%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T15:57:04-04:00
2021-07-02T15:57:03-04:00
2021-07-02T15:57:04-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
96-0226.a1
uuid:33fcf452-3103-4924-b2e2-40c3bfe33096
uuid:4ed99cbb-df10-4a7c-a11d-e74663712639
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 17 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
23 0 obj
[30 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(96-0226.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/96-0226.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:57:04 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: )Tj
(July 9, 1997)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 54.3262 748.5 cm
0 0 m
59.004 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 723.75 Tm
(__________________________________________)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(In Re:)Tj
T*
(---------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
T*
(__________________________________________)Tj
T*
(DOHA Case No. 96-0226)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.947 -2.125 Td
(Appearances)Tj
-2.016 -2.125 Td
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 250.7061 493.5 cm
0 0 m
110.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 224.2246 468.75 Tm
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq.)Tj
1.444 -2.125 Td
(Chief Department Counsel)Tj
1.512 -2.125 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 259.7002 417 cm
0 0 m
92.35 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
/TT2 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 290.377 392.25 Tm
(Pro se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-22.865 -2.125 Td
(Administrative Judge Paul J. Mason issued a decision, dated February 10,\
1997, in which he concluded it is not clearly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consistent with the national interest to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(grant or continue a security clearance for Applicant. Applicant appealed\
. For the)Tj
T*
(reasons set forth below, the Board affirms the Administrative Judge's de\
cision.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's appeal presents the following issues: \(1\) whether the Admi\
nistrative Judge made errors with respect to)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(certain factual findings; \(2\) whether the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Administrative Judge misapplied pertinent Adjudicative Guidelines; \(3\)\
whether)Tj
T*
(the Administrative Judge's adverse security clearance decision is arbitr\
ary,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(capricious, or contrary to law; and \(4\))Tj
T*
(whether Applicant can be granted a provisional security clearance subjec\
t to monitoring every year or two.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.032 -2.125 Td
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.032 -2.125 Td
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued a Statement of Reasons\
\(SOR\) dated May 22, 1996 to Applicant.)Tj
T*
(The SOR was based on Criterion F)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(\(Financial Considerations\) and Criterion J \(Criminal Conduct\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(A hearing was held on September 12, 1996. The Administrative Judge later\
issued a written decision in which he)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(concluded it is not clearly consistent with the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(national interest to grant or continue a security clearance for Applican\
t.)Tj
T*
(The case is before the Board on Applicant's appeal from that adverse dec\
ision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
21.225 -2.125 Td
(Appeal Issues)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.225 -2.375 Td
(1. )Tj
(Whether the Administrative Judge made errors with respect to certain fac\
tual findings)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 28 63 cm
0 0 m
412.189 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 440.1895 63.75 Tm
(.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 443.1895 68.25 Tm
(\(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 443.1895 67.5 cm
0 0 m
11.369 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 454.5581 63.75 Tm
( Applicant challenges the)Tj
-36.547 -1.125 Td
(following factual findings by the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Administrative Judge: \(a\) Applicant satisfied a worthless check on Nov\
ember 14,)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
( RaNs)
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
35 0 obj
<>
endobj
36 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
CGB=@j+aq~F˲45C&١ApN"\rPZ-rHH-DZ5$
r-:k9Nn
IwG4RkP8P#BeV_eC"q1rR8^
EҪЪϟ,wCp!ng3q1E)[}q\.C`ο'S3\yd2V*w̻G{4xNޝQ~Nii ~Pq
endstream
endobj
37 0 obj
<>stream
H|XTgv΅{Q`ٽņ
%h
JlA;6bEذ]ĸ}{}s=s~@ @M6Mrذu iKx6g~ET~!G4Hk;4fbϣ) ^#"N^<ύ/[;rc'u -1ð ^kd?
纈<_;2,6r$ qrܨ6׃' KDmnO
V# ji (,|*5s_ʀ(
*@$b *<~ݵ*Ԫ^k 4Z[5S.8?aCnvTSswEb(9Ԫ]DZ[
6jZKIf[|ӲU6mбSg.]?ؽG^ϗ}}?~88$4GDF
6|DLQqnji ')S:=qYISM6E,M_V\:cu7d6nL[foپc{rG
+:~dgΞ+.^|*\a44U{)hSiUT[ɓhSS@Q)'MP+^J( JQ*k-%O9*su偷wwwwwQ-tYlC9%ZV?5Vi՜tTE49TZG%TYZ |D(W.TWi@м=d[~!DNEB~m6^@Kԥ}94ksGpҔeŜ5Ρ9P0$Cbs+V`nU`˯D=~:9ݕVs1^sW!vv!vTT*s٢2#e$>wZXZ[ZYZZ>444x[WPUļļ֜`ά^)u769k224:LV&̈́Ƨ2xxzȘo