%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T15:50:04-04:00
2021-07-02T15:50:04-04:00
2021-07-02T15:50:04-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
05-11392.a1
uuid:fb192028-9d9c-4c79-b65e-20a314b9285e
uuid:de13458d-143e-445b-8731-92729300bf7d
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
18 0 obj
<><>]/P 16 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
21 0 obj
[28 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(05-11392.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/05-11392.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:50:04 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: December 11, 2006)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: ----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(CR Case No. 05-11392)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-4.193 -2.2 Td
(Melvin A. Howry, Esq., Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
4.971 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-0.346 -2.2 Td
(B. Daniel Lynch, Esq.)Tj
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) declined to grant Ap\
plicant a security clearance. )Tj
41.649 0 Td
(On December)Tj
-41.649 -1.125 Td
(19, 2005, DOHA issued a statement of reasons advising Applicant of the b\
asis)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.633 0 Td
(for that decision--security concerns)Tj
-31.633 -1.125 Td
(raised under Guideline H \(Drug Involvement\), Guideline E \(Personal Co\
nduct\), and Guideline F \(Financial)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Considerations\) of Department of Defense Directive)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
21.215 0 Td
(5220.6 \(Jan. 2, 1992, as amended\) \(Directive\). )Tj
18.828 0 Td
(Applicant requested)Tj
-40.042 -1.125 Td
(a hearing. )Tj
4.192 0 Td
(On July 31, 2006, after the hearing, )Tj
14.441 0 Td
(Administrative Judge Marc E. Curry denied Applicant's request for a)Tj
-18.633 -1.125 Td
(security)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
3.416 0 Td
(clearance. )Tj
4.274 0 Td
(Applicant timely appealed pursuant to the Directive \266\266 E3.1.28 and\
E3.1.30.)Tj
-7.689 -2.125 Td
(Applicant raised the following issue on appeal: whether the Administrati\
ve Judge erred by concluding that the security)Tj
0 -1.375 TD
(concerns raised under Guidelines H and E had not been mitigated.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 333.5664 314.25 Tm
( \(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 333.5664 313.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 284.25 Tm
(Applicant argues that the Administrative Judge should have concluded tha\
t the security concerns raised under)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Guidelines H and E had been mitigated, as a matter of law, because Appli\
cant's drug)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
34.086 0 Td
(use was isolated, aberrational, and)Tj
-34.086 -1.125 Td
(not recent, and Applicant has demonstrated that he would not use drugs i\
n the future. )Tj
34.241 0 Td
(In support of that argument,)Tj
-34.241 -1.125 Td
(Applicant contends the Judge engaged in a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.356 0 Td
(piecemeal analysis of the record and erred in his application of the who\
le)Tj
-17.356 -1.125 Td
(person concept. )Tj
6.525 0 Td
(The Board does not find Applicant's arguments persuasive.)Tj
-6.525 -2.125 Td
(The application of disqualifying and mitigating conditions does not turn\
simply on a finding that one or more of them)Tj
T*
(applies to the particular facts of a case. )Tj
15.798 0 Td
(Rather, their application requires the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.883 0 Td
(exercise of sound discretion in light of the)Tj
-30.682 -1.125 Td
(record evidence as a whole. )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
11.328 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 01-14740 at 7 \(App. Bd. Jan.15, 2003\). )Tj
(Thus, the presence of)Tj
-14.659 -1.125 Td
(some mitigating evidence does not)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.136 0 Td
(alone compel the Judge to make a favorable security clearance decision. \
)Tj
29.098 0 Td
(As the trier)Tj
-43.234 -1.125 Td
(of fact, the Judge has to weigh the evidence as a whole and decide wheth\
er the favorable evidence outweighs)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
43.872 0 Td
(the)Tj
-43.872 -1.125 Td
(unfavorable evidence, or )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
10.162 0 Td
(vice versa)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
4.025 0 Td
(. )Tj
(An applicant's disagreement with the Judge's weighing of the evidence, o\
r an ability)Tj
-14.187 -1.125 Td
(to argue for a different interpretation of the evidence, is not sufficie\
nt)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
28.017 0 Td
(to demonstrate the Judge weighed the evidence or)Tj
-28.017 -1.125 Td
(reached conclusions in a manner that is arbitrary, capricious, or contra\
ry to law.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(In this case, the Administrative Judge made sustainable findings as to a\
)Tj
28.744 0 Td
(lengthy and serious history of improper or)Tj
-28.744 -1.125 Td
(illegal drug use by a 57-year-old Applicant who was familiar with the se\
curity)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.574 0 Td
(clearance process. )Tj
7.523 0 Td
(That history included)Tj
-39.097 -1.125 Td
(illegal marijuana use two to three times a year from 1974 to 2002. )Tj
26.659 0 Td
(It also included the illegal purchase of marijuana and)Tj
-26.659 -1.125 Td
(the use of marijuana while holding)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.163 0 Td
(a security clearance. )Tj
8.383 0 Td
(The Directive does not define "recent," and there is no "bright-)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
23 0 obj
<>
endobj
24 0 obj
(ruw"3Q1)
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
33 0 obj
<>
endobj
34 0 obj
<>stream
H\j >wIJ!P-?4$:Iƈqyl~?Cgx=uF{n=zQ$6,/@ioeSroL+kܼ9N_m_Nd2aA1)k(ncpD7Yh~04_'>N"/UD&!NUDb8O^G]{9*[lUW6x]-PVW zg
endstream
endobj
35 0 obj
<>stream
H|XTgv΅H,wwnlb#kL%1&RDE%&*FTEh,Xׂł"bC] '%;>}{_ro̜ss
BjӾy^1q\[? \#%h+\- ˣ
.q2CcxZb#LZ4c'۹2}c3kNQت* 6Dž'ƻ/d yMЌZ^J qR 6' rFDoiOy@@ 3@ QX&Ck|ʂh
@n-*v^il5Bzm_w j -
DT 7E
|(*oów&MԒF4oѲUڴmCǀNtQzջOO}|?|аp=4fq#Gŏ36q'LI$MuZ3Sf͞>7c-^t,_rU5k`ظiޚ-wvۻ/
)