%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T15:56:47-04:00
2021-07-02T15:56:47-04:00
2021-07-02T15:56:47-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
96-0083.a1
uuid:9a1ef4e2-36c4-4805-8065-d5c736bf0645
uuid:65dbae76-558a-4124-b597-4f17c30d6f6a
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
<>
endobj
22 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
25 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
26 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
<><><><><><><><>]/P 19 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
27 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(96-0083.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/96-0083.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:56:47 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE:)Tj
( January 10, 1997)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 51.3262 748.5 cm
0 0 m
85.318 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 723.75 Tm
(_________________________________________)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(In Re:)Tj
T*
(-----------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
T*
(__________________________________________)Tj
T*
(ISCR Case No. 96-0083)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.947 -2.125 Td
(Appearances)Tj
-2.016 -2.125 Td
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 250.7061 493.5 cm
0 0 m
110.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 224.2246 468.75 Tm
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq.)Tj
1.444 -2.125 Td
(Chief Department Counsel)Tj
1.512 -2.125 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 259.7002 417 cm
0 0 m
92.35 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
/TT2 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 290.377 392.25 Tm
(Pro se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-22.865 -2.125 Td
(Administrative Judge Darlene Lokey Anderson issued a decision, dated Sep\
tember 27, 1996, in which she concluded it)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(is not clearly consistent with the national)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(interest to grant or continue a security clearance for Applicant. Applic\
ant)Tj
T*
(appealed. For the reasons set forth below, the Board affirms the Adminis\
trative Judge's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(decision.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's appeal presents the following issues: \(1\) whether the Admi\
nistrative Judge erred by finding Applicant's)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(marijuana use constituted drug abuse that)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(posed a security risk; \(2\) whether the Administrative Judge erred by f\
inding)Tj
T*
(Applicant knowingly and willfully falsified material facts about his his\
tory of drug)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(use; and \(3\) whether the)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge's adverse decision is arbitrary, capricious, or con\
trary to law.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.032 -2.125 Td
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.032 -2.125 Td
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued a Statement of Reasons\
\(SOR\) dated March 19, 1996 to Applicant.)Tj
T*
(The SOR was based on Criterion H)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(\(Drug Involvement\), Criterion E \(Personal Conduct\), and Criterion J \
\(Criminal)Tj
T*
(Conduct\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(A hearing was held on July 11, 1996. The Administrative Judge subsequent\
ly issued a written decision in which she)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(entered formal findings against Applicant)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(under each of the Criteria listed in the SOR and concluded it is not cle\
arly)Tj
T*
(consistent with the national interest to grant or continue a security cl\
earance for)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Applicant.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The case is now before the Board on Applicant's appeal from the Administ\
rative Judge's adverse security clearance)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(decision.)Tj
ET
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
/TT1 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 178.8437 39.75 Tm
(Administrative Judge's Findings and Conclusions)Tj
ET
EMC
Q
endstream
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
( ;hHs&+)
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
<>
endobj
32 0 obj
<>
endobj
37 0 obj
<>
endobj
38 0 obj
<>stream
H\n0