%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T15:58:01-04:00
2021-07-02T15:58:01-04:00
2021-07-02T15:58:01-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
96-0547.a1
uuid:51aab475-347c-4088-a6de-32889f48ce6f
uuid:3647dd09-25f6-41ef-9da5-8fdc4c8c29aa
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 17 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
23 0 obj
[29 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(96-0547.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/96-0547.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:58:01 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: )Tj
(August 12, 1997)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 54.3262 748.5 cm
0 0 m
79.67 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 723.75 Tm
(__________________________________________)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(In Re:)Tj
T*
(-----------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: ------------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
T*
(__________________________________________)Tj
T*
(ISCR Case No. 96-0547)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.947 -2.125 Td
(Appearances)Tj
-2.016 -2.125 Td
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 250.7061 493.5 cm
0 0 m
110.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 250.208 468.75 Tm
(William S. Fields, Esq.)Tj
0.515 -2.125 Td
(Department Counsel)Tj
0.276 -2.125 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 259.7002 417 cm
0 0 m
92.35 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 257.5469 392.25 Tm
(Eric F. Adams, Esq.)Tj
-20.129 -2.125 Td
(Administrative Judge John R. Erck issued a decision, dated March 26, 199\
7, in which he concluded it is not clearly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consistent with the national interest to grant)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(or continue a security clearance for Applicant. Applicant appealed that)Tj
T*
(adverse decision. For the reasons set forth below, the Board affirms the\
Administrative)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Judge's Decision.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's appeal presents the issue of whether the Administrative Judg\
e's conclusions were arbitrary, capricious or)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(contrary to law.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.032 -2.125 Td
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.032 -2.125 Td
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) issued to Applicant \
a Statement of Reasons \(SOR\) dated August)Tj
T*
(28, 1996. The SOR was predicated upon)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Criterion D \(Sexual Behavior\). Applicant submitted a response to the S\
OR in)Tj
T*
(which he requested a hearing. A hearing was held on December 18, 1996. T\
he)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Administrative Judge issued an)Tj
T*
(unfavorable decision on March 26, 1997. The case is before the Board on \
appeal from that adverse decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
21.225 -2.125 Td
(Appeal Issues)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.225 -2.375 Td
(Applicant does not contest most of the Administrative Judge's specific f\
indings of fact.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 433.0762 120.75 Tm
(\(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 433.0762 120 cm
0 0 m
11.369 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 444.4448 116.25 Tm
( He does contest the)Tj
-35.704 -1.125 Td
(Administrative Judge's conclusions. We construe)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(his appeal as asserting that the Administrative Judge's conclusions)Tj
T*
(were arbitrary, capricious or contrary to law.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant argues that his period of good behavior \(16 months as of the \
Administrative Judge's Decision\) combined with)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Applicant's acknowledgment of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(wrongdoing now outweigh his prior misconduct which consisted of multiple\
acts of)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
(3~xWa@c)
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
32 0 obj
<>
endobj
33 0 obj
<>stream
H\]k0+e{QIZas69v!r< '!IRVϕ&H`j
8`.xf`;3{I,q¾r 89NaՓ.[:wWY!o`n,G/mzd)T6wӼ5+>g--˘qWys|
\viwD4ۅc9cΈw;=X2K|$.K%s$Jʕ+)W"7jgE>}(vPAbE9hvA,MY4eiҔ9+67jn!#]rtMXE` 9ʮ
endstream
endobj
34 0 obj
<>stream
H|y\TG5o^p ^̛xDF5Y]xDݨCPTE#o>oAdF4^QM20=jߧ~ABd/5 +GXBE'G4"j9RM7]T/
R'7 (pI#Rw@بa_5 mv]aɩ#:.7I%
,H-F\^o[0jD2hh;G'=!)OxHRf/dErS
u+"NHFt7}#zYkv&]!':PSnm;yކjDBh