%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T15:57:22-04:00
2021-07-02T15:57:22-04:00
2021-07-02T15:57:22-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
96-0376.a1
uuid:e58f533e-a93a-4c5e-a26a-ae79d3618051
uuid:0990d07a-4539-4c53-8b0e-8cc25ce70fcd
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
18 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 16 0 R/Pg 12 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
22 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(96-0376.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/96-0376.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:57:22 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: )Tj
(March 6, 1997)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 54.3262 748.5 cm
0 0 m
70.318 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 723.75 Tm
(__________________________________________)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(In Re:)Tj
T*
(---------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
T*
(__________________________________________)Tj
T*
(ISCR Case No. 96-0376)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
15.711 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DETERMINATION)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
5.863 -2.125 Td
(Appearances)Tj
-2.016 -2.125 Td
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 250.7061 493.5 cm
0 0 m
110.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 269.0547 468.75 Tm
(Teresa A. Kolb)Tj
-1.056 -2.125 Td
(Department Counsel)Tj
0.276 -2.125 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 259.7002 417 cm
0 0 m
92.35 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 238.7148 392.25 Tm
(James E. Campion, Jr., Esq.)Tj
-18.56 -2.125 Td
(Administrative Judge John G. Metz, Jr. issued a determination, dated Nov\
ember 5, 1996, in which he concluded it is not)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(clearly consistent with the national)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(interest to grant or continue a security clearance for Applicant. Applic\
ant appealed)Tj
T*
(that adverse determination. For the reasons set forth below, the Board a\
ffirms)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(the Administrative Judge's Determination.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense \(DoD\) Directive 5220.6)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's appeal presents the following issues: \(1\) whether the Admi\
nistrative Judge erred in his findings of fact and)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(2\) whether the Administrative Judge)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(should have applied mitigating factors to the falsifications in this cas\
e.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.032 -2.125 Td
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.032 -2.125 Td
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) issued to Applicant \
a Statement of Reasons \(SOR\) dated May 17,)Tj
T*
(1996. The SOR was predicated upon)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Criteria H \(Drug Involvement\), E \(Personal Conduct\), and J \(Crimina\
l Conduct\). A)Tj
T*
(hearing was held on August 28, 1996. On November 5, 1996 the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Administrative Judge issued a written opinion in which)Tj
T*
(he concluded that it was not clearly consistent with the national intere\
st to grant or continue a clearance)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(for Applicant.)Tj
T*
(The case is before the Board on Applicant's appeal from that unfavorable\
decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
21.225 -2.125 Td
(Appeal Issues)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.225 -2.125 Td
(1. )Tj
(Whether the Administrative Judge erred in his findings of fact)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 28 105 cm
0 0 m
298.248 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 326.248 105.75 Tm
(. Applicant does not challenge the Administrative)Tj
-25.854 -1.125 Td
(Judge's findings that Applicant on several)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(occasions gave the government false or inconsistent answers to questions\
)Tj
T*
(regarding his drug history \(in writing on official forms and verbally t\
o investigators\).)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Applicant, however, does)Tj
T*
(challenge Judge's decision to not accept Applicant's explanations for th\
ose events as part of his findings of fact.)Tj
T*
(Applicant's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(explanations include, for example, misunderstanding the question in one \
case and being pressured to lie by a)Tj
ET
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
12 0 0 12 16 38.25 Tm
(company official in another. Applicant's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(explanations might have plausible bases for findings of fact by the)Tj
ET
EMC
Q
endstream
endobj
23 0 obj
<>
endobj
24 0 obj
(PniU*h=i)
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
30 0 obj
<>stream
H\ϊ0y9nEkۂú 6C~3N
/$#&H`j
8`.xd`;3gI,q¾r 8Nag;\p%`1t
O_ey= R(
4l]ٸM:=B7,co]Qi|
):o=;p٥5MyF4"mC9#2ow;b,{d.Gs>|$;Hr+)W"OnQvSGbE>9(vPAfM4eiҔ9KS8Oo