M{q鰈q-epgz#S)z7 R䲽%i e[%2E6AXdXMp䛭\O}B F֮!38 `& mFp&vz[~BNT˃{g-44,ßvva_@/n.djm}'u~ztW==0~s{3Fu$(V%rYz,R
pCl7 2@֪s7TQ wߘ( 8p'68Jptt,fb1S4yIu.(O%l^h)z3ci9)w%:TMS䈪9jKKհ"UAeU̪z"/Vux z"!w-^pq.DdAjpYCW5
ڐvX{W8سBA=K
S\-ΌAu#Ԡf;IrO},R@&\+Owum< gw>_.rINBqN |!ub-Дz4j5UIF*t cj3JF5U?J:I]J
N%Twl>| j3#`r`,rkQM 7Vf+k 2IJ_\Z|@j!=dsQV*zд>
twK/= ^/{^; h ^ \zTa
E;Ř,Lղ @̌Xj av(̋⃢C/aoOŜ[P|5nM[-aʺ`!V{h-y [@TȎ -A1$
Ů}A^*<=qs|ͲGBUbw
wTаK*T«bHnՊ1빌Q\D
\
hP+ FJ
ו?)[ӭ芇ğK}rvC}
!H&@Hab Mf;oCDs`N9o97},9X3S1^y̤؝2! ,ituFH@)'7
U~K>/#QwwRɞ.%|$ {dB ϸBo qC4 q hCq[0Ϝaޙ¼_m`k C7a!h feα2u0cBSHA,yerA*:T+yPnkyBy0;c2ES;q1H UX}ni_[)[
vTƵ\4?}Fɹsr_MPTi:4 \CSDN !BMpw3vv`Eg F:E٦$%ҹfa8{ګ;Z~k+[ƿumNk k{`zٜwZ41>0H$MYǹwcWZ;<7T=haݳi:/8YS
8tm[14? -F<.wދ h@ ]mFz`Tx,p QQP]#DiGP :QLҹt 7ZF NZCťY6НvȐȲ
iU%GW u%k%,
.,i! #J(^NĚn'Tfwcc5Z Pa&Ց 02uِRtCjqp'~ُ_?u~?ױ$a}d:q'
$^B HӫnХpA
Mq7v 4~ /Hx=]ZXlP j-q4u`:뵆(@H2%4N [GӖϚt30
I ʞU<`xR:s 0GHe)B/INF)1 h Ƒ V qN/_8t(Z@9ic5Ď0F]e1/Azur$`68h),lpYYv
ʳfb̥QMpٶ"ZpSd[cgOĚl|L{>w=p5/+3ʍ*TAM TLkU]B_m۪&b-0G4jtSmMUmJn8y ZQ
!us$W*B{*B˪,'8ö2 vB4; p3GJY*(bEtMIᣄ
eR֖$$J
UIMˤҦRVmFwIM{VE]H4ІB_ ={8
h]`egFBB&0F|G F3AX8:6/dNS%Pj"_$qjZ$frvǸKywd|Q<htcт`Y8#][O FQ 2kЌSsYDaSݽbeQK]q_æo} -wOV|d~8!k 0>͛] dMK8VeL0eJiRT
`)V`E`KMػVMⷥF$.MDgq͕F"aɩLN|=
~LQ,yũ=D0 NZnTyI [mKQ #"t]TKn,8U*VRk:|k_o5?^Ve VX C#c! aRF .#\ŏ }_엾G%vzE%ޒ>Puŋb]=V֛RBZ)%G4~uSڧjTR Yd#
~oDAp}2)
V֛jjc9@6P
́v辶ҡI>3z=au: ;7 ;^Jexr,q7r V-!O g 64uk [ d蒚|1-@RO &*947={P{'P!"jJ)
)j1` Q A~2 rd|1%bPmV4[)zhժ1JV@WWIҀ'=r
} [3 ]1(PgiI
9ҍ(*=]o^zo=
L &Ͱ+矐,ocxj4A G[/D&ٙTUvgyw؝ufw6Ma-vvlo_#.ֶiY,pL[m6\勩JLU7%@h$KE^F<4y2F6 wԤAB@+1F$s#51e&Be 5eh7yJ\L{\Ui0DžYN{ܣ&ñ ܬy!8$= :~uםOG m^7 ? JFr`B0 )
ˉD:w ܇LY6EENjTP9 6u:s -p0Vkm5ܒ6 }a8{t12 $
x
:\o3ČK % AzX6Wa*2tWl }}9/9;r ;CD,l%tH hhAC U]k[ˤn뀌upeڭB ?6eZ1-h{Pi{>ϯoq yh!i
;-j Q ?䘝ū*).JV^hKD!lXpa=T"P[)G
֜YĞ"6`ZME~UjP
!R%*DPSwpqM*^u :Ci8S
b#V>Q YByT jw`
eH^?-=kxU^"7-+ -2t(,>On2s,IerLs0:'k蜜~d*긠^ qTh'! KȡG<"@cH ԋJqՐ0/82AQeb\Ƥ^R_1a 85OudS/i背=ڭO~s4L.Wi=?u{.ޠr3m-]Yj%Bt0$E=?0 N) -y ~H
RB⼔yiT)ƳL~\eq 0gR33{`NgD N*G fGlk|?x`>c0ρA`>?
d2Tɱ`qVR
b\7I(?MLPI)J@
'a1 )8U&Q!U"HqMk F 00,^Q(G`$(dG#=V:1?; c2-]C1:V:1g@TMUoW!F<=
(BwCA(Fc/pfȊ`B"ѵ3q Z2ڽ1&=D 0Cc|~YI !"c"ɺݵJᡙ{HbT릎e kӛk0mA Y&㗵,?7U/-0QE(s';
(X?"yIyG8P{< R8!{!VX9 ChNٿ + nHЀVtAw'h"UçidU)p)!j@ntar zఅƧ 03jG,r*ʖ]P-)bjyի-R`ӏ: ȄYWtZAĠi ;8Τ dZI% U?dqa.P'|SvC7nqwმ=sr
Ŕp)߾BCU5ꥩ:?N nՊw ugxpx/c|}|b/ v! /q t84tkh8pЍ/@ Q>Q6;HFALB&0wKݨ͋ ^$qw0e_m.R; ?뎿ŗر/NĎ}$fP@J)v 4H$lh#elҤ&PNV*QMHĦ*Tmˆ&ξ-ݻ{y{|>yh~]ğJ>-u^VZ~ ?'@$j@Z̵\̗ ,haڏU2;^xS^CmX+Twh%ETw ɉLgL8_N`~ҲbZ|6U]κug&d!*E;_Vk}fSd`_o0R==p8I8Fjk
439UZ5U2ZG\ؗqiaw=!};Q誸*pc28&Pi%Uta*mgE p@0Iy<˷d|%6 *V#m $GmfΘJJP-w AJtN㨃N, rw_pUV \;aw*yTUNWOb=z?O
iiX=I*3myO~l~
o| !M͖0$LoBmJgPmoϫL2e-3gr,_xBE{>h TMќ QpjfZtv%W,L`/* ;L 㵍RcR$k_% I-ȸ / k[@ c3 Hnq Զo23ǼzZcf%VMZ $
QÉqR#[zɎl H/@]-N+t)v]GYa;SVN%J RYaG EakXsz5gbQf =̤w)Sz#3pśGꍥ b Nxa -K+.ƛ EGito6
r[-z}}lˠ]k]
bf&yS~sҌkFn|DȸEb;w l+RAIbo̫Y5.
;ͫ
۴+юkD;C[EH dwta*ӶӋݸ{@Yr0` @}cCQl1X۸k
2! p X-* e
=PЅQ,0
x%GT{I,VJ?e^1uy<])w`;Aua{p舽!&/.m1=F\БF^_c Ʊ5\!Ĝ9Vø!Ar 'Mvuujnxj
/yn$ra FޞWJC_u-M A8-2.П Z#O˚F\EX&`=;+{abE'XSJ 3~Pz__7l
x R.{ }k oo/&ɘFFք`{SۆwlyC=1?K
{s;tF%O~sb_p~0}8@"~F(|q;;Cq( @cI ƒ-&.vdj *Vb#۴@GJ# 8զ+ƈP!j+Rѩ=Bw˽w5fW2F?;n .vG0-U2yT|+
WDQLL R&*9Jc@&g)M J}hR
mȊ*snG_[~{ FTOVf۱ckO;?^zcS \Y#.f FY'x-(|ߥJEq#(D4$g
Z{)9+
2pйrVt%F&̶/10͜(ũXK58}' \ĿEq[H_/Buq ak2|5Gy
[\0 ; >ɝKRcfyEP9 _uo p@PQoaCfVE5j ƭ5k[ z&zÃ=L`{shc2Iźs.aJk((GE4dzCvW+X%,`[15N b۲io( /7 zdkgqӷDCgOtgtwaT?iii-V(C93aP׳C2$oZYVq < ٲx([2)21+ RE"܄0T>e;s'Ɠ~]W Oښ&X1ÛXU'5@R4/RCy:mS ֊AA GMdF
&bRR.
K~f3 A:Ì EixQ4bmYz\_ϳD0
^J=!!o`2S#QlGsQ.S(SEC+ < 8sL7Բ͉߰n`:9,e8LRδ@+A2I(}x)M dCS.ea8}:]L;=Pڨӓ^iK5B6l8;[ ?;&B3MdZ7pכ]3Es 4XTK
* ]alTEc0Mub>+1X. 3 3F
θ]-Z44\Gж|28m
i:)H+RjHuz&,`C 峐 1PL1Cx}Ar<@xk+@n9o6pc6g[tcoc߅qt=ѻ.?? o<;<>+*p?(O> uy HedXmM A1AYd
L; R /AD# _لi6{ йrFX(LnhQeYՇq9dǗQDob/PI HBq" o OoE`k@
I[-4A/j!93KC|6|VJia|ۃP v$ru6I1j<1Ś&v),>'* eȒˡY ^^D̽sMr$'
Fe$rL$:W+"H|Yq% ܼ3 ,n 8w j4tT/ۮ? ,ؒ@㵟6s&_>rU2j3
KQFtC5ɖ`'Ҹ4/)U_oU[Vyj *VJdxj[URfeb|(!
ӡNf=ⶾIa~X51Mg\v*C>V!jD<
[9#gy$] eB7ㆃI*~(^ GSx!ݞ E(H//)b
ek* G 2a;]xGl %cLPyNiy!O>QBRQ+ΔR 8]ʒ L#` j1#0)s12l]5Vj]' MڔƏ 2Gvݵ)t?r p:Gɘ4&?.m
E!%YlZeRMӖmR 'q$NFslv, H6%^ldh [e$UXl0t`ydCЧxٹW9,W ۪ ,<o~5 %ƤJKT*Hh0Qp@^ +5Su:
<$m`] hf9=^8CMB6&$jZ^vIK\]AۈH#[CX|x
cd%=l]YJt(Jz>>3碦@%
+_MhKYl#6d &K }gҲ}q!}qɾ ?|'xifQ
WOO ⍽J߰l
YLEz
]쒊jgU?_c]j7V;*{7kKVP˃W;2-!0WhAhA!W
`
V`EYpX5KhFw[H늠Rm ('1!t71~9OM+gBf93"C)c;i4* $gU<g N4J
7i4.i/ R?,?.43Rd.3wTm1 O뎇/Tr T@ =EۦhDR!R@tC Rύ*#tv43Lvc괄=Q7'*ĩDMuXqLBGS3:6 ÛPq4^4m8 > ]$Hۡ85 (XT}ڡ`br]$Tjq< rkMK=
;ǢIXŢ|,,ce Tsd|tt$Rd8u<&~}·Ԟ$j\jqqM aG4Y(F*ڜ>~ 5/8hگG3Rӽ o?x`: -SNn+z_
l+?^ +9奛d>(ĝv/zq'+XwGgϽ73T9zbzeF(dCy lv%nY<D_MBV oE/\ Ál) vvT&kȺk/]Qp6dpZ>"z: t!C#
G2@Ls,Z:N OWWᡆ5ӧn0R_S#Enpc ߘ2`Q8 hDIH$!Q!eIX<#5
/8o{DRXJ.6
^JՕM.7݀O%r+9 1h*7+㐕CqVl
5g -*&(_lۢ:[T5GP<.A EDŵ¡ qen9\
UΘ>eݾ趫:^u>w弨X&cU0a/B>s~ $˨Imr` ȇ
5DjX-5aw4-rr-Հ%- )ўnЙR/5Z= tQl̏mm
XSc ?:un7n~&.JJȻ'mdgLQ\W2m *a[?> ~Gq"Ɓ ip Oo.Bǻ|p`3
O y@<qWr /$ (@4ٺg qm
g.n RT\N8x{g\Jc #2A[u)/! gIOȊ敲\V)2,|R0VmJi2 NbRxT qG܁Jngϭ+uaW0oݞG--_.m㼔EԕHZHɶHY۲j2)+6qn}Vaːh̀0aRM Ì0 P PlE5t9WRlH ^{E9c[dцNfu/
}]F|'ywc vZ
4 ]ld<'xFq!D5d.ht) qːOğ?d h?'AEQd&b{X#/~ ˉe4NÛ
/`*?ĠόNH3{l !`
1pH718!DU4 C}Uέ,fjײ:Z(|Tǚ֛7-5˥@mf9MMZ ҝ i*"|%@MŠ̴lK"=L hD6ɒn..fscLJ ̍*:1d DO*ǿ2u49TjyUV&Sj][PX)^?eD}gSAꁒo3RB3rHZTYBah#U,Z _qa$S_v.g>}Ȋ1N.
4Y av4)EeGЂj .Ղm6t+0`!)6f =GaM
QaI aa an t3he<
){4
M}\{K`5
1-cmmC -C0Z
` A!aR۠7=oW
$.D(g3Yzθw?Zwۮm OQ?Ԓ^2&RaZ^!{|F1laL(bR#/)sfW\' cYfM[)ƀa ʂW ~C8urו9u. 偁qj'O o-Jy#I')net X Ƨ,3va)W1B)!Ɛϩ)2՞@@ hTJJ|wTBRJǓXt|r^Q 7
` ჄL#@,).9NkNJ? %oQ~}/-Ӭ]щ 1
h%YV}vdnؼ4Qho^, .B = ͇P<"*Xpb-w/x vNQv:^{b "JZe@IvSmP)/a p@x)cxR r:Q8ڑl@qD1]InTBIP$JpswKr NzAü6e,/^wzbK_+?x\"ޱ?vuϞzeͨDq_|T4y{O{8 D#ս $W}uL=bT/A u@D¢
aцhC(pj#9ЇcV<\ >7d%
<c D:Վ}I,0 .܌T0
{hZ虒bwږ4$(
D2>GՖeCGA
x0+)x$Q84!hYJ2muKt#t ZG
8ɘis Jbh·GgJ%;7HJ%ʧ'3 Yfrs]I;<EWk\'pqaőqse;;ʼnaL+3 ʕ [3Y`|ꄱoEi*nV bC^apq~;v>sU6PM̫l3ǒosfk3s /v5G^ a9'[#/^j}W, r<;Y̒ vp$'v8'XjOaz+ŹiQ Q/fKM`6+_fWevU{gna >aN ?|~܀o [.>9*lW;*0Ѓ>7+nz.w ,oG
lxQȵ*/Z>Ҩcz9OGGpttĠjM3n˷/`8kjy.ZUNy8qh<.!*yE-LtM*j"3ɲy&s|ڶmq'( Ұ|`lز$oV J\
ER0QV~1ziJeg=sohhҝrqз+1I,}l(=b ~}
9
+ނJ wڅ2Je& {R}v|DS_7:,sèUt@#[M5R(Aε (_"nIIyR$ W<2PD MQ ʼnԡ`+T &
G ~N,^mF(;tNt'dXV8L(j;MA]Yۤo̚u )8ɜ, o?ߕH5_AqH!!E!E102Lar2L6z 2:FBͮ5< L<2n,M+c
&F9dNSِeEsk̛&` ,LXPkqYͭ I
zDH buH~[ /Ɏ%~% hA@.aJ Xa~
p"Շ }Jgy}Ag(]i F> @ dk1@ @d.Р֓ r|>8ODZ]SiUnbIb%&%FI53
91xjQߩT5Er xnuC©}03wȖӵF-D:D'~ W;&ї.TIfP\tQa:!7[O$GeFنOA\CNRv&NίF| _CX*%:e!eb Y7e#Ng4HJ #jL6BE>Pi+j, E78NSM9>ާ/MP;-b*X1DKM x Bu^FBr
LplPGR*q|p"\
r Xe}@u(kTWP "l OEVGt!hvU>B4jpU')`1 ^f- 8iUFj.>fvSidG'۟.;M=űjknػs 0y8
#6m1l\Bx%4 H|T qN,2m,CVHӆbS1z. [-nbVڭ-2*nVa[3XF#r&$$RTg 5Pl,i((j]ڀqjz cMs%XxcjUr*i`1vdч-Ot~c`#lfhv<^(JM nJ{|r<HFÓ_|x5ڙK0?|V7sek#$R IXg@v$=k pX
aAoʧ/ "G_ a8x.aqǓN s;xH :5rX&
E `$2X ֬R##2U,me?le;Xof1([4F]CXd(7qD> ɜtl8~xjw3獟(?RqMyVch٣ɣm/{yy
ӭHpx(D#x2 yN
hT2QQ4 4.# xv*/||7|1>G}}}̮ջ868~uA ')jTJ{u*n 5Z C(WKX
n}IPި؊&&-"=&*Zbgs|? {Td \BK2);`-Դ .6:g}/wsmOn}[*CBMb[X ئQǦZ B%2BB!t*K' :؊@*㏨*c*cS~c;˄D{ ?"1k5d b%Tb E"TT)Nz
D^+TS=NjIBD)
x$2GߢHue ۧl{t?Ű*-G˭ع\ ~wJ "_2ǴcIKOg#vczcq ;(9#}q0^۔B2Bƶ=}I{/JȒz[ 8ƃw
ܕTMRZsXh-[-ޚ()*,;rb*Q^Ym(Zgz|RD7t__?;E&.ug;ၧ>#9V۵K>>1S܅߾l*<~6"f6Bs˟э]Ԁ-kTS5$ :D LvZ4 <-]jxU1Id9˄ sdMY
*4GMw:nd b$Vx8,cyxg\ѳ7 &d9U (JjVIc۵k:m 9 j5FZW[6ʬV ^u=4|.<0QR "ુVsF/[[[Eu(?|ΰg9?S H >w}71#ĹHHGF!V[g3gZ
ˇʣڳg/P݊ @&!U` %r q94S&Ȧo #dpf3%ٴR-0 y
CorPJ^,
^KWK7#NK0!MKs'5acئQI lY6k,f_ ܥoq߱44Udߥ
.
0"w}>1/+I53WvŊ
`Jc'Bʒ'.q''ǡg$Q⳼x>?R>ɻc0o .p s9s.6B '4f[>=_c야eԽyØ䫛$zo: 1v)VQ"h,iLcV/Zg-#T|Z/[*$4|N,9Ѓ)?|7c9f21|EuqQ#ݔH
4ӵh$;sF/K AB f}|y^h }GpKBS.MI]ܦ3
!%3}yݸQ˧w+vfvoXOG +ڿ˱݅#I C+wɱǶ/b;DgB7JV\ZLf%}^q4"7ˤM5N=a j(8=N"2+^ RNQlD囥,w´ >`6U;K] X\L ggQZnròp RQPUBxxAOD#(W
ȤmC`$dmq8uu0uMAE.̤G9;#ذǓZb.!4a\-?AŴEJY`^vrafUAmNcgqDVW(Ͼ7N}PS(s#UMZDkcqIKf3%wani.e() >1h
`GHAep8gzrE| "+{ґ \wD9>|vwn݅q%s{^/um.{3{Jڝ;hwe"iQk"n8RH$pCBC#J!:}(%["(8Cc i)nbόڕΜ93s+_+!} G"Dte-/RJ6 E8lo\L.,ޞzDò#//}% H
s6kvl7oQP͛+.tr^#\Eв5I5z\7I |b J)3ʫs#d`__W,\b5i]~[,m| K+s,"OY { `U;ÇC4!@ߗjF^PX aLkK^wM^Jr@q)j*i*`Ydy,˕2bD<c`ߨ"'IaƝָ?pqn-͎,c&*Q6K[ peC`=ա-H.wZ g""2gf(;G2pC J0
8Az1uqG
uw {yL,KVL@>^dk!i\c4KPP㈩ ,
PلԄ|V
%NؕBˁa1t*dl 4Lzȴ HQXeЪHzb8I] ]2*;Ftg *d"D)|s];᷵]1P5dv@%&%QV0
ԠNHO Go4qY~o AB!y)Ԝ)933+E.Xu뮖 rg
3yIjctbG K֒༊_&xC߰uWND!&:mVG lr/Ig%}XpE%qш'y!%u ,
*֪UJ\F˲~eBx}Ii ͰtͶmQ3 H.8=qzV$ɶQ%rh覢2r "˚FEH'p YDߣtAyˇլ,-z1~/2zMF/5:°脴T[D2hAܓ#b9Ι.6V( -XwEjF )MhFm-MO7Y܁4mfOK8-QƑBdB\oػɽ=3CЉP/2C`oMcf eASfIӯU1p>#*`(ʰ'<+(G
Ȑ_1j%N5X^橄n Z 6E$B1:PyQ5
O-@۶d'Ek95S YFZiH%i"s)FIp.|fG&F5U!&%Tdq9^, bFx˼byd-5˝N~4Fu ӋpO0z N%c!u8b}wO'iz>9 >'6
51/2. ٢p8t7Aj/L !?pmQ =@% Ԗ(VXoz .Ţnwd*cCӲ[ =\t$tSsTW:_T*㵚ڶٚN) >!YɆ 0L E Ƽ'@i/J?W{lS?W\DZ}cqĉmp^
ĨIBXBG56]+-XMeꚶҶHkyfCҍ?&$5i455VUB|;}CH _ι;|(| L0\#kh
G0s
20pUtf|KT#s&ً܇>sYJ{M.vixƩS0؍Y'{e0hb Y.M&щήή.~fEcRgkuŮ s١ ̞]KD esfUYoM(\U_F lU a Gvzgקo:} MM{C7D6e psU:*U QC1iUz@FyV~^=KLn#rӤ5_[Z֣K;ti~.-'? >\.wg^@5H|Vӎr]O(_QTLVu]nxx_]Kz$<*'U(RZe[4iu7աf|#勀O p;P| X,,Cׁ ƾNW[I"q J)}!c6%J)赨kGyѮV[~QwTM[Om~eQ5wȩ)dcjǨJ|*G]v HVTt_SVG _7%=p!vZ@ay88" oƹAGf&π]ZYFP O
?p3(y P e m0nG3MsC |{amg=26%V #mfn1g,/>Sd\ˈ
2F>K%/(\l-)6aIk=lF ώݒYLu?P~مyA34.!>J%3A}L&Y֫Y!ZuLҴamX~K.gB-ֱdL_ gaژic#J-@%Q~xH9A}҈}y ~5O_ԥRvWMw=F4Jmڕ1#neG39e. iH%M̿ ʙMBQ
E| +,NT\<ϛ;3e)x,;E += ?#Vr!~4i5
ԡw%??ر\ciQk!?5ITLlɗX礝YSqY Sb =>-+v6 D Bfe K.GqꠀECyAJV+i0̪4fi=8~}I DH4$1@!@Z
S"X'JGԡ`-3vZD"C1P*-?0 : VgGˏ&oI gy=s>b6XS]2{e{tR.o0R`.@W+Q"َ%%A"ӧ|10e-m c3e .eK_'_d檕J Κ"[&ܮ|s̹_F#'!V]2zyfL3s%-SRjc9Wyy&?й ''X{ޒR7*AWMLe
3\5YG [eM|2[xn<>*3ؿ-מ~Cջ2n a!|rd}vCx7~c-'s Y;.#H_gv:Fi.I[&W+
kw'א|~ܮ ~g`\ӏ6#Y1(mr\^[ vc#Ԧa`g<ߊ}eY% 媠X8XVJx'|^}*>Ϋv*b`
۩@C]$ =ĹRhw3u y=zoWFwX˽q{{b)P.3\pG"h92# 2\qF 崷dݾeW0 e ж#_s WAۚKoW~1 RֵB^'ܗmN܁-NƦ~3 cI{m"FyGc?6}sń
U2 FY/hjE{a{ |yja wP KiNR#6vC. #9r hyM?7?o Y6X>8OS~X<| Kmә}GڹPzmxm;DWlu٫wfûD;֬C58B.]9њɟ5lzo5g0NhT5w5>ٿ畤DŽ[cd5t>m%:MĞ,byK
垪kX?ֽm(bχ61Mj'!3"tT qJTJgN |Hp$Fz;h^&Yr4r9(mG^HN+ﮫ~%}~ǭ[PfƤB fZ ٰҚM22=vw؊r㔻;L۩:;sY3KTA6ýֻ's^{3;4A$`,jcwVJ!q
q~B ]bwqR K5C[,ݬ$>PG hQ.:@j:0qŻcy2E ]зH`ct3G&u9WLD
v{&}?JX#dM,)w* ӧHAbԐD'naJu)4iR22>'r6-V9kUzJ7Zc}NjyG;Xk|mrz47g:55kXbb4]Z5p{Q_¹8g ܄SƞyQ {gɜh#w_;aMF?16/ kK[Q 5P|Y[Zq^j0=grse@9f f[4RؓvftMgl{nfkg_ Ӄs:=jRGr*t/1mq!d &ܻ g)Qȥy
Ƀ c<+g7m'K~l
E%L p~YXb}yϹ3u!֥@;_gٯ=Dι@4/ƹu5WmYE sPvTGGG:Qh܂(\ÿ(uֹ0
cB'D >
^z{8_uI7;( -t76y3]ětnx=r&o5n_0;R X̻;߾ M=WlX{dHa]<ߌ+ A<Ǯ9d$ƞ|:&
ZUshR_ Qp戸CM'zQBĊ崯 u_xٜ LT5q[-U(M%ަ77UoȀxFWEFF)MHv|N~ޒttS Ro-r /;Heh7n "NI&.f_l;ȵG:x=87\Eh^<7KnK>>)89tep()r'` <^D?D1Ի츬C5!|#\9%N@}k5VE0J)4O+#?ƢOWRe?(}'GEm{Y3ٿ u h_y֑LX3jtiw%!'ʡ6{2ΪDb
BXBe( $--
)XNъaŲm, "0aNJ:(,E:2v:
TT߹@7?0;37˗.U i so/援ύh/.
KTVgF]o6ןaHUBGz
K t\H&~36=~4gnfuvV ts~mXb Ac Ys= :xy N [C!]b"T2h §-倂w[}+IDfΡDž Hf)K5Esg샏,{
+gM]Ns
pFϴB>{ @T{ NFRߒ!掗x;e{{{>PgEN p GĄljβϲj {d}Vl_I?
Vo44.o nR`|/_w tpKy} [̔KIW"QlVSg\Y !Ӵ_{ݙ{CEmx-NTRJ"]Cid_:xWQNAOӺ>Pq
{+Kzqm;<s
[Xqm;|Kz>h5p9Gjrg5EI|߀W?Uy/X}z[ ?N4>h$Vk\g}ZB|ȑ
_>hnrȫ3k;=SnCQ/ySū6 ='茆:ew+}.=5p&>> $:kD%RSu0Z|.w]F;29,?h)uKMs?`Oɭ|O-N )ͬZN;(EK{?GM^龂2ԝIzI8]+8/wIO
*B/m{Z3A:If0Ee^)3̿هoѺ?CchdƓ'"p'ⱴ@Ǒ$eM`:)f-.ڄU8&Č5 H5ѵlm'1a a
tOL 辻{yy1 pNIaRFur̸սBe|2ϓ5{m͚'t=w?=G өN4Ӷo;~o > `앩s5mDIݜ3 ]O$G 甧/W2hur at?l9H99.)A{,ߕN J y@.%.tZ*:uP nX~+m˶4Xsk)I .{H){WШHhIW M:o 4jg÷} VG#R)I~g |_
m>ζ;ocV*i[0wwI/Dn1RC7sIx6(yI.ա>"S#M/]w4Y nk{)圍i/!NjBEGIKqY3GdѠŲRky8ۥA+|+'d~!"oQQZJ
>'[ _ gS2N .OW'V%M kލ
BUR/#qL5C4<ļzJAMP(]j{?:zݙ8KV-
H
M{}^,uqp2͓~˜
AT_C Ew7 a ERJ:y{pWǿow$<,xHC Wx4L nv7dI )ɴ:iM[Q>δ:XGC G+8Ԫ=w@be7s_{{,M}Pk%(>1G^ gA ;_0/۹I;䭌}O.d$?=5}v[:}O[/卐JWHǡRG]N:M1L';<5el.4Cu sc3*òWvˤwbﴊqdۛ0o(iD>j/U;v?\px
V>J;{37f*nI&, >bIyOXQmA =Jq1\6^ 6ޢ߅zb_@'9 b<xyy{,bGf bvBLO8&α>t_C5a7wTv
<Ƚ]b 3Uc.ڬhFk3BVT:X#422KH)}}$c.0ĸ^9oETle, r;5R?^1ekYV:]e+d A1)4;u5I~5e;x7*iAnc[2{S\}Zv ?9^6 C`<ά{N/`x| wܝsbM1i4V
YSvk?+| ݂ov:%LqSy˭"{_y
S DϏ? /'@MM5ars,'zo/ ާ,c/S(Qe3yf&0^9-|dEJwcu v8|{=7Q<($rA ULxzP2?O VǦ">b3ߢ zy/W rh:> ;Y {n9%l1ޤ.'{I|e]a +`[b -R:Y!Ķa ۼA~7Ƨ279o;-c9ckO!SʳQyqtBڧ/2vd;9az缑{<3PwRKۃs7|${[e}<_ARA;V6#Np~[B5b5?S2~h s2o b_5cyF/QDkwgfOssYD".qݷ:4Y3Lc{ꡝIdԇ x4 XXb}
ʓT\wuoFt|[^G˞[._v.M]|u;!61}gDsNZ@9hFOA\0B{J&sOjiZ)Jw] P0?Ӎ JfS|>Bi&}.řc=A\F?ۭ|xTSGߜb>N2#w)Zʳȗ)GInDM(ئnxy%3qK G?g\x
q39I60y ?@On#gg4BFs,`h. Xz>(gL*Up5?֟6uՌpץyrVK=p1* o At;_$YY _$]<9}xeNJ<{;@ mF/ߩFh4Fh4Fh4Fh4Fh4Fh4Fh4Fh4Fh4O ȫ5P_ Xnz'X] d/2Ryr: < g ً%tm; %l`'&ˏ:+|9 DFJPЂZD!It"J62,~Ubl@mԱl?'P[ oPsM,
Kv(;zlRg1GƱGf_rJ Gr+Q qDG NjZX* cbdMbZGΧYF%MRĭkL:+(
Jo\tUPYfyf?qNbQ]T9X:~mgF*ODuH}gVhԮmە%3Yʙ9*ZzoZBvm4MvBh<hfׅ$v]( 휜PS* HФy}fgGXt5Z=h;vFc {w1:ݱ-|;{D^hlq"b!1爵o3ٻڻ|ȒrFIz|HNFx6 /zf-WʉzO dֆ efr{g<`Kxo CnbAĂR
Ї,1;Kno\*U/pO`= YL8"S+SĒJm_E> v&V eR(5 xٯe#ϑ{K\7:).%(u_ ƻ0
˾O#` f0M"86ڛU@/p0`g"[0;vR&;NA_fǤ] } IOAEd:W
E N:bz J qc뎋;LWY )uC{RmvyOwbKعA 1 5p3Txg@/ƋwY þnGQQc/b +0Cl^qu%Vy5WlH/v yP%nDhNZhbNF S
n_ _.> ˪e7)Cl0aXyט4n"s$g k8?&c" *MȸMis6Lg4sh rmùM@ 0v|my|)˫.IA\gQqQUzFI\ͩW֫?W^.FA)/JKy >uO b#2Or`{%6MЦnS/Dx,T%_\zɋsnj5W}*=M1:K.\$~t 09WGU{*xR!RA{A{NC{*-]ͣuQ8 :2vALj:o鞃=?$oFnv]F=I\rWt DCon!&K,\E E̤!=z
]j ]U@ }9dUj'r8"]v夋Cj5ɫTI D/ w_9)K]Ia\[u>JJ*"c5xzOy̾mGzSOٷ 몘" v
q֑H{=̛ş^uq,) }_K0";rx
b.cݸոٸh5My&)ǔm2L&I1S~rv$x3-B2
lQAPG )&?B$תqvL_lS0j$%-EEhH˫m$V
.:0|8 !mڭ&$kv-/$k
kZxS|SXNZgÚ[ggQi뚬϶L*{``Rn/){[D߷R6"l R*l&ApҔ Z'LޑT_e}5
M)!e2Dpc:3?Y6fٙ9
SxZ t!qа 7Cڣq+?Qci"r#(ЦB+VkHX5yv
h5 xDC#@t[ h@x#A{$N
Ն>3֡c=!Yk,tHX!1VH5 ci%n"p)M(sXK (l kv"U RAN Xm+LϤSs~Vcs`? ^[SH[y{je6 q944K rpN:pKR
N):9`kN ~ wQA.wЭS[u_1 *{Ixϼ
ͼj;vc/ +=6?%6j*D,rkuZ*JmN)f^̮h~*V6IP<[is{K{|>NAWtC!iFsꠌh Sv4ڊSq.nĝp
c/%lllN߲mK#zb 1l[g+#NR R\y\0'!`7[w=4 ڧIMj` ?i/O>@_nygFazQ[#g Ct_\798/IX8A2 *+eb*L"05bb%AtA0i-g迆JW :;
endstream
endobj
18 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 5/Type/Page>>
endobj
44 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(30-1130.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/30-1130.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:56:29 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 185.25 591.75 580.5 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(Chairman, Appeal Board)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 729.75 Tm
(Signed: Michael Y. Ra'anan)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 16 729 cm
0 0 m
134.795 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 704.25 Tm
(Michael Y. Ra'anan)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Administrative Judge)Tj
T*
(Member, Appeal Board)Tj
T*
(Signed: Jeffrey D. Billett)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 627 cm
0 0 m
120.645 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 602.25 Tm
(Jeffrey D. Billett)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge)Tj
T*
(Member, Appeal Board)Tj
T*
(1. )Tj
(This case involves an adjudication \(under DoD Regulation 5200.2-R\) of \
Applicant's eligibility to occupy a sensitive)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(position,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(not an adjudication \(under DoD Directive 5220.6\) of Applicant's eligib\
ility for a security clearance. )Tj
43.778 0 Td
(However,)Tj
-43.778 -1.125 Td
(the Board will cite)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
7.665 0 Td
(to some of its decisions in security clearance cases in support of legal\
propositions and principles that)Tj
-7.665 -1.125 Td
(are pertinent to both security)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.746 0 Td
(clearance cases and sensitive position cases.)Tj
-11.746 -2.125 Td
(2. )Tj
(The Adjudicative Guidelines in DoD Regulation 5200.2-R are the same as t\
he Adjudicative Guidelines in DoD)Tj
T*
(Directive)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
3.97 0 Td
(5220.6. )Tj
(Accordingly, Board decisions construing the Adjudicative Guidelines in s\
ecurity clearance cases will)Tj
-3.97 -1.125 Td
(be relied on in)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
5.998 0 Td
(construing the Adjudicative Guidelines in sensitive position cases.)Tj
-5.998 -2.125 Td
(3. )Tj
("[T]he falsification was an isolated incident, was not recent, and the i\
ndividual has subsequently provided correct)Tj
T*
(information)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
4.971 0 Td
(voluntarily.")Tj
-4.971 -2.125 Td
(4. )Tj
("[T]he individual made prompt, good-faith efforts to correct the falsifi\
cation before being confronted with the facts.")Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(5. )Tj
(Deciding what is reasonable is based on the reasonable person standard, \
not the personal beliefs of an applicant. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
46.041 0 Td
(See,)Tj
-46.041 -1.125 Td
(e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(, ISCR)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Case No. 98-0470 \(April 19, 1999\) at p.3.)Tj
T*
(6. )Tj
("[T]he individual has taken positive steps to significantly reduce or el\
iminate vulnerability to coercion, exploitation,)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(or)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(pressure.")Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(7. )Tj
("[A]ssociation with persons involved in criminal activities has ceased."\
)Tj
T*
(8. )Tj
(The text of Personal Conduct Mitigating Condition 2 is quoted in footnot\
e 3 of this decision.)Tj
T*
(9. )Tj
(Nothing in the MOA gives the Board authority in appeals of sensitive pos\
ition cases that is broader than its authority)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(under DoD Directive 5220.6, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32\
.)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
17 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 4/Type/Page>>
endobj
45 0 obj
[47 0 R]
endobj
46 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(30-1130.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/30-1130.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:56:29 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(provided the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
5.276 0 Td
(Judge does so in a fair and impartial manner. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
18.217 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(, ISCR Case No. 96-0869 \(September 11, 1997\) at p.)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 741.75 Tm
(2; ISCR Case No. 94-1055 \(May 8, 1996\) at p. 2. )Tj
(Absent a showing that Judge questioned witnesses in an unfair or)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(otherwise improper manner, it is)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.274 0 Td
(irrelevant whether a party believes that the Judge's questions failed to\
elicit useful or)Tj
-13.274 -1.125 Td
(helpful answers. )Tj
(In considering an appeal or)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.938 0 Td
(a cross-appeal, the Board does not exercise general supervisory jurisdic\
tion)Tj
-17.938 -1.125 Td
(over the manner in a Judge conducts a hearing or)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
19.882 0 Td
(questions witnesses. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(Cf.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( ISCR Case No. 99-0201 \(October 12, 1999\) at)Tj
-19.882 -1.125 Td
(p. 2 \(Board does not have general, supervisory jurisdiction)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
23.689 0 Td
(or authority over Administrative Judges\). )Tj
16.774 0 Td
(Rather, the Board)Tj
-40.463 -1.125 Td
(has the authority to review a Judge's findings, conclusions, and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
25.453 0 Td
(rulings under the terms of Item E3.1.32 of the)Tj
-25.453 -1.375 Td
(Directive's Additional Procedural Guidance.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 228.7598 662.25 Tm
( \(9\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 228.7598 661.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 242.5659 657.75 Tm
( )Tj
(Accordingly, the Board need not rule)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.384 0 Td
(on Department Counsel's)Tj
-34.265 -1.125 Td
(contention that the Judge's questions of the special agent failed to eli\
cit useful or helpful answers about)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
41.475 0 Td
(when a)Tj
-41.475 -1.125 Td
(confrontation occurs.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(\(2\) )Tj
(Personal Conduct Mitigating Condition 3)Tj
ET
0 G
q 1 0 0 1 32.9922 604.5 cm
0 0 m
198.662 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 231.6543 605.25 Tm
(. )Tj
(Department Counsel persuasively argues that the Administrative Judge)Tj
-17.971 -1.125 Td
(erred by)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(applying Personal Conduct Mitigating Condition 3 to Applicant's disclosu\
re of his criminal arrest record during)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(the October 1996)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
7.192 0 Td
(interview.)Tj
-7.192 -2.125 Td
(Applicant's disclosures about his criminal arrest record were not made p\
romptly. )Tj
32.504 0 Td
(Applicant concealed his criminal arrest)Tj
-32.504 -1.125 Td
(record)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(when he executed the NAQ in January 1996. )Tj
20.993 0 Td
(Applicant made no effort to disclose his criminal arrest record until)Tj
-20.993 -1.125 Td
(he was)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(interviewed by a special agent in October 1996. )Tj
22.354 0 Td
(It was not "prompt" action by Applicant to passively wait)Tj
-22.354 -1.125 Td
(approximately nine)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
7.998 0 Td
(months until a federal investigator came to interview him before he trie\
d to correct his NAQ)Tj
-7.998 -1.125 Td
(falsification. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
5.276 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(No. 99-0201 \(October 12, 1999\) at p. 4 \(there was no prompt good-fait\
h disclosure)Tj
-8.607 -1.125 Td
(where applicant falsified a security)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.244 0 Td
(questionnaire in June 1998 and waited passively until October 1998 inter\
view to)Tj
-14.244 -1.125 Td
(correct the falsifications\); ISCR Case No. 98-0809 \(August 19, 1999\) \
at pp. 5-6 \(not arbitrary and capricious for)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge to conclude applicant's disclosures in)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
23.925 0 Td
(November 1998 interview were not a prompt correction of)Tj
-23.925 -1.125 Td
(the applicant's August 1998 falsification of a security questionnaire\).\
)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The Administrative Judge failed to articulate a rational basis for his c\
onclusion that Applicant's disclosures about his)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(criminal)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
3.582 0 Td
(arrest record in the October 1996 interview were made as part of a good-\
faith effort to correct his NAQ)Tj
-3.582 -1.125 Td
(falsifications. )Tj
5.665 0 Td
(The Judge)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(stated "there is no acceptable justification for deliberate deception on\
[Applicant's] part during)Tj
-5.665 -1.125 Td
(a personnel security investigation)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.663 0 Td
(with little evidence to show a prompt, good-faith correction of )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
25.187 0 Td
(all)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 482.207 378 cm
0 0 m
12.668 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 494.875 378.75 Tm
( of his deceptions )Tj
7.276 0 Td
(. .)Tj
-47.183 -1.125 Td
(." )Tj
(Although Applicant disclosed his)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.518 0 Td
(criminal arrest record during the October 1996 interview, he did not ful\
ly disclose)Tj
-14.518 -1.125 Td
(his substance abuse history at that time. )Tj
16.108 0 Td
(Having)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(concluded that Applicant was not entitled to application of Personal)Tj
-16.108 -1.125 Td
(Conduct Mitigating Condition 3 with respect to his false)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
22.803 0 Td
(statements about his substance abuse history because they were)Tj
-22.803 -1.125 Td
(not "a prompt, good-faith correction of )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
15.82 0 Td
(all)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 205.8437 324 cm
0 0 m
12.668 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 218.5117 324.75 Tm
( his deceptions," )Tj
(the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Judge failed to explain why Applicant's disclosures about)Tj
-16.876 -1.125 Td
(his criminal arrest record warranted application of Personal Conduct)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
27.629 0 Td
(itigating Condition 3 despite the fact those)Tj
-27.629 -1.125 Td
(disclosures were not made as part of a correction of all his false state\
ments on the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
32.878 0 Td
(NAQ. )Tj
(The Judge's unexplained)Tj
-32.878 -1.125 Td
(application of Personal Conduct Mitigating Condition 3 is indicative of \
arbitrary and capricious)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
38.52 0 Td
(action. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
2.943 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(, ISCR)Tj
-41.463 -1.125 Td
(Case No. 99-0144 \(February 11, 2000\) at p. 3 \(it was arbitrary and ca\
pricious for Administrative Judge to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
42.462 0 Td
(rely on)Tj
-42.462 -1.125 Td
(inconsistent reasons for making a particular finding\); ISCR Case No. 97\
-0595 \(February 19, 1999\) at p. 4 \(it was)Tj
T*
(arbitrary)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
3.692 0 Td
(and capricious for Administrative Judge to fail to articulate a satisfac\
tory explanation for the Judge's)Tj
-3.692 -1.125 Td
(conclusions\).)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
21.767 -2.125 Td
(Conclusion)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.767 -2.125 Td
(Applicant has failed to meet his burden of demonstrating error below. )Tj
28.159 0 Td
(Department Counsel has demonstrated the)Tj
-28.159 -1.125 Td
(Administrative)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
6.249 0 Td
(Judge's formal finding for Applicant with respect to SOR paragraph 1.a. \
was arbitrary and capricious.)Tj
-6.249 -1.125 Td
(However, no useful purpose)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(would be served by remanding the case to the Judge for correction of his\
error concerning)Tj
T*
(SOR paragraph 1.a. )Tj
(Accordingly, the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.107 0 Td
(Board affirms the Judge's adverse sensitive position determination in th\
is case.)Tj
-15.107 -2.125 Td
(Signed: Emilio Jaksetic)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 112.5 cm
0 0 m
113.32 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 87.75 Tm
(Emilio Jaksetic)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Administrative Judge)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
47 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<
>/Rect[228.0 660.0 242.0 671.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 3/Type/Page>>
endobj
48 0 obj
[50 0 R 51 0 R 52 0 R]
endobj
49 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(30-1130.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/30-1130.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:56:29 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(abuse history in a piecemeal manner over the course interviews that occu\
rred in October 1996, July 1997, October 1997,)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 741.75 Tm
(and February 1998. Selective, partial disclosures that are parceled out \
to the federal government over an extended period)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(of time do not constitute "prompt, good-faith efforts" to correct a fals\
ification. It is untenable for Applicant to argue the)Tj
T*
(Judge should have applied Personal Conduct Mitigating Condition 3 to his\
falsifications concerning his substance abuse)Tj
T*
(history.)Tj
0 -2.375 TD
(Applicant argues the Administrative Judge should have applied Personal C\
onduct Mitigating Condition 5)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 521.9219 677.25 Tm
( \(6\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 521.9219 676.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 535.728 672.75 Tm
( because he)Tj
-43.311 -1.125 Td
(no longer)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(associates with persons involved in criminal behavior or drug or alcohol\
abuse, he successfully completed)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(drug rehabilitation in)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
8.692 0 Td
(1995, and he has demonstrated a solid and prolonged recovery from his pa\
st substance abuse. )Tj
37.629 0 Td
(By)Tj
-46.321 -1.125 Td
(its plain meaning, Personal)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.082 0 Td
(Conduct Mitigating Condition 5 addresses the concerns covered by Persona\
l Conduct)Tj
-11.082 -1.125 Td
(Disqualifying Condition 4 \("[P]ersonal)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.851 0 Td
(conduct or concealment of information that increases an individual's)Tj
-15.851 -1.125 Td
(vulnerability to coercion, exploitation or pressure."\). )Tj
21.263 0 Td
(Because the Judge did not conclude that Personal Conduct)Tj
-21.263 -1.125 Td
(Mitigating Disqualifying Condition 4 is applicable to Applicant's case,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
28.509 0 Td
(the Judge was not required to apply Personal)Tj
-28.509 -1.125 Td
(Conduct Mitigating Condition 5. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
13.361 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 99-0417 \(February 24,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(2000\) at p. 4. )Tj
(Applicant's argument to)Tj
-16.693 -1.125 Td
(the contrary is not persuasive.)Tj
0 -2.375 TD
(Applicant argues the Administrative Judge should have applied Personal C\
onduct Mitigating Condition 7)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 521.9219 540.75 Tm
( \(7\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 521.9219 540 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 535.728 536.25 Tm
( because he)Tj
-43.311 -1.125 Td
(no longer)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(associates with persons who abuse alcohol or drugs or who are involved i\
n criminal activity. )Tj
41.268 0 Td
(By its plain)Tj
-41.268 -1.125 Td
(meaning, Personal)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
7.637 0 Td
(Conduct Mitigating Condition 7 addresses the concerns covered by Persona\
l Conduct Disqualifying)Tj
-7.637 -1.125 Td
(Condition 6 \("[A]ssociation)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.379 0 Td
(with persons involved in criminal activity"\). )Tj
17.933 0 Td
(Because the Judge did not conclude that)Tj
-29.312 -1.125 Td
(Personal Conduct )Tj
7.333 0 Td
(Disqualifying Condition)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
10 0 Td
(6 is applicable to Applicant's case, the Judge was not required to apply\
)Tj
-17.333 -1.125 Td
(Personal Conduct Mitigating Condition 7. )Tj
17.055 0 Td
(Applicant's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(argument to the contrary is not persuasive.)Tj
-17.055 -2.125 Td
(Applicant also argues that the Administrative Judge should have conclude\
d Applicant's )Tj
35.144 0 Td
(reform and rehabilitation with)Tj
-35.144 -1.125 Td
(respect to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
4.109 0 Td
(substance abuse and past criminal conduct, as well as the favorable evid\
ence of his job performance, weigh in)Tj
-4.109 -1.125 Td
(his favor)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(sufficiently to warrant a determination that he is eligible to be assign\
ed to sensitive duties. )Tj
40.101 0 Td
(The record evidence)Tj
-40.101 -1.125 Td
(submitted by)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
5.444 0 Td
(Applicant to demonstrate his reform and rehabilitation with respect to s\
ubstance abuse and criminal)Tj
-5.444 -1.125 Td
(conduct and the evidence of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.467 0 Td
(his job performance did not, as a matter of law, compel the Judge to con\
clude that evidence)Tj
-11.467 -1.125 Td
(demonstrated extenuation, mitigation)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.163 0 Td
(or reform and rehabilitation with respect to Applicant's falsifications.\
)Tj
27.894 0 Td
(Applicant's)Tj
-43.057 -1.125 Td
(argument fails to demonstrate the Judge)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.218 0 Td
(weighed the favorable evidence in a manner that is arbitrary, capricious\
, or)Tj
-16.218 -1.125 Td
(contrary to law.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant also contends the Administrative Judge should have concluded h\
is conduct was mitigated under Guideline J)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(Criminal)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
4.138 0 Td
(Conduct\). )Tj
(In support of this contention, Applicant points out that his false state\
ments provide the sole basis)Tj
-4.138 -1.125 Td
(for the Guideline J)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
7.72 0 Td
(allegation in the SOR and argues that because he has demonstrated mitiga\
tion of those false)Tj
-7.72 -1.125 Td
(statements under Guideline E, they)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.274 0 Td
(should be deemed to be mitigated under Guideline J as well. )Tj
24.383 0 Td
(Applicant's argument)Tj
-38.657 -1.125 Td
(about the Judge's adverse conclusions under)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.898 0 Td
(Guideline J has no merit independent from his arguments about the Judge'\
s)Tj
-17.898 -1.125 Td
(adverse conclusions under Guideline E. )Tj
16.106 0 Td
(Because)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
3.582 0 Td
(Applicant has failed to demonstrate the Judge erred with respect to his)Tj
-19.688 -1.125 Td
(adverse conclusions under Guideline E, his argument about)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
24.021 0 Td
(the Judge's adverse conclusions under Guideline J lacks)Tj
-24.021 -1.125 Td
(merit.)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
20.142 -2.125 Td
(Cross-appeal Issue)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.142 -2.125 Td
(The Administrative Judge concluded Applicant had mitigated falsification\
of his criminal arrest record by disclosing the)Tj
T*
(full)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(extent of his criminal arrest record to an investigator in October 1996.\
)Tj
29.88 0 Td
(The Judge applied Personal Conduct)Tj
-29.88 -1.375 Td
(Mitigating Condition)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
8.723 0 Td
(2)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 126.6719 152.25 Tm
( \(8\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 126.6719 151.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 140.478 147.75 Tm
( to Applicant's disclosures about his criminal arrest record and entered\
a formal finding in)Tj
-10.373 -1.125 Td
(favor of Applicant with respect to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.773 0 Td
(SOR paragraph 1.a. )Tj
(Department Counsel contends the Judge's favorable findings and)Tj
-13.773 -1.125 Td
(conclusions under SOR paragraph 1.a. are)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.106 0 Td
(arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law. )Tj
16.188 0 Td
(In support of this contention,)Tj
-33.294 -1.125 Td
(Department Counsel argues: \(1\) the Judge's leading)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
20.869 0 Td
(questions of the special agent about the general topic of when a)Tj
-20.869 -1.125 Td
(confrontation occurs did not aid the inquiry; and \(2\) even if the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
25.493 0 Td
(Judge had a sufficient basis to find Applicant's)Tj
-25.493 -1.125 Td
(disclosures were made before he was confronted by the special agent, the\
record)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
32.375 0 Td
(evidence shows that Applicant's)Tj
-32.375 -1.125 Td
(disclosures were not prompt, good-faith disclosures.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(\(1\) )Tj
(Administrative Judge's questions)Tj
ET
0 G
q 1 0 0 1 32.9922 40.5 cm
0 0 m
158.15 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 191.1426 41.25 Tm
(. )Tj
(An Administrative Judge has discretion to question witnesses at a hearin\
g,)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
50 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[522.0 675.0 536.0 686.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
51 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[522.0 538.0 536.0 549.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
52 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[126.0 150.0 140.0 161.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 2/Type/Page>>
endobj
53 0 obj
[55 0 R 56 0 R]
endobj
54 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(30-1130.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/30-1130.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:56:29 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(false)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(statements were not recent and were an isolated incident, and he subsequ\
ently disclosed to the government the)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 741.75 Tm
(information about)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
7.443 0 Td
(his substance abuse history and criminal arrest record. )Tj
21.91 0 Td
(Applicant's argument is not persuasive.)Tj
-29.353 -1.125 Td
(Personal Conduct Mitigating)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.805 0 Td
(Condition 3 \(discussed in the next paragraph\), not Personal Conduct Mi\
tigating Condition)Tj
-11.805 -1.125 Td
(2, is relevant when an applicant tries to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.912 0 Td
(correct a falsification. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.995 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( ISCR Case No. 99-0557 \(July 10, 2000\) at p. 4 \(and)Tj
-24.907 -1.125 Td
(prior Board decisions cited in that decision\). )Tj
17.996 0 Td
(Even)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(assuming merely for the sake of deciding this appeal argument that)Tj
-17.996 -1.125 Td
(Personal Conduct Mitigating Condition 2 were potentially)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
23.525 0 Td
(applicable in situations similar to Applicant's, the record)Tj
-23.525 -1.125 Td
(evidence would not warrant its application in this case. )Tj
22.216 0 Td
(Applicant did not)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
7.249 0 Td
(engage in a single, isolated incident of)Tj
-29.465 -1.125 Td
(falsification. )Tj
5.276 0 Td
(In addition to Applicant's falsification of the NAQ in January 1996, App\
licant)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.479 0 Td
(made false and misleading)Tj
-36.755 -1.125 Td
(statements to federal investigators over the course of interviews in Oct\
ober 1996, July 1997, and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
38.851 0 Td
(October 1997. )Tj
(Even if)Tj
-38.851 -1.125 Td
(the Board were to deem Applicant's falsifications to be not recent, they\
clearly were not limited to a single,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
43.027 0 Td
(isolated)Tj
-43.027 -1.125 Td
(incident. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
3.721 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( ISCR Case No. 99-0500 \(May 19, 2000\) at p.4 \(two separate instances \
of falsification are not an isolated)Tj
-3.721 -1.125 Td
(incident\); ISCR Case No. 99-0417 \(February 24, 2000\) at p. 3 \(acts o\
f dishonesty occurring on four separate occasions)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(do not)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(constitute an isolated incident\).)Tj
0 -2.375 TD
(Applicant argues the Administrative Judge should have applied Personal C\
onduct Mitigating Condition 3)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 521.9219 569.25 Tm
( \(4\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 521.9219 568.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 535.728 564.75 Tm
( because he)Tj
-43.311 -1.125 Td
(voluntarily)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
4.638 0 Td
(provided correct information to the investigating agents without being c\
onfronted with evidence of)Tj
-4.638 -1.125 Td
(falsification or incompleteness. )Tj
12.774 0 Td
(For the reasons that follow, the Board concludes Applicant's gradual, pi\
ecemeal)Tj
-12.774 -1.125 Td
(disclosures about his substance abuse history do)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
19.525 0 Td
(not warrant application of Personal Conduct Mitigating Condition 3.)Tj
-19.525 -2.125 Td
(The words "prompt, good-faith" are not defined in the Adjudicative Guide\
lines. )Tj
32.114 0 Td
(Undefined words in the DoD)Tj
-32.114 -1.125 Td
(Regulation 5200.2-R, including the Adjudicative Guidelines Directive, mu\
st be applied in a reasonable, common sense)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(way. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(Cf)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(. ISCR Case No. 98-0803 \(August 17, 1999\) at p. 3. )Tj
(The Board specifically has declined to set forth a "bright)Tj
T*
(line" definition of "prompt" in)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
12.362 0 Td
(connection with Personal Conduct Mitigating Condition 3. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
23.72 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( ISCR Case No. 98-0809)Tj
-36.082 -1.125 Td
(\(August 19, 1999\) at p. 5. )Tj
(Resolution of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.193 0 Td
(this appeal does not require the Board to provide a "bright line" defini\
tion of the)Tj
-16.193 -1.125 Td
(word "prompt." )Tj
(In a variety of contexts, courts)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.923 0 Td
(have indicated that the word "prompt" means to act within a reasonable)Tj
-18.923 -1.125 Td
(time. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
2.277 0 Td
(See, e.g., American Employers Insurance Co. v.)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
19.356 0 Td
(etro Regional Transit Authority)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12.639 0 Td
(, 12 F.3d 591, 592 \(6th Cir. 1993\);)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
-34.272 -1.125 Td
(K.M.L. Laboratories Ltd. v. Hopper)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(, 830 F. Supp. 159, 166)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(\(E.D.N.Y. 1993\); )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(Stonewall Insurance Co. v. Hamilton)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
46.028 0 Td
(, 727)Tj
-46.028 -1.125 Td
(F. Supp. 271, 273 \(W.D. Va. 1989\). )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(See also Black's Law Dictionary)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
/Span<>> BDC
27.6 0 Td
( )Tj
EMC
(\(6th edition, West, 1990\) at p. 1214 \(definitions of)Tj
-27.6 -1.125 Td
("prompt" and "promptly"\). )Tj
(What constitutes acting in a reasonable time will)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.681 0 Td
(depend of the particular facts and)Tj
-30.681 -1.375 Td
(circumstances of each case.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 148.5918 365.25 Tm
( \(5\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 148.5918 364.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 335.25 Tm
(The Board also has not set forth a "bright line" definition of "good-fai\
th" in connection with Personal Conduct)Tj
T*
(Mitigating)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
4.472 0 Td
(Condition 3. )Tj
5.25 0 Td
(The phrase "good-faith" is particularly ill-suited for a precise definit\
ion. )Tj
29.057 0 Td
(Courts have construed)Tj
-38.78 -1.125 Td
(or interpreted the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
7.136 0 Td
(phrase "good-faith" in a variety of ways:)Tj
-7.136 -2.125 Td
(\(i\) action that is contrary to what a reasonable person would be expec\
ted to do is not action taken in good faith, )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
44.681 0 Td
(Barrett)Tj
-44.681 -1.125 Td
(v. United)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
3.916 0 Td
(States)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(, 51 F.3d 475, 479-80 \(5th Cir. 1995\); \(ii\) "[T]hat state of mind de\
noting honesty of purpose, freedom)Tj
-3.916 -1.125 Td
(from intention to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
7.027 0 Td
(defraud, and generally speaking, means being faithful to one's duty or o\
bligation," )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
33.107 0 Td
(Arnold M.)Tj
-40.134 -1.125 Td
(Diamond, Inc. v. Dalton)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(, 25 F.3d)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(1006, 1010 \(Fed. Cir. 1994\); \(iii\) a buyer acts in good faith if a b\
uyer has legitimate)Tj
T*
(business reason for its action, as opposed to a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.441 0 Td
(desire to avoid its contract, )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
11.052 0 Td
(Brewster of Lynchburg, Inc. v. Dial Corp)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
16.526 0 Td
(., 33)Tj
-46.02 -1.125 Td
(F.3d 355, 366 \(4th Cir. 1994\); \(iv\) "Good faith requires)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
22.433 0 Td
(that the parties exercise honesty in fact, and prudence in the)Tj
-22.433 -1.125 Td
(exercise of discretion conferred by contract," )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
18.261 0 Td
(Continental Bank N.A. v.)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
10.249 0 Td
(odansky)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(, 997 F.2d 309, 312 \(7th Cir. 1993\); \(v\))Tj
-28.509 -1.125 Td
(good faith means a company must act reasonably and not arbitrarily or)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
28.491 0 Td
(capriciously, )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
5.387 0 Td
(Olympic Chevrolet, Inc. v. General)Tj
-33.878 -1.125 Td
(Motors Corp.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(, 959 F. Supp. 918, 923 \(N.D. Ill. 1997\); \(vi\) "'Good faith' refers \
to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(a statement made in the honest belief)Tj
T*
(that it is a correct statement and with reasonable grounds for believing\
it to be true," )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
33.87 0 Td
(Maggio)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(v. Liztech Jewelry)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
10.553 0 Td
(, 912 F.)Tj
-44.423 -1.125 Td
(Supp. 216, 220 \(E.D. La. 1996\). )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(See also Black's Law Dictionary)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
26.1 0 Td
( \(6th edition, West, 1990\) at p. 693)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.248 0 Td
(\(definition of "good)Tj
-40.347 -1.125 Td
(faith"\). )Tj
(As these examples show, the concept of "good faith" requires a showing t\
hat a person acts in a way)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
43.046 0 Td
(that shows)Tj
-43.046 -1.125 Td
(reasonableness, prudence, honesty, and adherence to duty or obligation. \
)Tj
28.963 0 Td
(Such standards are consistent with the level of)Tj
-28.963 -1.125 Td
(conduct that must be expected of persons to be assigned to sensitive dut\
ies with the Department of Defense. )Tj
43.405 0 Td
(It would not)Tj
-43.405 -1.125 Td
(be)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(clearly consistent with the interests of national security to assign an \
applicant to sensitive duties if the available)Tj
T*
(information shows)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(the applicant does not demonstrate reasonableness, prudence, honesty, an\
d adherence to duty or)Tj
T*
(obligation, especially when the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
12.691 0 Td
(applicant deals with the federal government.)Tj
-12.691 -2.125 Td
(In this case, the record evidence supports the Administrative Judge's fi\
nding that Applicant disclosed his substance)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
55 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[522.0 567.0 536.0 578.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
56 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[148.0 363.0 162.0 374.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
14 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 1/Type/Page>>
endobj
57 0 obj
[59 0 R 60 0 R 61 0 R]
endobj
58 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(30-1130.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/30-1130.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:56:29 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(that Applicant had not mitigated)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.191 0 Td
(falsification of his substance abuse history because Applicant disclosed\
his substance)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 741.75 Tm
(abuse history to the government in a gradual,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.301 0 Td
(piecemeal manner over the course of interviews in October 1996, July)Tj
-18.301 -1.125 Td
(1997, October 1997, and February 1998. )Tj
16.524 0 Td
(The Judge entered)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
7.58 0 Td
(a formal finding in favor of Applicant with respect to SOR)Tj
-24.104 -1.125 Td
(1.a., but entered formal findings against Applicant with respect to the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
27.992 0 Td
(rest of the SOR paragraphs. )Tj
(The Judge then)Tj
-27.992 -1.125 Td
(concluded it is not clearly consistent with the national interest to mak\
e or continue a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
33.907 0 Td
(trustworthiness determination for)Tj
-33.907 -1.125 Td
(Applicant, or to make a determination that Applicant is eligible to occu\
py a noncritical-sensitive)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
38.794 0 Td
(position.)Tj
-38.794 -2.125 Td
(Applicant appealed the Administrative Judge's adverse decision. )Tj
26.006 0 Td
(Department Counsel cross-appealed the Judge's)Tj
-26.006 -1.125 Td
(favorable)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
4.025 0 Td
(findings and conclusions about SOR paragraph 1.a.)Tj
-4.025 -2.125 Td
(Applicant asks that he "be permitted to make an oral presentation in sup\
port of his appeal." )Tj
36.667 0 Td
(The Board cannot receive or)Tj
-36.667 -1.125 Td
(consider)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(new evidence on appeal. )Tj
13.716 0 Td
(Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.29. )Tj
23.354 0 Td
(Furthermore, the Board)Tj
-37.07 -1.125 Td
(does not have the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
7.22 0 Td
(authority to entertain personal appearances before the Board or hear ora\
l argument on appeal. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
37.623 0 Td
(See,)Tj
-44.843 -1.125 Td
(e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(, DISCR Case No. 93-1043)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(\(August 1, 1994\) at p. 2 \("The Directive does not provide for persona\
l appearances)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(before the Board on appeal."\); DISCR Case)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.737 0 Td
(No. 88-2577 \(February 22, 1991\) at pp. 5-6 \(explaining why Board lack\
s)Tj
-17.737 -1.375 Td
(authority to hear oral argument\).)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 172.2754 557.25 Tm
( \(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 172.2754 556.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
/TT2 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 273.0332 527.25 Tm
(Appeal Issue)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.419 -2.125 Td
(Applicant does not challenge the Administrative Judge's findings that he\
made false statements about his substance)Tj
T*
(abuse history. )Tj
(However, Applicant contends the Judge's adverse decision is arbitrary, c\
apricious, or contrary to law)Tj
T*
(because: \(1\) the Judge erred)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.467 0 Td
(by not concluding Applicant had successfully demonstrated mitigation of \
his false)Tj
-11.467 -1.125 Td
(statements; and \(2\) the Judge erred by not)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.995 0 Td
(relying on Applicant's mitigation of his false statements to conclude)Tj
-16.995 -1.125 Td
(Applicant had mitigated the Guideline J allegation \(SOR 2\),)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
24.272 0 Td
(which was predicated on Applicant's false statements. )Tj
21.785 0 Td
(For)Tj
-46.057 -1.125 Td
(the reasons that follow, the Board concludes Applicant has failed to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
27.326 0 Td
(demonstrate the Judge erred.)Tj
-27.326 -2.125 Td
(Under Sections 2-101 and 6-100 of DoD Regulation 5200.2-R, an Administra\
tive Judge must decide whether, based on)Tj
T*
(all)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
1.25 0 Td
(available information, it "is clearly consistent with the interests of n\
ational security" to assign the applicant to)Tj
-1.25 -1.125 Td
(sensitive duties. )Tj
6.638 0 Td
(Furthermore, "[i]n all adjudications the protection of the national secu\
rity shall be the paramount)Tj
-6.638 -1.125 Td
(determinant." )Tj
5.684 0 Td
(DoD Regulation)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
6.833 0 Td
(5200.2-R, Section 6-100.d. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
11.083 0 Td
(Cf)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(. DoD Regulation 5200.2-R, Section 3-100 \("Designation)Tj
-23.599 -1.125 Td
(of Sensitive Positions"\)\(noting "[i]t is)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.344 0 Td
(vital to the national security that great care be exercised in the selec\
tion of)Tj
-15.344 -1.125 Td
(individuals to fill such positions."\). )Tj
14.325 0 Td
(Persons in)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(sensitive ADP positions must be held to high standards because their)Tj
-14.325 -1.125 Td
(positions give them access to important, sensitive)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
20.052 0 Td
(information on government computers. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
15.913 0 Td
(Cf. Swann v. Walters)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
8.416 0 Td
(, 620 F.)Tj
-44.382 -1.125 Td
(Supp. 741, 745 \(D.D.C. 1984\)\(in case involving computer)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
23.525 0 Td
(operator in a Veterans Administration medical center, court)Tj
-23.525 -1.125 Td
(noted computer operator had access to large amounts of sensitive)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
26.325 0 Td
(information on government computers and could)Tj
-26.325 -1.125 Td
("cause substantial harm by destruction, alteration, or disclosure of the\
data"\). )Tj
31.029 0 Td
(Accordingly, there is no presumption in)Tj
-31.029 -1.125 Td
(favor of making a determination that an applicant is eligible to be assi\
gned to sensitive)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
34.907 0 Td
(duties.)Tj
-34.907 -2.125 Td
(Making false oral or written statements to the federal government provid\
es a rational basis for deciding that an applicant)Tj
T*
(is not)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(eligible for assignment to sensitive duties under DoD Regulation 5200.2-\
R. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
32.885 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( ADP Case No. 30-0385 \(August)Tj
-32.885 -1.125 Td
(8, 1995\) at p. 3. )Tj
(Given the undisputed fact that Applicant made false statements to the De\
partment of Defense, the)Tj
T*
(burden shifted to Applicant to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
12.248 0 Td
(present evidence of extenuation, mitigation or changed circumstances suf\
ficient to)Tj
-12.248 -1.125 Td
(warrant a conclusion that it is clearly consistent)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
19.272 0 Td
(with the interests of the national security to make a determination that\
)Tj
-19.272 -1.125 Td
(he is eligible for a sensitive position. )Tj
14.942 0 Td
(Applicant has a heavy)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
9.108 0 Td
(burden of persuasion because "the protection of the national)Tj
-24.05 -1.125 Td
(security shall be the paramount determinant." )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
18.43 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( DoD Regulation)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
8.47 0 Td
(5200.2-R, Section 6-100.d.)Tj
-26.9 -2.125 Td
(The Administrative Judge had to consider the record as a whole and decid\
e whether the favorable evidence outweighed)Tj
T*
(the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(unfavorable evidence or )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
11.383 0 Td
(vice versa)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
4.025 0 Td
(. )Tj
(In making that analysis, the Judge had to consider and apply pertinent p\
rovisions)Tj
-15.409 -1.125 Td
(of the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Adjudicative Guidelines. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
12.802 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( DoD Regulation 5200.2-R, Section 6-102.b. )Tj
19.553 0 Td
(Those Adjudicative Guidelines appear)Tj
-32.355 -1.375 Td
(in Appendix I)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(of DoD Regulation 5200.2-R.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 228.6426 102.75 Tm
( \(2\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 228.6426 102 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 242.4487 98.25 Tm
( )Tj
(Absent a showing that the Judge acted in a manner that is arbitrary,)Tj
-18.871 -1.125 Td
(capricious, or contrary to law,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
12.246 0 Td
(the Board will not disturb the Judge's weighing of the record evidence o\
r the Judge's)Tj
-12.246 -1.125 Td
(application of pertinent provisions of the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.552 0 Td
(Adjudicative Guidelines.)Tj
-16.552 -2.375 Td
(Applicant argues the Administrative Judge should have applied Personal C\
onduct Mitigating Condition 2)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 521.9219 47.25 Tm
( \(3\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 521.9219 46.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 535.728 42.75 Tm
( because his)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
59 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[172.0 555.0 186.0 566.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
60 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[228.0 100.0 242.0 111.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
61 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[522.0 45.0 536.0 56.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>
endobj
62 0 obj
<>
endobj
9 0 obj
<>
endobj
10 0 obj
<>
endobj
11 0 obj
<>
endobj
73 0 obj
(file:///usr.osd.mil/Home/OSD/OGC/JosephLM/_MyComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archived%20-%20HTML/30-1130.a1.html)
endobj
72 0 obj
<>
endobj
74 0 obj
<>
endobj
63 0 obj
[18 0 R/XYZ 0 536.0 null]
endobj
64 0 obj
[18 0 R/XYZ 0 470.0 null]
endobj
65 0 obj
[18 0 R/XYZ 0 417.0 null]
endobj
66 0 obj
[18 0 R/XYZ 0 378.0 null]
endobj
67 0 obj
[18 0 R/XYZ 0 353.0 null]
endobj
68 0 obj
[18 0 R/XYZ 0 314.0 null]
endobj
69 0 obj
[18 0 R/XYZ 0 275.0 null]
endobj
70 0 obj
[18 0 R/XYZ 0 249.0 null]
endobj
71 0 obj
[18 0 R/XYZ 0 224.0 null]
endobj
4 0 obj
<>
endobj
xref
0 75
0000000000 65535 f
0000000016 00000 n
0000000141 00000 n
0000003657 00000 n
0000178433 00000 n
0000003535 00000 n
0000003590 00000 n
0000003744 00000 n
0000003771 00000 n
0000177310 00000 n
0000177599 00000 n
0000177641 00000 n
0000177122 00000 n
0000004609 00000 n
0000166272 00000 n
0000154897 00000 n
0000144434 00000 n
0000134926 00000 n
0000131054 00000 n
0000003874 00000 n
0000003920 00000 n
0000003969 00000 n
0000004242 00000 n
0000004050 00000 n
0000004082 00000 n
0000004114 00000 n
0000004146 00000 n
0000004178 00000 n
0000004210 00000 n
0000004820 00000 n
0000010806 00000 n
0000010855 00000 n
0000010891 00000 n
0000011403 00000 n
0000011836 00000 n
0000077314 00000 n
0000077581 00000 n
0000045482 00000 n
0000045755 00000 n
0000012297 00000 n
0000012573 00000 n
0000013078 00000 n
0000046208 00000 n
0000078194 00000 n
0000131254 00000 n
0000135151 00000 n
0000135176 00000 n
0000144110 00000 n
0000144659 00000 n
0000144698 00000 n
0000153925 00000 n
0000154249 00000 n
0000154573 00000 n
0000155111 00000 n
0000155143 00000 n
0000165624 00000 n
0000165948 00000 n
0000166497 00000 n
0000166536 00000 n
0000176152 00000 n
0000176476 00000 n
0000176800 00000 n
0000177207 00000 n
0000178055 00000 n
0000178097 00000 n
0000178139 00000 n
0000178181 00000 n
0000178223 00000 n
0000178265 00000 n
0000178307 00000 n
0000178349 00000 n
0000178391 00000 n
0000177848 00000 n
0000177683 00000 n
0000178002 00000 n
trailer
<<4506B81CAFB98C429B11563952ACF283>]>>
startxref
178605
%%EOF