judge)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
23.439 0 Td
(James)Tj
-44.985 -1.125 Td
(A. Young denied Applicant's request for a security clearance. )Tj
24.81 0 Td
(Applicant timely appealed pursuant to the Directive \266\266)Tj
-24.81 -1.125 Td
(E3.1.28 and E3.1.30.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant claims on appeal that the Judge's decision was arbitrary and c\
apricious because it failed to correctly apply the)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
("whole person" test, and failed to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.563 0 Td
(explain his conclusion that Applicant's drug use was recent. )Tj
24.119 0 Td
(Applicants assertion of)Tj
-37.682 -1.125 Td
(error is without merit. )Tj
9.026 0 Td
(However, the Judge's decision is vacated because)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
20.006 0 Td
(Applicant's termination from employment)Tj
-29.032 -1.125 Td
(before the hearing, albeit then unknown to the Judge or Department Couns\
el representing the Government, ended)Tj
T*
(DOHA's jurisdiction to grant or deny a clearance under the Directive.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 -2.125 TD
(Whether the Judge's Decision was Arbitrary, Capricious or Contrary to La\
w)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(The Appeal Board may reverse or remand the Judge's decision to grant, de\
ny, continue or revoke a security clearance if)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(it is arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.967 0 Td
(law. )Tj
(Directive \266 E3.1.32.3. )Tj
10.978 0 Td
(A long line of our cases, based on Supreme Court)Tj
-26.945 -1.125 Td
(precedent, define the "arbitrary and capricious" standard as one that re\
quires an)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.997 0 Td
(Administrative Judge to examine the)Tj
-31.997 -1.125 Td
(relevant evidence and articulate a satisfactory explanation for his conc\
lusions, including a "rational connection between)Tj
0 -1.375 TD
(the facts found and the choice made.")Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 196.4922 168.75 Tm
( \(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 196.4922 168 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 210.2983 164.25 Tm
( )Tj
(A decision is arbitrary and capricious when it, "does not consider relev\
ant)Tj
-16.192 -1.125 Td
(factors; it reflects a clear error of judgment;)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.714 0 Td
(it fails to consider an important aspect of the case; it offers an expla\
nation)Tj
-17.714 -1.125 Td
(for the decision that runs contrary to the record evidence; or it is so \
implausible that)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
33.768 0 Td
(it cannot be ascribed to a mere)Tj
-33.768 -1.375 Td
(difference of opinion.")Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 125.1895 125.25 Tm
( \(2\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 125.1895 124.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 138.9956 120.75 Tm
( )Tj
(In deciding whether a decision is contrary to law, the Board will consid\
er whether it is)Tj
-10.25 -1.375 Td
(contrary to the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
6.081 0 Td
(provisions of Executive Order 10865, the Directive, or other applicable \
federal law.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 490.8262 108.75 Tm
( \(3\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 490.8262 108 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 78.75 Tm
(The facts of this case require us to decide whether DOHA jurisdiction to\
render a clearance decision ended when, after)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(the issuance of the SOR and his reply)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.275 0 Td
(thereto but some seven weeks before the hearing, Applicant quit the job \
for which)Tj
-15.275 -1.125 Td
(he was seeking a clearance. )Tj
11.271 0 Td
(Applicant's failure to appreciate or raise this as)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
19.006 0 Td
(an issue on appeal does not negate our)Tj
ET
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
12 0 0 12 16 38.25 Tm
(obligation to resolve this fundamental jurisdictional concern. )Tj
24.605 0 Td
(As the Board has held:)Tj
ET
EMC
Q
endstream
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
(ӄ˥L_>
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
36 0 obj
<>
endobj
37 0 obj
<>stream
H\Ak0:ıV
@HZ=8&5FqjigfvRut.I/55zb6/\5mV]F=Ϫ寶yݭY7xrwagʵz4?RSîn=Xω۠^TǓf̞Ye_%NYUlfq 1.b\ ,dS~$/kLrݒ'l
V={f#g6ly