%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T15:56:41-04:00
2021-07-02T15:56:40-04:00
2021-07-02T15:56:41-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
95-0904.a1
uuid:7c778e4f-fc69-4068-aca7-faa352161ac8
uuid:da8f7041-1478-44a3-b2d5-c3852f46bb02
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>
endobj
21 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
<><><><><><>]/P 18 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
25 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(95-0904.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/95-0904.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:56:41 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE:)Tj
( November 15, 1996)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 51.3262 748.5 cm
0 0 m
98.648 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 723.75 Tm
(__________________________________________)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(In Re:)Tj
T*
(---------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -------------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
T*
(__________________________________________)Tj
T*
(DOHA Case No. 95-0904)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
11.641 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION AND REVERSAL ORDER)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
9.934 -2.125 Td
(Appearances)Tj
-2.016 -2.125 Td
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 250.7061 493.5 cm
0 0 m
110.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 255.5547 468.75 Tm
(Teresa A. Kolb, Esq.)Tj
0.069 -2.125 Td
(Department Counsel)Tj
0.276 -2.125 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 259.7002 417 cm
0 0 m
92.35 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
/TT2 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 290.377 392.25 Tm
(Pro se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-22.865 -2.125 Td
(Administrative Judge Kathryn Moen Braeman issued a decision, dated July \
9, 1996, in which she concluded it is clearly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consistent with the national interest to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(grant or continue a security clearance for Applicant. Department Counsel\
)Tj
T*
(appealed. For the reasons set forth below, the Board reverses the Admini\
strative)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Judge's Decision.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Department Counsel's appeal presents the following issues: \(1\) Whether\
the Administrative Judge's failure to apply the)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Felony Policy properly was arbitrary,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(capricious and contrary to law; \(2\) Whether the Administrative Judge's\
findings as)Tj
T*
(to falsification are contrary to the record evidence and arbitrary, capr\
icious)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(and contrary to law; and \(3\) Whether the)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge's finding that Applicant was rehabilitated was supp\
orted by adequate record evidence.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.032 -2.125 Td
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.032 -2.125 Td
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) issued to Applicant \
a Statement of Reasons \(SOR\) dated)Tj
T*
(December 14, 1995. The SOR was predicated)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(upon Criterion H \(criminal conduct\), Criterion O \(falsification\), an\
d)Tj
T*
(Criterion I \(poor judgment, untrustworthiness and unreliability\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(A hearing was held on June 6, 1996. The Administrative Judge issued a de\
cision dated July 9, 1996, in which she)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(concluded it is clearly consistent with the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(national interest to grant or continue a security clearance for Applican\
t.)Tj
T*
(Department Counsel appealed that favorable decision and the case is read\
y for)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(disposition by the Board.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
21.225 -2.125 Td
(Appeal Issues)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.225 -2.125 Td
(1. )Tj
(Whether the Administrative Judge's failure to apply the Felony Policy pr\
operly was arbitrary, capricious and contrary)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 28 52.5 cm
0 0 m
563.994 0 l
h
S
Q
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
12 0 0 12 16 39.75 Tm
(to law.)Tj
ET
Q
q 1 0 0 1 16 39 cm
0 0 m
32.66 0 l
h
S
Q
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
12 0 0 12 48.6602 39.75 Tm
( Department Counsel argues that)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(the Administrative Judge misapplied the Felony Policy in light of the re\
cord)Tj
ET
EMC
Q
endstream
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
27 0 obj
(03u!Zϫ)
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
35 0 obj
<>
endobj
36 0 obj
<>stream
H\j >wI4X]ȡhHt
1}G]PA'3|3{ߝ=zW904J-b,$ɰAջiF<2$:g8|xYj4
H街S')~"_nxϓa$v=#3Z
7Z
C-,I|E(2
m65L5e)ωOed
U*-1"2⤥4Ix/68sVi|5H6`
endstream
endobj
37 0 obj
<>stream
H|TT=\(6\bN=&H^bXbKTػb.V(boˌucb>}og~ DY'JF\K
Ľ@AǚA@:/*{L
KFmi h wȰ{çgz
BeBeZ1Zya:z
òN}? 5Mxs|sȠ?6oyؾz>,T?2vu회%*!@Qž="I"#(UC*E%?9\)*f0,WV½de<˖)_bʾ&lUZzk֪]n
6jܤi'>mޢem~/lᫎ_o];ǟ[xDdT={7_4xa:|ȸQ3v\Ĥ 'L2u3g͞y,L]xeV\]>}Mlض}]dݗ?C=vS98}.j5SH_uFPllX~ܑHN OKQRtTj*)!8%QR(/|{{Է4ҴT+jmZ'EImֲM{
~d뙷^mTbCe522fmۇ=]E]+p6Vb)<(!T