%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T15:56:30-04:00
2021-07-02T15:56:30-04:00
2021-07-02T15:56:30-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
94-1153.a1
uuid:c906be7e-80f2-4e4a-a04c-ef5f628406b2
uuid:bea533ec-8837-4924-ad1b-1507337fab04
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
<><><><><><>]/P 17 0 R/Pg 12 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
24 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(94-1153.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/94-1153.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:56:30 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE:)Tj
( March 26, 1997)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 51.3262 748.5 cm
0 0 m
79.318 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 723.75 Tm
(__________________________________________)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(In Re:)Tj
T*
(--------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
T*
(__________________________________________)Tj
T*
(ISCR Case No. 94-1153)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.947 -2.125 Td
(Appearances)Tj
-2.016 -2.125 Td
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 250.7061 493.5 cm
0 0 m
110.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 244.5537 468.75 Tm
(Matthew E. Malone, Esq.)Tj
0.986 -2.125 Td
(Department Counsel)Tj
0.276 -2.125 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
2.612 -2.125 Td
(Pro se)Tj
-22.92 -2.125 Td
(Administrative Judge Wilford H. Ross issued a decision, dated November 1\
2, 1996, in which he concluded it is not)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(clearly consistent with the national interest)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(to grant or continue a security clearance for Applicant. Applicant appea\
led.)Tj
T*
(For the reasons set forth below, the Board affirms the Administrative Ju\
dge's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(decision.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's appeal presents the following issues: \(1\) whether the Admi\
nistrative Judge erred by admitting Government)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Exhibit 4 into evidence over Applicant's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(objections; \(2\) whether the Internal Revenue Service used information \
in)Tj
T*
(violation of its own statute, regulations, and procedure, or in violatio\
n of a specific)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(state law, Sections 1863 and 1865 of)Tj
T*
(Title 42 of the United States Code, or the 4th Amendment of the U.S. Con\
stitution; and \(3\) whether the Administrative)Tj
T*
(Judge's security clearance decision is arbitrary, capricious, or contrar\
y to law.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.032 -2.125 Td
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.032 -2.125 Td
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued a Statement of Reasons\
\(SOR\) dated March 19, 1996 to Applicant.)Tj
T*
(The SOR was based on Criterion J)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(\(Criminal Conduct\) and Criterion E \(Personal Conduct\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(A hearing was held on August 14, 1996. The Administrative Judge subseque\
ntly issued a written decision in which he)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(concluded it is not clearly consistent with)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(the national interest to grant or continue a security clearance for Appl\
icant.)Tj
T*
(The case is before the Board on Applicant's appeal from the Judge's unfa\
vorable)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
21.225 -2.125 Td
(Appeal Issues)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.225 -2.125 Td
(1. )Tj
(Whether the Administrative Judge erred by admitting Government Exhibit 4\
into evidence over Applicant's)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 28 52.5 cm
0 0 m
515.689 0 l
h
S
Q
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
12 0 0 12 16 39.75 Tm
(objections)Tj
ET
Q
q 1 0 0 1 16 39 cm
0 0 m
49.324 0 l
h
S
Q
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
12 0 0 12 65.3242 39.75 Tm
(. At the hearing, Department Counsel)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(offered Government Exhibit 4, which is a December 15, 1995 letter)Tj
ET
EMC
Q
endstream
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
(aU+}\rx9.)
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
<>
endobj
32 0 obj
<>stream
H\]k0+e{QIZas69v!r< '!IRVϕ&H`j
8`.xf`;3{I,q¾r 89NaՓ.[:wWY!o`n,G/mzd)T6wӼ5+>g--˘qWys|
\viwD4ۅc9cΈw;=X2K|$.K%s$Jʕ+)W"7jgE>}(vPAbE9hvA,MY4eiҔ9+67jn!#]rtMXE` 9ʮ
endstream
endobj
33 0 obj
<>stream
H|y\TG5o^p "ofMԸj4A%n