%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T15:56:37-04:00
2021-07-02T15:56:36-04:00
2021-07-02T15:56:37-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
95-0817.a1
uuid:309ffd3a-cdc4-4fe2-82ea-38c546fa2d23
uuid:fcd56290-f263-4eef-9d67-bcc478b861f1
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
21 0 obj
<>
endobj
22 0 obj
<>
endobj
24 0 obj
[23 0 R 23 0 R]
endobj
25 0 obj
[23 0 R 23 0 R]
endobj
26 0 obj
[23 0 R 23 0 R]
endobj
27 0 obj
[23 0 R 23 0 R]
endobj
28 0 obj
[23 0 R 23 0 R]
endobj
29 0 obj
[23 0 R 23 0 R]
endobj
30 0 obj
[23 0 R 23 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
<><><><><><><><><><><><>]/P 21 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
31 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(95-0817.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/95-0817.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:56:37 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE:)Tj
( February 21, 1997)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 51.3262 748.5 cm
0 0 m
91.318 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 723.75 Tm
(__________________________________________)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(In Re:)Tj
T*
(---------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
T*
(__________________________________________)Tj
T*
(ISCR Case No. 95-0817)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
11.641 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION AND REVERSAL ORDER)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
9.934 -2.125 Td
(Appearances)Tj
-2.016 -2.125 Td
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 250.7061 493.5 cm
0 0 m
110.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 255.7129 468.75 Tm
(Earl C. Hill, Jr., Esq.)Tj
0.056 -2.125 Td
(Department Counsel)Tj
0.276 -2.125 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 259.7002 417 cm
0 0 m
92.35 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
/TT2 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 290.377 392.25 Tm
(Pro se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-22.865 -2.125 Td
(Administrative Judge Robert R. Gales issued a decision, dated August 22,\
1996, in which)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(he concluded it is clearly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consistent with the national interest to grant or continue a security)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(clearance for Applicant. )Tj
36.515 0 Td
(Department Counsel)Tj
-36.515 -1.125 Td
(appealed. )Tj
4.053 0 Td
(For the reasons set forth below, the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Board reverses the Administrative Judge's decision.)Tj
-4.053 -2.125 Td
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
T*
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Department Counsel's appeal presents the following issues: \(1\) whether\
the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Administrative Judge erred by failing to)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(apply collateral estoppel to Applicant's arguments)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(concerning his conviction on two state felony counts; \(2\) whether the)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(ruling that Applicant's sexual misconduct was isolated is arbitrary, cap\
ricious, or contrary to law;)Tj
T*
(\(3\) whether the Administrative Judge erred by failing to explain his d\
eviation from pertinent)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Adjudication Policy)Tj
T*
(factors; \(4\) whether the Administrative Judge erred by refusing to con\
sider a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Certified Results of Interview; \(5\) whether)Tj
T*
(the Administrative Judge erred by considering only a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(portion of a Report of Investigation offered by Applicant; and \(6\))Tj
T*
(whether the Administrative)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Judge erred by finding for Applicant under Criterion H with respect to o\
ne of the allegations)Tj
T*
(of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(sexual misconduct.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.032 -2.125 Td
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.032 -2.125 Td
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued to Applicant a Stateme\
nt of Reasons)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(\(SOR\) dated November 24,)Tj
T*
(1995. )Tj
(The SOR was based on Criterion H \(dishonest and/or criminal)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(conduct\), Criterion Q \(sexual misconduct\), and)Tj
T*
(Criterion I \(poor judgment, unreliability, or)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(untrustworthiness\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant submitted an answer to the SOR, in which he indicated "I elect\
to have a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(decision without a hearing.")Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Department Counsel prepared a File of Relevant Material \(FORM\),)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(a copy of which was sent to Applicant. )Tj
43.072 0 Td
(Department)Tj
-43.072 -1.125 Td
(Counsel objected to portions of Applicant's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(response to the FORM.)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
32 0 obj
<>
endobj
33 0 obj
(dde$JE9)
endobj
34 0 obj
<>
endobj
35 0 obj
<>
endobj
36 0 obj
<>
endobj
41 0 obj
<>
endobj
42 0 obj
<>stream
H\n0y
Ce%!M8Cc{ i(o?WHĿ6N{m3tw-/W\oiPrL3Fe$ɍgܪ-:j4~p@?C
e ;K^!Yv#?/;\B;:Bk1ʤJ0'ZBvw88MWQH|xX2}ZX|>09̅p,uj'a*[n g̢[n!d[k1Rkq=nc O
0 -^
endstream
endobj
43 0 obj
<>stream
H|XT3"M{w,(A,1@^LF@DDň*6(bwX,a,}|߹3g̙:!_lS$/ϘGG$d .["%j?rWZ $],@ C&ɍo h8(6:"ѤE:z||¹k8{s'6>1)kUhoR s8)aD ; c67/qPL@ ~嚾/eC
B JbIy;_7
ilUBFuOs J -"*ŃGؐ$d
=_$&88JZ8uqusWӫAFUjIyO4mּŧ-[n;vYPn{eHW34vq#G%36q&LI$OeZ3SgϞ17s-^t,_rU5k`ظ)g3mٺm{vٛo9ZxxJN9{|)\xM閹XvW&MQPl%o
4h6a!BK&҄ Z5\5BuLUW_H$C'}+
J?HRtI2JϥR&J3ZY)Thkiӵu
MWOP'z"t
ooB-X[m@9NNSTy@^-owAH>#o }>\яЏj17ؠ54l3l_iZXZ[CmU6[͝VB^|(&R
Ak*3Za0G'
*TEj5ꗒzI9I^X*ݒ^Jo4$j25ٜhô)\9:{ẨC-|P9\:~9Ӡ3r
[q`uCgv?zv}'Q=af\I8;9vPUZuˍ >X:X[Y,m,-,--ZZX[ZXS<;m,[l^l^cN0oyGød3zzML&?S+SSaB3cb|`ke,6qq1cF{хC{UpaWK_9.urrQ
u Q@!I*^}o MR+)s j }ל{/3ws8/b&5x
!̀H ցqH`TK
y]z+!^Kx
k`b
C 2!
J N)8G<6
`\p b1,`Cl!Xa$D ?$`5LɼZN'b\
$d(02j~(
\0W5@%
7an-vw[iq<܇uc>EtE7
w= zXg!<xb!zl\l
a#l*Tq,PB
jQ'$